JSSA Financial Picture

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
F BUDGET Cancer Center Emerging Leader Program Ely Kuo-Vasher, MBA Finance Director.
Advertisements

Capacity Planning. How much long-range capacity is needed When more capacity is needed Where facilities should be located (location) How facilities should.
State Budgets & The Economy Presentation to the National Association of State Auditors, Comptrollers and Treasurers Tony Hutchison, Director Oklahoma Office.
Business Plan Update Medical Center July CEC Presentation.
A Review of Trust Options & other Recommendations April 26, 2011.
Revised July 12, 2010 Carryforward Estimates for “A” Funds.
CFO Career Grid Corporate Cost Accnt. Planning, Reporting, Investor Relations Business Analysis, Treasury Strategic Planning Acct.Audit Tax Entry Manager.
Dick Anastasi Lydia Sellie Board Study Session December 8, 2009.
Business Management Agenda: Tuesday, March 26 th – Chapter 6.1 Notes & Activity Thursday, March 28 th – Chapter 6.2 Notes & Activity Tuesday, April.
FINANCIAL UPDATE May 16, Financial Update will Cover Four Main Topics 1.Review of local economic indicators 2.Review of financial results for year.
On Target Group Coaching
The Business Planning Process
1 Presentation Overview The national economic recession has had significant impacts on the Rio Rancho economy, which can be seen in employment levels,
SOUTH WHIDBEY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 206 LEVY PLANNING
Warsaw, Poland May 17, 2010 Poland Social Sector and Public Wages Public Expenditure Review From Maastricht to Vision 2030 Overview.
Fiscal Strength Finding the balance at UMass Boston.
Middle Management Scott Pattison Executive Director NASBO April 15, 2015.
Executive Office for Administration and Finance State House Rooms 373 & 272 Boston, MA FY2012 Budget Hearings Slide Presentation For The Executive.
State Fiscal Outlook NAMM Washington, DC May 11, 2010 Brian Sigritz Director of State Fiscal Studies National Association of State Budget Officers 444.
Quarterly Performance Report For the period October – December 2014.
Calculating Costs, Revenues and Profit. Today’s session  Identification of fundamental business cost elements  Distinguishing between revenue and profit.
STRATEGIC BUDGET COMMITTEE CHARGE Develop model for a 5 year sustainable budget. The model budget should include strategies for cost reductions, recommendations.
October 22, Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 22, 2004.
Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 29, Page 2 April 29, 2002www.atlascopco-group.com Contents  Q1 Highlights and Strategic Moves  Market Development.
SUBMISSION TO PARLIAMENT on the DIVISION OF REVENUE BILL for 2002 / FINANCIAL AND FISCAL COMMISSION For Select Committee.
1 UCLA Budget Overview and Outlook Presentation to the UCLA Academic Senate Seminar # 1: Uses of Campus Funds October 23, 2012.
East Lansing Public Schools Financial Strategies Past, Present and Future.
Financial & Budget Outlook City Council Strategic Planning Retreat March 19, 2012 Pueblo, Colorado.
State of the States Brian Sigritz Director of State Fiscal Studies NASBO NASACT Middle Management April 12, 2016.
ESNA Economic Outlook 2016: Alberta’s Fiscal and Environmental Challenges “It could be worse…..” Mike Percy Ph.D. December 3,
Public Hearing: Fiscal Year 2017 Recommended Operating Budget City Council Meeting, May 9, 2016 Item 7.
Measuring and Increasing Profit
17 Costs and break-even © Malcolm Surridge and Andrew Gillespie 2016.
Today ’s Agenda.
Long Range Financial Forecast Preview
Master Budget and Responsibility Accounting
Tyler Chamberlin, Telfer School of Management
LRP Group FY 17 Accomplishments August 21, 2017
Financial Report - FY 2017 Year to Date March 31, 2017 May 12, 2017
Faculty Senate, March 9, 2017 University Budget Update Joan King, AVP and Chief University Budget Officer.
AS Business Studies: Finance
You Can’t Save Your Way to Financial Sustainability
Master Budget and Responsibility Accounting
Revenue and Budget Update Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce
Culture, Sport and Leisure Services in Scotland
Operating Budget Update—March 2016
Homework Ch 12 Electricity Regulation
Fiscal Policy: Spending & Taxing
Decision-Making and Forecasting
FY17 Research Management Annual Financial Update
Pre-Budget Consultation
Chapter 3.
Georgia’s Economic Conditions and Outlook
Remove this slide Instructions only! Instructions.
ABHOW Preliminary Planning Parameters – FY 2010 Budget
Managing Non-Interest Income & Non-Interest Expense
Restaurant Shark Tank Project
BUDGETING FOR PLANNING & CONTROL
JSSA Financial Picture
Annual Accounts and Reports Report to the Annual General Meeting of Members Kris Murali November 2014 Good Morning.
Financial Modeling and Forecasting Smart Practices
BUDGET WORKSHOP February 15, 2017.
Fiscal Sustainability Task Force
Why cities are on the frontline of pension reform
Fiscal Policy: Spending & Taxing
Finance Committee August 1, 2018.
AS&E Faculty Meeting University Financial Condition March 27, 2019
Remove this slide Instructions only! Instructions.
SABC FY2016/17 SECOND QUARTER REPORT
Where we’ve been and where we are now
Presentation transcript:

JSSA Financial Picture Structural Deficit and Operating Loss for FY 17

March Financial analysis September 30, 2016: 3-month operating deficit of $217,447 December 31, 2016: 6-month operating surplus of $37,654 March 31, 2017: 9-month operating deficit of $385,666

