Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Algorithms
Advertisements

AP STUDY SESSION 2.
1
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley
STATISTICS INTERVAL ESTIMATION Professor Ke-Sheng Cheng Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering National Taiwan University.
STATISTICS POINT ESTIMATION Professor Ke-Sheng Cheng Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering National Taiwan University.
STATISTICS Univariate Distributions
Properties Use, share, or modify this drill on mathematic properties. There is too much material for a single class, so you’ll have to select for your.
FIGURE 2.1 The purpose of linearization is to provide an output that varies linearly with some variable even if the sensor output does not. Curtis.
1 RA I Sub-Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Casablanca, Morocco, 20 – 22 December 2005 Status of observing programmes in RA I.
Properties of Real Numbers CommutativeAssociativeDistributive Identity + × Inverse + ×
Custom Statutory Programs Chapter 3. Customary Statutory Programs and Titles 3-2 Objectives Add Local Statutory Programs Create Customer Application For.
1. Name the particles in the atom and give the charges associated with each.
PUBLIC KEY CRYPTOSYSTEMS Symmetric Cryptosystems 6/05/2014 | pag. 2.
Chapter 7 Sampling and Sampling Distributions
Pole Placement.
FET Biasing.
Stationary Time Series
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
Digital Filter Banks The digital filter bank is set of bandpass filters with either a common input or a summed output An M-band analysis filter bank is.
Turing Machines.
Table 12.1: Cash Flows to a Cash and Carry Trading Strategy.
Filters and Tuned Amplifiers
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
Slide 6-1 COMPLEX NUMBERS AND POLAR COORDINATES 8.1 Complex Numbers 8.2 Trigonometric Form for Complex Numbers Chapter 8.
MAT 205 F08 Chapter 12 Complex Numbers.
LIAL HORNSBY SCHNEIDER
4. Binomial Random Variable Approximations,
Bellwork Do the following problem on a ½ sheet of paper and turn in.
Exarte Bezoek aan de Mediacampus Bachelor in de grafische en digitale media April 2014.
Solving Quadratic Equations Solving Quadratic Equations
Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 Section 5.5 Dividing Polynomials Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. 1.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
1 RA III - Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25 – 27 October 2006 Status of observing programmes in RA.
Functions, Graphs, and Limits
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
1..
CONTROL VISION Set-up. Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 5 Step 4.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Synthetic.
6.4 Best Approximation; Least Squares
Analyzing Genes and Genomes
1 Let’s Recapitulate. 2 Regular Languages DFAs NFAs Regular Expressions Regular Grammars.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 12 Keynesian Business Cycle Theory: Sticky Wages and Prices.
Essential Cell Biology
12 System of Linear Equations Case Study
Chapter 8 Estimation Understandable Statistics Ninth Edition
Exponents and Radicals
Clock will move after 1 minute
PSSA Preparation.
Essential Cell Biology
Chapter 13: Digital Control Systems 1 ©2000, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Nise/Control Systems Engineering, 3/e Chapter 13 Digital Control Systems.
Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health & Disease Sixth Edition
Physics for Scientists & Engineers, 3rd Edition
Energy Generation in Mitochondria and Chlorplasts
Select a time to count down from the clock above
16. Mean Square Estimation
Murach’s OS/390 and z/OS JCLChapter 16, Slide 1 © 2002, Mike Murach & Associates, Inc.
9. Two Functions of Two Random Variables
1 Decidability continued…. 2 Theorem: For a recursively enumerable language it is undecidable to determine whether is finite Proof: We will reduce the.
State Variables.
Math Review with Matlab:
AUTOMATIC CONTROL THEORY II Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
(COEN507) LECTURE III SLIDES By M. Abdullahi
11-1 Lyapunov Based Redesign Motivation But the real system is is unknown but not necessarily small. We assume it has a known bound. Consider.
§7-4 Lyapunov Direct Method
Stability Analysis of Linear Systems
Chapter 7 Inverse Dynamics Control
Presentation transcript:

High Gain Observer Introduction Consider the following system where (A,C) is observable. This form is special because g depends only on y and u. Taking the observer as we obtain that satisfies Therefore, designing C such that AHC is Hurwitz guarantees asymptotic error convergence.

