Program Evaluation Results Prepared for Annual Faculty Retreat 4/06 by D. Detzel (who wishes she could be there!)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Radio Maria World. 2 Postazioni Transmitter locations.
Advertisements

EcoTherm Plus WGB-K 20 E 4,5 – 20 kW.
Números.
1 A B C
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
/ /17 32/ / /
AP STUDY SESSION 2.
Reflection nurulquran.com.
1
EuroCondens SGB E.
Worksheets.
Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-01. Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-02.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Addition and Subtraction Equations
Disability status in Ethiopia in 1984, 1994 & 2007 population and housing sensus Ehete Bekele Seyoum ESA/STAT/AC.219/25.
David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
Create an Application Title 1Y - Youth Chapter 5.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
CHAPTER 18 The Ankle and Lower Leg
Summative Math Test Algebra (28%) Geometry (29%)
The 5S numbers game..
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
Frequency Tables and Stem-and-Leaf Plots 1-3
1 Prediction of electrical energy by photovoltaic devices in urban situations By. R.C. Ott July 2011.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
1 RA III - Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25 – 27 October 2006 Status of observing programmes in RA.
Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run
Biology 2 Plant Kingdom Identification Test Review.
1..
Adding Up In Chunks.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Synthetic.
TCCI Barometer September “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
When you see… Find the zeros You think….
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
Note to the teacher: Was 28. A. to B. you C. said D. on Note to the teacher: Make this slide correct answer be C and sound to be “said”. to said you on.
2.10% more children born Die 0.2 years sooner Spend 95.53% less money on health care No class divide 60.84% less electricity 84.40% less oil.
Foundation Stage Results CLL (6 or above) 79% 73.5%79.4%86.5% M (6 or above) 91%99%97%99% PSE (6 or above) 96%84%100%91.2%97.3% CLL.
Subtraction: Adding UP
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
Numeracy Resources for KS2
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
1 hi at no doifpi me be go we of at be do go hi if me no of pi we Inorder Traversal Inorder traversal. n Visit the left subtree. n Visit the node. n Visit.
1 Measure Up! Benchmark Assessment Quality Assurance Process RCAN September 10, 2010.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Converting a Fraction to %
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Clock will move after 1 minute
famous photographer Ara Guler famous photographer ARA GULER.
PSSA Preparation.
Lial/Hungerford/Holcomb/Mullins: Mathematics with Applications 11e Finite Mathematics with Applications 11e Copyright ©2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Murach’s OS/390 and z/OS JCLChapter 16, Slide 1 © 2002, Mike Murach & Associates, Inc.
A Data Warehouse Mining Tool Stephen Turner Chris Frala
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Introduction Embedded Universal Tools and Online Features 2.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Presentation transcript:

Program Evaluation Results Prepared for Annual Faculty Retreat 4/06 by D. Detzel (who wishes she could be there!)

Rating System of Evaluation 1 = excellent 2 = good 3 = average 4 = fair 5 = poor The lower the score, the better!

Academics Teaching at the ELI For Session III, the average was % (141/157) of the students rated ELI teaching in the excellent/good categories. Teaching has scored a 1.9 average across the three sessions we have used this evaluation.

Tutoring ELI tutoring was rated at 2.02 in Session III. 77% of the students gave an excellent/good rating for their tutoring experience. 104 of 135 students claimed this a good experience. 17 students (23%) thought the tutoring was about average, and 8 (5.9%) rated the experience as fair/poor. Average over 3 sessions = 1.96

SALC The SALC earned a % say it is excellent 47% say its good 12.77% rank it as average 9% gave it a fair One student thought it was poor. Average over 3 sessions = 1.96

Staff and Administrative Help The help given by administrators and office staff received an overall average of 2.05 for session III06. The average over three sessions was 2.17.

Admissions process The survey asks about the admission process – the information and help received before arriving here. average = % (89 of 152 students) rate the process as excellent/good. 33.5% (51 students) said it was average 8% (12 of the 152) wish they had had a better admissions experience Average over 3 sessions = 2.45

New student orientation The evaluation led 151 students to rank the orientation they received as a new ELI student – from help with housing, learning about how the program works, to introduction to the campus and community- a pretty broad question: 62.9% rated orientation as excellent/good 31.8% said it was average 7% (10 students) did not get the orientation they expected Score given to orientation for Session III=2.29 Score over 3 sessions = 2.43

Academic advising from teachers, administrators and staff This question addresses the help students received in choosing classes or other academic advice: 61% (71 of the 116 students) said the help they received was excellent/good. 34.4% (40 students) said it was average. 5 students that session thought the help was only fair No one received poor advice or reported being poorly advised. Whew! Average over 3 sessions = 2.48

Orientation: ELI activities and trips In session III, orientation activities received a % rated excellent/good (19 and 67 students respectively) 12.23% gave a fair/poor (10 and 5 students, respectively) Average given for orientation trips and activities over 3 session = 2.48 ELI students want more activities!

Housing of ELI students In answer to where our students lived for Session III, 142 of the 163 students who did the survey didnt mind sharing the info: 35 of 142 said they lived in the dorm 55 lived in homestays 40 lived in apartments 11 lived with family members 1 student lived somewhere not listed above 21 didnt like such a personal question (presumably :)

Comparing the homestay and dorm experience in Session III06 DormsHomestay 2.38 average2.0 average The percentages: 58% excellent/good 79.65% 36%average16.95% 6%fair/poor3.38% Averages over 3 sessions:

Opportunity to speak English in dorm vs. homestay DormHomestay 2.77 average2.11 average 47% excellent/good 69.5% 24.5%average25.4% 28.3%fair/poor5.08% Averages over 3 sessions: ENGLISH

Miscellaneous tidbits of statistical information from the III06 evaluation Host Families earned 1.92! ELI facilities earned a 2.41 rating (Plans for improvement are underway.) Language Partner ranked 2.95 (Weve got to do better at this!)

Our overall rating Session III average was of 143 (12%) students rank their experience here as excellent 99 of 143 (69%) had a good experience 26 students (17.5%) felt it was average 1 student (.7%) had a fair time And 1 (.7%) rated his/her experience as poor. Average over 3 sessions = 2.18

Numbers top to bottom over last three ELI sessions (III06 compared to average of 3 prior sessions) 1. Teaching Tutoring and SALC / Staff/administration Host Families Overall ELI experience English in homestays Homestay living ELI facilities New student Orient Admissions Process Dorm Living Orientation Activities Academic Advising Language Partners

Recommendations/goals 1. Expand and improve Language Partner Program 2. Make advising a planned, integrated activity 3. Involve students in orientation planning? 4. Discern from students what would improve dorm experience 5. Evaluate admissions process end of week one 6. Evaluate new student orientation end of week one 7. Upgrade existing facilities, request the construction of a new annex

Goal for 2007 Improve ratings in all areas by 10% Improve overall rating (average of all categories, currently at 2.2) by 10% to 2.0