Strategies for making exam feedback dialogic Prof Alasdair Blair Dr Sam McGinty Dr Alun Wyburn - Powell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QROAD to learning… Its about taking control of your learning. Become an independent learner! Follow the following steps to get more out of your lessons!
Advertisements

Enhancing Induction: Principles for Improving the Student Experience Engaging the learner: Why did I get 37%? Professor Brenda Smith Goldsmiths, University.
Self-directed Learners Dr Sara Preston.
Experience of using formative assessment and students perception of formative assessment Paul Ong Greg Benfield Margaret Price.
Directorate of Human Resources Engaging students with assessment and feedback Chris Rust, Head, Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
Completing the cycle: an investigation of structured reflection as a tool to encourage student engagement with feedback Jackie Pates Lancaster Environment.
Self- and Peer-Assessment
The perceived added value of peer marking in formative assessment: a cross-disciplinary study Tom Bartlett ENCAP Paul Crosthwaite ENCAP Helen Jones BIOSI.
Peer peer-assessment & peer- feedback
Enhancing Student Engagement with Feedback Stuart Hepplestone and Helen Parkin, Learning and Teaching Institute.
Frances Chetwynd Chris Dobbyn The Open University. UK Consistency v Autonomy: effective feedback to a very large cohort 13/04/2012HEA Stem Conference 2012.
ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING
Correction, feedback and assessment: Their role in learning
Peer dialogues: A new approach to developing feedback practises? Dr. Sarah Richardson Ian Gwinn Sam McGinty.
SIG invited symposium UTILIZING ASSESSMENT INFORMATION FOR (IN)FORMATIVE FEEDBACK.
Key Issues in Assessment and Feedback: The only feedback I received was two ticks and a question mark! University of Surrey Faculty of Arts and Human Sciences.
Delivering and Receiving Feedback. Feedback Information about performance or behaviour that leads to action to affirm or develop that performance or behaviour.
Using technology to enhance student engagement with feedback Stuart Hepplestone and Helen Parkin Quality Enhancement & Student Success.
Parallel Session Presentation Mini Conference April 2013 D2-LP-14 Dr LAM Bick Har Department of Curriculum and Instruction The Use of Formative.
Creating a dialogue over feedback between staff and students in the classroom and online Heather A. Thornton
Feedback to the Future Sue Gill, QuILT and Rachael Thornton, NUSU.
Dr Susie Schofield Lecturer / academic eLearning lead Centre for Medical Education University of Dundee Technology-enhanced.
Assessment Careers: towards a vision of post-modularisation Dr Gwyneth Hughes Dr Martin Oliver Dr Holly Smith SRHE Conference 2012.
An Examination of student formative assessment and feedback & its relationship to learning outcomes and the student learning experiences – an interim project.
Formative Assessment: Looking beyond the techniques Dr Jeremy Hodgen Kings College London.
Perceptions of Feedback: Myth & Reality Jon Scott School of Biological Sciences.
Assessment for learning: the benefits of generating feedback David Nicol Professor of Higher Education Centre for Academic Practice and Learning Enhancement.
Peer assessment and group work event and practical workshop RSC WM Stimulating and supporting innovation in learning.
1.3 – Putting a business idea into practice
VARIETY VERSUS FAMILIARITY IN ASSESSMENT TASK TYPE IN HIGHER EDUCATION Neil Currant.
David Carless University of Hong Kong
"What works in a wiki? Redesigning collaborative learning" Eileen Kennedy.
Developing your Assessment Judy Cohen Curriculum Developer Unit for the Enhancement of Learning and Teaching.
Assessment as a process leading to success. A case scenario.
The University Writing in STEM Disciplines: providing students with effective feedback and empowering students’ peer assessment © Dr Trevor Day This presentation.
E-assessment An introduction to assessment for learning.
Improving Students’ understanding of Feedback
FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT Nisreen Ahmed Wilma Teviotdale.
Perceptions of the Role of Feedback in Supporting 1 st Yr Learning Jon Scott, Ruth Bevan, Jo Badge & Alan Cann School of Biological Sciences.
Assessment. Scales and Rubrics Lettered Scales Point Scales 100 Point Scales Degree Classifications.
What are some instructional strategies that support inquiry?
Discussion examples Andrea Zhok.
Critical Partnerships: Using Peer Support to Develop Skills in Writing at Masters Level Sue Forsythe Maarten Tas School of Education
Teachers mentoring teachers: A process of reflection and rejuvenation
Developing your Assessment and Feedback Judy Cohen Curriculum Developer Unit for the Enhancement of Learning and Teaching.
Mark Goodwin. NTFS ‘It’s Good to Talk: Feedback, Dialogue and Learning’ 3 years Funded by Higher Education Academy National Teaching Fellowship.
Centre for Academic Practice University of Strathclyde
Assessment for Learning: supporting post graduate students’ Margo McKeever.
Learning and Feedback: what is the link? Paul Orsmond Stephen Merry Biologist © Paul Orsmond This presentation is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-
A review of peer assessment tools. The benefits of peer assessment Peer assessment is a powerful teaching technique that provides benefits to learners,
Post-Graduate students’ perceptions of feedback Dr Helen Boulton Nottingham Trent University. Dr Alison Hramiak Sheffield Hallam University.
What feedback do Political Science Students Want? Lessons from a British perspective Alasdair Blair Paper presented at the American Political.
Why dialogue matters in the student experience Alasdair Blair Sam McGinty.
indispensable conditions for improvement (Sadler 1989)
Assessment ModellingTasks LessonsAssessment Reflecting.
Making sense of expectations and feedback David Carless University of Hong Kong Glasgow, June 9, 2015 The University of Hong Kong.
Assessment Careers: getting better value out of feedback Dr Gwyneth Hughes and Dr Holly Smith.
It’s Good to Talk Alasdair Blair Paper presented to Faculty of Business and Law, ‘Tricks of the Trade’ Seminar, 8 November 2011.
+ Summer Institute for Online Course Development Institute – Assessment Techniques Presentation by Nancy Harris Dept of Computer Science.
Mark Goodwin. NTFS ‘It’s Good to Talk: Feedback, Dialogue and Learning’ 3 years institutions: De Montfort, London Metropolitan, Warwick History.
How I Should Talk to My Teacher
TRANSLATING PRINCIPLES OF EFFECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR STUDENTS INTO THE CS1 CONTEXT By Claudia Ott, Anthony Robins and Kerry Shepard Presented by Laurel Powell.
Margo McKeever, Hannah Waller, Emma Davies, Ben Ward & Lisa Gilholme.
Devising Assessment Tasks PGCE CS IT. Objectives To consider how to plan for assessment To consider progression To think about collaborative learning.
Supporting student partnerships
Assessment and Feedback – Module 1
Magnus M B Ross & Mary P Welsh
Strategies for making exam feedback dialogic
Alasdair Blair & Sam McGinty
Providing feedback to learners
Presentation transcript:

