WG 2A Ecological Status Drafting group: Guidance on the process of the intercalibration excercise 2nd meeting WG2A, 15-17/10/03.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DRAFT Intercalibration of methods to evaluate river EQ using fish Niels Jepsen, JRC & Didier Pont, Cemagref.
Advertisements

Intercalibration Guidance: update Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
WG 2A ECOSTAT 7-8 July 2004 Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods Status Report AC Cardoso and A Solimini Harmonisation Task Team: JRC.
WG 2A ECOSTAT Meeting 4-5 March 2004 Meeting of the WFD CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT summary Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre The.
Framework for the intercalibration process  Must be simple  Aiming to identify and resolve big inconsistencies with the normative definitions and big.
ECOSTAT 8-9 October 2007 Comparability of the results of the intercalibration exercise – MS sharing the same method Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 3 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Updating the intercalibration process guidance Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Finalisation of the intercalibration register Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
NE ATLANTIC GEOGRAPHICAL INTERCALIBRATION GROUP (NEA GIG)
Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive Working Group A ECOSTAT Ecological Status 7th Meeting Stresa, Lago Maggiore, Italy
IC network selection process
WG 2A Ecological Status First results of the metadata collection for the draft intercalibration register: RIVERS.
Results of the metadata analysis Meeting of the Working Group 2A on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT) March 4-5 , 2004, Ispra, Italy Peeter Nõges Anna-Stiina.
CIS guidance document on E-Flows
ECOSTAT WG 2A, JRC - Ispra (I), 7-8 July 2004
Synthesis of the intercalibration process Working group 2.5.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Objectives & Agenda of the meeting March 2005
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Development of guidelines
Central Rivers Geographical Intercalibration Group
Intercalibration Report on State - of - play and way forward Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre The Institute for Environment.
WG 2A Ecological Status First results of the metadata collection for the draft intercalibration register 2nd meeting WG2A, 15-17/10/03.
River GIGs: Future intercalibration needs/plans Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Task 1 - Intercalibration WG 2A ECOSTAT - Intercalibration
Central-Baltic Rivers GIG progress
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Intercalibration process - state of play Wouter van de Bund & Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, October 2005 Progress in the intercalibration exercise.
Task on harmonization WFD Annex V 1.3.6
Development of a protocol for identification of reference conditions, and boundaries between high, good and moderate status in lakes and watercourses (REFCOND)
WG ECOSTAT: Good Ecological Potential (GEP)
ANNEX: TIMETABLE (1)) Updated
WG 2.5 Intercalibration.
Intercalibration Timetable
Discussion agenda Summary & proposals (30 min)
CBriv GIG Macrophyte Intercalibration Status Overview
Update on progress since last WG meeting (13-14 June 2002)
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT State of play in the intercalibration exercise Water Directors Meeting, November 2005.
on a protocol for Intercalibration of Surface Water
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
Progress Report Working Group A Ecological Status Intercalibration (1) & Harmonisation (3) Activities Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen EC Joint Research.
IC manual: what and why Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Intercalibration Decision and Technical Report
Working group Ecological Flows
WFD – CIS Working group A ECOSTAT
Activities of WG A Ecological Status
WG A Ecological Status Progress report April-October 2009
Water Directors meeting Mondorf-les-bains, June 2005
EU Water Framework Directive
Working Group A ECOSTAT progress report on Intercalibration Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Water Directors meeting Warsaw, 8-9 December 2011
WG 2.3 REFCOND Progress report for the SCG meeting 30 Sep-1 Oct 2002
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Guidance for the intercalibration process Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
WG A ECOSTAT Intercalibration guidance : Annexes III, V, VI
Metadata analysis.
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
Status of the Nutrient Best Practice Guide
Guidelines to translate the intercalibration results into the national classification systems and to derive reference conditions Presented by Wouter.
Intercalibration: problems of selecting types
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, 22 Febraury 2006 Progress Report.
WFD CIS WG ECOSTAT meeting on 8-9 October 2007 Objectives What do we need to achieve during this meeting?
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Fish intercalibration – rivers Progress and expected outcome
Working Group on Reference Conditions
WG A Ecological Status Progress report October 2010 – May 2011
Why are we reviewing reference conditions in intercalibration?
Presentation transcript:

