Impact in H2020 research proposals

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DOs and DONTs Joan-Anton Carbonell Kingston University EC External Expert TEMPUS Modernising Higher Education TEMPUS INFORMATION DAY.
Advertisements

Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the Seventh Framework Programme Coordination actions ICT Calls Jan- March 2012.
Proposal Structure.
Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the Seventh Framework Programme Large-scale integrating projects (IPs)
Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the Seventh Framework Programme Support actions.
Funding schemes, application forms and evaluation criteria
Horizon 2020 Energy Efficiency Information Day 12 December 2014 Essentials on how to submit a good proposal EASME Project Advisors: Francesca Harris,
TUTORIAL Grant Preparation & Project Management. Grant preparation What are the procedures during the grant preparations?  The coordinator - on behalf.
“”Capacity and services to road users” Task descriptions Paul van der Kroon, Paris November 2005.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
Writing Impact into Research Funding Applications Paula Gurteen Centre for Advanced Studies.
Dr. Dinesh Kumar Assistant Professor Department of ENT, GMC Amritsar.
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
Application Form Part 1, Sections 4-9 How to Apply Seminar 16 th September 2010 – Copenhagen Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
Market Health Annotated templates for Horizon 2020 a H2M tool for you! Caterina BUONOCORE, APRE, NCP for H2020 Societal Challenge 1.
Technology Strategy Board Driving Innovation Participation in Framework Programme 7 Octavio Pernas, UK NCP for Health (Industry) 11 th April 2012.
A new start for the Lisbon Strategy Knowledge and innovation for growth.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
1 NEST New and emerging science and technology EUROPEAN COMMISSION - 6th Framework programme : Anticipating Scientific and Technological Needs.
“Thematic Priority 3” Draft Evaluation of IP + NoE.
1 SMEs – a priority for FP6 Barend Verachtert DG Research Unit B3 - Research and SMEs.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
María Amor Barros del Río Gender as content in research in Horizon 2020 GENDER AS CONTENT IN RESEARCH IN HORIZON 2020 CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP FOR RESEARCHERS.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Date: Page: © GÖRGEN & KÖLLER GMBH Enabling Impact - How to successfully address the impact section in Horizon 2020 proposals Impact in H2020.
© Services GmbH Proposal writing: Part B 2/1/ St. Petersburg, May 18, 2011 Dr. Andrey Girenko
Evaluation of proposals Alan Cross European Commission.
Evaluating Engagement Judging the outcome above the noise of squeaky wheels Heather Shaw, Department of Sustainability & Environment Jessica Dart, Clear.
Horizon 2020 Ian Devine European Advisor – UK Research Office University of Manchester, 11 September 2014.
Experience from H2020 Proposals (a personal assessment)
Open Access and Open Access Pilot Initiative in Fp7 Marion Korres.
“Preparing competitive grant proposals that match policy objectives - project proposal evaluators' viewpoint ” Despina Sanoudou, PhD FACMG Assistant Professor.
ARTEMIS Industry Association Title Presentation - 1 e.g. SCALOPES e.g. SCAlable LOw Power Embedded PlatformS.
The Assessment Process 11/07/2016. Types of calls and proposals Calls are challenge-based, and therefore more open to innovative proposals − Calls are.
Accelerating progress towards the Green Economy
Collaborative & Interpersonal Leadership
SYMED Program: Interreg Europe Axis: 1 Specific Objective: 1.2
Communication matters from day one Trends in HORIZON 2020
COMPLIMENTARY TEACHING MATERIALS
Towards REF 2020 What we know and think we know about the next Research Excellence Framework Dr. Tim Brooks, Research Policy & REF Manager, RDCS Anglia.
Science Communication matters from day one Trends in HORIZON 2020
H2020 AMICI Workpackage 4 - Innovation.
Name Job title Research Councils UK
EERA e3s and Energy Consumers
LEARNING REPORT 2016 Disasters and Emergencies Preparedness Programme
National Contact Points (NCP) Training
Week 6 Innovation Process
Advocacy and CampaiGning
Application Form Sections 4-9 Christopher Parker & Kirsti Mijnhijmer 28 January 2009 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development.
Our new quality framework and methodology:
Institutul Bancar Român ROMANIAN BANKING INSTITUTE
Ανοικτή Πρόσβαση: η άμεση διάδοση της παραγόμενης επιστημονικής γνώσης
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Implementation of SAPCC:
PLUG-N-HARVEST ID: H2020-EU
Understanding Marketing Objectives
FP7 SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS
Information session SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 22/05/2013 José M. Jiménez.
Information session SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-WATER-INNO-DEMO "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 24/06/2013.
Innovation in H2020 Net Futures
Introduction to the PRISM Framework
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Assessment of Quality in Statistics GLOBAL ASSESSMENTS, PEER REVIEWS AND SECTOR REVIEWS IN THE ENLARGEMENT AND ENP COUNTRIES Mirela Kadic, Project Manager.
Writing Impact into Funding Applications
Plan your journey.
Open Access to scientific publications
Module No 6: Building Capacity in Rural Micro-Enterprises
Overview of Good Regulatory Practice
Presentation transcript:

