Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Novel Cancer Therapeutic Using Thrombospondin 1 in Dendritic Cells
Advertisements

Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
Complexes of trophoblastic peptides and heat shock protein 70 as a novel contraceptive vaccine in a mouse model  Mei Han, Yuan Yao, Wangjiang Zeng, Yanfang.
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Induction of Immunity to Neuroblastoma Early after Syngeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Using a Novel Mouse Tumor Vaccine  Weiqing Jing,
by Norman Nausch, Ioanna E
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 119, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
by Bindu Varghese, Adam Widman, James Do, Behnaz Taidi, Debra K
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Combination Therapy Using IL-2 and Anti-CD25 Results in Augmented Natural Killer Cell–Mediated Antitumor Responses  William H.D. Hallett, Erik Ames, Maite.
Xinchun Chen, Yi Zeng, Gang Li, Nicolas Larmonier, Michael W
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Essential Role of Interleukin-12/23p40 in the Development of Graft-versus-Host Disease in Mice  Yongxia Wu, David Bastian, Steven Schutt, Hung Nguyen,
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
T Cells Redirected to EphA2 for the Immunotherapy of Glioblastoma
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (December 2008)
Oncolytic VSV Primes Differential Responses to Immuno-oncology Therapy
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Activation of Akt as a Mechanism for Tumor Immune Evasion
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Thomas S. Griffith, Elizabeth L. Broghammer  Molecular Therapy 
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
CTLA-4 Regulates Induction of Anergy In Vivo
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Skin Delivery of Clec4a Small Hairpin RNA Elicited an Effective Antitumor Response by Enhancing CD8+ Immunity In Vivo  Tzu-Yang Weng, Chia-Jung Li, Chung-Yen.
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
In Vivo Expansion of Regulatory T cells With IL-2/IL-2 mAb Complexes Prevents Anti- factor VIII Immune Responses in Hemophilia A Mice Treated With Factor.
Maraba Virus as a Potent Oncolytic Vaccine Vector
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Moutih Rafei, Elena Birman, Kathy Forner, Jacques Galipeau 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Genetic Immunization With In Vivo Dendritic Cell-targeting Liposomal DNA Vaccine Carrier Induces Long-lasting Antitumor Immune Response  Arup Garu, Gopikrishna.
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
MRNA Vaccine with Antigen-Specific Checkpoint Blockade Induces an Enhanced Immune Response against Established Melanoma  Yuhua Wang, Lu Zhang, Zhenghong.
Genetic Targeting of the Active Transcription Factor XBP1s to Dendritic Cells Potentiates Vaccine-induced Prophylactic and Therapeutic Antitumor Immunity 
Loss of Transgene following ex vivo Gene Transfer is Associated with a Dominant Th2 Response: Implications for Cutaneous Gene Therapy  Zhenmei Lu, Soosan.
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
A Novel Cancer Therapeutic Using Thrombospondin 1 in Dendritic Cells
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Interleukin-17 is Produced by Both Th1 and Th2 Lymphocytes, and Modulates Interferon-γ- and Interleukin-4-Induced Activation of Human Keratinocytes  Cristina.
