Feedback Team Deployment Division Safety Coordinators Meeting Kem Robinson November 14, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.
Advertisements

1 US Investigator Meeting DIAS-4, Chicago, July 2011 Good Clinical Practice (GCP) for Investigators and the Research Team.
Elements of an Effective Safety and Health Program
Presented to: AWP Managers Conference By: Chuck Hicks, Manager, AWP-230 Prepared By: Brad Howard, AWP-230 Date: November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration.
Overview An overview of Apprenticeships and the Apprenticeship Vacancy Matching Service Your presenter is Anne Rodriguez Issue 1.0 Apprenticeship Vacancy.
My AmeriCorps AmeriCorps and VISTA Programs Create and Manage an eGrants Account Presentation developed for the Corporation for National and Community.
for Cabin Safety Inspectors
St. Louis Public Schools Curriculum Management Audit Speaker Dr. James Scott Lead Auditor for the St. Louis Public Schools Curriculum Management Audit.
Meetings and Conference Call Logistics WECC Leadership Annual Training Session May 6, 2009.
Module N° 9 – SMS operation
Making the System Operational
Preparation for the SSPC QP Audit
Gaining Senior Leadership Support for Continuity of Operations
Baldrige National Quality Program 2003 Baldrige National Quality Program The Site Visit Process and Evaluating Site Visit Issue Worksheets.
1 Implementing Internet Web Sites in Counseling and Career Development James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State University Copyright 2003 by James P. Sampson,
Presented by: Guy Prescott Common Sense Safety, Inc. (530)
Workplace Occupational Health, Safety and Security
Steve Fuller InforMedix Marketing Research, Inc. Medical-Surgical Market Research Group April 3, 2008.
International Atomic Energy Agency INIS Promotion & Outreach INIS Training Seminar November 2011, Vienna, Austria Taghrid ATIEH Leader, Capacity.
12. Does final classification result in promotion? 10. HR Spec. conducts desk audit with supervisor and employee (~ 15 days) Yes No Yes 8A. Dir. submits.
Property Management Contract Oversight VDOTs Outsourced Safety Rest Area Program November 15, 2013 Maintenance Division.
Customer Service.
“The Honeywell Web-based Corrective Action Solution”
. Technology Assessment. Who is requiring this technology assessment? A technology skills assessment is being required by the United States Department.
Checking & Corrective Action
National Incident Management System (NIMS)
All Rights Reserved. National Library Board Singapore Tracking and Measuring Performance of Reference Services at the National Library Board, Singapore.
1 Advanced Archive-It Application Training: Quality Assurance October 17, 2013.
October 14, 2009 Ambulatory Joint Commission. Agenda Chart Audit Updates Chart Audit Action Plan Grid PACE Audit Updates Announcements.
GEtServices Services Training For Suppliers Requests/Proposals.
DD-214 AS1 Calderbank REFERENCES BUPERSINST B.
Compliance Assurance Process (CAP) Permanency
Welcome Telework Training for Managers. 2 Objectives Review Teleworker selection criteria. Review FLSA applicability to Telework. Review Telework reporting.
Environmental Affairs 1 Introduction; Corporate Compliance… Accountability for Environmental Matters “Environmental liability is strict liability….”
Holistic Rating Training Requirements Texas Education Agency Student Assessment Division.
05/19/04 1 A Lessons Learned Process Celebrate the Successes Learn From the Woes Natalie Scott, PMP Sr. Project Manager.
Annual Register Verification Training Presented By: OFFICE OF AUDITOR GENERAL New York City Department of Education.
Joint Contingency Contracting
Exercise Swaps Community Emergency Response Team.
HSS ISM Feedback Teams Next Steps November 7, 2008 Kem Robinson.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Unit 8: Tests, Training, and Exercises Unit Introduction and Overview Unit objectives:  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises. 
Slide 1 FAA’s Special Technical Audit of Boeing and the Audit Resolution Plan.
IS-100 Intro. to Incident Command System
Tipologie di Audit e loro caratteristiche Riunione sottogruppo GCP-GIQAR 21 Marzo 2006 Francesca Bucchi.
Slide Team Leader Training 1. Slide Lesson One 2 Introduction.
Incident Reporting Procedure
DOE-HSS Review of LBNL Science Divisions 10/23/08.
ISM Workshop 1 Independent Oversight Perspectives Michael A. Kilpatrick Deputy Director Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 ISM Core Function Teams Kickoff Meeting January 8, 2008 Define Work P e r f o r m W o r k F e e d.
1. Objectives  Describe the responsibilities and procedures for reporting and investigating ◦ incidents / near-miss incidents ◦ spills, releases, ◦ injuries,
P1 External Quality Assessment (EQA) Proficiency Testing.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Standing TSA/Addendum Process Importance of TSAs Why are TSAs important? – Planning safety into the job minimizes surprises and slow downs, thereby improving.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
DOE Accelerator Safety Workshop August 12-14, 2008 HSS Review Panel Discussion Ed Lessard, BNL Bob May, TJNAF.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
NIEP Evaluation PO&A “How-to” Guide and Issue Classification
District’s Plan for Disaster Preparedness.
ASPEC QSHR June 2015 Minutes
Athletics Certification Orientation
DSC Assurance Team Reporting
The ORR/RA Pre-Visit and Other Prior Planning Items May 2005 Revision
Departmental Safety Coordinator’s Training
DOE Nuclear Safety Research and Development Program
Version 0.1Assessment Method Overview - 1 Process Assessment Method An objective model-independent method to assess the capability of an organization to.
Environmental Quality Program Strategy
Purpose of meeting: Establish Team
Review of the Incident Command System
Pharmacovigilance inspections: what HPRA expects
Presentation transcript:

