Dr. Malcom Phelps Presentation by

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by: Jerry Legge Associate Provost for Academic Planning (Interim), and Professor of Public Administration and Policy (SPIA) Provost Advisory.
Advertisements

Presented by the US Department of Education. More information at
September 8, NASA Transformation Challenges and Opportunities September 8, 2004.
SMART: Developing Effective Goals and Objectives Presented by Barry Nagle Evaluation and Action Research Associates (EARA) Fairfax, VA March 2009.
ADD UCEDD TA Institute Panel: The Future of UCEDD Accountability Lu Zeph, Ed.D. June 2, 2009.
Business & Operations Advisory Committee -- March 31, Performance Assessment.
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
U.S. Science Policy Cheryl L. Eavey, Program Director
Contractor Assurance Discussion Forrestal Building Washington, D.C. December 14, 2011.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
National Space Weather Program Unified National Space Weather Capability Dr. Jack Hayes NOAA Assistant Administrator for Weather Services Director, National.
UWM CIO Office A Collaborative Process for IT Training and Development Copyright UW-Milwaukee, This work is the intellectual property of the author.
Overview of the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) Program Office of Integrative Activities National Science.
NASA Real Property Program August 20, 2014 Scott Robinson Director, Facilities Engineering Division Acting Director, Integrated Asset Management Division.
Diversity and Inclusion at NASA: A Strategic Integrated Approach
A Report on Progress toward the Strategic Goals Presented to the Valencia District Board of Trustees on behalf of the College Planning Council.
Human Capital Management Assessment Joe Burt Director, HRM March 31, 2004.
The Maryland Co-teaching Framework
Report to Los Angeles County Executive Office And Los Angeles County Health Services Agencies Summary of Key Questions for Stakeholders February 25, 2015.
© 2012 The Finance Project Finding Funding and Planning for Sustainability of Community Tennis Programs May 5, Community Development Workshop.
CNCS Evaluation Highlights Carla Ganiel, Senior Program and Project Specialist AmeriCorps State and National.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Professional Science Master’s Programs: Federal Budget Strategy April 4, 2008 Council of Graduate Schools.
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
Preventing events “…that could not only hurt someone, but hurt someone you know and … could have a dramatic consequence on all of us “ SO’K Mission Success.
Research Program Overview National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Robert J. Jaeger, Ph.D. Interagency and International Affairs Interagency.
NASA Education March 30, 2009 Employ Educate Engage Inspire Jo Ann Charleston Chief, Educational Programs Office NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland,
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
University of Central Florida Assessment Toolkit for Academic, Student and Enrollment Services Dr. Mark Allen Poisel Dr. Ron Atwell Dr. Paula Krist Dr.
Safeguarding the Freedom of Information: Digital Archive Initiatives in the United States Federal Government Michael Paul Huff Information Resource Officer.
Knowing What ¢ount$: Connecting Performance to the Budget
Managing IT to Deliver Results Stacie Higgins E-Gov Portfolio Manager United States Office of Management and Budget North American Day 2005.
Draft Modernization Roadmap for the Geospatial Platform Karen Siderelis NGAC Meeting March 25,2010.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Leveraging Federal Resources: Teacher Quality, Research, and Program Improvement Peggi Zelinko Office of Innovation and Improvement (OII) Robert Ochsendorf.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Great Midwestern Space Grant Consortium November 5, 2004 Jim Stofan Director, Informal Education Division To Inspire the Next Generation of Explorers …As.
Digital Data Collections ARL, CNI, CLIR, and DLF Forum October 28, 2005 Washington DC Chris Greer Program Director National Science Foundation.
Research in the Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation.
Joint Biodiversity, Terrestrial Ecology and Related Applied Sciences Education and Public Outreach Breakout Session Monday August 2, 2006.
Directorate for Education and Human Resources Photo credits (from left) : U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Intel Free Press, Kate Ter Haar, Woodley Wonder.
Office of Infrastructure and Management Results-Oriented Government: The Executive Branch Management Scorecard January 25, 2006 White House Summit on Federal.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Just the Facts Perkins IV Presented by: Carolyn Zachry Career.
Stimulating Research and Innovation for Preservice Education of STEM Teachers in High-Need Schools W. James Lewis Deputy Assistant Director, Education.
Building evaluation in the Department of Immigration and Citizenship
Using Administrative Data for Federal Program Evaluation
Responding to Times of Challenge ATMCH Meeting March 5, 2006 Jeffrey G
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GEORGIA TECH Academic Year
Betty McGrath North Carolina North Carolina Department of Commerce
As use of 619 data increases in state accountability systems, new and challenging issues for data sharing/governance arise particularly as these data are.
NSF INCLUDES – DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT LAUNCH PILOTS
Evaluating Partnerships
Community schools: a strategy, not a program
Research Program Strategic Plan
HHS Strategic plan fy An Overview
Generic Terms and Conditions: Incentive-based Funding
Introducing Science.
Office of Secretary of Defense
Unidata Policy Committee Meeting
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Strategic Boards Toolkit
Presentation to the National Council of Space Grant Directors
Australia Local Mission Delivery and the National Strategy
Visions and Voyages: The Planetary Decadal Survey
Project Management Method and PMI ® PMBOK ® Roles
Missouri Healthy Schools: A Comprehensive Approach to Student Success
Report by the Director-General on Evaluations Completed in th Session of the Executive Board October 2008 B. Keuppens Dir. IOS, UNESCO.
Matter and Technologies
The Futures Initiative Creating the Future of CDC for the 21st Century
The role of assessment and data systems in Pennsylvania’s model of systems development Philip Sirinides, Ph.D., Office of Child Development.
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Malcom Phelps Presentation by Assistant Director, Programs Education Division Office of Human Resources and Education 202.358.1110 malcom.phelps@hq.nasa.gov March 22, 2002 July 18, 2001 1

