ECON 201FS MSFT Daily Realized Variance: Factor Analysis and Time-Lagged Regressions By: Zed Lamba.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Econ 140 Lecture 121 Prediction and Fit Lecture 12.
Advertisements

WFC & ORCL David Kim Data ORCL (Oracle Corporation) – April 16, 1997 – Dec 30, 2010 WFC (Wells Fargo Corporation) – April 9, 1997 – Dec 30, 2010.
Realized Beta: Market vs. Individual stocks Angela Ryu Economics 201FS Honors Junior Workshop: Finance Duke University March 17, 2010.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
Predictive Models of Realized Variance Incorporating Sector and Market Variance Haoming Wang April 16 th 2008.
Education 795 Class Notes Factor Analysis II Note set 7.
Correlational Research Strategy. Recall 5 basic Research Strategies Experimental Nonexperimental Quasi-experimental Correlational Descriptive.
Relationship Between Commodities and Currency Pair Realized Variance Derrick Hang Econ 201FS April 28, 2010.
Lecture 5 Correlation and Regression
IT Sector Presentation Spring 2006 Divya Mirchandani Jake Monk Sameem Lutfi Pat McAuley Suk-Ho Lee.
Relationships between Variables. Two variables are related if they move together in some way Relationship between two variables can be strong, weak or.
Initial Data Analysis Kunal Jain February 17, 2010 Economics 201FS.
1 Experimental Statistics - week 10 Chapter 11: Linear Regression and Correlation.
1 Experimental Statistics - week 10 Chapter 11: Linear Regression and Correlation Note: Homework Due Thursday.
Examining Relationships Chapter 3. The growth and decline of forests … included a scatter plot of y = mean crown dieback (%), which is one indicator of.
Multiple Linear Regression. Purpose To analyze the relationship between a single dependent variable and several independent variables.
Real Estate Investments David M. Harrison, Ph.D. Texas Tech University  Expected Rate of Return -  Example: Risk & Return.
Review Multiple Choice Regression: Chapters 7, 8, 9.
8.1.4 Can it still be factored? Factoring Completely I can factor out a common factor.
Predictive Regression Models of Realized Variation and Realized Semi-Variance in the Pharmaceuticals Sector Haoming Wang 2/27/2008.
Chapter 4 Summary Scatter diagrams of data pairs (x, y) are useful in helping us determine visually if there is any relation between x and y values and,
© 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 12 Testing for Relationships Tests of linear relationships –Correlation 2 continuous.
Initial Stock Analysis Andrew Bentley February 8, 2012.
Final Presentation Siyu Zheng. Continuing from last time… Looked at volumes of largest stocks (by MCap) in S&P 100 – AAPL, CSCO, CVX, GE, IBM, JNJ, JPM,
The coefficient of determination, r 2, is The fraction of the variation in the value of y that is explained by the regression line and the explanatory.
Semivariance Significance in the S&P500 Baishi Wu, 4/7/08.
High Frequency Data Analysis Sharon Lee Econ 201 FS February 4, 2009.
Time-Varying Beta: Heterogeneous Autoregressive Beta Model Kunal Jain Spring 2010 Economics 201FS May 5, 2010.
Jump Correlation within an Industry – A Beginning By: Zed Lamba ECON 201FS.
INTRODUCTION TO PSYCHOLOGY
Time and Money By Ken Hodor
The Value Premium and the CAPM
Examining Relationships
Jump Detection and Analysis Investigation of Media/Telecomm Industry
Factor Analyses and Time-Lagged Regressions
Semivariance Significance
High-Frequency Analysis of WFC and PFE
By: Andrey Fradkin Date: 1/22/08
Suppose the maximum number of hours of study among students in your sample is 6. If you used the equation to predict the test score of a student who studied.
Seasonal Variance in Corn Futures
1) A residual: a) is the amount of variation explained by the LSRL of y on x b) is how much an observed y-value differs from a predicted y-value c) predicts.
HAR-RV with Sector Variance
Factor Analysis and HAR-RV
Data Analysis II Mingwei Lei March 3rd, 2010 Econ 201S.
Presentation 3: Median Based Jump Test by Industry Siyu Zheng
Econ201FS- New Jump Test Haolan Cai.
Jump Detection and Analysis Investigation of Media/Telecomm Industry
J.-F. Pâris University of Houston
Initial Analysis Siyu Zheng.
Public Opinion and Industry Effects on Financial & Tech Markets
Kunal Jain February 17, 2010 Economics 201FS
Econ 201 FS April 8, 2009 Pongpitch Amatyakul
Chapter 3 Statistical Concepts.
Presentation 4 Mingwei Lei Econ 201.
Semivariance Significance
Derrick Hang February 24, 2010 Economics 201FS
Kunal Jain March 24, 2010 Economics 201FS
Semivariance Significance
Semivariance Significance
Factor Analysis, HAR-RV Regressions, and F-Tests
Product moment correlation
Seasonal Variance among Light Sweet Crude and Corn Futures
Deeper exploration of volume and Jump statistics
Second Attempt at Jump-Detection and Analysis
MSFT GE About the Stocks April 16, 1997 – January 25, days
Sampling Frequency and Jump Detection
Regression Part II.
Canonical Correlation Analysis
Investment Banking Project By Mr. Canak
Presentation transcript:

ECON 201FS MSFT Daily Realized Variance: Factor Analysis and Time-Lagged Regressions By: Zed Lamba

Background + Mathematics ECON 201FS Background + Mathematics All data is for a 10 year period 5-minute returns examined to minimize microstructure noise Use log returns and daily realized variation Daily Realized Variation where: rt,j = log return M = # returns/day

Tech Stocks in S&P 100 (besides MSFT) ECON 201FS Tech Stocks in S&P 100 (besides MSFT) AAPL – Apple, ignored due to lack of trustworthy data CSCO – Cisco Systems DELL – Dell EMC – EMC Corporation (data storage, competes with IBM, HP, etc.) HPQ – HP IBM – IBM INTC – Intel ORCL – Oracle TXN – Texas Instruments UTX – United Technologies XRX – Xerox

ECON 201FS MSFT Daily RV

CSCO Daily RV (Corr with MSFT Daily RV = 0.7278) ECON 201FS CSCO Daily RV (Corr with MSFT Daily RV = 0.7278)

DELL Daily RV (Corr with MSFT Daily RV = 0.4856) ECON 201FS DELL Daily RV (Corr with MSFT Daily RV = 0.4856)

HPQ Daily RV (Corr with MSFT Daily RV = 0.6399) ECON 201FS HPQ Daily RV (Corr with MSFT Daily RV = 0.6399)

IBM Daily RV (Corr with MSFT Daily RV = 0.6829) ECON 201FS IBM Daily RV (Corr with MSFT Daily RV = 0.6829)

ECON 201FS Factor Analysis

Factor Analysis Conclusions I ECON 201FS Factor Analysis Conclusions I Based upon default mineigen(0) criterion, only eigenvalues > 0 indicate factors worth retaining Factor 2 basically not worthy of being retained Uniqueness = % of variance not explained by factors High uniqueness (> 0.6) implies factors cannot explain variable well

Factor Analysis Conclusions II ECON 201FS Factor Analysis Conclusions II 1 Common Factor explains Daily RV of all stocks other than DELL well Flashback: DELL’s Daily RV had low correlation with that of MSFT, unlike all the other stocks

Time Lagged Regressions I ECON 201FS Time Lagged Regressions I MSFT Daily RV self-lagged by 1, 5, and 22 to look back a day, week, and month, respectively. Predictive power decreases as lag increases.

Time Lagged Regressions II ECON 201FS Time Lagged Regressions II MSFT against all other stocks lagged by 1, 5, and 22 days. DELL 5-day lag is moderately strong.

Time Lagged Regressions III ECON 201FS Time Lagged Regressions III MSFT against all other stocks, as well as MSFT, each lagged by 1, 5, and 22 days. Seems to indicate OVB in previous regression, as MSFT self-lagged predictive power seems diminished.

Time Lagged Regressions IV ECON 201FS Time Lagged Regressions IV More OVB seems to be indicated, as all coefficients smaller/similar to before.