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 404-410 (February 2007) Inhibitor of Heat-shock Protein 90 Enhances the Antitumor Effect of DNA Vaccine Targeting Clients of Heat-shock Protein  Chi-Chen Lin, Cheng-Fen Tu, Meng-Chi Yen, Ming-Chuan Chen, Wan-Jung Hsieh, Wen-Chang Chang, Wen-Tsang Chang, Ming-Derg Lai  Molecular Therapy  Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 404-410 (February 2007) DOI: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300014 Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 GA downregulates Her-2/neu but upregulates MHC class I and HSP70 expression in MBT-2 tumors overexpressing p185neu. (a) Tumors were treated with escalating amounts of GA for the indicated periods, and tumor lysates were harvested and subjected to Western blot analysis with the indicated antibodies. (b) MBT-2 tumors were treated with various doses of GA, and the surface MHC class I was examined by flow cytometric analysis. Gray histogram plots represent GA treatment. White histogram plots represent the saline controls and the black dotted lines represent the isotype-matched controls. (c) Tumors were treated with GA, and the expression HSP70 was examined by Western blotting, and the fold represents the HSP70/actin ratio. Molecular Therapy 2007 15, 404-410DOI: (10.1038/sj.mt.6300014) Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Therapeutic effects of GA and N′-neu DNA vaccine on established MBT-2 tumors. (a) Tumor volume in mice treated with GA was measured every 3 days; bars, ±SD. (b) Lifespan of C3H mice after s.c. challenge with MBT-2 cells; survival data were subjected to Kaplan–Meier analysis. (c) Experimental protocol for combination treatment with GA and N′-neu DNA vaccine. (d) Tumor volume of mice treated with combination of GA and N′-neu DNA vaccine was measured every 3 days; bars, ±SD. (e) Lifespan of C3H mice after s.c. challenge with MBT-2 cells; survival data were subjected to Kaplan–Meier analysis. Numbers in parentheses are the number of mice in treatment groups. *Statistically significant difference compared with the control mice. **Statistically significant difference between the GA and N′-neu DNA vaccine combination and the N′-neu DNA vaccine alone. Molecular Therapy 2007 15, 404-410DOI: (10.1038/sj.mt.6300014) Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Humoral and cellular immunity. (a) IgG and IgG subtype of anti-p185neu antibody titers in the serum samples was determined with an ELISA. The data represent the average titer of three mice. (b) Cytotoxicity assay of lymphocytes. Target cells are MBT-2-luciferase cells cultured in vitro. Effector cells were lymphocytes derived from mice treated with the N′-neu DNA vaccine, a combination of GA and the N′-neu DNA vaccine, or saline (control). Cytotoxicity was determined by the luciferase release. Each point represents the average of triplicate wells. (c) Adoptive transfer of splenocytes of immunized mice. MBT-2 tumor-bearing mice were injected intravenously with splenocytes isolated from the mice treated with the N′-neu DNA vaccine or a combination of GA and the N′-neu DNA vaccine as indicated. Tumor bearing control animals received no splenocytes (MBT-2) or received splenocytes from mice that received saline treatments (MBT-2+saline). (d) Cytokine profile, pooled splenocytes from each group of mice were stimulated with p185neu antigen. Supernatants were collected 2 days after stimulation and the concentration of interferon-γ and interleukin-4 were measured with ELISA. (e) Susceptibility of GA-treated tumor cells to cytotoxic lymphocytes. Effector cells were lymphocytes isolated from mice immunized with the N′-neu DNA vaccine or from control mice. Target cells were isolated from established GA-treated or untreated MBT-2-luciferase tumors. Statistically significant differences between treated and control mice are represented with *(P<0.05), **(P<0.01). Molecular Therapy 2007 15, 404-410DOI: (10.1038/sj.mt.6300014) Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The effects of CD4+ T-cell depletion or CD8+ T-cell depletion on the therapeutic efficacy of GA and/or the N′-neu-DNA vaccine. (a) Protocol for in vivo depletion of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells. MBT-2 tumor-bearing mice were intraperitoneally injected with 300 μg of anti-CD4 antibody, 500 μg of anti-CD8 antibody, or an isotype-matched control mAb at weekly intervals starting 2 days before the first treatment. (b) Lifespan of C3H mice after s.c. challenge with MBT-2 cells; survival data were subjected to Kaplan–Meier analysis. Molecular Therapy 2007 15, 404-410DOI: (10.1038/sj.mt.6300014) Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Therapeutic effects of GA and C′-met DNA vaccines on established B16 tumors in C57BL/6 mice. (a) Therapeutic protocols of GA alone and in combination with the C′-met DNA vaccine. Lifespan of (b) B16 tumor bearing C57BL/6 mice treated with GA alone or (c) a combination of GA and the C′-met DNA vaccine is shown by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Numbers in parentheses are numbers of mice in treatment groups. *Statistically significant differences between treated and control mice (P<0.05). **Statistically significant differences between mice treated with the combination of GA and the C′-met DNA vaccine and mice treated with either GA alone or the C′-met DNA vaccine alone (P<0.05). Molecular Therapy 2007 15, 404-410DOI: (10.1038/sj.mt.6300014) Copyright © 2007 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions