REMOTENESS OF DAMAGE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DutyCausation DamagesBreach of Duty Elements of Negligence.
Advertisements

What You’ll Learn How to define negligence (p. 88)
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2.
Torts True or False Torts Defined Torts Completion.
{ Chapter 10 TORTS: Negligence and Strict Liability.
Chapter 18: Torts A Civil Wrong
Tort Law Part 2 Negligence and Liability. Negligence Most common tort Accidental or Unintentional Tort Failure to show a degree of care that a “reasonable”
NEGLIGENCE Law 12 – MUNDY Negligence  Tort law is based on mostly case precedents and certain provincial and federal legislation;  Hence, our.
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. © 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 5 Negligence Chapter.
Tort Law – Unintentional torts
Negligence and Unintentional Torts
By Monika, Max, Vanja, Nicole KEY PRINCIPLES OF NEGLIGENCE.
By : Lillie Gray 1 st period Business Law Exam.  Crime- an offense against the public at large, which is therefore punishable by the government.  Tort-
Chapter 14 Negligence and Unintentional Torts LAW 120.
Causation Review Dr. Steiner Torts I. Elements of Causation Cause in Fact Cause in Fact Sine qua non or “but for” cause; Sine qua non or “but for” cause;
Unit 6 – Civil Law.
Tutorial Business Law Law of Tort. Question 1 The driver of a car driving at a fast speed hits a pedestrian who had just stepped down from the footpath.
Chapter 7: Negligence and Strict Liability Copyright © 2009 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Jentz Miller.
Chapter 20 Negligence. The failure to exercise a reasonable amount of care in either doing or not doing something resulting in harm or injury.
Chapter 09 Negligence and Strict Liability Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
 Understand the four elements of the tort of negligence  Understand the reasonable person standard  Understand how foreseeability (ability to anticipate.
Negligence by Snježana Husinec. Negligence  failure to exercise the care toward others which a reasonable or prudent person would do in the circumstances,
 I punch Joe in the face?  I start class by telling everyone that Joe drowns puppies?  I leave all of my teaching stuff in the doorway to the classroom,
Law in Action – Ch. 14. Tort = a civil wrong; damage to property or a personal injury caused by another person Unintentional Torts = injuries that are.
UNIT 29: TYPES OF ENGLISH CIVIL LAW. the Law of Contract the Law of Torts legally binding rights are acquired by one or more… (to acquire rights) to acquire.
COMMON LAW CIVIL LIABILITY LAW OF TORTS 1 Environmental Law.
 Tort: harm caused to a person or property for which the law provides a civil remedy  The branch of law that holds persons, private organizations, and.
CHAPTER 12: NEGLIGENCE THE BASICS Emond Montgomery Publications 1.
CIVIL LAW 3.4 NEGLIGENCE. Elements of Negligence  Duty: a legal obligation  Breach of Duty: violation of a duty, either by engaging in an action or.
Sensor Circuits, Inc. Student Coaching. Negligence Duty of Care Owed by Defendant to Plaintiff Breach of the Duty of Care by the Defendant Causation Damages.
Corporate and Business Law (ENG). 2 Designed to give you knowledge and application of: Section B: The Law of Obligations B1. Formation of contract B2.
Personal Injury Laws Objective: Define negligence and strict liability Bellwork: What was conversion? How do you think the name came about?
Negligence. Definition Negligence in an unintentional Tort This occurs when a person fails to use reasonable care and it causes harm to another person.
Understanding Business and Personal Law Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2 The Law of Torts A person can commit an unintentional tort, when he.
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2.
UNIT 1 Chapter 3 Sports Law. Who’s often on the scene 1 st ? THE COACH Inappropriate decisions and actions may jeopardize the injured person and lead.
Negligence Tort law establishes standards for the care that people must show to one another. Negligence is the conduct that falls below this standard.
Negligence SLO: I can understand the three types of torts, including negligence, intentional torts, and strict liability. I can identify relevant facts.
Legislations.
Section 4.2.
Chapter 6-1 Lesson Objectives
Neglect Torts Chapter 20.
Tort and negligence.
Professional Engineering Practice
The Law of Torts I’m going to sue you!.
Civil Law An overview of Tort Law – the largest branch of civil law
Strict Liability Chapter 21.
Liability in negligence
Negligence.
2.03 Civil Law.
A. Negligence is the most common tort.
Bank of Gould Student Coaching
Negligence Torts Chapter 14 Pg 415.
Proving Negligence in a Personal Injury Claim
Bank of Gould Student Coaching
Chapter 6-1 Lesson Objectives
Negligence.
Unintentional Torts: Negligence
Section Outline Unintentional Torts Negligence Strict Liability
Bank of Business Solutions Student Coaching
Negligence and Other Torts
Negligence Ms. Weigl.
Tort Law Summary.
Bank of Gould Student Coaching
UNINTENTIONAL TORTS Chapter 14.
Civil Law 3.1 Intro To Civil Law
Negligence.
Civil Law 3.4 negligence.
CIVIL LAW Unintentional Torts.
Bank of Business Solutions Student Coaching
Presentation transcript:

REMOTENESS OF DAMAGE

Remoteness of damage In black law dictionary: remote means a far off, at a distance. Remoteness: lack of close connection between a wrong and the injury which prevents the party injured from claiming compensation from the wrongdoer

Remoteness of damage Remoteness of damage means the unusual and unexpected result, not reasonably to be anticipated from an accidental or unusual combination of circumstances, a result beyond which the negligent party has no control.

The causation chain of negligence Negligence is the breach of a legal duty to take care which results in damage. Whether there was a duty of care owed to you? (Foreseeability) Whether you committed a breach of that duty? (reasonable and prudent person) Whether the negligent was a cause of the injury? (intervening action) How many items of plaintiff’s loss a negligent actor should not be held responsible

Determining the liability of negligence Negligence is the breach of a legal duty to take care which results in damage. For negligence these elements are important: Foreseeability Acting reasonably (not breach of law) Causation

Determining the liability of negligence The chain of causation is broken when there is an intervening action which you could not reasonably be expected to foresee. The remoteness of damage concerns how many items of plaintiff’s loss, a negligent actor (defendant) should not be held responsible. If a particular item is remote, the defendant is not held responsible for that item of plaintiff’s loss

Test of remoteness There are two views relating test of remoteness: Consequences are too remote if a reasonable man would not have foreseen them. If a reasonable man would have foreseen any damage as a result of his act, then he is liable for all direct consequences. i.e., the chartered ship, Bakara Market Fire 2002

Degree or extent of damage If the kind of damage to a human being is foreseeable, the defendant will be liable even though it is much greater in extent than would have been reasonably anticipated from the negligence. Precise ways or manner. (i.e. lorry collision in east African case)

The end Any question?