Feedback Team Deployment Division Safety Coordinators Meeting Kem Robinson November 14, 2008

ISM Feedback Teams Approach Teams focus within home divisions until Nov. 21, 2008 Safety coordinators have classified non-office spaces Feedback teams have been organized into 20 teams of 2 –Assigned based on number of high priority spaces –Generally, keeping single divisions within a team Division Safety Coordinators (DSCs) are main contact / coordination –DSCs are excluded from the 20 teams in order to focus on specific division weaknesses –DSC organize the deployment of the Feedback Team(s) within division Concentrate on weak areas / multiple hazard environments Use as an opportunity for quality assurance and training

Guidance to Feedback Teams No feedback visits during any HSS visit –Scoping: Dec. 3-4, 2008 –Planning: Jan , 2009 Jan. 6-8, 2009 –Data Collection: Jan. 26 – Feb. 6, 2009 Give Feedback to people immediately after conducting interview/inspection for maximum benefit. Discuss with DSC (or other liaison) after each area completed. DSC should ensure that all deficiencies be entered into CATS or QuickFixes (see additional details following slides) Weaknesses in responses are not entered into CATS, but can be entered into

Feedback Interview Team The first member of each team is the leader. The initial goal is to cover just the priority 1, 2 and 3 areas in each Division. MSD has, by far, the most spaces with priorities 1, 2 and 3. When a team completes visiting the Division assigned to it, the team leader should contact Rick Kelly to find out if MSD can use additional teams to do Feedback Interviews, otherwise it will not be possible to cover the priority 1, 2 and 3 areas in MSD, even with four teams assigned to MSD.

ISM Feedback Teams DivisionTeam #Member Name PB1Michael MartinDavid Lorenzetti, Tosh Hotchi GN2Ben FeinbergTony Warwick LS3Ali BelkacemWayne Lukens LS4Michael BandaJason Hick MS5John HutchingsPaul Hargrove MS6Howard WalterScott Mason MS7Ernie MajerMaryann Villavert MS8Charles McParlandSeiji Nakagawa EE9John FreemanRobert Candelario NS10R.P. SinghEd Tully PH10R.P. SinghEd Tully AF11Eve Edelson AL12Axel ViselMing Dong AL13Rebecca RishellAloke Chatterjee CH14Tom ScarvieSusan Waters EG15Cheri HadleyPaul Johnson EG16Joel AgerStefano De Santis ES17Claud LyneisBrian Fujikawa ES18Jack BartleyKelly Montgomery EE19Stewart LokenChris Bebek

Additional Details

Preparation for DOE HSS Audit 1.By COB Nov. 21: Finish rolling stand downs of all personnel within each Division. This is currently on-going. 2.Starting Nov. 24: Cross-Divisional Feedback Interviews of all non- office spaces and associated programs. 3.Each review team will consist of two members from outside the division with coordination by someone from the division being interviewed (typically the Division Safety Coordinator for the division being interviewed). 4.The team member from the Division being interviewed (the Divisions Safety Coordinator) to arrange for the Area Safety Lead for the area being visited to be present during the Feedback Interview, in addition to those personnel who normally work in the area who should be interviewed, along with their supervisor(s) / the PI(s) for the area.

Preparation for DOE HSS Audit 5.Each review team to probe familiarity of personnel interviewed with ISM and to consider potential safety- related issues with non-office space visited 6.It is the responsibility of the interviewed Division to arrange for all deficiencies immediately fixed and all other deficiencies found during each Feedback Interview to be entered into CATS at the web site: This web site has the option of entering immediately corrected deficiencies or those that will be corrected later. Findings that need to be entered into the CATS database should be given to the team member from the interviewed Division.

Preparation for DOE HSS Audit A persons inadequate responses do not belong in the CATS database. Such items are to be stored in the ISM feed back database (ISMfeedback.lbl.gov), so they can be followed up. Please see the file ISM_Feedback_Documentation.pdf for a brief overview on using this database.ISMfeedback.lbl.gov To avoid confusion with the DOE HSS –No feedback visits during any HSS visit Scoping: Dec. 3-4, 2008 Planning: Jan , 2009 Jan. 6-8, 2009 Data Collection: Jan. 26 – Feb. 6, 2009