IFE Wetted-Wall Chamber Engineering “Preliminary Considerations”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
September 24-25, 2003 HAPL meeting, UW, Madison 1 Armor Configuration & Thermal Analysis 1.Parametric analysis in support of system studies 2.Preliminary.
Advertisements

October 2, 2002/ARR 1 1. Liquid Wall Ablation 2. FLiBe Properties A. R. Raffray and M. Zaghloul University of California, San Diego ARIES-IFE Meeting.
Initial Results from ARIES-IFE Study and Plans for the Coming Year Farrokh Najmabadi for the ARIES Team Heavy-ion IFE Meeting July 23-24, 2001 Lawrence.
DAH, UW-FTI ARIES-IFE, April 2002, 1 Results from parametric studies of thin liquid wall IFE chambers D. A. Haynes, Jr. Fusion Technology Institute University.
May 27, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., IFE Chamber Walls: Requirements, Design Options, and Synergy with MFE Plasma Facing Components 1 IFE Chamber Walls:
Assessment of Chamber Concepts for IFE Power Plants: The ARIES-IFE study Farrokh Najmabadi for the ARIES Team IFSA2001 September 9-14, 2001 Kyoto, Japan.
April 6-7, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber 1 Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi, Z. Dragojlovic,
IFSA, Kyoto, Japan, September Dry Chamber Wall Thermo-Mechanical Behavior and Lifetime under IFE Cyclic Energy Deposition A. R. Raffray 1, D. Haynes.
DAH, RRP, UW - FTI ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 1 Thin liquid Pb wall protection for IFE chambers D. A. Haynes, Jr. and R. R. Peterson Fusion Technology Institute.
September 3-4, 2003/ARR 1 Liquid Wall Ablation under IFE Photon Energy Deposition at Radius of 0.5 m A. René Raffray and Mofreh Zaghloul University of.
Design Considerations for Beam Port Insulator Rings
1 Boyle’s Law (T and n constant) Charles’ Law (p and n constant) Combined Gas Law (n constant) Summary of Gas Laws p 1 ×V 1 = p 2 ×V 2.
A. R. Raffray, B. R. Christensen and M. S. Tillack Can a Direct-Drive Target Survive Injection into an IFE Chamber? Japan-US Workshop on IFE Target Fabrication,
June 18, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., ARIES-IFE Chamber Engineering Activities, IAEA Meeting, San Diego 1 ARIES-IFE Chamber Engineering Activities A. R.
September 3-4, 2003/ARR 1 ARIES-IFE ARIES Project Meeting Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia September 3-4, 2003 Summary of Issues, Results,
Advanced Energy Technology Group Mechanisms of Aerosol Generation in Liquid-Protected IFE Chambers M. S. Tillack, A. R. Raffray.
April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Chamber Clearing Code Development 1 Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Code Development Effort A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi,
November 20, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Thin Liquid Wall Behavior under IFE Cyclic Operation 1 Thin Liquid Wall Behavior under IFE Cyclic Operation A.
Design Windows for IFE Chambers and Target Injection Farrokh Najmabadi for the ARIES Team US/Japan Workshop on Target Fabrication December 3-4, 2001 General.
June7-8, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Completion of Assessment of Dry Chamber Wall Option Without Protective Gas, and Initial Planning Activity for Assessment.
July 1, 2002/ARR 1 Scoping Study of FLiBe Evaporation and Condensation A. R. Raffray and M. Zaghloul University of California, San Diego ARIES-IFE Meeting.
April 22, 2002/ARR 1 1. Concluding Sacrificial Liquid Film Activities 2. Starting Thick Liquid Wall Activities A. R. Raffray, J. Pulsifer, M. Zaghloul.
October 24, Remaining Action Items on Dry Chamber Wall 2. “Overlap” Design Regions 3. Scoping Analysis of Sacrificial Wall A. R. Raffray, J.
ARIES-IFE Assessment of Operational Windows for IFE Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego 16 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
1 THERMAL LOADING OF A DIRECT DRIVE TARGET IN RAREFIED GAS B. R. Christensen, A. R. Raffray, and M. S. Tillack Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department.
Progress Report on Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Farrokh Najmabadi, Rene Raffray, Mark S. Tillack, John Pulsifer, Zoran Dragovlovic (UCSD) Ahmed Hassanein.
Laser IFE Program Workshop –5/31/01 1 Output Spectra from Direct Drive ICF Targets Laser IFE Workshop May 31-June 1, 2001 Naval Research Laboratory Robert.
