ACSF Category B1 (LKAS) Concern with “Default-on” strategy

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

OICA HCV industry input to ACSF informal Group #1 Meeting & 30 in Bonn Informal Document ACSF

Advertisements

Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad- hoc group on LKAS/RCP Submitted by the Chair of the Special Interest Group on Lane Keeping Assist Systems (LKAS)

1 Different use cases for ACSF Prepared from the experts of OICA and CLEPA Informal Document ACSF

3rd ACSF meeting Munich, September 2-3 Industry proposals for ACSF status definition and HMI Informal Document: ACSF Submitted by the experts from.

CSE9020 Schedule, / 1 The Suggested Schedule Week Content/Deliverable 1. 4/3Unit Overview, Project Description, Meetings, Group Formation 2. 11/3Project.

Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF

REPORT TO GRPE 65 TH SESSION EVE IWG 1 Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG) Informal document No. GRPE (65 th GRPE, January 2012,

AND Gate Inputs Output Input A (Switch) Input B (Switch) Output Y (Lamp) 0 (Open) 0 (OFF) A B Lamp.

CLEPA Position Special GRRF Session on Automatic Emergency Braking and Lane Departure Warning Systems Brainstorming Meeting 9 Dec UN Palais des.

Outcome of 2nd session of the IWG VGL April 04, 2016 in Geneva

Results of the CP-Meeting

Hand-off Warning Time of LKA

Regulatory strategy when voluntary systems become mandated

This is the text frame you can fill in all your project-related information. Please note: (a) that the following information is mandatory: - project.

7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016

Presentation of ACSF C tests

SpecialServices Administrator What’s New in 16.2

Industry proposal Driver availability recognition system

Submitted by UNECE Document No. ITS/AD-07-07

Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1

ACSF-C2 2-actions system

Review of the 1958 Agreement

GRSP May 2016 ECE R129 Amendments N°1 & 2

Submitted by the expert of France and the Secretary

Regulatory strategy when voluntary systems become mandated

Industry views on GRVA priorities and organization

SpecialServices Administrator What’s New in 16.2

Status of the IWG VGL April 03, 2017

Industry views on GRVA priorities and organization

Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C

Submitted by the Expert of Sweden

ACSF C tests Prepared by JAPAN 15 November, 2017

Signalling of information and warnings

Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan

ACSF B1+C functional description

New Assessment & Test Methods

Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS

Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C

Supplementary Document

Industry input to ACSF 11th meeting March 2017, Berlin

Transfer to Operations

Hands-off detection warning time for B1-systems

Informal Document: ACSF-10-08

DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry

Definition of aysmax Interpretation 1

Informal document GRPE-79-11

Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP

Maximum allowable Override Force

Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP

ACSF - Category C1 Definition of Sensor range and safety distances

ACSF B1+C functional description

Emergency Steering Function

Inputs Regard to “Test Phase” to TFCS

Submitted by the expert

Interpretation of CSF warnings #2

ACSF-17 – Industry Preparation

Request of clarification on

ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3

Driver initiated transition demand and system reaction

ACSF B2 and C2 Industry expectations from ACSF IG Tokyo meeting

OICA Comments to GRE/2017/17 and GRE/2017/22

Hands-off detection versus Start of Lane Change Manoeuvre

Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP

Alternative Approach to UN R13 Type-IIA for Battery Electric Vehicles

Overview of small drafting group output on Interpretation documents

6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016

Status of discussion after 7th meeting

Regulation ECE R79-03 ACSF C 2-Step HMI

Deactivation of the ALKS system: Different cases

Status of discussion after 8th meeting

Presentation transcript:

ACSF Category B1 (LKAS) Concern with “Default-on” strategy Submitted by the experts of OICA and CLEPA Informal Document: ACSF-11-05 ACSF Category B1 (LKAS) Concern with “Default-on” strategy Industry input to ACSF 11th meeting March 2017, Berlin v1

ACSF Category B1 (LKAS) - “Default-on” strategy Extract from series 02: Interpretation: the system cannot be “default-on” after a manual deactivation (system switched off). Concern: this may create a potential conflict in the case such a system would become mandatory in a given CP