Hubris and Hybrids in Science and Society Andrew Jamison

A Brief History of STS 1970s – science, technology and society - building bridges acrosss the two cultures 1980s – science, technology and strategy - story-lines of economic innovation 1990s – science and technology studies - story-lines of social construction 2000s – science, technology, and sustainability - story-lines of cultural appropriation

Hubris and Hybrids hubris: ”impious disregard of the limits governing human action in an orderly universe” hybrids: ”offspring of parents that differ in genetically determined traits”

Hubris and Hybrids in S&T GMOs, nano appropriate technology globalization sustainability entrepreneurship scientific citizenship foresight cultural assessment technoscience green knowledge

The Underlying Tension ”When we look at modern man, we have to face the fact that modern man suffers from a kind of poverty of the spirit which stands in glaring contrast to his scientific and technological abundance. We’ve learned to fly the air like birds, we’ve learned to swim the seas like fish, but we haven’t learned to walk the earth like brothers and sisters.” Martin Luther King, Jr

Dealing with the Tension educating phronesis, or moral judgment telling stories of appropriation focusing on contexts of use providing a cultural assessment of S&T making STS matter

Cultural Appropriation At a discursive, or macro level structural and cognitive transformations At an organizational, or meso level processes of institutionalization At a personal, or micro level practices of habituation and use

The Age of Technoscience blurring discursive boundaries between science (episteme) and technology (techne) breaking down institutional borders between public and private, economic and academic mixing skills and knowledge across faculties, disciplines, and societal domains

From Science to Technoscience change in range and scope market orientation, global reach university-industry collaboration ”epistemic drift” (Elzinga) the state as strategist: “picking the winners”

Transdisciplinarity ”Knowledge which emerges from a particular context of application with its own distinct theoretical structures, research methods and modes of practice but which may not be locatable on the prevailing disciplinary map.” Michael Gibbons et al, The New Production of Knowledge (Sage 1994, p168)

From Science to Research from doing experiments to doing business product-oriented, or commercial research from providing expertise to governing project-oriented, or governance research from enlightening to empowering problem-oriented, or advocacy research

Contending Discourses commercial research: hubris goes to market - globalization, competitiveness, innovation governance research: controlling hubris - welfare, employment, equality, construction advocacy research: the hybrid imagination global justice, scientific citizenship, sustainability

Contending Institutions commercial research - innovation networks, patent systems, markets governance research - state agencies, regulations, policies, laws advocacy research - civic organizations, public education, assessment

Contending Identities commercial research - academic entrepeneurs, market researchers governance research - expert consultants, policy researchers advocacy research - activist academics, action researchers

Cultural Assessment of S&T Reflection: challenging the hype and the myths and giving voice to the critics Mediation: building bridges, making spaces across cultures and subcultures Engagement: doing change-oriented research or cultural appropriation in action

The Hybrid Imagination integrative, as opposed to specialized contextual, as opposed to reductionist connective, as opposed to innovative