January 8-10, 2003/ARR 1 1. Pre-Shot Aerosol Parameteric Design Window for Thin Liquid Wall 2. Scoping Liquid Wall Mechanical Response to Thermal Shocks.
Aug. 8-9, 2006 HAPL meeting, GA 1 Advanced Chamber Concept with Magnetic Intervention: - Ion Dump Issues - Status of Blanket Study A. René Raffray UCSD.
Nov 13-14, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Effort 1 Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Development Effort A.
Highlights of ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi VLT Conference Call April 18, 2001 Electronic copy: ARIES Web Site:
January 1, 2002/ARR 1 1. “Overlap” Design Regions for IFE Dry Wall 2. Scoping Analysis of Condensation for Wetted Wall A. R. Raffray, D. Blair, J. Pulsifer,
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Update on IFE Aerosol Analysis J.P. Sharpe INEEL Fusion Safety Program.
ILE, Osaka Concept and preliminary experiment on protection of final optics in wet-wall laser fusion reactor T. Norimatsu, K. Nagai, T. Yamanaka and Y.
Design Considerations for Thin Liquid Film Wall Protection Systems S.I. Abdel-Khalik and M.Yoda Georgia Institute of Technology ARIES Project Meeting,
1 MODELING DT VAPORIZATION AND MELTING IN A DIRECT DRIVE TARGET B. R. Christensen, A. R. Raffray, and M. S. Tillack Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering.
RRP:10/17/01Aries IFE 1 Liquid Wall Chamber Dynamics Aries Electronic Workshop October 17, 2001 Robert R. Peterson Fusion Technology Institute University.
April 9-10, 2003 HAPL Program Meeting, SNL, Albuquerque, N.M. 1 Lowering Target Initial Temperature to Enhance Target Survival Presented by A.R. Raffray.
June 2-3, 2004 HAPL meeting, UCLA 1 Progress on Target Survival Presented by A.R. Raffray Other Contributors: B. Christensen, M. S. Tillack UCSD D. Goodin.
ARIES Workshop Dry Wall Response to the HIB (close-coupled) IFE target Presented by D. A. Haynes, Jr. for the staff of the Fusion Technology Institute.
Status of HAPL Tasks 1 & 3 for University of Wisconsin Gregory Moses Milad Fatenejad Fusion Technology Institute High Average Power Laser Meeting September.
Temperature Response and Ion Deposition in the 1 mm Tungsten Armor Layer for the 10.5 m HAPL Target Chamber T.A. Heltemes, D.R. Boris and M. Fatenejad,
Target threat spectra Gregory Moses and John Santarius with Thad Heltemes, Milad Fatenejad, Matt Terry and Jiankui Yuan Fusion Technology Institute University.
Target threat spectra Gregory Moses and John Santarius Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin-Madison HAPL Review Meeting March 3-4, 2005.
HEIGHTS Integrated Models for Liquid Walls in IFE A. Hassanein and HEIGHTS Team Presented at the ARIES Meeting April 22-23, 2002, Madison, WI.
IFE Ion Threat Spectra Effects Upon Chamber Wall Materials G E. Lucas, N. Walker UC Santa Barbara.
Liquid Walls Town Meeting May 5, 2003, Livermore, CA Work performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by University of California Lawrence.
Modeling of Z-Ablation I. E. Golovkin, R. R. Peterson, D. A. Haynes University of Wisconsin-Madison G. Rochau Sandia National Laboratories Presented at.
Action Items from ARIES IFE Meeting, GA, July 1-2, 2002 (DRAFT)
University of California, San Diego University of Wisconsin
States of Matter Matter commonly occurs in one of three “states”
BUCKY Simulations of Z and RHEPP Experiments
States Of Matter K 2.2 Changes of state.
Can a Direct-Drive Target Survive Injection into an IFE Chamber?
UNIT - 4 HEAT TRANSFER.
Chapter 13 States of Matter.
Chapter 10 Preview Multiple Choice Short Answer Extended Response
M. S. Tillack and F. Najmabadi
Farrokh Najmabadi US/Japan Workshop October 9-11, 2003 UC San Diego
University of California, San Diego
INTERACTION BETWEEN PLASMA AND WATER
1.6 Glow Discharges and Plasma
Kinetic Theory.
Physics Revision- CHAPTER 3 – Particle model of matter
Aerosol Production in Lead-protected and Flibe-protected Chambers
States of Matter Investigate relationships among the pressure, temperature, and volume of gases and liquids. Distinguish among solids, liquids, gases,
Changes in State Chapter 8 - Lesson 2 pages
Phase Changes.
First Wall Response to the 400MJ NRL Target
Action Items from ARIES IFE Meeting, UW, April 22-23, 2002 (DRAFT)
Presentation transcript:

IFE Wetted-Wall Chamber Engineering “Preliminary Considerations” Mofreh R Zaghloul A Rene Raffray Mark S Tillack Farrokh Najmabadi Aries Meeting, UCSD June 7-8, 2001

Initial Computations “Primary Evaporation” The target X-rays reach the liquid film prior to burn products and ionic debris and can cause substantial evaporation. The primary evaporated mass can be used to assess: Material choice (Li vs. Pb & No gas vs. Xe filled cavity) Spectral effects (Indirect drive vs. Direct drive) After-blast pressure effect Minimum mass needed to ensure aerosol existence

Time of Flight to the First Surface Typical time of flight to wall: X-rays (~22 ns) Fusion neutrons (>120 ns) Burn products (>200 ns) Debris ions (~1-10 ms) Interaction of the target X-rays with the first surface (liquid film) can be studied separately

Vapor Pressure

X-rays Spectra and Photon Attenuation Coefficient HI Indirect Drive Target NRL Direct Drive Target

Photon Energy Deposition No External Gas Pcavity = Vapor Pressure = 1 mTorr

Photon Energy Deposition Xenon Cavity @ Pxe = 0.5 Torr

Film Response “Phase Transitions” Alternative Ways of Modeling Volumetric Model “Lumped Heat Capacity Model” Useful in cases where the volumetric energy deposition is rapid enough that the resulting hydrodynamical motion and thermal diffusion are insignificant ed ~ ns  td = L2/ =  CP (x)2/ ~ ms Hydrodynamic motion in ed ~ Cs ed ~ m  film thickness ~ mm Kinetic Model “Kinetic Theory”

Temperature Dependence of Heat of Vaporization (Correlating Data) Hv= a T + b for T[T1 T2] Hv= c T2 + d T + e for T[T3 T4] Film Lithium Lead a -1.419110-3 -1.680910-3 b 3.8518101 4.7127101 c 4.983710-8 4.769710-7 d -2.050810-3 -3.011410-3 e 3.8052101 4.6607101 T1 (K) 298.15 T2s=T3l 453.7 600.6 T4 (K) 2200 2100

Energy Density Profile in Pb & Li Films Esens: Energy density required for the material to be at the transition temperature Et: Total evaporation energy

Effect of after-X-ray-blast pressure on film evaporation Summary of Results for Indirect Drive Spectrum and Different Materials Li vapor @ 1 mT + Li film Pb vapor @ 1 mT+ Pb film Xe gas @ 0.5 T+ Pb film P+ / P- 10 103 106 Et (GJ/m3) 11.4 11.7 12.5 Esens (GJ/m3) 0.16 0.60 1.94 Xvap (m) 0.53 0.50 0.44 Xbp (m) 158.5 40.4 10.4 Xtot (m) 7.41 4.55 2.30 mvap (kg) 0.144 0.136 0.117 mtot(kg) 2.0 1.2 0.6 10 103 106 9.15 0.13 0.49 1.48 1.88 13.8 5.5 3.7 2.85 2.66 2.45 10.1 9.8 8.9 15.3 13.9 11.6 10 103 106 9.15 9.14 9.26 0.42 0.94 2.75 1.27 1.26 5.1 3.6 2.3 2.03 1.90 1.65 6.7 6.4 10.7 9.5 6.8

Minimum Mass Needed for Aerosol Existence Assuming all of the ionic energy and thermal radiation energy in the cavity will be deposited later in the two phase region, shall aerosol exist due to X-ray ablation? Fast Ions Two Phase Liquid + Vapor Vapor Slow Ions Pb vapor @ 1 mT+Pb film Xe gas @ 0.5 T+Pb film P+ / P- 10 103 106 Xbp (m) 13.8 5.5 3.7 Xtot (m) 2.85 2.66 2.45 Mliq (kg) 58.8 14.8 5.7 Maer,min (kg) 31.2 31.6 32.4 P+ / P- 10 103 106 Xbp (m) 5.1 3.6 2.3 Xtot (m) 2.03 1.90 1.65 Mliq (kg) 16.0 8.3 2.6 Maer,min(kg) 129.4 131.4 135.0 Liquid

Conclusions and Future Work Interaction of the target X-rays with first surface can be studied separate from other products from the micro-explosion The volumetric model has been used to predict the primary-vaporization depth and evaporated mass from Li & Pb liquid films using the direct-drive and indirect-drive target spectra The volumetric energy deposition from the direct drive spectrum was always less than the cohesion (total phase transition) energy. However in some cases the local volumetric energy deposition was greater than the sensible heat required to raise the temperature to the vaporization temperature. The indirect drive spectrum showed high mass evaporation rate (per shot) for all cases studied.

Conclusions and Future Work The after-X-rays-blast pressure has a negative effect on the total evaporated mass from the liquid film. Increasing the cavity initial pressure relative to the film vapor pressure helps to decrease the evaporated mass In future work, the impulse caused by the reaction (rocket effect) will be evaluated Mass transfer will be considered in detail to investigate both of the aerosol formation and vapor condensation