Private Sector Participation in Medicare: Exceeding Expectations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

Exhibit 1. Premiums for Family Coverage, by State, 2011 Source: 2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey–Insurance Component. Dollars U.S. average = $15,022.
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Millions of uninsured Source: Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: United States Census Bureau,
Background Information on the Newspoets Total Number: 78 active newspoets. 26 (of the original 36) newspoets from returned this year.
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
Agencies’ Participation in PBMS January 20, 2015 PA IL TX AZ CA Trained, Partial Data Entry (17) Required Characteristics & 75% of Key Indicators (8) OH.
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, FY.
Essential Health Benefits Benchmark Plan Selection, as of October 2012
Uninsured Non-Elderly Adult Rate Increased from 17. 8% to 20
Medicaid Eligibility for Working Parents by Income, January 2013
House Price
WA OR ID MT ND WY NV 23% CA UT AZ NM 28% KS NE MN MO WI TX 31% IA IL
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, as.
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, as.
House price index for AK
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Children's Eligibility for Medicaid/CHIP by Income, January 2013
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Other Adults, January 2017
NJ WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NH NV
The State of the States Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families
Comprehensive Medicaid Managed Care Models in the States, 2014
Medicaid Costs are Shared by the States and the Federal Government
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, January WY WI WV◊ WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA.
Share of Births Covered by Medicaid, 2006
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 386 sessions with 11,336 participants
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
Coverage of Low-Income Adults by Scope of Coverage, January 2013
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
619 Involvement in State SSIPs
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 386 sessions with 11,336 participants
Status of State Participation in Medicaid Expansion, as of March 2014
Percent of Women Ages 19 to 64 Uninsured by State,
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Parents, January 2017
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
State Ranking on Equity Dimension
Average annual growth rate
Market Share of Two Largest Health Plans, by State, 2006
Uninsured Rate Among Adults Ages 19–64, 2008–09 and 2019
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
Post-Reform: Projected Percent of Adults Ages 19–64 Uninsured by State
United States: age distribution family households and family size
Premiums for Family Coverage, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
Uninsured Nonelderly Adult Rate Has Increased from Percent to 20
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Presentation transcript:

Private Sector Participation in Medicare: Exceeding Expectations The Second National Medicare Prescription Drug Congress Washington, DC November 1, 2005 Karen Ignagni

Presentation Outline Where We Were Prior to MMA Where We Are Now Statutory Benefits Benefits Available in the Market Providing a Safety Net for Low-Income Quality Performance

Where We Were Prior to MMA

Where We Are This Year

Where We Will be in `06 Medicare Advantage plans will be available in all 50 states and the District of Columbia Medicare Advantage plans that offer zero-premium prescription drug benefits will be available in 44 states Medicare Advantage plans that provide coverage in the coverage gap will be available in 39 states and the District of Columbia Medicare Advantage regional plans will be available in 37 states and the District of Columbia There has been a 12 percent increase in enrollment in Medicare Advantage plans since enactment of MMA

75% Plan Contribution ($1,500 total) Statutory Benefits 95% Plan Contribution 5% co-pay 100% Enrollee Payment 75% Plan Contribution ($1,500 total) 25% co-pay $250 Enrollee Deductible Enrollee Out-of-Pocket Expenditures $250 $2,250 $0 $5,100+ Total Drug Expenditures $750 $3,600+

Benefits Available in Market MA Plans in 44 States Offer No Premium Plans Regional PPOs in 7 States Offer No Premium Plans MA Plans in 36 States Offer Coverage for Generic Drugs in “Donut” 18 States will have Options which Include Coverage for Brand Names and Generics in “Donut” 2/3 of MA Plans with Rx have no Deductibles 15% have Reduced Deductibles

How Do We Do It

MA: A Low Income Safety Net Source: Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey Access to Care files, 2002 (CMS). Note: Calculations based on non-institutionalized Medicare beneficiaries and living in an area with at least one Medicare Advantage plan offering.