Impact in H2020 research proposals Enabling Impact - How to successfully address the impact section in Horizon 2020 proposals Impact in H2020 research proposals Dr Christoph Köller Athens, 27. February 2014 Impact 2.1 Expected impacts Please be specific, and provide only information that applies to the proposal and its objectives. Wherever possible, use quantified indicators and targets. • Describe how your project will contribute to: o the expected impacts set out in the work programme, under the relevant topic; o improving innovation capacity and the integration of new knowledge (strengthening the competitiveness and growth of companies by developing innovations meeting the needs of European and global markets; and, where relevant, by delivering such innovations to the markets; o any other environmental and socially important impacts (if not already covered above). • Describe any barriers/obstacles, and any framework conditions (such as regulation and standards), that may determine whether and to what extent the expected impacts will be achieved. (This should not include any risk factors concerning implementation, as covered in section 3.2.) 2.2 Measures to maximise impact a) Dissemination and exploitation of results • Provide a draft ‘plan for the dissemination and exploitation of the project's results’ (unless the work programme topic explicitly states that such a plan is not required). For innovation actions describe a credible path to deliver the innovations to the market. The plan, which should be proportionate to the scale of the project, should contain measures to be implemented both during and after the project. Dissemination and exploitation measures should address the full range of potential users and uses including research, commercial, investment, social, environmental, policyThe approach to innovation should be as comprehensive as possible, and must be tailored to the specific technical, market and organisational issues to be addressed. • Explain how the proposed measures will help to achieve the expected impact of the project. Include a business plan where relevant. • Where relevant, include information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, in particular addressing the following issues: oWhat types of data will the project generate/collect? oWhat standards will be used? oHow will this data be exploited and/or shared/made accessible for verification and re-use? If data cannot be made available, explain why. oHow will this data be curated and preserved? You will need an appropriate consortium agreement to manage (amongst other things) the ownership and access to key knowledge (IPR, data etc.). Where relevant, these will allow you, collectively and individually, to pursue market opportunities arising from the project's results. The appropriate structure of the consortium to support exploitation is addressed in section 3.3. • Outline the strategy for knowledge management and protection. Include measures to provide open access (free on-line access, such as the ‘green’ or ‘gold’ model) to peer-reviewed scientific publications which might result from the project. Open access publishing (also called 'gold' open access) means that an article is immediately provided in open access mode by the scientific publisher. The associated costs are usually shifted away from readers, and instead (for example) to the university or research institute to which the researcher is affiliated, or to the funding agency supporting the research. Self-archiving (also called 'green' open access) means that the published article or the final peer-reviewed manuscript is archived by the researcher - or a representative - in an online repository before, after or alongside its publication. Access to this article is often - but not necessarily - delayed (‘embargo period’), as some scientific publishers may wish to recoup their investment by selling subscriptions and charging pay-per-download/view fees during an exclusivity period b) Communication activities • Describe the proposed communication measures for promoting the project and its findings during the period of the grant. Measures should be proportionate to the scale of the project, with clear objectives. They should be tailored to the needs of various audiences, including groups beyond the project's own community. Where relevant, include measures for public/societal engagement on issues related to the project. 27.02.2014

Social Sciences and Humanities in Horizon 2020. SSH in H2020 Integrated in EVERY topic SSH topics Impact as a relevant criterion Evaluation criteria depending on type of action 27.02.2014

Meeting the Impact Criteria. Requirements Impact relevant research topic Impact oriented consortium and distribution of tasks „Excellence“ (mainly) Kurzfassung: Impact Criteria: Bei Research and Innovation Actions (RIA) und Innovation Actions (IA) - Expected impacts: Contribution to 1) expected impacts set out in the work programme 2) improving innovation capacity and the integration of new knowledge 3) any other environmental and socially important impacts (if relevant) - Measures to maximise impact 1) Dissemination and exploitation of results 2) Communication activities Management structure and procedures - Organisational structure and the decision-making - appropriateness of the organisational structure to the complexity and scale of the project - Effectiveness of the innovation management in the management structure and work plan. Consortium as a whole - Description of the consortium: in line with project’s objectives, Complementarity of members, Contribution of the members to the project, effective collaboration - Industrial/commercial involvement in the project (if relevant) Originaltext Impact 2.1 Expected impacts Please be specific, and provide only information that applies to the proposal and its objectives. Wherever possible, use quantified indicators and targets. • Describe how your project will contribute to: o the expected impacts set out in the work programme, under the relevant topic; o improving innovation capacity and the integration of new knowledge (strengthening the competitiveness and growth of companies by developing innovations meeting the needs of European and global markets; and, where relevant, by delivering such innovations to the markets; o any other environmental and socially important impacts (if not already covered above). • Describe any barriers/obstacles, and any framework conditions (such as regulation and standards), that may determine whether and to what extent the expected impacts will be achieved. (This should not include any risk factors concerning implementation, as covered in section 3.2.) 2.2 Measures to maximise impact a) Dissemination and exploitation of results • Provide a draft ‘plan for the dissemination and exploitation of the project's results’ (unless the work programme topic explicitly states that such a plan is not required). For innovation actions describe a credible path to deliver the innovations to the market. The plan, which should be proportionate to the scale of the project, should contain measures to be implemented both during and after the project. Dissemination and exploitation measures should address the full range of potential users and uses including research, commercial, investment, social, environmental, policyThe approach to innovation should be as comprehensive as possible, and must be tailored to the specific technical, market and organisational issues to be addressed. • Explain how the proposed measures will help to achieve the expected impact of the project. Include a business plan where relevant. • Where relevant, include information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, in particular addressing the following issues: oWhat types of data will the project generate/collect? oWhat standards will be used? oHow will this data be exploited and/or shared/made accessible for verification and re-use? If data cannot be made available, explain why. oHow will this data be curated and preserved? You will need an appropriate consortium agreement to manage (amongst other things) the ownership and access to key knowledge (IPR, data etc.). Where relevant, these will allow you, collectively and individually, to pursue market opportunities arising from the project's results. The appropriate structure of the consortium to support exploitation is addressed in section 3.3. • Outline the strategy for knowledge management and protection. Include measures to provide open access (free on-line access, such as the ‘green’ or ‘gold’ model) to peer-reviewed scientific publications which might result from the project. Open access publishing (also called 'gold' open access) means that an article is immediately provided in open access mode by the scientific publisher. The associated costs are usually shifted away from readers, and instead (for example) to the university or research institute to which the researcher is affiliated, or to the funding agency supporting the research. Self-archiving (also called 'green' open access) means that the published article or the final peer-reviewed manuscript is archived by the researcher - or a representative - in an online repository before, after or alongside its publication. Access to this article is often - but not necessarily - delayed (‘embargo period’), as some scientific publishers may wish to recoup their investment by selling subscriptions and charging pay-per-download/view fees during an exclusivity period b) Communication activities • Describe the proposed communication measures for promoting the project and its findings during the period of the grant. Measures should be proportionate to the scale of the project, with clear objectives. They should be tailored to the needs of various audiences, including groups beyond the project's own community. Where relevant, include measures for public/societal engagement on issues related to the project. 3.2 Management structure and procedures • Describe the organisational structure and the decision-making ( including a list of milestones (table 3.2a)) • Explain why the organisational structure and decision-making mechanisms are appropriate to the complexity and scale of the project. • Describe, where relevant, how effective innovation management will be addressed in the management structure and work plan. Innovation management is a process which requires an understanding of both market and technical problems, with a goal of successfully implementing appropriate creative ideas. A new or improved product, service or process is its typical output. It also allows a consortium to respond to an external or internal opportunity. 3.3 Consortium as a whole The individual members of the consortium are described in a separate section 4. There is no need to repeat that information here. • Describe the consortium. How will it match the project’s objectives? How do the members complement one another (and cover the value chain, where appropriate)? In what way does each of them contribute to the project? How will they be able to work effectively together? • If applicable, describe the industrial/commercial involvement in the project to ensure exploitation of the results and explain why this is consistent with and will help to achieve the specific measures which are proposed for exploitation of the results of the project (see section 2.3) But how to allow and enable „impact“? 27.02.2014

