Horizontal GIA Velocities and Reference-Frame Determination

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Normal Distribution

Advertisements

Geodetic Reference Frames In Presence of Crustal Deformations Martin Lidberg 1,2, Maaria Nordman 3, Jan M. Johansson 1,4, Glenn A Milne5, Hans-Georg Scherneck.

Glacial Isostatic Adjustment Contributions to Tide Gauge, Altimetry and GRACE Observations Glenn Milne Dept of Earth Sciences University of Durham, UK.

Slides for Ben Study Area 500 km N Great Earthquakes, Strongly-Coupled Arc Pacific plate motion 1938, , M S 7.4 tsunami earthquake 1957, 9.1.

2-3 November 2009NASA Sea Level Workshop1 The Terrestrial Reference Frame and its Impact on Sea Level Change Studies GPS VLBI John Ries Center for Space.

A Reference Frame for PBO: What do we Have; What do we Need? Geoff Blewitt Nevada Bureau of Mines & Geology, and Seismological Laboratory, University of.

Tracking using the Kalman Filter. Point Tracking Estimate the location of a given point along a sequence of images. (x 0,y 0 ) (x n,y n )

Run 1 Ball at rest relative to inertial frame On a flat rotating disk.

NI Assays: Troubleshooting & Analysis of Curve Fitting Graph 1: Standard clinical isolate Good NA activity S shaped curve (observed points) IC50 in expected.

Current Reference Frame Treatment and Future Needs: Regional Arrays SNARF Workshop 27 January 2004 Rick Bennett Harvard-Smithsonian CfA …from the southwestern.

Overview of the SNARF Working Group, its activities, and accomplishments Stable North America Reference Frame Working Group (SNARF) Chair: Geoff Blewitt.

The Hunting of the SNARF Giovanni F. Sella Seth Stein Northwestern University Timothy H. Dixon University of Miami "What's the good of Mercator's North.

Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior Calais E, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, Han JY,

Thoughts on the GIA Issue in SNARF Jim Davis & Tom Herring Input from and discussions with Mark Tamisiea, Jerry Mitrovica, and Glenn Milne.

Map exercise using the 3D fault model Using seismic data to position a dam.

Using Flubber to Study Glaciers A Hands-on Experience.

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F

First SNARF Workshop: Conclusions Stable North America Working Group UNAVCO Inc., 27 Jan 2004 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.

Blue – comp red - ext. blue – comp red - ext blue – comp red - ext.

GPS: “Where goeth thou” Thomas Herring With results from Jen Alltop: Geosystems Thesis Katy Quinn: Almost graduated Ph.D

First SNARF Workshop: Introduction Stable North America Working Group UNAVCO Inc., 27 Jan 2004 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.

SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT

Testing intraplate deformation in the North American plate interior E. Calais (Purdue Univ.), C. DeMets (U. Wisc.), J.M. Nocquet (Oxford and IGN) ● Is.

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F

Workshops for Establishing a Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF) to Enable Geophysical and Geodetic Studies with EarthScope: Annual Report

Jayne Bormann and Bill Hammond sent two velocity fields on a uniform grid constructed from their test exercise using CMM4. Hammond ’ s code.

Original objective = quantify intraplate deformation –Pros: Larger number of sites High density of sites in some areas Minimal cost… –Cons: Density varies.

Using GPS and InSAR to study tectonics, deformation, and earthquakes GPS displacements, velocities (and transients) InSAR displacements.

The Plausible Range of GIA Contributions to 3-D Motions at GPS Sites in the SNARF Network 2004 Joint AssemblyG21D-03 Mark Tamisiea 1, Jerry Mitrovica 2,

Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.

Application of a North America reference frame to the Pacific Northwest Geodetic Array (PANGA) M M Miller, V M Santillan, Geodesy Laboratory, Central Washington.

PBO Frame Definition using SNARF Version 1.0 Tom Herring MIT.

5/18/2994G21D-04 Spring AGU Realization of a Stable North America Reference Frame Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary, Sciences,

Are thermal effects responsible for micron-level motions recorded at deep- and shallow-braced monuments in a short-baseline network at Yucca Mountain,

Assessing the GIA Contribution to SNARF Mark Tamisiea, James Davis, and Emma Hill Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

Assessing the GIA Contribution to SNARF Mark Tamisiea and Jim Davis Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

Towards a standard model for present-day signals due to postglacial rebound H.-P. Plag, C. Kreemer Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological.

12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences

Aug 6, 2002APSG Irkutsk Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan Thomas Herring, Bradford H. Hager, Brendan Meade, Massachusetts.

2002/05/07ACES Workshop Spatio-temporal slip distribution around the Japanese Islands deduced from Geodetic Data Takeshi Sagiya Geographical Survey Institute.

Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future Reference Frames Panel Discussion M. Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada IAG.

Reference Frames Global Continental Local -- may be self-defined

5 – Systems of Inequalities (No Calculator)

Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan

Remote GPS in Antarctica

Cart on Ramp Lab.

Velocities in ITRF – not appropriate for interpretation

Reference Frames Global Continental Local -- may be self-defined

Geodesy & Crustal Deformation

Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF): Version 1

Geodesy & Crustal Deformation

Geodesy & Crustal Deformation

Geodesy & Crustal Deformation

NRCan Velocity Fields & Comparisons to Some Plate Motion Estimates

Where is the NW Corner of Stable North America

ANATOMY OF THE STANDARD NORMAL CURVE

Towards a modernized geodetic datum for Nepal: Options for developing an accurate terrestrial reference frame following the April 25, 2015 Mw7.8 Gorkha.

Investigation of site-dependent GPS errors and monument stability using a short-baseline network of braced monuments Emma Hill, Jim Davis, Pedro Elosegui,

Assimilated GIA Field.

Review of Important Concepts from STA247

HI in the Interacting Pair NGC 4618/4625

SNARF Ver 2.0 Construction

Calculating Net Force.

Stable North America Reference Frame Working Group

Tom Herring, MIT; Jim Davis, SAO

STEPS FOR CALCULATING TIME

Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks

Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks

АВЛИГАТАЙ ТЭМЦЭХ ҮНДЭСНИЙ ХӨТӨЛБӨР /танилцуулга/

Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF): Version 1

Presentation transcript:

Horizontal GIA Velocities and Reference-Frame Determination Jim Davis, Mark Tamisiea, and Tom Herring

Reference Frame

Following Slides GIA deformations calculated in CE frame (standard) GIA deformations after rotation that establishes reference frame

Conclusions GIA may introduce a systematic error in rotation of ~1 mm/yr We need a greater density of GPS sites in GIA-deforming regions (but: sensitive to ice-model errors) Radial motions perhaps more important, but we still require a greater site density in these areas (also see Mark Tamisiea’s presentation) We need to extend suite of Earth models for which we have the viscoelastic Green’s functions. We probably need to make the western “site cutoff” for SNARF farther east than for this solution.

Recommendations SNARF group needs to have working standard solution: Sites well distributed Well on stable NA Velocities and covariances