Quality Record

Breast Cancer Screening Medicare+Choice HEDIS® 2001 vs. Medicare Fee-for-Service 2000 - 2001 Measures Median percentages of women ages 52-69 years old receiving mammograms at least every two years WA (7) M+C=80% FFS=64% NATIONAL MEDIANS (165) M+C=75% FFS=60% ND MN (3) M+C=82% FFS=67% MT NH ( 1) M+C=87% FFS=68% WI (2) M+C=75% FFS=67% ME OR (4) M+C=77% FFS=64% ID (1) M+C=69% FFS=60% SD VT MI (6) M+C=77% FFS=67% NY (12) M+C=75% FFS=58% WY IA (2) M+C=76%FFS=65% NE (1) M+C=71% FFS=63% MA (5) M+C=83% FFS=66% IL (7) M+C=79% FFS=58% OH (16) M+C=73% FFS=61% PA (8) M+C=79% FFS=60% NV (3) M+C=67% FFS=56% IN (2) M+C=67% FFS=60% CO (3) M+C=77% FFS=60% RI (2) M+C=79% FFS=62% MO (7) M+C=79% FFS=52% KS (5) M+C=74%FFS=64% WV (3) M+C=80% FFS=61% UT DE VA (1) M+C=77% FFS=60% KY (1) M+C=66% FFS=59% CT (3) M+C=80% FFS=63% CA (17) M+C=73% FFS=56% NM (2) M+C=74% FFS=56% OK (3) M+C=65% FFS=55% TN (3) M+C=77%FFS=58% NC (3) M+C=76% FFS=62% AZ (9) M+C=73% FFS=60% NJ (5) M+C=65% FFS=54% AR AL (4) M+C=72% FFS=60% SC MD (1) M+C=77% FFS=61% MS GA (2) M+C=77% FFS=57% TX (7) M+C=66% FFS=56% LA (2) M+C=71% FFS=55% DC (1) M+C=77% FFS=52% HI (2) M+C=81% FFS=57% AK FL (20) M+C=74% FFS=65% M+C indicators higher than FFS (38 states + DC) No difference (e.g. +/- 1%) between M+C and FFS (0 states) FFS indicators higher than M+C (0 states) No M+C health plans reporting this indicator (12 states) Number in parentheses indicates the count of M+C plans operating in each state and reporting HEDIS data for this specific indicator. * Medicare+Choice: Medicare+Choice HEDIS® 2001 Data FFS: Jencks, et al. JAMA (1/2003) Data Collected in 2000-2001

Influenza Immunization Medicare+Choice HEDIS 2001 Measures vs. Medicare Fee-for-Service 2000-2001 Measures Median percentages of individuals ages 65 years or older who reported receiving an influenza immunization every year WA (4) M+C=84% FFS=72% MT MN (4) M+C=86% FFS=78% NATIONAL MEDIANS (192) M+C=75% FFS=72% ND ME WI (3) M+C=79% FFS=77% OR (6) M+C=78% FFS=77% SD VT ID (1) M+C=75% FFS=72% MI (4) M+C=73% FFS=72% NY (13) M+C=70% FFS=70% NH WY IA (3) M+C=78% FFS=78% MA (4) M+C=75% FFS=79% NE (1) M+C=82% FFS=79% IL (9) M+C=78% FFS=69% OH (12) M+C=74% FFS=69% PA (6) M+C=71% FFS=74% NV (3) M+C=66% FFS=62% IN (4) M+C=82% FFS=73% RI (2) M+C=78% FFS=73% CO (3) M+C=85% FFS=78% MO (7) M+C=80% FFS=70% WV (3) M+C= 78% FFS=70% UT KS (3) M+C=77% FFS=72% DE CT (1) M+C=76% FFS=72% VA (1) M+C=77% FFS=74% KY (1) M+C=71% FFS=66% NJ (3) M+C=70% FFS=68% CA (13) M+C=74% FFS=73% OK (1) M+C=76% FFS=78% TN (4) M+C=78% FFS=74% NC (3) M+C=74% FFS=72% AZ (4) M+C=76% FFS=69% NM (2) M+C=78% FFS=72% AR MD (1) M+C=76% FFS=72% GA (2) M+C=73% FFS=71% MS SC AL (2) M+C=72% FFS=65% TX (3) M+C=78% FFS=69% DC (1) M+C=77% FFS=61% LA (2) M+C= 69% FFS=65% HI (1) M+C=82% FFS=78% AK FL(12) M+C=68% FFS=66% M+C indicators higher than FFS (29 states + DC) No difference (e.g. +/- 1%) between M+C and FFS (5 states) FFS indicators higher than M+C (3 states) No M+C health plans reporting this indicator (13 states) Number in parentheses indicates the count of M+C plans operating in each state and reporting HEDIS data for this specific indicator. *Medicare+Choice: Data Source: Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) survey FFS: Jencks, et al. JAMA (1/2003) Data Source: CDC’s Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey (BRFSS)

