Bringing RTI to Scale in Oregon

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Cadre 8 Training, October 9, 2012 DIETS & Drivers.
April 10, 2013 SPDG Implementation Science Webinar #3: Organization Drivers.
Oregon RTI Cadre 8 Initial Training #1 Welcome, Introduction, History, and Context.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Implementation Science
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
Professional Development and Technical Assistance: The National Blueprint for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral.
Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS Coaching Makes a Difference Expanding and Refining the Coaches Role Oregon 1.
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
VTPBiS Intensive Level Wraparound Webinar Presented by: Jesse Suter February 4, 2015.
No, Not the Drivers Again! (Or, RTI is a Journey Not a Destination)
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
Evidence-Based Practices Implementation for Capacity Chad Dilworth EBP Implementation Specialist Ty Crocker EBP Implementation Specialist.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Implementation Science 101 Vestena Robbins, PhD Kentucky Dept for Behavioral Health, Developmental and Intellectual Disabilities.
Implementation Science Vision 21: Linking Systems of Care June 2015 Lyman Legters.
Cynthia M. Anderson, University of Oregon Lisa Bateman, Bethel School District Bruce Stiller, School District 4j Chris Borgmeier, Portland State University.
By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.
RTI: Checking for Fidelity Melissa Williams Director of School Improvement, Ontario SD Erin Lolich Oregon RTI Project, Tigard-Tualatin.
Presented by Shawn Fletcher Special Thanks To: Oregon DATA Project Team, EBISS, & David Douglas School District.
Implementation Drivers March 23, 2012
Oregon RTI The Who, What & How of Participation in
Scaling Up in Illinois Integrated System for Student Achievement (ISSA)
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Coaching for Competence Margie McGlinchey SPDG Regional Mtg. October 1, 2009 Steve Goodman Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Co-Directors.
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
MAINE RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION IMPLEMENTATION FUNDING AND RESOURCES "Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." (Nelson.
MiBLSi Schools’ Implementation Process and Student Outcomes Anna L. Harms Michigan State University MiBLSi State Conference
Oregon RTI Cadre 8 Initial Training #1 Welcome, Introduction, History, and Context.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
RTI Essential Components Jenice Pizzuto Jenice Pizzuto Jenice Pizzuto National Consultant, Learning Forward, President, Learning Forward Oregon Leadership.
Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Jon Potter Oregon RTI David Putnam Oregon RTI.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Using the WIKI to Support Training and Technical Assistance October 27, 2011 Susan Barrett Implementer Partner, Center on PBIS Sheppard Pratt Health System.
Integrated System for Student Achievement SISEP in Illinois.
Secondary Systems Overview What to Know Before Venturing Out of Bounds OrRTI Project January 15, 2009.
COSA SISEP PRESENTATION DAVID DOUGLAS SCHOOL DISTRICT APRIL 2010.
Oregon Response to Intervention OrRTI Cadre 10-R: Technical Assistance & District Responsibilities Year 1 and Beyond.
Welcome To Implementation Science 8 Part Webinar Series Kathleen Ryan Jackson Erin Chaparro, Ph.D University of Oregon.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Year 2 and Beyond ORTIi Cadre ER-10: Technical Assistance.
Copyright © Dean L. Fixsen and Karen A. Blase, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. National Implementation Research Network Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE OVERVIEW. CONTEXT & RATIONALE.
Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. How are we doing? Tools for reviewing strengths &
Module 1: Overview, Assumptions, and Stages of Change/Implementation
Lisa Bates and Jenice Pizzuto
An Introduction to Implementation Tools to Help Build Implementation Capacity SPDG Evaluators May 2012 Michelle A. Duda, Dean L. Fixsen,
Documented District Support and Needs
Coaching as a Process Not a Person
Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri
Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.
Zelphine Smith-Dixon, State Director of Special Education
The Process of VTPBiS Implementation
State and District Role in
Please dial into the phone line:
Response To Instruction
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
Assessing Readiness Erin Chaparro, Ph.D. Kimberly Ingram-West, Ph.D.
RtI Coordination: Supporting Training
Recommendation: ASD Licensed Specialist
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
Installation Stage and Implementation Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Bringing RTI to Scale in Oregon Evolution or Intelligent Design?

