GTR – Tyres LIGHT TRUCK / C-TYPE HARMONIZED HIGH SPEED TEST

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WET GRIP ADHESION FOR C2 & C3 TYRES Proposal for minimum requirements 1 Transmitted by the expert from ETRTO Informal document GRRF (73 rd GRRF,
Advertisements

T h e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n New Snow Test Method for Tyre Class C2 Agenda 1.Scope 2.Requirements.
T h e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n UNECE Regulation No 117 Testing method for measuring the wet grip index.
UNECE-Regulation No. 64 Tyre Pressure Monitoring Systems (TPMS) Informal document No. GRRF (60th GRRF, September 2006 agenda item 5.3.)
ISO 28580: Information on Rolling Resistance (RR)
1 Informal Document No th GRRF, 6-8 October 2003 Agenda Item 6. Status of tire rulemaking actions Submission by the United States of America for.
UN WP.29 GTR on TYRES REPORT ON KICKOFF MEETING Paris, December 15, 2004 Informal document No. GRRF (57 th GRRF, 31 January-4 February 2005, Agenda.
1 Light Truck Tyres (C Tyre types and LT Tyre types) Roadmap for Harmonization March 2009 Informal document No. WP (147th WP.29, March.
Gtr for Tyres: Update (of last WP ) March 2009 Informal document No. WP (147th WP.29, March 2009, agenda item 16.9.)
Wet Grip for C3 tyres Minimum Type Approval Level
Proposal for Draft Amendment to Regulation No. 117
WP.29, June 2010 T h e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n 1/6 Global Technical Regulation Marking for Tyres.
Geneva, 09 December Commission Proposal on the General Safety of Motor Vehicles Automotive Unit- F1 Geneva, 09 December Informal document No.
Netherlands’ presentation for Informal Group on Frontal Impact of GRSP 6 Oct UNECE Reg.94 - Past, Present & Future Presentation by the expert from.
26 February, 2010 Possible approach for harmonisation of marking requirements 1 IMMA Informal document No. WP , agenda item 20.
India Group Harmonized High Speed and Low Pressure Endurance Test Sept’09 Informal Document No. GRRF th GRRF September 2009 Agenda Item 9(a)
Katie Herta, Understanding Global Tire Regulations Understanding Global Tire Regulations Katie Herta 20 September 2006 Procedure Dimensional Tests Goals.
LT/C Harmonization Update for informal Tyre gtr group 24 September 2010 Working Paper N° : TYREGTR (ETRTO – Progress on the harmonisation work for.
New EU Regulation on General Safety Implementation of Tyre Aspects Presentation to GRB and GRRF. Informal Document No. GRRF (67th GRRF, 2-5 February.
Tire Sidewall Markings. Information Contained: basic dimensions week it was produced types of materials used internally to reinforce the rubber maximum.
Informal Document No. GRRF th GRRF, September 2004 Agenda Item 6
Tyre GTR # 16 IWG session 15 January 23th 2017 Agenda item 4
Document TYREGTR (Geneva, 23 January 2017)
WLTP Informal Working Group
TPMS OICA POSITION Informal document No. GRRF-64-29
Informal document GRB Rev.1
IWG TYREGTR 16th Meeting*
The Implement of ECE R51 03series in China
Tyre GTR # 16 Progress report
Tyre GTR # 16 IWG session 16 Moscow, June progress report IWG
Informal Working Group Tyre GTR
gtr for Tyres: Update November 2008 Informal document No. WP
Reversing Alarm of M- and N-Vehicles
Informal Working Group Tyre GTR
Informal Working Group Tyre GTR
European Tyre and Rim Technical Organisation - ETRTO
WET GRIP TEST METHOD IMPROVEMENT for Passenger Car Tyres (C1)
China amendment proposal for tyre marking of GTR
Testing to benchmark the wet traction performance
Development of Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
Development of Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
Development of the Japan’s RDE (Real Driving Emission) procedure
Risk Management with Minimum Weight
GRBP subjects Meeting 31st October, 2018 Brussels
TPMS and Tyre Inflation Pressure Field Study 2016/2017
GTR – Tyres LIGHT TRUCK / C-TYPE HARMONIZED HIGH SPEED TEST
LT/C Endurance harmonization
North American All-Season Tyre Pre-meeting
ETRTO proposal for UN R30 & 64 amendments Extended Mobility Tyres
Development of Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
ETRTO answer to Contracting Party question from GRB 68th session
Development of Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
Amendment to regulation UN 117 Introduction of worn tyre performances
Main subjects: priority 1, 2, 3
Document TYREGTR Agenda item 4
Snow tyres provisions - status report
New EU Regulation on General Safety Implementation of Tyre Aspects
Informal Working Group Tyre GTR
Inflation Pressure Markings
Document TYREGTR Agenda item 4.4
Informal Working Group Tyre GTR
Tire Sidewall Markings
Additional prescriptions to regulation UN 117
Maximum Load Rating Consumer Tires
Editorial proposal on Definitions
IWG TYREGTR 17th Meeting* Brussels, ETRTO Office, 2-3 November 2017
Document TYREGTR Tyre GTR # 16 IWG session 17 Brussels, Nov progress report IWG.
Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
WET GRIP TEST METHOD IMPROVEMENT for Passenger Car Tyres (C1)
Presentation transcript:

