Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 2013-2014 Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module 4: Analyzing Evidence and Descriptive Feedback
Advertisements

School Leadership Team Fall Conference West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support Bridgeport Conference Center.
Formative Assessment Institute Presented by: Jennifer Nehl From.
Characteristics of Descriptive Feedback
Giving and receiving quality FEEDBACK
Formative Assessment: Looking beyond the techniques Dr Jeremy Hodgen Kings College London.
Assessment for Learning
ASSESSMENT LEADERSHIP SERIES FEEDBACK, INQUIRY AND DEEPER LEARNING Session 2 JANUARY Linda Kaser & Judy Halbert.
Gradual Release of Responsibility & Feedback
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Committed Listening Learning Focused Conversations October,
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking Assessment Targets to Instructional Tasks and DOK This.
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS Statewide Collaborative Initiative.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project
TWSSP Cape Flattery Winter Workshop Saturday, February 7th, 2015.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Shape Group 1 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
Task 4 Mathematics Boot Camp Fall, 2015.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics.
Standards-Based Science Instruction. Ohio’s Science Cognitive Demands Science is more than a body of knowledge. It must not be misperceived as lists of.
Your Name Grading and Reporting on Student Learning What is it? A system of assessing and reporting that describes student progress in relation to standards.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Exploring Claim 2, 3, and 4 This material was developed for.
Coaching Case 3 Group 4 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Writing in Science in Action – 6. Learning Objectives 1. Understand strategies for conferring with students and critiquing scientist notebook entries.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Paraphrases and Wait Time Learning Focused Conversations April.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Inquiry and the IB. Stuents do not learn by doing. on what they have done. Rather, they learn by and.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Coaching Case 10 Group 6 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project
Formative assessment and effective feedback at Manor Lakes College
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
A Parent’s Guide to Formative Assessment Communication is Key! Education is shared between the home and the school. Good communication is important as.
Data Team Training February 4, 7, 10, 2014 Principals’ Meeting February 6, 2014.
A Formative Assessment System That Really Works Lee Ann Pruske, MTS Kim O’Brien, MTL Milwaukee.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
GSS as a Professional Learning Community. What do we already know about PLC’s?
Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Formative Assessments John Vail Kalamazoo RESA. Formative Assessments Please write down the top three questions you have about formative assessments?
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
THE FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT PROCESS BEST PRACTICES. Formative Assessment is a process used by teachers and students during instruction that provides feedback.
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Equality and Relational Thinking: Abstracting from Computation Part 1
Classroom Discussions to Support Problem Solving
Project & Syllabus.
Instructional Coaching Samir Omara RELO-NileTESOL Trainer s. m
Smarter Balanced Assessment Items
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Using Talk Moves to Help Students Engage in the Reasoning of Others
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Number Talks: An Instructional Strategy used to Create a Classroom Culture of Listening, Sharing and Flexible Thinking Core Mathematics Partnership.
The Power of A Number String Purposeful Number Talks (part 2)
Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready
Race to the Top~November Session
A Language-Rich Math Class
Access & Equity Core Mathematics Partnership
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Student Work Presentation and Reflection Project Due: July 31
Student Work Analysis: Looking for Growth in Thinking
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Chapter 1 Formative Assessment.
Presentation transcript:

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for the Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics project through the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Center for Mathematics and Science Education Research (CMSER). This material may be used by schools to support learning of teachers and staff provided appropriate attribution and acknowledgement of its source. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. This project was supported through a grant from the Wisconsin ESEA Title II Improving Teacher Quality Program.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Providing Students with Effective Feedback Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM)

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Assessment Strategies Refer back to your CCLM binder: Seven Strategies of Assessment for Learning Focus is on Feedback

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Formative Assessment: Dylan Wiliam University of London Emeritus Professor of Educational Assessment Known for his Work on Formative Assessment and Student Achievement

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Formative Assessment Take notes on important ideas from Dylan on Formative Assessment. You will engage in a collegial reflective conversation on the critical messages from Dylan Wiliam on Formative Assessment.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Practicing Coaching Skills 1.Listening * autobiographical, solution, expert 2. Paraphrasing * clarifying, organizing, shifting 3. Probing/questioning * invitation, cognition, content

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Learning Target We are learning to give descriptive feedback based on the assessment blueprint and the evidence of student learning. Key question; What does this student need at this point in their learning?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee What is Feedback? Research has shown that effective feedback is not a discrete practice, but an integral part of an instructional dialogue between teacher and student, (or between students, or between the student and him/herself). From Providing Students with Effective Feedback

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Feedback is Based on the Assessment Plan A Formative Assessment Plan (Blueprint) for a cohesive set of lessons: Learning Targets aligned to a Common Core Standard Type of Target (e.g., knowledge, reasoning, or skill) Description of Lesson Description of Assessment Aligned to Target (what data will you collect that shows evidence of student learning) Students Monitoring their Learning of the Mathematics in the Target

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee What Does Research Say? Feedback seems to work well in so many situations that it led researcher John Hattie (1992) to make the following comment after analyzing almost 8,000 studies: The most powerful single modification that enhances achievement is feedback. The simplest prescription for improving education must be dollops of feedback. ~ Robert Marzano

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Characteristics of Effective Feedback 1.Directs attention to the intended learning 2.Occurs during learning 3.Addresses partial understanding 4.Supports student thinking; feedback does not do the thinking for the student 5.Provides the amount of advice a student can act on

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Effective Feedback Directs Attention to the Intended Learning Points out what the student has done well (success feedback) and gives specific information to guide improvement (intervention feedback). Look at intervention feedback on pgs. 58 and 59. Is the feedback a reminder, a suggestion, or a question?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Effective Feedback Directs Attention to the Intended Learning Look at success feedback on pgs. 57 and 58. Does the feedback… 1)Identify work done correctly. 2)Describe a feature of quality that is present in the work. 3)Point out effective use of a strategy or process.

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Feedback and Self-Efficacy Fixed or Growth Mindset? Do students believe their intelligence is a fixed trait or something they can develop?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Feedback Correlated to Fixed and Growth Mindsets All great teachers teach students how to reach the high standards. -Carol Dweck, Mindset Comments emphasizing learning goals have been repeatedly shown to lead to greater learning gains than comments emphasizing self-esteem. -Ames, 1992; Butler, 1998; Hattie & Timperley, 2007

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Feedback on Learning: Dylan Wiliam As you watch the video clip, Feedback on Learning, listen for the two types of feedback Dylan Wiliam describes: 1)Ego Involvement 2)Task Involvement In what ways do the concepts of ego and task involvement relate to fixed and growth mindset?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee There is No Formula for Feedback Use your judgment. Feedback: Usually includes both success and intervention remarks Usually has a focus on targets but does not have to be limited to specific learning target Ask yourself, What does this student need at this point in their learning? Will the student understand the feedback? Can the student take action on the basis of the comment? Can feedback support partial understanding or is reteaching needed?

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Learning Target We are learning to give descriptive feedback based on the assessment blueprint and the evidence of student learning. Key question; What does this student need at this point in their learning?