Assessment Professional Development

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STRATEGIES TO HELP YOU MEET YOUR TRAINING NEEDS.  Our goal today is to have discussion on what Facilities Management Departments in our region are doing.
Advertisements

Engaging Online Faculty and Administrators in the Assessment Process at the American Public University System Assessment and Student Learning: Direct and.
THIS WORKSHOP WILL ADDRESS WHY THE FOLLOWING ARE IMPORTANT: 1. A comprehensive rationale for funding; 2. Measurable objectives and performance indicators/performance.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
UQ Teaching and Learning Small and Large Strategic Grants Scheme 14 June 2007.
Westminster City Council and Westminster Primary Care Trust Voluntary Sector Funding 2009/10 Voluntary Sector Funding Eligibility, Application Form Funding,
1 The Journey to Reaffirmation “Systematic Based Evaluation” Spring 2009 Faculty/Staff Conference Southern University at Shreveport January 12, 2009 Planning,
DISTRICT MANAGEMENT COUNCIL ACADEMIC RETURN ON INVESTMENT (A-ROI)
Prerequisites Changed My Life ASCCC Fall Plenary Session November 2013 Greg Burchett, Riverside City College John Stanskas, San Bernardino Valley College.
The Quality Enhancement Plan from a SACSCOC Perspective 1 Leadership Orientation for 2016-A Institutions January 27, 2014 Michael S. Johnson Senior Vice.
1 Monitoring and Evaluating Employee Wellness Programs.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
An example of the application of the Learning Leverage Model to Enterprise Resource Planning Question: To what extent does the college have the “resources”
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Kimberlee Pottberg.  Part 1: Why we use WEAVEonline  Part 2: How to enter components.
FUSE TEMPUS Project Coordination Meeting Belgrade University, 27 and 28 November, 2014 INTERMEDIATE REPORT (IR) PREPARATION (+ Statement of the Costs Incurred.
Is it working? Tracking outcomes of Professional Development Title I & Title IIA Statewide Conference June 3, 2016.
OH NO!!! Quality Improvement. Objectives Define a Quality Improvement Program Identify how to get started Identify who should be involved Identify how.
Evaluating Campus Green Funds: Student Review of Campus Impacts Karen Blaney, University of Texas at Austin Micah Kenfield, University of Illinois.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
PLC Year 2 Day 2 Inquiry Cycle
Advanced Writing Requirement Proposal
Staff Survey 2013 Friday 11 January 2013.
Administrative Faculty Evaluation Workshop 2016
PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS GRANTEES NEED ASSESSMENT
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
The assessment process For Administrative units
How to Conduct Toileting Trials: A Webinar Course Evaluation
The Hope Foundation Presentation on Pre-Funding Appraisal For Partners and New Applicant Organisations.
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
Add your school name and the date and time of the meeting
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
Courtney Mills Principal, Midlands Middle College
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
TRENT UNIVERSITY 2007 CGPSS REPORT
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
“Weigh Pig, Feed Pig, Weigh Pig”
Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support
Socratic Conversation
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Roles and Responsibilities of an External Examiner
Assessment and Program Review Learning Centers
Institutional Effectiveness Presented By Claudette H. Williams
Single Plan For Student Achievement
General Education Redesign Task Force
The Heart of Student Success
Good practice in preparing an application
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Welcome to the CIS Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
What to do with your data?
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Continuing Professional Development Assessor Briefing
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Using the PFW General Education Assessment Template
Academic English iii May 14, 2015.
Proposed Seelio Contract Revision
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Presented By Claudette H. Williams
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Presentation transcript:

Assessment Professional Development January 31-February 1, 2018

The Challenge Recommendation 1 CS 3.3.1.2 (Institutional Effectiveness, administration, support services) The Committee recommends that the institution identify expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these outcomes, and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of the results in administrative support services.

THE PROPOSED IE STANDARDS. . . The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these outcomes and provides evidence of seeking improvement based on analysis of results in academic and student services that support student success. (Section 8 -- 2C) The institution identifies expected outcomes of its administrative support services and demonstrates the extent to which the outcomes are achieved. (Section 7 -- 3)

THE USP FLU. . . Symptoms: We will continue to monitor. The committee approved this same plan last year. The objective was met. . .why do I need an improvement or use of results? My objective was not met due to the budget, so I am just going to request funds again. I just want to hire another person.

“A WEIGHED PIG NEVER FATTENS. . .” Any and all pig references can be attributed to: Fulcher, K.H., Good, M.R., Coleman, C.C., & Smith, K.L. (2014). A simple model for learning improvement: Weigh pig, feed pig, weigh pig. NILOA Occasional Paper #23, www.learningoutcomesassessment.org.

ASSESSMENT MADE SIMPLE Intervene Re-assess

ASSESSMENT REDUCED TO A CLEVER METAPHOR WEIGH THE PIG WEIGH THE PIG FEED THE PIG

PITFALLS IN THE MODEL. . .

WEIGH THE PIG FEED THE PIG

ASSESS, INTERVENE, DO NOT ASSESS AGAIN Library surveys students as requirement for a periodic review Based on results, program adopts new front desk procedures Program review was not done the next year, so survey was not replicated

STRATEGIES TO AVOID PITFALL Choose sustainable assessments like short, targeted surveys that address specific areas/changes.  Require units to complete objectives for following year at the same time they submit final report for current year. Use of results becomes “steps to meet objective” in next plan. Assessment methods are considered for next year while process is still fresh in minds.

ASSESS, INTERVENE, ASSESS AGAIN Library surveys students as requirement for a periodic review Based on results, program adopts new front desk procedures Brief survey conducted next year asking for feedback specific to front desk procedures

WEIGH THE PIG WEIGH THE PIG

ASSESS, DON’T INTERVENE, ASSESS AGAIN IE office conducts satisfaction survey of services Results reviewed, weaknesses found, but disregarded for number of reasons IE office conducts same survey following year

STRATEGIES TO AVOID PITFALL Enhance lines of communication between administration and plan supervisors Help plan supervisors find value in reports/data to increase accountability Look deeper into the results Encourage tougher benchmarks (or any benchmarks) Pose hypothetical results and ask “now what?” Analyze the results to identify examples of improvements  Realize that small changes are acceptable

IE office conducts satisfaction survey of services ASSESS, INTERVENE, ASSESS AGAIN IE office conducts satisfaction survey of services Results reviewed, weaknesses identified and small changes made to content of website IE office conducts same survey following year to see if weakness has improved

FEED THE PIG WEIGH THE PIG

DON’T ASSESS, INTERVENE, ASSESS AGAIN Program starts a new concentration with the hopes of increasing enrollment by 10 students Enrollment numbers are tracked and the new academic concentration had 10 students enrolled the first year

STRATEGIES TO AVOID PITFALL Provide evidence of the “Why” - What’s the rationale for the objective/intervention? When this happens, the objective is often synonymous with intervention Emphasize including any prior rationale for change in report Complete objectives for following year at the same time they submit final report for current year. Use of results becomes “steps to meet objective” in next plan. Assessment methods are considered for next year while process is still fresh in minds.

ASSESS, INTERVENE, ASSESS AGAIN Program surveyed employers about needed skills. Lack of skilled workers identified. Program starts a new concentration with the hopes of increasing enrollment by 10 students to meet employer needs Enrollment numbers are tracked and the new academic concentration had 10 students enrolled the first year

QUESTIONS?