Pneumococcal Immunization Medicare+Choice HEDIS 2001 Measures vs. Medicare Fee-for-Service 2000-2001 Measures Median percentage of individuals ages 65 years or older who reported receiving an pneumococcal immunization at least once WA (4) M+C=77% FFS=67% MT MN (4) M+C=79% FFS=68% ND NATIONAL MEDIANS (192) M+C=65% FFS=65% ME WI (3) M+C=73% FFS=68% OR (6) M+C=70% FFS=67% SD VT ID (1) M+C=66% FFS=59% MI (4) M+C=64% FFS=63% NY (13) M+C=57% FFS=64% NH WY IA (3) M+C=72% FFS=68% MA (4) M+C=68% FFS=71% NE (1) M+C=75% FFS=70% IL (9) M+C=71% FFS=59% OH (12) M+C=64% FFS=63% PA(6) M+C=58% FFS=66% NV (3) M+C=68% FFS=65% IN (4) M+C=71% FFS=61% RI (2) M+C=65% FFS=62% CO (3) M+C=77% FFS=69% MO (7) M+C=66% FFS=60% WV (3) M+C=63% FFS=64% UT KS (3) M+C=65% FFS=67% DE VA (1) M+C=68% FFS=63% CT (1) M+C=66% FFS=66% KY (1) M+C=58% FFS=58% CA (13) M+C=67% FFS=66% OK (1) M+C=68% FFS=69% TN (3) M+C=72% FFS=68% NC (3) M+C=66% FFS=70% AZ (4) M+C=69% FFS=68% NM (2) M+C=71% FFS=64% NJ (3) M+C=59% FFS=60% AR GA (2) M+C=65% FFS=63% MS SC MD (1) M+C=68% FFS=67% AL (2) M+C=63% FFS=54% TX (3) M+C=62% FFS=62% LA (2) M+C= 61% FFS=59% DC (1) M+C=68% FFS=48% HI (1) M+C=70% FFS=75% AK FL (12) M+C=58% FFS=61% M+C indicators higher than FFS (20 states + DC) No difference (e.g. +/- 1%) between M+C and FFS (10 states) FFS indicators higher than M+C (7 states) No M+C health plans reporting this indicator (13 states) Number in parentheses indicates the count of M+C plans operating in each state and reporting HEDIS data for this specific indicator. *Medicare+Choice: Data source: Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) FFS: Jencks, et al. JAMA (1/2003) Data source: CDC’s Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey (BRFSS)

Beta-Blockers After Heart Attack Medicare+Choice HEDIS 2001 Measures vs. Medicare Fee-for-Service 2000-2001 Measures Median percentages of individuals who received beta-blockers following a heart attack WA (6) M+C=94% FFS=78% MN (3) M+C=91% FFS=87% NATIONAL MEDIANS (121) M+C=93% FFS=79% MT ND WI (2) M+C=86% FFS=79% ME OR (4) M+C=96% FFS=80% SD VT ID MI (4) M+C=97% FFS=93% WY NY (9) M+C=95% FFS=85% NH IA (1) M+C=95% FF=89% MA (5) M+C=98% FFS=88% NE OH (10) M+C=96% FFS=79% PA (7) M+C=97% FFS=79% NV (1) M+C=85% FFS=69% IL (6) M+C=87% FFS=75% IN (2) M+C=79% FFS=83% CO (3) M+C=95% FFS=92% RI (2) M+C=93% FFS=95% UT MO (5) M+C=93% FFS=78% KS (2) M+C=94% FFS=74% DE WV VA (1) M+C=100% FFS=88% KY (1) M+C=72% FFS=80% CT (3) M+C=92% FFS=83% CA (10) M+C=91% FFS=66% AZ (7) M+C=91% FFS=84% NM (3) M+C= 78% FFS=74% OK (1) M+C=81% FFS=76% TN (1) M+C=95% FFS=75% NC (2) M+C=89% FFS=81% NJ (5) M+C=90% FFS=68% AR AL(1) M+C=60% FFS=78% SC MS TX (5) M+C=74% FFS=72% GA (2) M+C=90% FFS=74% MD (1) M+C=100% FFS=77% LA (2) M+C=75% FFS=71% HI (1) M+C=97% FFS=84% DC (1) M+C=100% FFS=85% AK FL (20) M+C=93% FFS=79% M+C indicators higher than FFS (30 states + DC) No difference (e.g. +/- 1%) between M+C and FFS (0 states) FFS indicators higher than M+C (4 states) No M+C health plans reporting this indicator (16 states) Number in parentheses indicates the count of M+C plans operating in each state and reporting HEDIS data for this specific indicator. * Medicare+Choice: Medicare+Choice HEDIS 2001 Data FFS: Jencks, et al. JAMA (1/2003)