NASA & Space Grant: What’s Different? New Administrator, Sean O’Keefe President’s Management Agenda Performance – Outcome Evaluation Emphasis on evaluation and accountability - GPRA NASA Education Program Evaluation Review Panel (NEPER)

NEPER Panel Report Ordered by OMB Responded to Five Questions Made 31 Recommendations Action Plan

NEPER Report – Question 1 Is there an appropriate role in education for NASA that is unique from other federal agencies, such as the Department of Education and the National Science Foundation? These special scientific and technological resources [mission, facilities, people] provide NASA with a unique niche in the national science and education community. Therefore, this committee strongly supports NASA’s Education Program.

NEPER Report – Question 2 What is the appropriate role in education for NASA? Three characteristics of educational transfer appear important: 1) the contributions should support national, state, and local agendas, not create new agendas; 2) the content delivery should cover the vision and scope of mathematics, science, technology, and engineering; and 3) the endeavors should capture the excitement and spirit of NASA exploration and new discovery.

NEPER Report – Question 3 Has NASA established appropriate goals and objectives for its Education Program? … concluded that the appropriate set of goals and objectives guides NASA’s national SMET educational enterprise. The NASA Education Program makes a broad impact with a relatively small amount of dollars. Sound planning Integrating active scientists Building alliances, partnerships, and coalitions with key national SMET organizations

NEPER Report – Question 4 Is the NASA Implementation Plan an effective document to guide the Education Program to the achievement of the identified goals and objectives? …the panel concluded that NASA’s Implementation Plan includes appropriate goals and objectives that guide its Education Program and keep it aligned with NASA’s mission.

NEPER Report – Question 5 Is NASA’s Education Program effective at achieving its established goals and objectives with the appropriate balance of recipients? …impressed with the number of projects undertaken, the number and diversity of persons affected, and the effectiveness based on dollars spent per person reached. …concluded that the NASA Education Program is effective at reaching its goals within NASA’s appropriate role. … recommended further longitudinal studies to document actual outcomes.

NEPER Report – Major Recommendations Outcome Evaluation Longitudinal studies Return on Investment Coordination Stipends Diversity Workforce Other Space Grant – should expand its national network

NEPER – Action Plan Establish a standing review panel Review EDCATS Ensure data are reliable Ensure data are valid & outcome-based Incorporate longitudinal data & cost-effectiveness data Conduct training in evaluation Evaluate major national education programs

Space Grant Challenges Outcome Evaluation What’s the “Value Proposition”; the “So What?” Collect & use longitudinal data (esp. student) Integrate CMIS with EDCATS Make use of & coordinate with NASA Education Resources Linking Leaders/NASSMC Aerospace Education Services Program Specialists Educator Resource Centers Curriculum Support Products GLOBE, NOVA…