WG 2A Ecological Status Drafting group: Guidance on the process of the intercalibration excercise 2nd meeting WG2A, 15-17/10/03

Preliminary technical protocol IC exercise (Guidance WG 2 Preliminary technical protocol IC exercise (Guidance WG 2.5 - Section 5) Commission IC data base Publishing (Dec/06) Data (Jan/05- Jun/06) Reporting (Jun/06) Member States’ assessment system Potential additional sampling Sites selected for intercalibration (2003/4) Classification of intercalibration site (EQR-value) Member State 2nd meeting WG2A, 15-17/10/03

Preliminary technical protocol for the intercalibration exercise No clear overview what data can be expected from intercalibration sites Unclear if there will be major differences in MS interpretations of the normative definitions This will become more clear after completion of the metadata analysis (2003) The Ecological status Working Group 2A will develop further guidance in 2003-4 2nd meeting WG2A, 15-17/10/03

Tentative timetable for the IC exercise (Guidance WG 2.5 - Section 5) 2nd meeting WG2A, 15-17/10/03

Tasks To develop guidance for the intercalibration process taking into account the results of the process so far (expected) availability of data analysis what IC sites represent recommendations of experts and WG2A 2nd meeting WG2A, 15-17/10/03

Messages from site selection process so far (1) Common intercalibration types good basis for intercalibration in all GIGs General agreement on pressures and quality elements For most countries, Intercalibration sites represent preliminary national view on class boundaries 2nd meeting WG2A, 15-17/10/03

Messages from site selection process so far (2) Analysis on comparability of national views on class boundaries requires comparable biological data Methodological differences will make it very difficult to apply national assessment methods using existing data from other countries Recommendation to use common metric Need for revision of the IC register in 2005-6 2nd meeting WG2A, 15-17/10/03

Members of drafting group Guidance on the process of the IC exercise (lead - JRC) Joerg Janning (DE) Manuel Toro (ES) Pierre-Jean Martinez (FR) Gisela Ofenböck (AT) Roger Owen (UK) Andrea Buffagni (STAR project repr.) Wouter van de Bund (JRC) ………... 2nd meeting WG2A, 15-17/10/03

Outline of the guidance: table of contents Section 5 of Intercalibration guidance 2nd meeting WG2A, 15-17/10/03

5.1. Stepwise description of the intercalibration exercise and the tasks of the participants --> PROCEDURE Member States’ assessment system Publishing (Dec/06) Commission Member State Classification of intercalibration site (EQR-value) IC data base Reporting (Jun/06) Potential additional sampling Data (Jan/05- Jun/06) Sites selected for (2003/4) 2nd meeting WG2A, 15-17/10/03

5.2.Geographical scope/ applicability of different national assessment systems --> possibilities to asses sites in other countries 5.3. [Criteria for selection of] biological quality elements. --> including discussion on common metric 2nd meeting WG2A, 15-17/10/03

5.4. Guidance for additional sampling in the intercalibration sites. 5.5. Execution of (voluntary) intercalibration field campaigns 2nd meeting WG2A, 15-17/10/03

5. 6. Reporting of the final classification results. 5. 7 5.6. Reporting of the final classification results. 5.7. Expected outcome of the intercalibration exercise 2nd meeting WG2A, 15-17/10/03

Timing... First meeting Dec. 2003, Vienna First draft of the guidance document Spring 2003/next WG meeting; agreement on scope and key issues Guidance should be finilised by the end of 2004 2nd meeting WG2A, 15-17/10/03