Diabetes Care: Lipid Screening Medicare+Choice HEDIS 2001 Measures vs. Medicare Fee-for-Service 2000-2001 Measures Median percentages of people with diabetes who had Lipid (LDL-C) profile tests every two years WA (7) M+C=84% FFS=78% NATIONAL MEDIANS (167) M+C=83% FFS=74% ND MN (3) M+C=81% FFS=76% MT NH ( 1) M+C=78% FFS=77% WI (1) M+C=85% FFS=76% ME OR (4) M+C=82% FFS=74% ID (1) M+C=78% FFS=75% SD VT MI (6) M+C=81% FFS=70% WY NY (12) M+C=88% FFS=76% IA (2) M+C=84%FFS=74% NE (1) M+C=81% FFS=69% MA (5) M+C=83% FFS=69% IL (7) M+C=81% FFS=69% OH (17) M+C=80% FFS=75% PA (8) M+C=86% FFS=78% NV (3) M+C=79% FFS=77% IN (2) M+C=75% FFS=73% CO (3) M+C=81% FFS=74% MO (8) M+C=78% FFS=59% KS (6) M+C=75%FFS=70% UT WV (3) M+C=82% FFS=75% DE RI (2) M+C=87% FFS=76% VA (1) M+C=86% FFS=74% KY (2) M+C=78% FFS=74% CA (17) M+C=83% FFS=77% CT (3) M+C=90% FFS=76% NM (3) M+C=73% FFS=66% OK (3) M+C=85% FFS=68% TN (3) M+C=86% FFS=71% NC (3) M+C=86% FFS=75% AZ (9) M+C=85% FFS=72% AR AL (4) M+C=67% FFS=65% SC NJ (5) M+C=74% FFS=79% MS GA (2) M+C=84% FFS=67% TX (7) M+C=83% FFS=77% MD (1) M+C=86% FFS=79% LA (1) M+C=85% FFS=71% HI (2) M+C=92% FFS=82% DC (1) M+C=86% FFS=68% AK M+C indicators higher than FFS (36 states + DC) No difference (e.g. +/- 1%) between M+C and FFS (1 state) FFS indicators higher than M+C (1 state) No M+C health plans reporting this indicator (12 states) FL (20) M+C=89% FFS=83% Number in parentheses indicates the count of M+C plans operating in each state and reporting HEDIS data for this specific indicator. * Medicare+Choice: Medicare+Choice HEDIS 2001 Data FFS: Jencks, et al. JAMA (1/2003)

Diabetes Care: A1C Testing Medicare+Choice HEDIS 2001 Measures vs. Medicare Fee-for-Service 2000-2001 Measures Median percentage of people with diabetes who received a Hemoglobin A1C Test every year WA (7) M+C=93% FFS=86% NH (1) M+C=88% FFS=87% MT MN (3) M+C=93% FFS=87% NATIONAL MEDIANS (176) M+C=84% FFS=78% ND ME WI (1) M+C=93% FFS=86% OR (4) M+C=89% FFS=85% ID (1) M+C=89% FFS=82% SD VT MI (6) M+C=85% FFS=78% NY (12) M+C=84% FFS=76% WY IA (2) M+C=92% FFS=85% MA (5) M+C=90% FFS=83% NE (1) M+C=89% FFS=77% IL (7) M+C=83% FFS=74% OH (17) M+C=81% FFS=78% PA(8) M+C=90% FFS=80% NV (3) M+C=82% FFS=78% IN (2) M+C=78% FFS=77% RI (2) M+C=87% FFS=80% CO (3) M+C=85% FFS=84% MO (8) M+C=85% FFS=65% WV (3) M+C=80% FFS=77% UT KS (6) M+C=88% FFS=83% DE VA (1) M+C=81% FFS=80% KY (2) M+C=82% FFS=75% CT (3) M+C=86% FFS=80% CA (17) M+C=81% FFS=73% OK (3) M+C=88% FFS=72% TN (3) M+C=91% FFS=78% NC (3) M+C=86% FFS=81% AZ (9) M+C=83% FFS=71% NM (3) M+C=78% FFS=71% AR NJ (5) M+C=72% FFS=73% GA (2) M+C=88% FFS=74% MS SC AL (4) M+C=75% FFS=70% MD (1) M+C=81% FFS=77% TX (7) M+C=80% FFS=75% LA (1) M+C= 89% FFS=69% DC (1) M+C=81% FFS=65% HI (2) M+C=92% FFS=82% AK FL (20) M+C=84% FFS=79% M+C indicators higher than FFS (33 states + DC) No difference (e.g. +/- 1%) between M+C and FFS (5 states) FFS indicators higher than M+C (0 states) No M+C health plans reporting this indicator (12 states) Number in parentheses indicates the count of M+C plans operating in each state and reporting HEDIS data for this specific indicator. * Medicare+Choice: HEDIS 2001 Data FFS: Jencks, et al. JAMA (1/2003)

Conclusion