Euthanasia and applying ethical theories

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Should euthanasia be legalised?
Advertisements

Euthanasia Passive Euthanasia: refusing to continue medical treatment, leading to death Voluntary Active Euthanasia: Killing someone with their consent.
Normative Ethics Metaethics ETHICS
Kant’s Categorical Imperative and Euthanasia
Euthanasia Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Practical ethics: applying theory Michael Lacewing
Aristotle on voluntary action
© Michael Lacewing Can war be just? Michael Lacewing
Michael Lacewing Simulated killing Michael Lacewing
Michael Lacewing Deception and lies Michael Lacewing
Deontology in practical ethics
Ethics—The Basics by John Mizzoni
Euthanasia Quiz Blockbusters Click to enter P S V N T AD I S H AS R E H PVS K I B R M LW P T.
Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism Learning Objectives:- (long term) 1. To understand the ‘greatest happiness principle’. 2. To understand the similarities.
Chapter Five: Euthanasia Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
© Michael Lacewing Abortion and persons Michael Lacewing
Social problems in our actual world THE BEGINNING AND THE END OF HUMAN LIFE. Euthanasia THE BEGINNING AND THE END OF HUMAN LIFE. Euthanasia.
Utilitarian Theory of Ethics Utilitarian theory is a consequentialist approach to judging moral behavior. Consequentialist hold that –consequences count.
Objections to Kant’s ethics Michael Lacewing
Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide
James Rachels 1941 – 2003 Philosopher by trade Argues against relativism.
Utilitarianism. Learning Objectives:- (long term) 1. To understand the ‘greatest happiness principle’. 2. To understand the similarities and differences.
Utilitarianism.
Chapter Five: Euthanasia
If someone close to you, asked for your help to end their life, what would you say? What would a Christian would say?
Voluntary euthanasia Involuntary euthanasia Passive Euthanasia Active Euthanasia Performed because the patient has asked for it. e.g. a cancer patient.
Week 11 Review. From Last Week… Proponents of moral relativism sometimes point to John 8:1-11 as an example of Jesus practicing moral relativism. How.
How to Argue for Moral Premise Using Mills, Kant and Rawls to help your arguments.
Basic concepts in Ethics
Ethics and Values for Professionals Chapter 2: Ethical Relativism
Michael Lacewing Ethical naturalism Michael Lacewing
Michael Lacewing Eating animals Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Michael Lacewing Relativism Michael Lacewing
Michael Lacewing Rule utilitarianism Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia
Religious Views on Euthanasia
Michael Lacewing Mackie’s error theory Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Lecture 01: A Brief Summary
Personhood & the Euthanasia debate
Michael Lacewing Stealing Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Aristotle on voluntary action, choice and moral responsibility
Lesson Outcomes: know what the sanctity of life means
Lesson 1 – Introduction to ethics
Kant: the good will, duty and the Categorical Imperative
Natural Law – Bernard Hoose’s Proportionalism
Introduction to Meta-Ethics
What is a crime? Write a brief definition.
Happiness, pleasure and preferences
Welcome to a taster session in: A Level Religious Studies
Meta-Ethics Objectives:
STARTER QUESTION In 5 minutes, draw a spider diagram of everything you can remember about Consequentialism, Kantian Ethics and Virtue Ethics: Bentham.
Here are my arguments… Thesis T Argument 1 for T Argument 2 for T
Natural Law – Bernard Hoose’s Proportionalism
Religion and Medical Ethics – all past questions
Lecture 10: A Brief Summary
Bentham’s Utilitarianism
Euthanasia From Greek “EU” and “Thanatos” - means “good death”
BY Muteb Alshayban Hamad Alshageri Zaied Alharithi
01 4 Ethical Language 4.1 Meta-Ethics.
Do these phrases describe: Meta or Normative ethics?
Michael Lacewing Rights Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Medical Ethics – the end of life
Intro to Philosophy Ethical Systems.
Contemporary Moral Issue
Natural Laws applied to voluntary euthanasia
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 15 Ethics #1 (Intro.)
The Morality of Euthanasia
Welcome to a taster session in: A Level Religious Studies
Chapter 2: How to Think about Morality
The rights and wrongs about morals
Presentation transcript:

Euthanasia and applying ethical theories Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk © Michael Lacewing

Euthanasia 6 types Involuntary, voluntary, non-voluntary Passive, active

Utilitarian thoughts Act utilitarianism Look at each act of euthanasia individually; not making a rule Involuntary: person doesn’t want to die, so is made unhappy by the thought of their death Voluntary: person does want to die, often believing they will be less unhappy by dying No significant difference between active and passive

Two practical points Morality v. legality Don’t get into metaethics Whether a practice should be legalized is a separate debate from whether it is moral acceptable. Don’t get into metaethics The premise of practical ethics is that we are searching for the (or a) right thing to do. So don’t start talking about relativism or subjectivism.

Deontology What kind of action is euthanasia? Slippery slope Active: more like murder, in that there is intervention to cause death Passive: often combined with intended pain relief Slippery slope An action that is permitted may incline people to perform actions that aren’t permitted.

Two more practical points Separate empirical (sociology, psychology) from philosophical Don’t spend long discussing whether or not the slippery slope would actually occur. The conclusion is often conditional It is not just acceptable, but good, to say ‘if it turns out like this, then this follows’. E.g. ‘if allowing voluntary euthanasia in some cases caused people to seek it wrongly, then it would be wrong to allow it at all’

Complexity So is voluntary euthanasia permissible? Utilitarianism Pro: Individual’s suffer differently Con: Allowing it has bad consequences, e.g. looking at better alternatives Deontology Pro: passive eu is not unjust, and is charitable Con: bringing about death unnecessarily is always wrong

Two final practical points Avoid oversimplification Normative theories might not deliver just one answer, but give reasons both for and against. Noting this is important for evaluation. Don’t say ‘Who knows? Who can say?’ You are the thinker – this is your attempt to try to say. Why think practical ethics should or could be easy?