The design of interaction region

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interaction region design and construction for BEPCII C. H. Yu IHEP Feb.4, 2007.
Advertisements

Qingjin XU Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP)
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Yingshun Zhu Design progress of QD0 in CEPC Interaction Region
CEPC parameter choice and partial double ring design
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
Interaction region design for the partial double ring scheme
CEPC APDR Study Zhenchao LIU
100km CEPC parameter and lattice design
The Studies of Dynamic Aperture on CEPC
CEPC parameter optimization and lattice design
Primary estimation of CEPC beam dilution and beam halo
The Interaction Region
The 13th Symposium on Accelerator Physics
The MDI at CEPC Dou Wang, Hongbo Zhu, Huamin Qu, Jianli Wang, Manqi Ruan, Qinglei Xiu, Sha Bai, Shujin Li, Weichao Yao, Yanli Jin, Yin Xu, Yiwei Wang,
Cavity-beam interaction and Longitudinal beam dynamics for CEPC DR&APDR 宫殿君
Issues in CEPC pretzel and partial double ring scheme design
Conceptual Design of CEPC Interaction Region Superconducting Magnets
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Optimization of CEPC Dynamic Aperture
CEPC accelerator physics
CEPC accelerator physics
Status of CEPC lattice design
CEPC Booster Design Dou Wang, Chenghui Yu, Tianjian Bian, Xiaohao Cui, Chuang Zhang, Yudong Liu, Na Wang, Daheng Ji, Jiyuan Zhai, Wen Kang, Cai Meng, Jie.
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
DA study for CEPC Main Ring
DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
CEPC APDR SRF considerations(3)
Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group
Some CEPC SRF considerations
CEPC partial double ring scheme and crab-waist parameters
CEPC parameter optimization and lattice design
Interaction region design for the partial double ring scheme
CEPC partial double ring scheme and crab-waist parameters
Comparison of the final focus design
CEPC main ring magnets’ error effect on DA and MDI issues
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Lattice design for the CEPC collider ring
CEPC APDR and PDR scheme
CEPC partial double ring FFS design
CEPC advanced partial double ring scheme
CEPC partial double ring FFS design
Lattice design for the CEPC collider ring
CEPC parameter optimization and lattice design
Design of Interaction Region
CEPC DA optimization with downhill Simplex
CEPC Partial Double Ring Lattice Design and DA Study
Update of DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
CEPC APDR SRF considerations(4) -LEP Cavity Voltage &BBU
CEPC parameter and DA optimization
Update of Lattice Design for CEPC Main Ring
CEPC Partial Double Ring Parameter Update
CEPC optics and booster optics
Update of Lattice Design for CEPC Main Ring
Lattice design for double ring scheme of CEPC main ring
Update of lattice design for CEPC main ring
Lattice design and dynamic aperture optimization for CEPC main ring
Simulation check of main parameters (wd )
Lattice Design of the Collider Ring toward TDR
Lattice design for CEPC PDR
Lattice design for CEPC
CEPC Final Focus Superconducting Quadrupole and Anti-solenoid Magnets
CEPC APDR and PDR scheme
CEPC parameter optimization and lattice design
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
Update on JLEIC Electron Ring Design
CEPC Parameter /DA optimization with downhill Simplex
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Presentation transcript:

The design of interaction region Chenghui Yu for CEPC team Nov.7, 2017

Outline Start from detector solenoid 3.0T The design of interaction region Assembly nearby the IP Summary

Emittance growth caused by the fringe field of solenoids Start from detector solenoid 3.0T Emittance growth caused by the fringe field of solenoids Design emitY/emitX expected contribution real contribution H: 3.6pm/1.21nm (0.3%) 0.36pm 0.14pm (0.01%) W: 1.6pm/0.54nm (0.3%) 0.16pm 0.47pm (0.09%) Z: 1.0pm/0.17nm (0.5%) 0.09pm 2.67pm (1.57%)

Start from detector solenoid 3.0T Coupling=1.6% + 0.3~0.5% Large beam size & serious bunch lengthening Coupling Vs. Luminosity @ Z For the 2Cell cavity operation, if the coupling lose control L  L0/2 ~ L0/4