GTR – Tyres LIGHT TRUCK / C-TYPE HARMONIZED HIGH SPEED TEST Document GRB-68-24 Agenda item 19 GTR – Tyres LIGHT TRUCK / C-TYPE HARMONIZED HIGH SPEED TEST Status and Recommendation for GTR No. 16 GRBP September 2018

High Speed Test for LT/C type Tyres 2014: GTR No. 16 (Tyre GTR) adopted with non-harmonized provisions for LT/C type tyres Phase 2: Working to harmonize high speed test for LT/C type tyres Two high speed tests listed in Tyre GTR: UNECE R 30 high speed test USA FMVSS 139 high speed test Key test components that affect test severity: Test load Test temperature Test inflation pressure Harmonization Goal: Where multiple tests exist, select most severe test for each tyre type Assessment Method: For high speed test, assess test severity by speed rating

Approach for Passenger Car Tyre HS Test Harmonization Analysis UNECE Reg 30 HS test to the FMVSS 139 HS test For passenger tyres with speed symbol (“SS”) >/= T, agreed that Reg 30 HS was more severe For passenger tyres with SS </= S, agreed that FMVSS 139 HS was more severe GTR-Tyres specifies these HS requirements in clauses 3.11.3 and 3.11.4 The HS analysis and agreement was based on testing tyres until reaching an ‘end of test’ condition and reporting the number of test steps above the appropriate minimum speed level (Steps Above Limit) Industry used same approach to assess HS test for LT/C type tyres

Non-harmonized High Speed Tests for LT/C type Tyres UNECE R 54 ~100% ~91% 60 min ~240 min

Initial Assessment of LT/C HS Test Severity Earlier data mining, analyses and limited testing (circa 2013) validated: SS >/= S ECE Reg 54 HS was more severe SS </= Q FMVSS 139 HS was more severe SS = R relative severity was inconclusive ECE Reg 54 HS Test is a more ‘efficient’ test Does not include 2 hour break-in and resulting cool down (FMVSS 139 carry over provision from bias tyres; no longer justified) 60 minute Reg 54 test duration vs 90 minute FMVSS 139 Over 3 hour shorter duration test

Industry test program for SS </= R (2017) Agreed to validate for SS Q; apply same solution for SS R Tested all tyres to SS Q limit (160 km/h) regardless of actual tyre speed symbol Increased temperature of Reg 54 HS test to 38°C ambient to increase test severity All results based on SAL test analysis (same as earlier passenger tyre HS test analysis) SAL for both Modified Reg 54 & FMVSS 139: 10 minutes @ + 5 km/h

Testing Summary (2017) Seven Manufacturers / test locations 29 tyre pairs tested (1 to FMVSS 139; 1 to Modified Reg 54) Wide variety of tyres representative of global market: 17 C-type tyres 11 LT-Metric 1 High Flotation Tyre Types in Study: 13 “Summer” (normal tyres) 6 Winter (3PMSF; includes one all-terrain with 3PMSF) 7 All Season (include one all-terrain w/o 3PMSF) 3 not identified

Testing Summary (continued) Speed Symbols (all tyres tested to Q conditions) 2 tyres SS Q − 5 tyres SS S 21 tyres SS R − 1 tyre SS T Load Index (Range of ‘Single’ Load Index values) LI 102 – 110 - 10 tyres LI 111 – 116 - 7 tyres LI 120 – 125 - 12 tyres Load Range (“LR”) (17 of 29 tyres are DOT marked; other have no LR marked) LR C 1 tyre LR D 3 tyres LR E 13 tyres

LT/C HS Test Results Each manufacturer followed internal guidelines for test removal criteria Results analyzed by Steps Above Limit (SAL) Ratio # SAL FMVSS ÷ # SAL Modified Reg 54 Ratio of 1.00 is equal severity; > 1.00 means Reg 54 is more severe Dispersion rates were typical of HS testing, but could be reduced with additional replicate testing Industry members opted for greater variety of tyre types, sizes, manufacturers instead of replicate testing of fewer SKUs. Results showed FMVSS 139 test and the modified Reg 54 test to be equal in severity, with overall average SAL of 0.99 to 1.01, depending on analysis method

Harmonized LT/C High Speed Recommendation Previous industry recommendations acknowledged by CPs: Tyres with SS >/= S: Existing ECE Reg 54 HS test Final test speeds are based on the speed symbol of the tyre 20° to 30°C ambient temperature Current industry recommendations for consideration by CPs: Tyres with SS = R: test to 170 km/h (106 mph) at 38°C ambient temperature* All tyres with SS </= Q: test to 160 km/h (99 mph) at 38°C ambient temperature* * proposed 36.5 °C ± 1.5°C (TBC) 10