Senior Adviser, OECD/SIGMA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tips and Resources IASC Cluster/Sector Leadership Training
Advertisements

Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
C.H. Montin, Hsin Chu, August Hsin Chu, August 2012 Building Effective Institutions for Managing Regulatory Policy Charles-Henri Montin, Senior.
AGENCY FOR PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION AND COORDINATION OF FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION mr.sci. Vladica Babić - Assisstent.
Implementation of Capacity Development for CDM Project in Viet Nam Nguyen Khac Hieu Climate Change Coordinator Vietnam National Office for Climate Change.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework Prime Minister’s Office, Better Regulation Group The Project Implementation Team.
Integration of Regulatory Impact Assessment into the decision making process in the Czech Republic Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public.
A PROCUREMENT ASSESSMENT MODEL Joel Turkewitz World Bank April 2003.
Adviser, Ministry for State Reform, Lebanon
Key Elements of Legislation For Disaster Risk Reduction Second Meeting of Asian Advisory Group of Parliamentarians for DRR 5-7 February, 2014, Vientiane,
The Aarhus & Espoo Conventions Making implementation work for stakeholders.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Ex-ante Impact Assessment Anca Ghinea Councilor Public Policy.
© OECD SIGMA A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU SIGMA Assistance to Public Procurement Reform in IPA.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENS SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP CONSUMER
Improving Government responsiveness as key to meaningful public participation in decision-making processes: Croatian experience Igor Vidačak Government.
The Commission's Impact Assessment system 18 September 2014 María Dolores Montesinos Impact Assessment unit Secretariat General 1.
Capacity Building for the Kosovo Anti- Corruption Agency Constantine Palicarsky.
CORLEAP Development of the Local and Regional Dimension of the Eastern Partnership Dorin CHIRTOACĂ, Mayor of Chişinău, EaP Co-chair of CORLEAP Brussels.
The Splendours and Miseries of Regulatory Impact Assessment in the Czech Republic Daniel Trnka Regulatory Policy Division, Directorate for Public Governance.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Better Regulation in New EU Member States Public Policy –
Elisabetta Piselli Senior Counsel, LEGIA Procurement and Consultant Services.
Glasgow, 17 May 2012 Mike Coles Developments in the validation of learning in the EU.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) in OECD countries: a policy tool to manage the flow of regulation Regional Capacity-Building Seminar on “Drafting Legislation.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
Riga’s AC Baseline Review Säästva Eesti Institute Heidi Tuhkanen, SEI-Tallinn Centre
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Seminar on Administrative Simplification Seminar on Administrative.
UNEP EIA Training Resource ManualTopic 14Slide 1 What is SEA? F systematic, transparent process F instrument for decision-making F addresses environmental.
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Ministry of Finance and Treasury Donor Coordination Forum Meeting The Report on progress on Adherence to the Principles of the Paris.
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
Impact analysis during the harmonisation process with the EU and effects on Lithuanian economy Giedrius Kadziauskas, Senior Policy analyst 23 rd Fabruary.
1 Quality Indicators of Regulatory Management Systems Stéphane Jacobzone, Chang Won Choi, Claire Miguet The views are the author’s responsibility OECD.
Better regulation in the Commission Jonathon Stoodley Head of Unit C.1 Evaluation, Regulatory Fitness and Performance Secretariat General of the European.
Priorities of the draft National Youth Strategy Sergiu STANCIU, Deputy Minister of Youth and Sports of the Republic of Moldova.
Твининг пројекат Европске Уније Успостављање механизма за спровођење ММR *** Twinning project Establishment of a mechanism for implementation of MMR Пројекат.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
DG NEAR's Centre of Thematic Expertise on Civil Society Support Mikael Erbs-Jorgensen Centre of Thematic Expertise on Civil Society Support Directorate-General.
Civil Society Participation and Contribution to the UNCAC Review Process Towards Transparency – TI National Contact Vietnam UNCAC Self Assessment Process:
Better Regulation – practices
Regulatory Impact Assessment in Poland
The Splendours and Miseries of Regulatory reform in the Czech Republic
Country Level Programs
UNEP/Global Mechanism support for UNCCD reporting
Regulatory Strategies and Solutions Group, LLC
Roadmap for Health in All Policies in Sudan
Eastern European Partner countries
Cesar Cordova-Novion Deputy Head of Programme Regulatory Reform, OECD
EMR Consultation, HRH Observatory, Tunis, September 2010
Assessing a national PIC system
RIA: Communication – building credibility
Building Coalitions for Change Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-making Experience from OECD countries Directorate for Public.
Statutory participatory mechanisms
Draft OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting
Senior Adviser, OECD/SIGMA
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Strengthening the Role of EQAVET National Reference Points
OECD good practices for setting up an RIA system Regional Capacity-Building Seminar on Regulatory Impact Assessment Istanbul, Turkey 20 November 2007.
Ad hoc Group of Experts on Better Regulation
Meeting of PAP/RAC Focal Points, Split, Croatia, 8-9 May 2019
Role of the Council of Europe - International Partner Organisation Justice Programme Prague, 20 March 2019 Criminal Law Cooperation Unit Action against.
Internal control quality assessment
Overview of Good Regulatory Practice
Role of the Council of Europe - International Partner Organisation Justice Programme Prague, 20 March 2019 Criminal Law Cooperation Unit Action against.
Roadmap for Health in All Policies in Sudan
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS AND AUDITORS BOARD
Presentation transcript:

Senior Adviser, OECD/SIGMA Unblocking Benefits of Public Participation in Decision Making: Panel 1: Public Participation that Delivers Promoting Public Participation in Policy Making Through the Principles of Public Administration Bagrat Tunyan Senior Adviser, OECD/SIGMA Vienna City Hall 11 June 2018

What is SIGMA? SIGMA - Support for Improvement in Governance and Management - is a joint initiative of the OECD and EU, principally financed by the EU. Active for more than 25 years, working with EU accession countries and, since 2008, European Neighbourhood countries. Our overall objective is to support public governance reforms and strengthen the capacity of public administrations through enhancing horizontal governance and improving the design and implementation of public administration reforms.

Principles of Public Administration: 48 Principles in 6 Core Areas 12 Principles in PDC Area, covering: Policy planning and co-ordination / Centre of Government functioning Policy development: P10- Evidence-based policy making P11- Public consultation on public policy

How do we promote public consultation? Thorough regular assessment of partner countries against the Principles which also provide policy recommendations that cover policy development area. 2015- Baseline Measurement assessment 2017 -Monitoring Assessment in all IPA countries 2018- Baseline Assessments in Georgia (PDC) and Ukraine. SIGMA also supports partner countries to improve the regulatory framework and implementation of public consultation and evidence-based policy making. Awareness raising, thematic and regional studies.

Evidence-based Measurement Framework

P10: Evidence-based policy making

P11: Public consultation

Main requirements for good public consultation Regulations and procedures should enable effective public consultation and should be consistently applied. The process and timing of public consultations as well as the structure of the consultation documents should enable all key stakeholders to review and comment in a meaningful way. Public consultation mechanisms and procedures should include prior notification to those likely to be affected. Ministries should have sufficient time and resources to collect, analyse, report and use the feedback and responses. The government should hold constructive discussions on the manner in which consultees’ views have shaped the policy and the government’s final decisions. Public consultation should be integrated within the existing policy making cycle and process.

How do we actually measure public consultation in public policy (P11)? -Framework

2017 SIGMA Monitoring Assessments: Public consultation, consistency and accessibility of laws WB countries performing below the average value of the indicator for public consultation. * *This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence.

2017 SIGMA Monitoring Assessments: Key Findings in Public Consultation Area Public consultation is still not forming an integral part of the policy making and legislative drafting process in WB countries. Policy development is primarily seen as a legislative drafting task. There is limited analysis of policy measures contained in draft laws and their possible impacts on all stakeholders. Basic regulatory framework enabling public consultation exists in most WB countries, but application of those rules is poor. Procedures, systems and IT platforms for public consultation are often incomplete and do not facilitate effective consultation. No evidence that the outcomes of public consultation are considered in the final design of policies and decision making. Oversight and support mechanisms in the relevant CoG institutions are weak/non-existent in most countries. This does not ensure effective and consistent implementation of rules.

Weak legislative planning: Many laws are initiated outside the plans Insufficient time and resources for ministries to prepare, plan and conduct public consultation. Stakeholders and citizens are not getting advance notice and sufficient time to plan and participate in consultations.

Laws adopted in extraordinary proceedings Many laws are processed through extraordinary proceedings limiting the opportunity for any meaningful consultation with wider stakeholders and affected groups.

Implementation of public consultation rules remains a major challenge Legal framework enabling public consultation exists in most countries. But implementation is poor.   ALB BiH MKD XKV MNE SRB Advance notice about upcoming consultation to stakeholders Not required Not followed Partly followed Minimum duration for public consultations Report prepared on the outcome of consultations Followed The report on the outcome of consultations published Supporting documents made available together with the draft legislation

Some key recommendations More efforts and resources are needed to improve the actual implementation of the existing public consultation rules. Establish/strengthen the oversight and support function for public consultation to ensure the rules and requirements are followed. Provide additional guidance and regular training for ministries. More realistic legislative planning is needed; reduction in the use of extraordinary proceedings in legislative drafting. Change in culture within the administration is needed to ensure all participants of the public consultation process understand and value the process and use it to improve policy. Ensure any public consultation is focused on discussing the policy measures and content, not the legal provisions and drafting techniques. Facilitate consultation by publishing supporting materials, such as RIA reports and separate consultation documents. Ensure that requirements and rules for public consultation are fully aligned within the main policy-making processes. Avoid creating parallel processes in policy making.

Thank you. For more information: bagrat.tunyan@oecd.org www.sigmaweb.org