Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Advertisements

Luke D Sherlin, John J Perona  Structure 
Structure of the Rho Transcription Terminator
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Conservation of Structure and Mechanism between Eukaryotic Topoisomerase I and Site-Specific Recombinases  Chonghui Cheng, Paul Kussie, Nikola Pavletich,
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Structural Insights into RNA-Dependent Ring Closure and ATPase Activation by the Rho Termination Factor  Emmanuel Skordalakes, James M. Berger  Cell 
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
The Gemin6-Gemin7 Heterodimer from the Survival of Motor Neurons Complex Has an Sm Protein-like Structure  Yingli Ma, Josée Dostie, Gideon Dreyfuss, Gregory.
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Improved Structures of Full-Length p97, an AAA ATPase: Implications for Mechanisms of Nucleotide-Dependent Conformational Change  Jason M. Davies, Axel.
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Crystal Structure of the λ Repressor C-Terminal Domain Provides a Model for Cooperative Operator Binding  Charles E. Bell, Paolo Frescura, Ann Hochschild,
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 118, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Crystal Structure of the Flagellar σ/Anti-σ Complex σ28/FlgM Reveals an Intact σ Factor in an Inactive Conformation  Margareta K. Sorenson, Soumya S.
Structural Basis of 3′ End RNA Recognition and Exoribonucleolytic Cleavage by an Exosome RNase PH Core  Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Molecular Cell 
Eva M. Huber, Michael Groll  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Crystal Structure of the Human Neuropilin-1 b1 Domain
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Presentation transcript:

Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 363-376 (March 2007) Crystal Structures of the Pilus Retraction Motor PilT Suggest Large Domain Movements and Subunit Cooperation Drive Motility  Kenneth A. Satyshur, Gregory A. Worzalla, Lorraine S. Meyer, Erin K. Heiniger, Kelly G. Aukema, Ana M. Misic, Katrina T. Forest  Structure  Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 363-376 (March 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2007.01.018 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Sequence and Secondary Structure of A. aeolicus PilT Aligned with P. aeruginosa PilT, N. gonorrhoeae PilT, V. cholerae EpsE, and H. pylori HP0525 Alignments are based on 3D superpositions, sequence homology, and manual optimization. Observed A. aeolicus PilT α helices (h) and β strands (>) are denoted above the sequence, and indicated by blue and red letters, respectively, for known structures. Type II/IV secretion ATPase motifs are indicated by shaded boxes: Walker A, Asp box, Walker B, and His box, in that order. Other symbols mark the CTDn:NTDn+1 interface (diamond, also R207), recognition of adenine (plus sign), arginine wire (quotation), other residues presumed to participate in ATP recognition and catalysis (pound sign), and positions of changes in other nonfunctional PilT variants from this study (dagger). Dots indicate every tenth amino acid in the A. aeolicus PilT sequence. The EpsE zinc-binding tetracysteine motif (CM subdomain) is marked by a carat; the alignment continues after this 40 amino acid insertion. Residues not resolved in the refined structures are typed in gray. EpsE and HP0525 sequences are not shown upstream of the region of structural homology. A. aeolicus PilT, AaPilT; P. aeruginosa PilT, PaPilT; N. gonorrhoeae PilT, NgPilT; V. cholerae EpsE, EpsE; H. pylori HP0525, HP0525. Structure 2007 15, 363-376DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.01.018) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structure of PilT Monomer (A) Stereo view of the refined structure of the PilT:ADP monomer. The N-terminal PAS-like domain is blue and cyan to indicate quasi-internal two-fold symmetry. The CTD secondary-structure elements form the RecA fold (green), helices αH and αI which form the hexamer constriction and are an insertion in the RecA fold (magenta), helices αJ and αK (red), and the far C-terminal helices αL, αM, and αN (gray). Conserved residues Arg110, Lys149, Ser150, and Glu176, as well as the bound water and ADP, signpost the nucleotide-binding pocket. (B) Schematic of the PilT secondary-structure elements with conserved ATP-binding motifs indicated. The coloring scheme is as in (A). Structure 2007 15, 363-376DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.01.018) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Conserved Elements of PilT Fold (A) The NTD of PilT (colored as in Figure 2A) resembles the well-known PAS domain (gray, represented by the circadian clock protein Period; Yildiz et al., 2005). Noncanonical PAS elements (PilT αA and loops within Period) are removed for clarity. (B) The core ATPase subdomain of PilT (green) is readily superimposable upon RecA (Story and Steitz, 