Test Submission Forum Goals of the project Project status: for example

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clinical Genomics Sub-team Sub-team is one of three that evolved out of the DIA Pharmacogenomics Standards Workshop. Workshop was product of collaborative.
Advertisements

1 Module 9: Submit. Objectives 2 Welcome to the Cayuse424 Submit Training Module. In this module you will learn how to use Cayuse424 to:  Discern the.
Knowledge Transfer Process for Developers From Harsha Amin.
Automate Blue Button Initiative Push Workgroup Meeting January 7, 2013.
Roster Verification RV Presentation to School Administrators Spring 2012.
PhUSE Computational Science Working Groups Solutions Through Collaboration.
WG4: Standards Implementation Issues with CDISC Data Models Data Guide Subteam Summary of Review of Proposed Templates and Next Steps July 23, 2012.
Optimizing Data Standards Working Group Meeting Summary
WG4: Data Guide/Data Description Work Group Meeting August 29, 2012.
Study Data Reviewer’s Guide (SDRG): Recommendations on Use of the Clinical SDRG Model for Nonclinical Data Submission Nonclinical Working Group, SDRG Project.
CDISC©2009 February CDISC INTRAchange Carey Smoak Device Team Leader Li Zheng Submission Data Standards Team Member Thurday, April 2, 2009.
WG4: Standards Implementation Issues with CDISC Data Models Team Update: June 18, 2012.
Fall CS-EE 480Team Pit Roach University of Portland School of Engineering November Program Review Team Pit Roach B 2 Logic to L-Edit Translator.
Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting August 29, 2011.
PhUSE Computational Science Working Groups Solutions Through Collaboration.
1 Addendum FALL 2004 RFP Detailed Instructions for Bidder Registration and Proposal Submission ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. November 2004.
ESDIS DOI STATUS DOI process in operation since 2010 Process fully automated (manual review) Implement improvements to the process as we learn along the.
SAB Secretary Report Debbie Brown February 3, 2016 Standards Activities Board.
How Good is Your SDTM Data? Perspectives from JumpStart Mary Doi, M.D., M.S. Office of Computational Science Office of Translational Sciences Center for.
Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting September 12, 2011.
EGI-InSPIRE RI EGI-InSPIRE EGI-InSPIRE RI SA1.2 Plans 2013 Security Operations David Kelsey (STFC) 26/02/2013 Operations.
BSA 411 Week 2 Individual Assignment Business Application System Proposal Business Application System Proposal Submit a 4- to 5-page paper consisting of.
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
User-friendly and versatile site that is built to maximise communication between those performing pro bono work as well as.
BENCH-CAN Internal evaluation 2nd semester
Submitting to Grants.gov
Software Verification and Validation
University Supervisors
Define phase Interview the client to understand goals, audience, content, design, and delivery requirements. Organize and outline interview information.
360o Feedback Report Post-Training After-Session Actions
Maintaining the Clinical & Nonclinical Study Data Reviewer’s Guides
Week 8 Slides.
HCS 535 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
HCS 535 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
HCS 535 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
What can we do? Answers from CSS Nonclinical Topics WG
SDTM and ADaM Implementation FAQ
Data Consistency: SEND Datasets and the Study Report
OSOR - new opportunities for sharing statistical software
Impact Post-Hire Surveys
Study Data Reviewers’ Guide – Nonclinical Assessment
Nonclinical Study Data Reviewers Guide
SDTM and ADaM Implementation FAQ
INFM 603 Main Class Project
Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data
PhUSE Computational Science Working Groups
Work Time Work with your team to further develop and/or refine your written gifted and talented plan. Next session: May 17 You will be working independently.
WELCOME! Nonclinical Topics Working Group CSS Breakout Plan.
How to SEE / acknowledge FEEDBACK ON YOUR Booking Requests?
IT tool training Biocides Day 25th of October :30-11:15 IUCLID
Demystifying Define.xml Codelists for Nonclinical Studies
WG4: Data Guide/Data Description Work Group Meeting
SDTM and ADaM Implementation FAQ
Plan Collaborate Deliver
LAMAS Working Group June 2017
Nonclinical Working Group Update CSS 2014
WG4: Standards Implementation Issues with CDISC Data Models
Work Time Work with your team to further develop and/or refine your written gifted and talented plan. A copy of your new/revised written gifted and talented.
UL Student Employee Rubric + Blackboard Organization Tutorials
SEND Implementation User Group
Assessment Needs Analysis
Industry SEND Progress Survey
Work Time Work with your team to further develop and/or refine your written gifted and talented plan. A copy of your new/revised written gifted and talented.
Living Donor Committee
Nonclinical SDRG Goals of the project Project status: Ambition:
Crowd-Sourcing an Interactive Safety Review Package
Conduct an Employee Review
Apply for DXCC Awards on Logbook of The World
Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data
Demystifying Define.xml Codelists for Nonclinical Studies
Presentation transcript:

Test Submission Forum Goals of the project Project status: for example Increase the number of test submissions FDA receives Identify the barriers Propose ways to overcome the barriers Demystify the test submission process Project status: for example Completed Recommend to close project Contacts: Kathy Brown, kathryn.brown@sanofi.com and Dave Epstein, david.epstein@fda.hhs.gov Wiki site: http://www.phusewiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Test_Submission_Forum_Group

Test Submission Forum Milestones and Accomplishments √ Conduct survey to determine the barriers Two surveys conducted Results posted on wiki site A lot of questions surrounding the process Looking for more detailed feedback about submissions √ Develop “Wish list” for what should be included in test submission feedback: FDA Reviewer comments SDRG feedback Indication if correct information is being included in the variable Information on data loading success or issues The version of validator(s) used during review Data fitness checks √ Develop list of questions/suggestions that could help demystify the process Include diagrams (process flow) that details process from start to finish Describe what the reviewer sees in their tools Include commonly seen errors

Test Submission Forum Propose that this group be closed. Milestones and Accomplishments (cont.) √ Develop questions for eData at the CDISC SEND Fall F2F √ FDA listened and heard concerns of the industry and proposed a Fit for Use Pilot (collaboration between CDISC and PhUSE) Conclusion The Fit for use Pilot addressed most of the wish list items Team is waiting for the completion of the pilot to see if all major items identified within the team were addressed Pilot results are still being shared, but there where no major gaps Feedback provided within the pilot was/is much more useful than submitting a test submission Wish list and recommendations are posted on the wiki page Propose that this group be closed.