39 studies (41% Higher Ed), meta-analysis

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

For AS 229 (Environmental Technology). 1. A competent environmental technologist with strong understanding of fundamental scientific and technological.

Advertisements

Preparing Faculty to Conduct Educational Research: What’s SoTL’s Role Ruth Streveler, Nancy Chism, Marilla Svinicki and Karl Smith POD Conference, October.

Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills, 10e David W. Johnson & Frank P. Johnson © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Chapter Eight.

Constructive Academic Controversy: The Art of Arguing to Enhance Learning Workshop for Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Karl A. Smith Engineering Education.

Cooperative Learning- Implementing Student Teams and Achievement Divisions Presenter: Matthew Hillmer Date: 06/30/2005.

Grouping for Instruction Involvement and Interaction.

University of Delaware PBL Faculty Institute, University of Cincinnati November 1, 2001 An Introduction to Problem-Based Learning Institute for Transforming.

University of Delaware Plenary Presentation at September Institute Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning University of Cincinnati September.

ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology

Introduction to Constructive Controversy: The Art of Arguing to Enhance Learning Lilly Teaching Seminar Michigan State University April 11, 2013 Karl A.

Goals of General Education Program Statement of Philosophy "General Education is a part of our curriculum that challenges students to develop the intellectual.

Constructive Controversy & Decision Making Karl A. Smith February, 2012.

Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making

Active, Interactive, Cooperative & Collaborative Learning Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering University of Minnesota

Constructive Controversy in Graduate and Professional Courses Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University STEM Education Center/Civil Eng –

Student Collaboration Improves Retention Enhances Learning.

Institutional Outcomes and their Implications for Student Learning by John C. Savagian History Department Alverno C O L L E G E.

Cooperative Learning for Meaningful Learning Yael Sharan.

Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota January 2005 Engineers Leadership Institute Minnesota Society.

Project Management MOT 8221 Karl A. Smith Constructive Controversy & Decision Making Spring, 2002.

Roger Johnson & David Johnson

EENG 4910/4990 Engineering Design Murali Varanasi September 02, 2009.

Incorporating Engineering Standards in the Major Design Experience William E. Kelly Department of Civil Engineering The Catholic University of America.

Structuring Cooperative Learning: Examples from Small group learning in higher education (SGLHE) Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota Cooperative.

Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne

History and Philosophy of Engineering Education ENE 695M Karl A. Smith Constructive Controversy.

Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.

Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota Preparing and Supporting Students.

Engineering Standards in Capstone Design William E. Kelly Department of Civil Engineering The Catholic University of America Washington, DC ASEE.

Roger Johnson & David Johnson Cooperative Learning.

Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.

University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.

 Societal and global impact of engineering solutions  Codes of ethics in engineering  Risk-taking in engineering.

Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Purdue University/ University of Minnesota Engineers Leadership Institute Minnesota Society for Professional.

ABET ACREDITATION By: Elizabeth Rivera Oficina de Acreditación.

Prepared By :ANJALI. What is a Team? Two or more persons work together to achieve same goal or complete a task. Teams make decisions, solve problems,

Cooperative Learning in the College Classroom

Report from Curriculum Committee 4/3/2017

Learning Without Borders: From Programs to Curricula

Three Ways to Structure Cooperative Learning: Formal-Informal-Base

Instructional Leadership in the Social Studies

Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills

Controversy Learning goals: cognitive goals social goals

CONTROVERSY AND CREATIVITY

An Introduction to Teamwork

The importance of emotional learning within communication between the staff Project Number: RO01-KA

AACSB’s Standard 9: Curriculum content

Multidisciplinary Teams

Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5

Team Decision Making Engineers Leadership Institute

Three Ways to Structure Cooperative Learning: Informal-Formal-Base

Session 2 Challenges and benefits of teaching controversial issues

FIE 2009: Special Session Holly Matusovich, Virginia Tech

Three Ways to Structure Cooperative Learning: Informal-Formal-Base

Structured Academic Controversy

COMMUNICATOR Applies effective reading skills to acquire knowledge and broaden perspectives Employs active listening strategies to advance understanding.

Development of ABET Syllabus

to Enhance Student Success

What skills are necessary for a student to have to be hired for a job?

A fresh start toward a successful future

Assessment and Accreditation

The Global Workforce Project: Catalyst for Change

Changing Instructional Strategies and the Role of the Principal

Getting Started with Cooperative Learning

Three Ways to Structure Cooperative Learning: Formal-Informal-Base

Structuring Cooperative Learning:

Career Ready Practices

We Have a Mission, a Goal and Objectives… What’s Next?

Career Ready Practices

Keys to Success in Engineering Study

Presentation transcript:

39 studies (41% Higher Ed), meta-analysis Constructive Academic Controversy (CAC): The Art of Arguing to Enhance Learning FIE 2009: Special Session Holly Matusovich, Virginia Tech <matushm@vt.edu> Karl Smith, Purdue University/U of MN <ksmith@umn.edu> Why CAC? ABET criteria include requirements for graduates: who can function on multidisciplinary teams, who can communicate effectively, and who are educated sufficiently broadly to understand how engineering solutions have impact in global, economic, environmental and societal context. CAC can help students develop the skills to: contribute to engineering team discussions/negotiations develop and articulate positions on issues recognize and consider perspectives of multiple stakeholders respectfully and successfully navigate group conflict Theory Processes through which intellectual conflict leads to positive outcomes has been theorized by developmental, cognitive, social, personality, communication, and organizational researchers (Johnson & Johnson, 2009) Evidence 39 studies (41% Higher Ed), meta-analysis Achievement, Retention, and Quality of Decision Making and Problem Solving – Effect Size, ES = 0.70 (concurrence seeking), 0.62 (debate), 0.76 (individualistic) Cognitive and Moral Reasoning – ES = 0.84 (concurrence seeking, 1.38 (debate), 1.10 (individualistic) Similar ES’s for Perspective Taking, Open-Mindedness, Creativity, Task Involvement, Motivation to Improve Understanding, Attitude Change on the Issue, Attitudes toward Controversy and Toward the Task (Johnson & Johnson, 2009)

Constructive Academic Controversy Procedure Step Typical Phrase Prepare (pairs, 10 min) Our Best Case Is... Present (pairs,10 min tot) The Answer Is...Because... Open Discussion (group, 10 min) Your Position is Inadequate Because... My Position is Better Because... Perspective Reversal (10 min) Your Position Is...Because... Consensus Seeking Our Best Reasoned (group, 15 min) Judgment Is… Report out to larger group (10 min) Where Can I Find More Information? Holly Matusovich: www.enge.vt.edu/People/faculty/Profiles/matusovich.html Karl Smith: www.ce.umn.edu/~smith References: Gavin, David A. and Roberto, Michael A. 2001. What you don’t know about making decisions. Harvard Business Review, 79 (8), 108-116. Johnson, David W., Johnson, Roger T. 2009. Energizing learning: The instructional power of conflict. Educational Researcher, 38 (1) 37-51. Johnson, David W., Johnson, Roger T., and Smith, Karl A. 1996. Enriching college instruction with constructive controversy. ASHE-ERIC Reports on Higher Education. Washington, DC: ERIC. [ASHE-ERIC, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036-1183] Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., and Smith, K.A. 2000. Constructive controversy: The power of intellectual conflict. Change, 32 (1), 28-37. Smith, Karl A. 1984. Structured controversy. Engineering Education, 74(5), 306-309.