1992) (gray). In this view, the least-squares calculation is over P-loop residues only. Type II/IV secretion ATPase family motifs Walker A (blue), Asp box (lime green), Walker B (magenta), and His box (orange) neighbor the bound nucleotide. (C) Isolated, magnified view of the four sequence motifs described in (B), with ATP and signature invariant residues Lys149, Glu176, Glu217, and His242 depicted (blue, green, magenta, and orange, respectively). Structure 2007 15, 363-376DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.01.018) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Nucleotide Binding in PilT (A and B) Composite Fo − Fc omit electron density maps show (A) ATP (contoured at 2.0σ) and (B) ADP (contoured at 1.0σ) in the nucleotide-binding site of the respective PilT P6 structures. Protein atoms within 3.4 Å of ATP are enumerated in (A). In (B), the water is also indicated and protein atoms within 3.4 Å of the water, phosphates, or ribose are enumerated. (C) Close-up view of side chains and water adjacent to the nucleotide-binding site in PilT:ADP, with backbone ribbon colored as in Figure 1A. Structure 2007 15, 363-376DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.01.018) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Hexamer Formation (A) The P6 space group constrains the hexamer to be symmetric, as shown in this view of the assembly in which one subunit is highlighted in yellow. (B) In both ADP- and ATP-bound P6 crystal forms, the main intermolecular interface is CTDn:NTDn+1 as seen in these two adjacent subunits, viewed perpendicular to the six-fold symmetry axis. Black outlines the noncovalent CTDn:NTDn+1 pair. (C) Zoomed-in stereo view of the intermolecular CTDn:NTDn+1 interface, rotated to highlight a subset of the amino acids in the polar interface. The coloring in all panels is as in Figure 2. Structure 2007 15, 363-376DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.01.018) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Dramatic Domain Orientation Differences in the PilT C2 Hexamer (A) Six-fold symmetry is broken. Subunits E and B (light and dark blue, respectively) are displaced from the center of the hexamer. (B) Adjacent subunits E (blue) and F (orange) were superimposed over CTD residues 116–361. The NTDs of these monomers are then related by a 69° rotation about an axis through the domain linker. Helices C are labeled to highlight the extent of the movement. (C) Close-up view of the nucleotide-binding site at the three-way interface of NTDF (orange, below) and CTDF (orange, above) from the closed, liganded subunit and CTDE (blue) from the adjacent open subunit, with refined ADP and modeled Pi shown in Fo − Fc omit electron density calculated without nucleotide (contoured at 2.5σ [blue] and 5σ [red]). Note the arginine wire. Given the low resolution of this refinement, it is appropriate to consider this figure as one model that is consistent with our data. (D) At the engaged CTDE:CTDF interface, 950 Å2 are buried. Structure 2007 15, 363-376DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.01.018) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Protein Levels of Variant PilTs In Vivo Western blot analysis, using a polyclonal anti-P. aeruginosa PilT antibody, was used to assess relative levels of plasmid-encoded PilT in a PAKΔpilT background. The binding of the antibody to an unidentified constant band at higher molecular weight serves as a loading control. The wild-type protein is shown with full- and half-strength sample concentrations (WT and WT 1/2). Samples are from P. aeruginosa cells expressing the indicated PilT protein. Structure 2007 15, 363-376DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.01.018) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Model for Concerted PilT Motions (A) The quasi-two-fold symmetric C2 crystal structure has two peripheral wide-open subunits (B, E; blue), two central “active” subunits (C, F; orange), and two central “resting” subunits (A, D; green). Four CTD:CTD interfaces are engaged (double lines). The remaining two are disengaged (zig-zag). Subunit F is clamped around bound nucleotide. (B) When ATP (red) binds in the E cleft, the two domains close around the ligand (short black arrows), causing the β5/β6 arginines to approach the ATP. Because of the extensive CTDD:NTDE interface, the motion of NTDE forces the swiveling of CTDD (in particular the C-terminal helices) toward the periphery of the hexamer (long gray arrow). Consequently, the D arginine fingers approach the E active site (double lines). On the other side of CTDD, the interface likewise rearranges, disengaging CTDC from the D active site (zig-zag). (C) Subunit D is now poised as the most peripheral, wide-open subunit and ready to bind nucleotide; E is clamped around nucleotide and contributing to an engaged CTD:CTD interface on either side. Structure 2007 15, 363-376DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.01.018) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions