Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an Air-Pollution Episode Ana M. Lazarevska Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Skopje University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phoenics User Conference on CFD May 2004 Vipac Engineers & Scientists Ltd COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS Simulation of Turbulent Flows and Pollutant Dispersion.
Advertisements

Fluidyn -FLOWSOL March D numerical simulation of surface flows.
A numerical simulation of urban and regional meteorology and assessment of its impact on pollution transport A. Starchenko Tomsk State University.
Session 11: Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA 1 Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA Prepared by Dr. Erno Sajo, Associate.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering and Technology.
Session 8, Unit 15 ISC-PRIME and AERMOD. ISC-PRIME General info. PRIME - Plume Rise Model Enhancements Purpose - Enhance ISCST3 by addressing ISCST3’s.
Fluidyn FLOWCOAST FLOOIL 3D Fluid Dynamics Model to Simulate Oil slick movement in coastal waters or rivers FLOOIL.
2003 International Congress of Refrigeration, Washington, D.C., August 17-22, 2003 CFD Modeling of Heat and Moisture Transfer on a 2-D Model of a Beef.
OpenFOAM for Air Quality Ernst Meijer and Ivo Kalkman First Dutch OpenFOAM Seminar Delft, 4 november 2010.
Advanced Topics in Heat, Momentum and Mass Transfer Lecturer Payman Jalali, Docent Faculty of Technology Dept. Energy & Environmental Technology Lappeenranta.
TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.
The Use of High Resolution Mesoscale Model Fields with the CALPUFF Dispersion Modelling System in Prince George BC Bryan McEwen Master’s project
3-DIMENSIONAL SOFTWARE TOOL for Environmental Impact Assessment of atmospheric dispersion of industrial emissions October 2007 Fluidyn –PANEIA.
Flow over an Obstruction MECH 523 Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics Presented by Srinivasan C Rasipuram.
1 AirWare : R elease R5.3 beta AERMOD/AERMET DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen AUSTRIA
University of South Carolina FCR Laboratory Dept. of Chemical Engineering By W. K. Lee, S. Shimpalee, J. Glandt and J. W. Van Zee Fuel Cell Research Laboratory.
Introduction to the ISC Model Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering.
Derivation of the Gaussian plume model Distribution of pollutant concentration c in the flow field (velocity vector u ≡ u x, u y, u z ) in PBL can be generally.
fluidyn – PANAIR Fluidyn-PANAIR
Session 9, Unit 17 UAM and CAMx. UAM and CAMx UAM - Urban Airshed Model Currently available versions:  UAM-V 1.24  UAM-V 1.30  Available from Systems.
1 Simulation of convective- conductive-radiative heat transfer in a cooling basin P. Vaitiekūnas, V. Vaišis, D. Paliulis Dept of Environmental Protection,
Evaporation Slides prepared by Daene C. McKinney and Venkatesh Merwade
Environmental Modeling Steven I. Gordon Ohio Supercomputer Center June, 2004.
Introduction to CFD Analysis
AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION MODELING Types of Pollutant Sources Point Sources e.g., stacks or vents Area Sources e.g., landfills, ponds, storage piles Volume.
Dispersion Modeling A Brief Introduction A Brief Introduction Image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
In-term project presentation by Kanish Jindal Modeling of chlorine contact chamber at West Lafayette treatment plant.
Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System for Environmental Managers Ashok Kumar Abhilash Vijayan Kanwar Siddharth Bhardwaj University of Toledo.
A particle-gridless hybrid methods for incompressible flows
Mathematical Equations of CFD
Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System for Environmental Managers Ashok Kumar University of Toledo Introduction.
Air quality decision support under uncertainty (case study analysis) Piotr Holnicki Systems Research Institute PAS Warszawa, Newelska 6
Session 3, Unit 5 Dispersion Modeling. The Box Model Description and assumption Box model For line source with line strength of Q L Example.
MODELLING OF MULTIPHASE FLOWS OVER SURFACE WITH PENETRABLE ROUGH RELIEF Yevgeniy A. Shkvar National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine
Introduction to Modeling – Part II Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering.
CFX-10 Introduction Lecture 1.
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
INTRODUCTION Many heat and mass transfer processes in column apparatuses may be described by the convection – diffusion equation with a volume reaction.
Evaporation Slides prepared by Daene C. McKinney Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 4.1 and 4.2 Quotation for today (from Socrates) "There is only one.
FREE CONVECTION 7.1 Introduction Solar collectors Pipes Ducts Electronic packages Walls and windows 7.2 Features and Parameters of Free Convection (1)
Lagrangian particle models are three-dimensional models for the simulation of airborne pollutant dispersion, able to account for flow and turbulence space-time.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Sarthit Toolthaisong FREE CONVECTION. Sarthit Toolthaisong 7.2 Features and Parameters of Free Convection 1) Driving Force In general, two conditions.
Intro to Modeling – Terms & concepts Marti Blad, Ph.D., P.E. ITEP
Turbulence Models Validation in a Ventilated Room by a Wall Jet Guangyu Cao Laboratory of Heating, Ventilating and Air-Conditioning,
Stephen F. Austin State University February 27, 2014 Justin Cherry, P.E. Reece Parker TCEQ Air Permits Division.
1 LES of Turbulent Flows: Lecture 7 (ME EN ) Prof. Rob Stoll Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Utah Spring 2011.
Heat Transfer Su Yongkang School of Mechanical Engineering # 1 HEAT TRANSFER CHAPTER 6 Introduction to convection.
Transferência de Energia e de Massa Energy and Mass Transfer Lecture 1: Introduction to the subject and to the course 1.
Clemson Hydro Heat Transport Temperature of a wolf pup.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
Modeling of heat and mass transfer during gas adsorption by aerosol particles in air pollution plumes T. Elperin1, A. Fominykh1, I. Katra2, and B. Krasovitov1.
CFD ANALYSIS OF MULTIPHASE TRANSIENT FLOW IN A CFB RISER
Transferência de Energia e de Massa Energy and Mass Transfer
Types of Models Marti Blad PhD PE
Free vs. Forced Convection
UNIT - 4 HEAT TRANSFER.
Lecture Objectives Unsteady State Ventilation Modeling of PM.
Lecture Objectives Learn about particle dynamics modeling
© Fluent Inc. 8/24/ Introductory FLUENT Notes FLUENT v6.0 Jan 2002 Fluent User Services Center Introduction to CFD Analysis.
Combustor Model Simulation
Heat Transfer Coefficient
PURPOSE OF AIR QUALITY MODELING Policy Analysis
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
Lecture Objectives: Boundary Conditions Project 1 (software)
Lecture Objectives: Start using CFD Software Class project 1
Convective Heat Transfer
Chapter 19 FORCED CONVECTION
Chapter 19 FORCED CONVECTION
Lecture 16 Multiphase flows Part 1.
Presentation transcript:

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an Air-Pollution Episode Ana M. Lazarevska Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Skopje University “Sv. Kiril i Metodij”, Skopje, R. Macedonia lazana@mf.ukim.edu.mk 12/2/2018

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE Overview Application areas of Air Quality, Pollutant Dispersion and Transport Models Problem Description Engaged set of software tools: preprocessors, models, postprocessors, graphical visualization Necessary input data for simulating the air pollution episode (APE) Results Conclusion 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE Application areas of Air Quality, Pollutant Dispersion and Transport Models 1. Regulatory purposes - issuing emission permits 2. Policy support - - air quality assessment studies - forecasting the effect of abatement measures - combined use of AQM with other environmental models 3. Public information - - on-line information - possible occurrence of smog episodes - on-line forecasting - reciprocal exchange of smog information between countries 4. Scientific research - - description of dynamic effects - simulation of complex chemical processes involving air pollutants. - for practical applications - high requirement o computational effort diagnosis, analysis and prognosis 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE Problem Description Simulation of an SO2 air pollution episode Analyzed Region – Grid, Mesh Selection of an episode for simulation Selection of a simulation tool – CALPUFF vs. FLUENT Numerical simulation of the selected air pollution episode over the region of interest (FLUENT, CALPUFF) Comparative analysis of the parameters engaged 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE Simulation of an SO2 air pollution episode Analyzed region and episode - selection criteria Skopje is the capitol of the R. Macedonia, (30% of the population, main industrial center) - concentration of polluters - represent of APEs Simultaneous existence of min.necessary input data emission parameters meteorological parameters receptor data geo-physical parameters 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE Simulation of an SO2 air pollution episode Selection of a simulation tool CALPUFF approach – multi layer, multi species, non-steady-state puff dispersion model - simulates effects of varying (xi,t) meteorological conditions on pollutant transport, transformation and removal – contains algorithms/modules for near-source effects (building downwash, transitional plume rise, sub-grid scale terrain interactions), longer range effects (pollutant removal, chemical transformation, over-water transport etc.) 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE C(s) ground level concentration [g/m3]. Q(s) pollutant mass in the puff [g]. sx,y,z(s) standard deviation of the Gaussian distribution (along/across wind and vertical direction) [m] da,c(s) distance from puff center to the receptor (along / across wind direction) [m] g(s) vertical term (multiple reflection from top of ML and surface) He puff center's effective height above ground [m]. h ML height [m]. 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE Simulation of an SO2 air pollution episode Selection of a simulation tool (cont.) FLUENT provides comprehensive modeling capabilities for – incompressible and compressible fluid flow problems, – laminar and turbulent fluid flow problems. – Steady-state or transient analyses – models for transport phenomena (heat transfer and chemical reactions) – combined with ability to model complex geometries. in order to allow comparison – “try-to-imitate” CALMET/CALPUFF approach 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE Simulation of an SO2 air pollution episode Selection of a simulation tool (cont.) – grid – horizontally / vertically – same distancing – fields of meteorological parameters modeled, as much as the solver allows, similarly to the approach in CALMET (“hour–by–hour”) – boundary conditions – main flow: vel. & press. inlet – modeling of pollution transport (here w.o. chem.reac.) – species transport with Discrete Phase Model (DPM), which performs Lagrangian trajectory calculations for dispersed phases (particles, droplets, or bubbles). 1 step: solution of the main flow 2 step: emissions modeled as point injections 3 step: coupling with the continuous phase (possible) 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE Mass Conservation Equation Sm mass added to the continuous phase from the dispersed second phase and any user-defined sources. Transport Equations for the Standard k-e Model Gk generation of turbulence kinetic energy due to mean velocity gradients Gb generation of turbulence kinetic energy due to buoyancy YM contribution of fluctuating dilatation in compressible turbulence to overall dissipation rate, C1e, C2e, C3e constants. sk, se turbulent Prandtl numbers for k and e, respectively. Sk, Se user-defined source terms. 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE Species Transport Equations Yi local mass fraction of each species, Ri net rate of production by chemical reaction Si rate of creation by addition from the dispersed phase plus any user-defined sources. Heat Transfer to the Droplet Cp droplet heat capacity (J/kg-K)  Tp droplet temperature (K)  h convective heat transfer coefficient (W/m2 K) T  temperature of continuous phase (K) dmp/dt  rate of evaporation (kg/s) hfg  latent heat (J/kg) ep   particle emissivity (dimensionless) s Stefan-Boltzmann constant (5.67 10-8 W/m2 K4) qR radiation temperature, 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Geophysical Preprocessor GAMBIT PRTMET Meteorological postprocessor CALPOST Postprocessor CALPUFF Dispersion model Meteorological and Geophysical Preprocessors Excel & VBasic CALMET Meteorological model MATLAB Statistics, Analyze Graphical visualization, Animation Meteorological boundary conditions (main flow) FLUENT Solution of the main flow FLUENT Solution of the discrete phase FLUENT Analyze Graphical visualization, Animation, Statistics 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE FLUENT and CALPUFF Mesh of the Region 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE Simulation of an SO2 air pollution episode Necessary input data for simulating the APE 1. Geophysical - surface elevation, LUC, surface roughness 2. Meteorological - surface and upper air soundings - modeled surface and upper air data 3. Emission data - flow and geometry properties modeled emission data 4. Receptor data - ground concentrations 5. Mixture properties - species (FLUENT) 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE z [m] 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE z [m] 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE Postprocessing 1. 3D hourly fields of meteorological data p, r, T, |u|, u(direction), r[%] 2. ground concentrations of modeled species 3. Development of the APE 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE Jul 12, 2004 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE Jul 12, 2004 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE Jul 12, 2004 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE Jul 12, 2004 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE Results 1. Formation and Development Trends of the APE are maintained 2. Performance Comparison: FLUENT vs. CALPUFF Advantages: a. aside of the geometry/mesh preprocessor GAMBIT, FLUENT alone conducts the complete calculation of flow and species parameters b. Particle tracking avlb. within FLUENT c. 3D field of species fraction - Disadvantages: selecting/tuning the proper model in FLUENT might turn out to be a time consuming and difficult task 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE Conclusion The comparative analysis implies a possibility of supplementing the both software packages, aiming a better quality of the output However, due to the poor quality of input parameters, the analysis shows that formation and development of an APE can be predicted only qualitatively, i.e. only notification of existence / prediction of an APE The outcome certainty is a function of the input parameters quality 12/2/2018 Comparative Analysis of Parameters obtained while Simulating an APE

Thank you for your attention 12/2/2018