Evaluation of the marketing standards framework for fishery and aquaculture products Presentation to the Market Advisory Council 23 May 2018 Brussels.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fishery management and interested parties
Advertisements

Project of a Market Observatory Favignana FAO workshop September 2009 Philippe Paquotte - DG Maritime affairs and fisheries Markets and Trade.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation Inspiring other policy domains – towards the establishment of a European.
EU SME policy The “Small Business Act” for Europe and its Review
Presentation 4.2 CODEX STANDARDS ON SAFETY Section IV Food Quality and Standards Service (ESNS) Food and Nutrition Division. FAO.
Annual Report Executive Summaries Food and Veterinary Office Unit F1-Country profiles, Coordination of Follow-up.
CHESSS CEN Horizontal European Service Standardization Strategy Module 3: “Safety in the Delivery of Services” prepared by Axel Mangelsdorf Berlin University.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Animal Welfare EU Strategy Introduction Community Action Plan The Commission's commitment to EU citizens, stakeholders, the EP and.
Consultation on eco-labelling for fishery products.
European Commission Rita L’ABBATE Legal aspects linked to internal market DG Enterprise and Industry MARKET SURVEILLANCE COMMUNITY FRAMEWORK UNECE “MARS”
Setting the context: Full costing and the financial sustainability of universities Country Workshop: POLAND EUIMA – Full Costing Project University of.
1 The Future Role of the Food and Veterinary Office M.C. Gaynor, Director, FVO EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate.
E-PRTR Refit evaluation and Article 17 official data review 1 2 nd Global Round Table on PRTRs 25 November 2015 Andreas Grangler.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
Evaluating Engagement Judging the outcome above the noise of squeaky wheels Heather Shaw, Department of Sustainability & Environment Jessica Dart, Clear.
Creating the environment for business Assessment of the Implementation by the Member States of the IPPC Directive Advisory Group Meeting Friday 13 th January.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
Work Package 2 Targeting innovation chain processes to tackle Societal Challenges Task 2.2 Involvement of society in societal challenges.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
UNDERSTANDING ISO 9001:2008.
Session 3 General RIA Training 6–8 July 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR
Conference on the simplification of the Common Agricultural Policy
Committee on Transport and Tourism
Eastern European Partner countries
Development and Energy in Africa
The interim evaluation of Horizon 2020 – the way forward
New EU Multi-Annual Programme
Overview Of CREW Activities July 2013 – June 2014
Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
18th European Ecoinnovation Forum – Barcelona May 2015 OUTCOMES
Support in the implementation of the REFIT actions for ELD phase 2
Professional & Scientific Council Update
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
Cathy Hughes and Neil Crosby
Current Developments at EU level
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
Fitness check on chemicals legislation (excluding REACH)
Carl Bro a/s - Team Leader - IPPC-experts - Quality Assurance
Animal Welfare EU Strategy
Introduction to Better Regulation
Sustainable Aquaculture Joint guidance document on MSFD and WFD
Beyond Regulatory Compliance
IPPC Review Stakeholder Hearing
Ambient Air Quality Directives
Peer reviews DIME/ITDG Steering Group 15 February 2019 Claudia Junker
E-PRTR Refit evaluation and Article 17 official data review
FEAD Evaluation Partnership meeting 10 March, 2016 DG EMPL G4
Information on projects
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
European Commission, DG Environment Air & Industrial Emissions Unit
Morbidity statistics Item 10 of the agenda
Conference on the simplification of the Common Agricultural Policy
Fitness Check EU Water Policy
Cumulative Cost Assessment of the EU Chemical Industry
Guidelines on the Mid-term Evaluation
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation CGBN meeting
Sylvia Barova Unit B.3 – Nature DG Environment, European Commission
Outline Background: development of the Commission’s position
Finalisation of study report
Evaluation of the Consumer Credit Directive (2008/48/EC)
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
Issues of Technology Needs Assessment for Climate Change
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Building the Single Market for Green Products (SMGP)
Finalisation of study report
© Fresh Thoughts Consulting
WFD CIS Working Group Meeting Brussels, 4/4/2019
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of the marketing standards framework for fishery and aquaculture products Presentation to the Market Advisory Council 23 May 2018 Brussels

Who we are

Agenda Objectives of the study Presentation of the team Objectives of EU Marketing Standards Overview of the methodology Consultation of stakeholders Evaluation questions to be addressed Next steps Discussion

Objectives of the study The Evaluation will examine the 5 evaluation criteria established by the EU Better Regulation Package: relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, coherence and EU added value of the current marketing standards framework for fishery products In doing so, the evaluation team will pay a particular attention to : The ability of marketing standards to address market needs The potential for simplification, improved implementation and enforceability; the adequacy of the scope of marketing standards ; the impact on the supply of the EU market; Council Regulation (EC) No 2136/89: preserved sardines and sardine-like products; Council Regulation (EC) No 1536/92: preserved tuna and bonito products; and Council Regulation (EC) No 2406/96: fresh and chilled fishery products.

Presentation of the team

Objectives of EU Marketing Standards Realise the full potential of the internal market by ensuring that products marketed within the EU comply with the same quality requirements. Facilitate marketing activities based on fair competition and help to improve the profitability of production. Ensure that imported products meet the same requirement as Union products Ensure that the EU market is supplied with sustainable products

Overall approach Inception Preliminary desk research Mar 2018 Apr 2018 Aug 2018 Nov 2018 Mar 2019 Inception Preliminary desk research Familiarisation interviews Refining Methods and tools Data collection Desk research Open Public Consultation (OPC) EU-wide survey for National Authorities 6 Case Studies including interviews with the industry EU-level organisations Analysis Background description Analysis and triangulation of data Answers to the Evaluation Questions Conclusions Recommendations Recommendations based on data collection and analysis Test recommendations with stakeholders Final recommendations

Consultation of stakeholders (1) EU-wide consultation of public authorities: Online questionnaire with possible follow-up Obtain information on the implementation and control of EU marketing standards from all MS Obtain feedback on NA’s perception from all MS Specific emphasis on efficiency and enforceability issues Consultation of stakeholders in the supply chain: Individual interviews and/or focus groups will be carried out in 6 MS : DK, ES, FR, HR, IT and NL Obtain feedback from the industry on costs and benefits of marketing standards Will cover the different sub-sectors and all the supply chain stages Specific emphasis on market needs and usefulness

Consultation of stakeholders (2) Open Public Consultation : Allow to target a wider audience Make sure that all relevant stakeholders have the opportunity to express their views Will include questions for both an expert and a non-expert audience EU level: Interviews at EU level (relevant Commission staff and EU representative organisations) Discussion at expert group and advisory council level

Evaluation questions The evaluation study is structured around 5 evaluation criteria : Relevance: to what extent do the current scope and criteria used in EU marketing standards address market needs? i.e. is the information provided relevant at the different stages of the supply chain and for the different sub-sectors covered? Effectiveness: how do marketing standards affect the trade and marketing of fishery products? What is the impact on product quality, market fairness and transparency, level-playing field between EU and non-EU products, other CFP objectives? Efficiency: what are the costs for administrations and for operators? Are the benefits worth the costs? Would there be better alternatives to achieve the same results? Is there potential for simplification? Coherence: coherence with other EU rules (food safety, hygiene, consumer information, conservation rules), as well as with other relevant norms and standards EU added value: what can be achieved by EU intervention, that would not be achieved otherwise (e.g. through national public standards or private certifications)?

Next steps The coming months will be dedicated to gathering data and information from the various stakeholders, in particular NAs and the industry (representative organisations and a sample of operators) The NA survey and case studies are expected to run until mid-July Next deliverable is due in August 2018 and will include the background analysis and report on the data collection The OPC is expected to be in June and to run until Sept/Oct A small sample of stakeholders will be consulted again during the 1st trimester of 2019 to test the recommendations

Your input: Possible inadequacy of existing marketing standards: Potential issues with current criteria (specific species, origin, etc.) Potential issues with the implementation of marketing standards (e.g. differences in implementation in different locations, difficulties related to new technologies, etc.) Usefulness of marketing standards in practice : Do operators actually use marketing standards to assess products quality ? Are prices set by quality/size category? Does it depend on the organization / stage of the supply chains? Costs/burden for operators: Costs/ unnecessary tasks related to marketing standards and who bear them Level-playing field with imports : Examples of differences between EU and non-EU products (specific species) Products not covered by marketing standards : Examples of products covered by other types of standards (e.g. Codex, AFNOR, national standards): advantages and drawbacks; Examples of products not covered by any standards: how is the quality assessed and how are prices set?

Discussion Q&A

Thank you Contacts for follow-up Séverine Renault severine.renault@and-international.com Rod Cappell rod@consult-poseidon.com Safa Souidi safa.souidi@and-international.com