Impact - What Needs to Be Taken into Account? „Impact“ in H2020 User Needs Effective Measures Innovation Capacity Integration of Knowledge Societal/Environ- mental Impacts Project Organisational Structure Innovation Management Decision Making Consortium Member Composition

? Project „Enabling Innovation“ as a Basis. What Makes The Difference? Differences of public research organisations and their labs in terms of leadership, processes, organization, methods & culture? between and Analyses and Interviews Directors of Research Institutes/Heads of Departments 27.02.2014 5

Innovation Management Relevant Criteria to Enable Impact. Impact Strategy Ressources Innovation Management Enabling Impact Personnel Policy Research Planning Project Culture Organisation 27.02.2014 6

Innovation Management Relevant Criteria to Enable Impact. Impact Strategy Ressources Innovation Management Enabling Impact Personnel Policy Research Planning Project Culture Organisation 27.02.2014 7

Enabling Impact Requires Strategy. Who are they? What are their interests? How can we evaluate information about our target groups? Target Group Knowledge What are the ways to reach target groups? Are the transfer instruments known? Is impact integrated into the project strategy? Impact Strategy Transfer Instruments Emphasis on Implementation Who are the promoters? What is done to advance impact? 27.02.2014 8

Enabling Impact Requires Strategy. Project Innovation Capacity Target Group Knowledge Integration of Knowledge Impact Strategy Transfer Instruments User Needs Societal/Environ- mental Impacts Emphasis on Implementation Effective Measures 27.02.2014 9

Innovation Management Relevant Criteria to Enable Impact. Impact Strategy Ressources Innovation Management Enabling Impact Personnel Policy Research Planning Project Culture Organisation 27.02.2014 10

Organisational Structure Impact Orientation Matters! Is the consortium build according to impact relevant aspects? Are factors known that can influence success of the project? How can the success be measured? How are ressources and competences brought together? Are impact relevant factors taken into account? Is the consortium open for external impulses and recommendations? Openess Organisational Structure Organisation Integration 27.02.2014 11

Impact Orientation Matters! Consortium Organisational Structure Organisational Structure Innovation Management Organisation Integration Decision Making Member Composition Openess 27.02.2014 12

Thank you very much for your attention! Enabling Impact as a tool to improve impact capabilities. Dr. Christoph Köller Görgen & Köller GmbH Vogelsanger Weg 6 D – 50354 Hürth Phone:   (+49) 2233 99 59 0 Fax:   (+49) 2233 99 59 11 E-mail:     c.koeller@gk-bb.de Dr. Ute Gerhards Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Technologiemarketing Linder Höhe D - 51147 Köln Phone:   (+49) 2203 601 3675 Fax:   (+49) 2203 695 689 E-mail:     ute.gerhards@dlr.de 27.02.2014 13