If CEPC has higher luminosity requirement @Z Start from detector solenoid 3.0T If CEPC has higher luminosity requirement @Z Design emitY/emitX expected contribution Real contribution Z: 1.0pm/0.17nm (0.5%) 0.1pm 2.67pm (1.57%) Z: 1.0pm/0.17nm (0.5%) (2T solenoid) 0.16pm (0.10%) Z: 7.8pm/1.48nm (0.5%) 1pm 2.67pm (0.18%)  Set the detector solenoid at 2T or < 2T during Z operation Higher luminosity & Lower difficulty of SC magnet & More free space nearby IP Dedicated lattice for Z with large emittance

Key parameters of CEPC 100km circumference, double ring collider with 2 IPs Matching the geometry of SPPC as much as possible Adopt twin-aperture quadrupoles and dipoles in the ARC Detector solenoid 3.0T with length of 7.6m while anti-solenoid 7.2T Maximum gradient of quadrupole 151T/m (3.7T in coil) Tapering of magnets along the ring Two cell & 650MHz RF cavity Two dedicated surveys in the RF region for Higgs and Z modes Maximum e+ beam power 30MW & e- 30MW Crab-waist scheme with local X/Y chromaticity correction Common lattice for all energies.

Parameters of CEPC collider ring   Higgs W Z Number of IPs 2 Energy (GeV) 120 80 45.5 Circumference (km) 100 SR loss/turn (GeV) 1.68 0.33 0.035 Crossing angle (mrad) 33 Piwinski angle 2.75 4.39 10.8 Ne/bunch (1010) 12.9 3.6 1.6 Bunch number 286 5220 10900 Beam current (mA) 17.7 90.3 83.8 SR power /beam (MW) 30 2.9 Bending radius (km) 10.9 Momentum compaction (10-5) 1.14 IP x/y (m) 0.36/0.002 Emittance x/y (nm) 1.21/0.0036 0.54/0.0018 0.17/0.0029 Transverse IP (um) 20.9/0.086 13.9/0.060 7.91/0.076 x/y/IP 0.024/0.094 0.009/0.055 0.005/0.0165 RF Phase (degree) 128 134.4 138.6 VRF (GV) 2.14 0.465 0.053 f RF (MHz) (harmonic) 650 Nature bunch length z (mm) 2.72 2.98 3.67 Bunch length z (mm) 3.48 3.7 5.18 HOM power/cavity (kw) 0.46 (2cell) 0.32(2cell) 0.11(2cell) Energy spread (%) 0.098 0.066 0.037 Energy acceptance requirement (%) 1.21 Energy acceptance by RF (%) 2.06 1.48 0.75 Photon number due to beamstrahlung 0.25 0.11 0.08 Lifetime due to beamstrahlung (hour) 1.0 Lifetime (hour) 0.33 (20 min) 3.5 7.4 F (hour glass) 0.93 0.96 0.986 Lmax/IP (1034cm-2s-1) 2.0 4.1

Overview of CEPC Linac  Booster  Collider ring

The design of interaction region The definition of beam stay clear To satisfy the requirement of injection: BSC = 16 x Increase β@inj  14 x To satisfy the requirement of beam lifetime after collision BSC > 16y       BSC_x =(20x +3mm), BSC_y =(30y +3mm), While coupling=1% Beam tail distribution with full crab-waist BSC>16 x BSC>16 y

The design of interaction region  L*=2.2m, c=33mrad, βx*=0.36m, Detector solenoid=3.0T Lower strength requirements of anti-solenoids (~7.2T) Enough space for the SC quadrupole coils in two-in-one type (Peak field 3.7T & 151T/m) with room temperature vacuum chamber The control of SR power from the superconducting quadrupoles.

The design of interaction region Without tungsten shield.

The design of interaction region Superconducting QF and QD coils Rutherford NbTi-Cu Cable Single aperture of QF1 (Peak field 3.7T) Single aperture of QD0 (Peak field 3.5T) harmonics with shield coil(×10-4) Room-temperature vacuum chamber with a clearance gap of 4 mm n Bn/B2@R=9.6 mm 2 10000.0 3 0.113106 4 1.052949 5 -0.50883 6 -0.46465 7 -0.11318 8 -0.01595 9 -0.01112 10 -0.05347 11 -0.00067 12 9.01E-05 Magnet Central field gradient (T/m) Magnetic length (m) Width of Beam stay clear (mm) Min. distance between beams centre (mm) QD0 151 1.73 19.15 72.61 QF1 102 1.48 29.0 146.20 Shield coil in the apertures

The design of interaction region Specification of QD0 and QF1 Magnet name QD0 Field gradient (T/m) 151 Magnetic length (m) 1.73 Coil turns per pole 21 Excitation current (A) 2700 Shield coil turns per pole 22 Shield coil current (A) 95 Coil layers 2 Conductor size (mm) Rutherford NbTi-Cu Cable, width 3 mm, mid thickness 0.95 mm Stored energy (KJ) 20.0 Inductance (H) 0.0055 Peak field in coil (T) 3.5 Coil inner diameter (mm) 40 Coil outer diameter (mm) 53 X direction Lorentz force/octant (kN) 58 Y direction Lorentz force/octant (kN) -120 Magnet name QF1 Field gradient (T/m) 102 Magnetic length (m) 1.48 Coil turns per pole 29 Excitation current (A) 2630 Coil layers 2 Conductor size (mm) Rutherford NbTi-Cu Cable, width 3 mm, mid thickness 0.95 mm Stored energy (KJ) 32 Inductance (H) 0.009 Peak field in coil (T) 3.7 Coil inner diameter (mm) 56 Coil outer diameter (mm) 69 X direction Lorentz force/octant (kN) 65 Y direction Lorentz force/octant (kN) -145 Specification of QD0 and QF1

The design of interaction region 3T & 7.6m Specification of Anti-Solenoid Anti-solenoid Before QD0 Within QD0 After QD0 Central field(T) 7.2 2.8 1.8 Magnetic length(m) 1.1 1.73 1.98 Conductor (NbTi-Cu) 4×2mm Coil layers 12 6 4 Excitation current(kA) 2.2 1.7 1.2 Stored energy (KJ) 330 185 64 Inductance(H) 0.136 0.13 0.09 Peak field in coil (T) 7.4 2.9 1.9 Number of sections 3 9 7 Solenoid coil inner diameter (mm) 120 190 314 Solenoid coil outer diameter (mm) 196 262 390 Total Lorentz force Fz (kN) -78 -11 89 Cryostat diameter (mm) 500 Bzds within 0~2.12m. Bz < 460Gauss away from 2.12m with local cancellation structure The skew quadrupole coils are designed to make fine tuning of Bz over the QF&QD region instead of the mechanical rotation.

The design of interaction region Geometry and Lattice Crab-waist scheme with local chromaticity correction

The design of interaction region The central part is Be pipe with the length of 14cm and inner diameter of 28mm. IP upstream: Ec < 100 keV within 400m. Last bend(66m)Ec < 47 keV IP downstream: Ec < 300 keV within 250m, first bend Ec < 95 keV Reverse bending direction of last bends Background control & SR protection

The design of interaction region The total SR power generated by the QD magnet is 603W in horizontal and 157W in vertical. The critical energy of photons is about 1.3 MeV. SR power is 186W in vertical and the critical energy of photons is about 423keV. The total SR power generated by the QF1 magnet is 1387W in horizontal and 30W in vertical. The critical energies of photons are about 1.5MeV and 189keV in horizontal and vertical. No SR hits directly on the beryllium pipe. SR power contributed within 10x will go through the IP.

3, SC Magnet and Vacuum chamber (remotely) Assembly nearby the IP 1, IP Chamber (supporting) 3, SC Magnet and Vacuum chamber (remotely) 4, Move Lumical back and attach to the cover of cryostat by alignment holes (remotely) 2, Bellows and Lumical (remotely) (supporting system)

Assembly nearby the IP Crotch region Helicoflex

Summary Detector solenoid 3.0T is a relatively hard start point for the accelerator design. The finalization of the beam parameters and the specification of special magnets have been finished. The hardware devices are all reasonable. A preliminary procedure for the IP elements installation was studied. Realization is more important than the performance. The optimization to reduce machine cost and improve the luminosity is always under studying.