The New Provisions of the Amended Remedies Directive

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 SOURCES AND SCOPE OF COMMUNITY LAW Michele Colucci Web site: PARMA 8-9 November.
Advertisements

General introduction to Community legislation in the field of Public procurement the classical sector – Directive 2004/18/EC Mr. Jari Kallio DG MARKT Directorate.
Introduction to basic principles of Regulation (EC) 45/2001 Sophie Louveaux María Verónica Pérez Asinari.
EU Procurement – competitive dialogue and case-law Norman Ballantyne Yousof Khan.
National implementation of REMIT Henrik Nygaard, Wholesale and transmission (DERA)
Defence and Security Procurement Directive: Remedies London 8 June 2011 Defence and Security Procurement Directive: Remedies London 8 June 2011 Dr. Aris.
THE EUROPEAN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT POLICY NEW PROCEDURES AND INSTRUMENTS Christian SERVENAY and Olivier MOREAU.
Per Anders Eriksson
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Important Case law of the European Court of Justice by Jens.
The Law of the European Union Information and Communication.
Introduction to EU Law Cont.d. ECJ – TFI (Arts ) “The Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance, each within its jurisdiction, shall ensure.
Public Procurement The Remedies Directive Roger Cotton & Christine O’Neill Brodies LLP December 2009 Session 1.
1 The Current Situation Regarding PPPs and Concessions in the EU Olivier Moreau European Commission, DG MARKT.C1
Implementation of the EU PP Remedies Directive – the AUT case EBRD Project Ukraine Dr. Michael Fruhmann Federal Chancellery, Austria 9/6/
Public Procurement in the Republic of Cyprus By: Theodosis Tsiolas Public Procurement Directorate Treasury of the Republic.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Public Procurement Review and Remedies in the Member States.
Nov/Dec 2003ElectraNet BSP-2 Workshop (khb) 1 EU Telecoms Regulatory Status Governing Legislation Package 2002  Directive 2002/19/EC Access to, and interconnection.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU The Current Remedies Directives: History and Main Provisions.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Martin Oder, LL.M. Legislative Options for Regulating Concessions.
Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation system – EuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN Training on standardisation Support to the Modernisation.
Directive on the protection of the environment through criminal law Anna Karamat European Commission DG Environment Unit A.2 ‘Infringements’
Capacity Building of Public Procurement Review Body Seminar in Kyiv March /14/
Head of Unit, European Commission
Finding a PPP Partner Essential EU Law Considerations Bernard Wilson Maribor, 18 January 2005 Bernard Wilson Maribor, 18 January 2005.
Survey of States’ practices regarding the access to justice in the context of Public Procurement/PPPs Dr. Michael Fruhmann UNCITRAL Rule of Law Panel 16th.
Managing Authority of EU Funds – Ministry of Finance 1 Methodology of selection of project applications for EU funds including preparation of appraisal.
Eliza Niewiadomska EBRD Legal Transition Programme Kiev, 19 May 2012 Building Confidence in Public Procurement Review Best practice for enforcing public.
Towards improvement: Institution of appeal in public procurement – topical procedural and evidentiary issues Kyiv, April , 2012 Oleksandr Voznyuk.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Private sector interests in legal protection Tomaž Vesel First.
Essential Elements of the Complaint Request for Review of Public Procurement Procedure Kiev, 19 April 2012 Essential Elements of the Complaint Hubert Reisner.
Doc.JUDr.Soňa Skulová, Ph.D. Principles of Good Governance.
1 This project is supported by the European Union 3 rd MEDREG-IMME Seminar Reform and Opening of Maghreb Electricity Markets September 2013 MRA (Malta)
Reforms in the Albanian Public Procurement System 7 th Regional Public Procurement Forum Tbilisi, Georgia May 16-19, 2011 PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY 1.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 5 – Public Procurement Bilateral screening:
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Concessions laws from EU procurement directives perspective.
7/3/ Practical Problems and Issues of Applying the Review Mechanism Foreseen by the Legislation of Ukraine Kyiv, March 2012 Olexander Shatkovsky.
Marek Stavinoha Legal officer DG MOVE A4 European Commission
E-VOLUTION OF DATA PROTECTION (IMPLEMENTATION OF DATA PROTECTION REFORM) Developments and Challenges in EU Privacy Law Aspects from a German Perspective.
Better Regulation and the Future Challenges in Transport
Seminar on EU Service Directive Budapest, 3 May 2007 Thibaut Partsch
Code of Ethics and Ethics Panel
New systematization of EU legal instruments in the Lisbon Treaty
European Union Law Law 326.
THE NEW GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION: A EUROPEAN OR A GLOBAL STANDARD? Bart van der Sloot Senior Researcher Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology,
Filip Křepelka, Masarykova univerzita
MARINE STRATEGY FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE
First instance review in Slovenia
Public procurement oversight
European actions.
The Review of the Remedies Directives the Commission’s perspective
DG Employment and Social Affairs
Effectiveness of the Remedies Directives
Timing June : Negotiations with Council and EP: modification of the Financial Regulation subject to ordinary legislative procedure End 2011:
Importance of Law and Policies in the Environmental Management System
Is Data Protection a Fundamental Right Protecting the Individual?
Key obligations of the MS in CAP
Avv. Roberto Panetta LL.M. Ph.D. ISCL Secretary General
Academic Year Prof. Pietro Boria
Andrea Sundstrand Associate Professor
The EDPS: competences and processing of personal data in EU funds
The Treaty of Lisbon and Administrative Cooperation
Remedies in European public procurement
The WTO-Agreement on Import Licensing
NUTS 2010 The forthcoming amendment
Outline Background: development of the Commission’s position
Modernisation of EU public procurement policy
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Public Procurement in Macedonia Achievements in 2014
Item 2. Latest developments as regards the population and housing census round 2021 in the ESS  Luis del Barrio Enlargement, neighbourhood.
Presentation transcript:

