Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Advertisements

R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Three-Dimensional Structure of the Human DNA-PKcs/Ku70/Ku80 Complex Assembled on DNA and Its Implications for DNA DSB Repair  Laura Spagnolo, Angel Rivera-Calzada,
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
The Gemin6-Gemin7 Heterodimer from the Survival of Motor Neurons Complex Has an Sm Protein-like Structure  Yingli Ma, Josée Dostie, Gideon Dreyfuss, Gregory.
Structure of the Oligosaccharyl Transferase Complex at 12 Å Resolution
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Volume 69, Issue 6, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Solution Structures of Engineered Vault Particles
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Structure of CheA, a Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinase
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
The Dynamics of Signal Triggering in a gp130-Receptor Complex
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (August 2016)
Anna Hagmann, Moritz Hunkeler, Edward Stuttfeld, Timm Maier  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Crystal Structure of the RuvA-RuvB Complex
Ryan C. Wilson, Meghan A. Jackson, Janice D. Pata  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
Molecular Architecture of the S. cerevisiae SAGA Complex
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Three-Dimensional Structure of the Intact Thermus thermophilus H+-ATPase/Synthase by Electron Microscopy  Ricardo A. Bernal, Daniela Stock  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Structure of the Kinesin13-Microtubule Ring Complex
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
Structural Role of the Vps4-Vta1 Interface in ESCRT-III Recycling
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Species-Dependent Ensembles of Conserved Conformational States Define the Hsp90 Chaperone ATPase Cycle  Daniel R. Southworth, David A. Agard  Molecular.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 904-914 (August 2007) The Structural Basis for Unidirectional Rotation of Thermoalkaliphilic F1-ATPase  Achim Stocker, Stefanie Keis, Janet Vonck, Gregory M. Cook, Peter Dimroth  Structure  Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 904-914 (August 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2007.06.009 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Stereo Drawings of the Three-Dimensional Structure of the α3β3γɛ Subcomplex of F1 from the Thermoalkaliphilic Bacillus sp. TA2.A1 (A) Side view of the complex with the pseudo three-fold axis vertical. Three structural domains are visible in each subunit of the α3β3 hexamer. The β and α subunits are shown in pink and pale yellow, respectively. The γ subunit and the ɛ subunit with the highest occupancy are shown in light blue and lime, respectively. (B) Top view of the complex viewed toward the membrane; the pseudo three-fold axis points toward the viewer. (C) Bottom view of the complex viewed from the membrane. Structure 2007 15, 904-914DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.06.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Conformational Properties and Positional Analysis of γ Subunits within F1 Complexes (A) Three-dimensional overlay of the γ subunits of E. coli (yellow) and Bacillus sp. TA2.A1 (light blue). The overall conformations of the two subunits are very similar and superimpose with an rmsd for the Cα atoms of 1.52 Å. (B) Relative positions of the γ subunits within the F1 complexes from yeast, bovine mitochondria, E. coli, and Bacillus sp. TA2.A1. Shown are corresponding αβγɛ subcomplexes. The positions of the γ subunits were determined by superposing corresponding α subunits onto the α subunit of the yeast mitochondria F1Fo model. The distortion of the stator-rotor interface in the case of TA2F1 involves a rigid-body bending movement of the γ subunit out of its putative rotational axis. (C) Stereo drawing of the bent position of the γ subunit within TA2F1 (blue) relative to the position of the γ subunit within ECF1 (yellow). Structure 2007 15, 904-914DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.06.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Analysis of Rotor-Stator Interactions within Recombinant TA2F1 (A) Stereo drawing of the rotor-stator interface of thermoalkaliphilic TA2F1 depicting two salt bridges between the γ subunit N terminus (residues Arg9 and Arg10) and the helix-turn-helix motif in the βE subunit (residues Asp372 and Asp375). (B) Close-up with electron density. Shown is a 2Fo − Fc density map contoured at 1.0σ above the mean. Structure 2007 15, 904-914DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.06.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Biochemical Analysis of Recombinant TA2F1 (A) SDS-PAGE of recombinant TA2F1 complexes from the thermoalkaliphilic Bacillus sp. TA2.A1. Lane 1, TA2F1(γWT) (30 μg); lane 2, TA2F1(γ4Q) (30 μg). Samples were resolved by 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis by the method of Schägger et al. (1988). (B and C) Effect of LDAO on the ATPase activity of recombinant TA2F1 complexes. ATP hydrolysis of TA2F1(γWT) (B) and TA2F1(γ4Q) (C) was measured with the ATP-regenerating assay, as described in Experimental Procedures, by monitoring the continuous change in absorbance at 340 nm (OD340). The reaction was initiated by the addition of ATP (open arrows). The velocity increase (indicated by arrow) was due to addition of 0.4% (w/v; final concentration) LDAO (filled arrows). Specific activities for TA2F1(γWT) of 0.31 and of 14.09 U/mg and for TA2F1(γ4Q) of 10.01 and of 4.91 U/mg in the absence and presence of LDAO, respectively, were observed. Structure 2007 15, 904-914DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.06.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Electron Microscopic Analysis of Native TA2F1Fo (A) Electron micrograph of TA2F1Fo negatively stained with uranyl acetate. The scale bar represents 50 nm. (B) Class averages after multivariate statistical analysis and classification of 1940 particles. At least 20% of particles were rejected based on poor resolution, as well as 20% from each class. Classes 1–8 contain 197, 250, 197, 194, 184, 261, 141, and 129 particles, respectively. Classes 1–4 show a view with the central stalk attached asymmetrically on the left side of the c ring; classes 5–7 show a more centrally connected stalk and a much narrower Fo domain. Class 8 contains some poorly aligned particles, of which some have the F1 domain facing down. Each frame represents 382 Å. (C) Corresponding views of the TA2F1 structure rotated approximately 90° relative to each other. The images were created using UCSF Chimera (Pettersen et al., 2004). Structure 2007 15, 904-914DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.06.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions