Who, Why, and How. Who is SAMPI? Science and Mathematics Program Improvement is part of Western Michigan University in Kalamazoo We conduct evaluations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The E-Mentee Guide to Beginning Teaching Success Welcome to the Project REACH E-Mentorship.
Advertisements

Your Contact Information Here. Preschool Closes the Readiness Gap There is a growing recognition in California and across the nation of the importance.
What is Title 1?.
Field Testing Testing the Test March PARCC Consortium 2 Governed by the education chiefs in the states.
Emission Factor Database (EFDB) IPCC NGGIP Side Event at UNFCCC-SB20 17 June 2004, 13:00-15:00 Kiyoto Tanabe Programme Officer, Technical Support Unit.
Co-Teaching and Learning For Student Success Presented by Dr. Elizabeth Whitten Western Michigan University 3506 Sangren Hall Kalamazoo, Michigan
Work-Based Learning (WBL) Coordination The Amended Model WORKLIFE COOPERATION PLAN Workplace analysis Workplace database Framework agreement Workplace.
Infinite Campus Elementary Parent Portal
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
Magdalena Ruz Gonzalez, M.Ed. Project Director III Multilingual Academic Support Unit/ELL Division of Curriculum and Instructional Services
Helping L2 writers respond to writing assignments across the curriculum Part 2 Zuzana Tomaš Eastern Michigan University
Field Tests … Tests of the test questions Jeff Nellhaus, PARCC, Inc. Louisiana Common Core Implementation Conference February 19,
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Coordinating Districts’ Role in the REAC 3 H Network Cara Cusick, Director of District OutREAC 3 H Kerri White, Assistant State Superintendent for the.
Arkansas MSP Grants: Statewide Evaluation Plan Judy Trowell Arkansas Department of Education Charles Stegman Calli Holaway-Johnson University of Arkansas.
Chronology of the History and Social Science Standards of Learning.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
Michigan’s School Improvement Process Model Plan Study Gather Data Do Student Achievement.
Content Mastery Center- Opening the Doors of Success
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L Section School Parent Involvement Policies Virginia Department of Education March 11, 2009.
Up-Date on Science and SS February 2015 Faculty Meeting.
Michael Toole Southwest Plains Regional Service Center.
TITLEIIA(3) IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM 1.
Building Effective Assessments. Agenda  Brief overview of Assess2Know content development  Assessment building pre-planning  Cognitive factors  Building.
Title I Accountability Grant to Expand the SSOS for Schools in Phases 1 & 2 1.
History of Project WET Discover a Watershed Series WOW (The Wonders of Wetlands) Healthy Water, Healthy People Floods Series Educators.
A review of peer assessment tools. The benefits of peer assessment Peer assessment is a powerful teaching technique that provides benefits to learners,
Comprehensive Curriculum Now that I have it, what do I do with it? July 2005.
Schools Animal Ethics Committee (SAEC) Western Australia Julie Hitchens Category B  BSocSci Anthropology (Hons)(Curtin)  PGradDipOccHlthSfty (Curtin)
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents Insert School Name/Date.
The Regionalization Project New Regional Field Coordinator Orientation.
Common Core State Standards Common Core State Standards State Board of Education October 22, 2009.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 Lesson Study Presented by: Darliny G. Katz, Instructional Reading Specialist Florida.
Welcome to our COFFEE TALK!!!!
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Reading First Overview of 2004 Site Visits Jane Granger, M.S.
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Transtions in West Virginia Melissa Gholson Office of Assessment.
Suggested training for region, district, and campus professionals 9/24/2014Texas Education Agency – Student Assessment Division 1.
Strengthening “ Place-Based Education” on the Sunshine Coast A “Grassroots” Model.
Project WET Generation 2.0 Educate Empower Act. to reach Children, Parents, Educators and Communities of the World with Water Education. The Mission of.
Our time today… 10/7/11PSESD Assistant Superintendent CCSS Update 2  Updates on CCSS  Implementation discussion….  What do curriculum directors want.
Texas Regional Collaboratives for Excellence in Science Teaching Guidelines for Program Evaluation Presented by Carol L. Fletcher, Ph.D. Project Manager.
CREATING A LOCAL SYSTEM OF ASSESSMENTS WCPS ACTION PLAN.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction English Learner Program Categorical Program Monitoring Bilingual.
CAA Options: Collection of Evidence CTE Connection December 8, 2006 Rod Duckworth, Director of Career and Technical Education OSPI.
Evaluation Structure. 2| Evaluation – A Multi-layered Approach All AHEC awardees are conducting pre and post tests as well as focus groups with an external.
CaMSP Science Assessment Webinar Public Works, Inc. Sharing Lessons Learned in the Development and Use of Science Assessments for CaMSP Teachers and Students.
Providers Guide to Great Start to Quality Validation Process April 2, 2016 Michigan Association for the Education of Young Children Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Developed by the Southern Alberta Professional Development Consortium (SAPDC) as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation of.
RPDC’s Help Improve Student Achievement
Learning Management System
UPDATE Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation:  A Data-Informed Approach to State Program Review Presentation to the Alabama State Board of Education.
Common Core State Standards
Common Core State Standards
Understanding Your Child’s Report Card
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Self-Directed Learning in Formal Education Settings
Background First ERP written in 1991 Revised in 1998
Russ Brock Coordinator of Programs
Schools of Excellence Recognition Program For Century Learning
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
REPORTING.
School Title I Stakeholder Meeting
What is does it mean to be a Title I School?
Hands-On: FSA Assessments For Foreign Schools
TEMPLATE – Annual Title I Meeting
Self-Assessment Facilitators Guide Review and Resource Update
Presentation transcript:

Who, Why, and How

Who is SAMPI? Science and Mathematics Program Improvement is part of Western Michigan University in Kalamazoo We conduct evaluations for educational programs of various kinds, including K-16 schools, non-formal educators, and regional or statewide systems Mark Jenness is the director Cynthia Halderson is the senior research assistant Crystal Stein is the office coordinator Jack Christensen is the webinar coordinator

Our History with Project WET SAMPI conducted a national field test for first- generation Project WET activities with classroom teachers and non-school educators in 1994 Field reviews involved scientists, DNR, conservation and other environmental professionals All comments were summarized and reported to Project WET staff for revision of activities

Project WET writers feedback Writers will tell you: activities in the Project WET Curriculum and Activity Guide were much more effective as a result of field testers sharing their experiences and detailed suggestions for improvement

How Feedback Works SAMPI staff assign activities for review Activities will be sent to you as available Make plans for testing activities with your students Take notes of any questions or confusion during the field test While the experience is fresh, complete the appropriate Feedback Form

Accessing Feedback Forms Teachers complete an on-line Feedback Form at the address in their assignment Non-school educators can access their Feedback Form from the SAMPI website: Back-up forms and a copy of this presentation are also available at the SAMPI website above.

What Feedback is Requested The Feedback Form has six parts: Describe: activity, teacher, students, and setting How activity was used Clarity of activity layout Activity content Activity effectiveness Summarizing comments

Most Useful Information Rating items tell us whether various parts of an activity are working or not Your comments provide the most useful information Identify any part of the activity students found confusing Describe what you did to clarify Identify any part that students found difficult Describe what you did to provide missing information so students could continue

General Guidelines Read through all parts of the activity when planning Gather any instructional resources needed Conduct all parts of the activity with students Take notes on both planning and implementation, including any student difficulties Complete the Feedback Form while impressions are fresh in mind

How to Contact Us To see this presentation again, go to the SAMPI website: If you have difficulty with the online Classroom Teacher Feedback Form, contact Crystal Stein at Non-school educators should their Feedback Forms to Crystal Stein at

Benefits to Project WET Informed, professional feedback based on use of the activity with learners of various ages in a variety of settings to use for revision Suggestions for additional resources – technological, literary, informational Wider awareness across the country of new water- related educational activities

Benefits to You New activities to use with your student groups The opportunity for Project WET to acknowledge your contribution to an administrator or superordinate A free copy of the Generation 2 Project WET Curriculum and Activity Guide Your name and organizational affiliation listed as field testers in the new Guide