The New Provisions of the Amended Remedies Directive by Peter Trepte/Jens Fejoe « Public Procurement Review and Remedies » Ankara 26-27 February 2008

Remedies for Suppliers before National Review Bodies Remedies Directives Remedies Directives 89/665 (public sector) 92/13 (utilities) Minimum standards: Review before Independent body General principles, in particular effective remedies Specified remedies: suspension; set-aside of remedies; damages

Basic principles Effectiveness National procedural autonomy

Amended Remedies Directive Dir 2007/66 amending Dir 89/665 and Dir 92/13 Entered into force 10 January 2008 But MS shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the directive by 20 December 2009

Amended Remedies Directive Explicit provisions with the purpose to make remedies in the MS more effective The new explicit provisions include strict interpretations of existing ECJ case law, e.g. time limits, standstill, notification New provisions, e.g. automatic suspension, ineffectiveness sanctions Upholds a series of provisions on national choice/discretion

Amended Remedies Directive Specificly New provisions on availability of review procedures New provisions on requirements for review procedures Stand still period and derogations herefrom Time limits for applying for review Ineffectiveness Infringements and alternative penalties

Amended Remedies Directive Specificly (cont.) Ineffectiveness Infringements of the Directive and alternative penalties Corrective mechanism Notice for ex ante transparency-content Committee procedure Implementation Review

Amended Remedies Directive Effectiveness Designed to give effective remedies/enforcement Effectiveness principle stated expressly Practical consequenses: Encouraged action by national legislators Focuses attention of Commission on the issue Publicity for suppliers of their rights Judicial development, e.g. Alcatel The requirements of the Directive probably more demanding than the general EU law principles

Amended Remedies Directive Dropped remedies conciliation attestation

Amended Remedies Directive National procedural autonomy Member States have discretion on how to set up the system within the Directive Many explicit provisions on discretion: Review procedures need not necessarily have suspensive effect MS provide only for damages after contracts concluded When negative consequences exceed the benefits MS may deny interim remedies Standing to be given to suppliers under detailed rules that MS establish Remedies may be divided between different review authorities States may require a set aside as a condition for damages

Amended Remedies Directive Questions ? ?? ????