Strategies for making exam feedback dialogic Prof Alasdair Blair Dr Sam McGinty Dr Alun Wyburn - Powell

NTFS Its Good to Talk: Feedback, Dialogue and Learning 3 years institutions: De Montfort, London Metropolitan, Warwick History Politics/International Relations

Dialogue A range of feedback researchers have argued for engaging students in a dialogue (Sadler, 1989; Hounsell & Hounsell 2007; Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick, 2006). Feedback should be a collaborative process that encourages teacher and peer dialogue around learning (Nicol & Macfarlane- Dick, 2006, p. 205). Peer feedback can be defined as a communication process through which learners enter into dialogues related to performance and standards (Lui & Carless, 2006, p. 280).

Exam feedback: initial findings 308 student questionnaire responses I receive written feedback on my examination scripts: Frequently18% Sometimes13% Never40% N/A29% I receive verbal feedback on my examination scripts: Frequently7.1% Sometimes23.2% Never48.5% N/A21.2%

Exam feedback: initial findings In the exams, we never really get feedback from the exams and it would be nice to get to know what we have done wrong instead to just getting a mark for the exam from the actual board. Then youve got the opportunity to get the exam papers back but you dont get the opportunity to sit down and talk to anyone about it. (Female 1, History and Education Studies, Level 5 interview). But also, if you have access to your scripts…in exams obviously there very pressured situations, so you do have write as fast as you can, and sometimes it would interesting to see what you wrote in that situation in retrospect, and can reflect on it calmly, and to really analyse your own arguments, because I often come out of exams feeling completely drained, and so at the end of the exam when your reading over it, you dont have much idea whether it is a good argument or a bad argument. So to be able to look back in hindsight would be quite useful. (Student 1, Level 5, focus group 1)

Level 5 History students 3 or 4 exams per year 40-50% of assessment mark for each module 41.2% worried about exams 5.9% stressed about exams 82.5% never receive any exam feedback

Level 5 History students Feedback is the basis for improving my grades so I would take any chance to get more feedback especially with exams. With feedback from previous exams you may be better prepared in the next years exams. My exams are my weakest area – I need all the help I can get! Like any graded work it would be nice to receive an idea of where I went wrong or indeed right!

Exam feedback principles: Dialogic A variety of mediums Different feedback needs (process, product, performance and probability feedback) Feedback intervention points

Exam feedback cycle Prior to the exam After the exam Next cohort Process: Reassurance, exam technique Product: Exemplars, model answers Performance: Summative Performance: Written feedback via Performance: Tutorial Probability: Results analysis and breakdown

Product feedback Exemplar exam answers activity

Students estimates of marks Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Group 6 Average student mark Tutor mark Difference Answer Answer Answer

Q&A ?

Recommended reading Hounsell, D., McCune, V., Hounsell, J. & Litjens, J. (2008) The quality of guidance and feedback to students, Higher Education Research & Development, 27 (1), pp Nicol, D. (2010) From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (5), pp Orsmond, P., Merry, S. & Reiling, K. (2002) The use of Exemplars and Formative Feedback when Using Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27 (4), pp. 309 – 323