Lessons Learned… It's a wise man who profits by his own experience, but it's a good deal wiser one who lets the rattlesnake bite the other fellow. Josh Billings

To Cohort or Not to Cohort That is the question Or In this case the poll

Evolution of RTI in TTSD & Birth of OrRTI 2001: EBIS OSEP Grant; Reading & SPED incorporated 2005: TTSD develops RTI TAP for ODE; OrRTI is Born 2001-2005: Highly focused PD with EBIS teams on MTI/RTI principles 2011: OrRTI Supports 50 Districts to INSTALL, IMPLEMENT, and SUSTAIN RTI 1996: EBS

In the Beginning… OrRTI focused on the WHAT of RTI

Pentagon of RTI BIG RTI: Support for All Learners Little rti: LD Identification Multi-tiered, Research-based Core Curriculum & Interventions Universal Screening & Progress Monitoring Standardized Decision Rules & Procedures Integrity of Implementation and Sustainability rti (Little rti: LD Identification) Effective Teaming & Problem Solving ALL LEARNERS

Today… OrRTI focuses on the How as well

Core Implementation Drivers Successful Student Outcomes RTI Integrity and Sustainability Drivers?! What Drivers? Who’s Driving? Where are we going? Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Coaching Systems Intervention Training Facilitative Administration Competency Drivers Organization Drivers There are two categories of Implementation Drivers: Competency and Organization. When these core components are in place they provide the support to a successful implementation that will be sustained. Competency Drivers are mechanisms that help to develop, improve, and sustain one’s ability to implement an intervention to benefit students. Competency Drivers include: Selection, Training, Coaching, and Performance Assessment Organization Drivers are mechanisms to create and sustain hospitable organizational and systems environments for effective educational services. Organization Drivers include: Decision Support Data System, Facilitative Administration, and Systems Intervention PD is not a panacea to address every problem PD must be housed in a systems to support this effective practices resulting in successful sustainable student outcomes. Core Implementation Drivers Selection Decision Support Data System Leadership Adaptive Technical Capacity to Provide Direction/Vision of Process © Fixsen & Blase, 2008

In the Beginning… We thought Rome was built in a day

Today… We know it takes at least 2 years!

Stages of Implementation Implementation occurs in stages: Exploration Installation Initial Implementation Full Implementation Innovation Sustainability 2 – 4 Years Consensus Fidelity Efficacy Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005

Three Levels of Support Consultation: Installation Full Implementation Consultation: Sustainability and Innovation

One Primary Goal Help districts build internal capacity to Train Sustain Innovate Adapt

Question to Consider… Do you/does your state focus on just the WHAT, or on the HOW as well?

Support Delivery Vehicles Phone & Email Consultation Conference Style Training On-site Visits (177 visit days last year) Consultation Trainings Lab Schools ESD Collaboration Website: Videos, Presentations, Materials www.oregonrti.org

Year 1 Scope and Sequence September/October Initial Training Conference Consensus Core Instruction Universal Screening School-wide Data Analysis and Teaming Implementation Science & Drivers Districts complete District Implementation Evaluation Tool-School Based & District Based (DIET-SB & DIET-DB)

Year 1 Scope and Sequence September/October OrRTI Professional Development calendar completed Budget for OrRTI funds completed Begin /work on: District Implementation Tracking Plan EBIS/RTI Handbook First half of flow-through funds distributed

Implementation Tracking Plan

RTI Handbook Example

Year 1 Scope and Sequence November – March In-district trainings conducted Consensus building Infrastructure Skill Development On-site consultation & training Development of the District Implementation Plan and RTI Handbook

Year 1 Scope and Sequence February Second Conference: Tier II Implementation Science & Drivers April Implementation Plans & Handbooks due to TTSD May Spring Conference Districts receive final implementation feedback Final flow-through payments are distributed Contingent upon completion of Implementation Plan & RTI Handbook

Year 2 Scope and Sequence District continues development, training, implementation, and fidelity checks All of year 1 systems Tier II & III interventions Progress Monitoring Data analysis and application of decision rules October: 3rd Conference, Problem Solving

Year 2 Scope and Sequence December: Final RTI Handbook Due April: Final Implementation Plan due Spring Conference District implements RTI system, including LD identification when appropriate

Bringing it to Scale: 50 Districts and Counting Levels of Support Lab Schools Mini Grants ESDs

“Stop asking me if we’re almost there; we’re Nomads, for crying out loud.”