Budget Actual QTD YTD DESCRIPTION 9/30/2016 12/31/2016 3/31/2017   QTD YTD DESCRIPTION 9/30/2016 12/31/2016 3/31/2017 REVENUE TOTAL OPERATING PHILANTHROPY SUPPORT 688,318 1,582,857 1,119,087 3,390,262 TOTAL SERVICE FEES 4,037,441 4,159,026 4,551,527 12,747,994 TOTAL PUBLIC SUPPORT AND OTHER REVENUE 1,398,630 1,402,915 1,411,488 4,213,033 TOTAL REVENUE $6,124,389 $7,144,798 $7,082,102 $20,351,289 EXPENSE TOTAL PERSONNEL COSTS 5,103,938 5,148,521 5,279,697 15,532,156 TOTAL OCCUPANCY 243,748 243,749 244,431 731,928 TOTAL OTPS 1,245,076 1,296,187 1,279,585 3,820,848 Depreciation 84,750 254,250 TOTAL EXPENSE $6,677,512 $6,773,207 $6,888,463 $20,339,182 TOTAL REVENUE OVER EXPENSE before pension ($553,123) $371,591 $193,639 $12,107 Budget Actual REVENUE TOTAL OPERATING PHILANTHROPY SUPPORT 576,163 1,608,135 966,043 3,150,341 TOTAL SERVICE FEES 4,096,247 3,825,522 3,987,608 11,909,377 TOTAL PUBLIC SUPPORT AND OTHER REVENUE 1,350,749 1,378,383 1,522,317 4,251,449 TOTAL REVENUE $6,023,159 $6,812,040 $6,475,968 $19,311,167 EXPENSE TOTAL PERSONNEL COSTS 4,707,293 5,018,743 5,240,205 14,966,241 TOTAL OCCUPANCY 234,151 234,553 296,098 764,802 TOTAL OTPS 1,214,146 1,221,009 1,283,941 3,719,096 Depreciation 85,015 82,630 79,046 246,691 TOTAL EXPENSE $6,240,605 $6,556,935 $6,899,290 $19,696,830 TOTAL REVENUE OVER EXPENSE before pension ($217,446) $255,105 ($423,322) ($385,663)

What changed? The first quarter was budgeted to be a loss. Actual was better than budget Hospice census exceeded targets Personnel expenses were lower than budget due to staff vacancies The remaining quarters have steadily increasing revenue targets (Service Fees) due primarily to the planned growth in Hospice. Actual was worse than budget Hospice census dropped below target and received a rate cut in the 2nd quarter Philanthropy, though exceeding the target in the 2nd quarter, is not expected to reach its annual target

Causes of FY 17 Operating Loss vs. Budget Underperforming Profitable Program Services (negative $442k variance) Hospice $328k negative variance through March Specialized employment $114k negative variance through March Philanthropy is behind budget by $150k, excluding timing of event revenue Loss Leaders are at or better than budget (not causing budget variance)

RECAP Program Groupings by Financial Performance before overhead allocation Breakeven or Better Hospice ($2M surplus) Specialized Employment (positive margins in a growing business) Near Breakeven, small losses Premier (thin margins, need scale and pricing power) Senior Services (mix of svc, financial performance varies, Holocaust Survivor largest) Loss Leaders, require the most use of agency philanthropy as % of budget Mental Health ($2M loss, restructuring and pursing new revenue options) Community Outreach ($500k loss, little fee potential, primarily Jewish audience)

What is a structural deficit? Definition: A deficit caused by a structural imbalance in expense vs revenue, not just due to a one-time event or a short-term issue.

JSSA’s Case – Structural Deficit IF we remove hospice profits, philanthropy and endowment spending (which are all resources allocated at the discretion of the agency), THEN our remaining service and overhead costs are $9M more than the revenue they earn. This has been a long-term issue, sometimes masked by the Hospice program’s stellar growth and profitability. A solution requires reducing deficits, improving profitability and making tough choices about what we will continue to deliver.

Year-End Forecast: Expanding Deficit $800k-1M Negative Factors: Hospice expected to continue to underperform by $100k monthly Philanthropy gap will continue to grow through year end ($100-200k) April productivity hit across multiple programs (holidays) Positive Factors: Specialized Employment and Premier: stabilized and trending positive Hospice: recent increase in referrals outpacing discharges

FAQs Q: Is this a new problem? Have we returned to the financial problems of a few years ago? A: This is not a new problem, but the approach is different. The agency has had the problem of a structural deficit for years but there is a different strategy now to address the problem with strategic investments in growth versus exacerbating the problem with a starvation cycle Q: Why don’t we reduce costs in the profitable programs that are lagging? A: Investing in our “profitable” services still makes long-term sense Q: Why can’t we scale back expenditures on loss-leaders to close gap? A: We are restructuring in these areas to improve efficiencies and reduce deficits; but we are doing so in a way that preserves service which is slower and more complex. Remember these are the areas that serve the most people.

FAQs Q: Why wasn’t this problem evident the last couple of years? A: Hospice growth and profitability mitigated the problem, but we were taking steps to address the underlying structural deficit and competitive disadvantage. Q: Does this mean that next year’s budget will be equally challenging? A: YES and probably more so. The answer to a structural deficit is not a quick fix. We are changing structure and business models, which will take time. Additionally, we need to make infrastructure investments to make us competitive that will add costs without new immediate revenue relief.