High Gain Observer (Continued) However, any error in modeling g will be reflected in the estimation error equation. Thus, where is a nominal model of g. Hence We give a special design of the observer gain that makes the observer robust to uncertainties in modeling the nonlinear functions. The technique, called as high-gain observers, works for a wide class of nonlinear systems and guarantees that the output feedback controller recovers the performance of the state feedback controller when the observer gain is sufficiently high.

High Gain Observer (Continued) The main result is a separation principle that allows us to separate the design into two tasks. First, design a state feedback controller that stabilizes the system and meets other design specifications. Then, obtain an output feedback controller by replacing x by provided by the high-gain observer. A key property that makes this separation possible is the design of the state feedback controller to be globally bounded in x.

Example Ex: Assume that u = (x) is a local state feedback control law that stabilizes the origin. To implement this control law using only y, we use the observer where is a nominal model of the nonlinear function Then where

Example (Continued) We want to design such that In the absence of , asymptotic error convergence is achieved by designing H such that is Hurwitz. In the presence of , we need to design H with the goal of rejecting the effect of  on This is ideally achieved, for any , if the transfer function from  to is ideally zero.

Example (Continued) While this is impossible, we can make arbitrarily small by choosing Taking it can be shown that Hence Define the scaled estimation errors Then the newly defined variables satisfy the singularly perturbed equation. This equation shows clearly that reducing  diminishes the effect of .

Example (Continued) Notice, however, that will be whenever Consequently, the solution contains a term of In fact, This behavior is known as the peaking phenomenon.

Globally Stabilized by State Feedback Controller Let’s consider the system which can be globally stabilized by the state feedback controller The output controller is taken as where the observer gain assigns the eigen values of

State Feedback Controller The above figure shows a counter intuitive behavior as  0. Since decreasing  causes the estimation error to decay faster toward zero, one would expect the response under output feedback to approach the response under state feedback as  decreases. This is the impact of peaking phenomenon. Fortunately, we can overcome the peaking phenomenon by saturating the control outside a compact region of interest in order to create a buffer that protects the plant from peaking.

State Feedback Controller Suppose the control is saturated as The above figure shows the performance of the system under saturated state and output feedback. The control u is shown on a shorter time interval that exhibits control saturation during peaking. The peaking period decreases with .

Stabilization Consider the MIMO nonlinear system (1)

Stabilization (Continued)

Output Feedback Controller The functions ,  and q are locally Lipschitz and (0,0,0)=0, (0,0,0)=0, q(0,0)=0. Our goal is to find an output feedback controller to stabilize the origin. We use a two-step approach to design the output feedback controller. (i) A partial state feedback controller using x and  is designed to asymptotically stabilize the origin. (ii) A high-gain observer is used to estimate x from y. The state feedback controller can be shown as where r,  are locally Lipschitz in their arguments over the domain of interest and globally bounded functions of x. Moreover, r(0,0,0)=0 and  (0,0,0)=0.

Output Feedback Controller (Continued) For convenience, we write the closed-loop system under state feedback as (2) where X = (x, z, ). The output controller is taken as (3)

Output Feedback Controller (Continued) The observer gain H is chosen as

Theorem Theorem: Consider the closed-loop system of the plant (1) and the output feedback controller (3). Suppose the origin of (2) is asymptotically stable and R is its region of attraction. Let S be any compact set in the interior of R and Q be any compact subset of Then,

Theorem (Continued) (2), (2) Proof: See Ch 14.5

Results The theorem shows that the output feedback controller recovers the performance of the state feedback controller for sufficiently small . Note that (i) recovery of exponential stability (ii) recovery of the region of attraction in the sense that we can recover any compact set in its interior (iii) the solution under output feedback approaches the solution under the state feedback as   0.

Example Ex: Consider the following plant: Note : the given system is in triangular form. Thus, it is stabilizable by The output feedback controller is

Example (Continued) with For simulation: All system eigenvalues at 5. All observer eigenvalues at 5/ with  = 0.05.

Simulation Results