Liam M. Longo, Ozan S. Kumru, C. Russell Middaugh, Michael Blaber 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Advertisements

Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Mark E. Zweifel, Daniel J. Leahy, Doug Barrick  Structure 
Natalie K. Garcia, Miklos Guttman, Jamie L. Ebner, Kelly K. Lee 
Structure of the Molecular Chaperone Prefoldin
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
The 19S Cap Puzzle: A New Jigsaw Piece
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Protein folding via binding and vice versa
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Complex Energy Landscape of a Giant Repeat Protein
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Mark E. Zweifel, Daniel J. Leahy, Doug Barrick  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Phage Pierces the Host Cell Membrane with the Iron-Loaded Spike
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 99, Issue 10, Pages (November 2010)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2006)
Anna Hagmann, Moritz Hunkeler, Edward Stuttfeld, Timm Maier  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Jason O. Moore, Wayne A. Hendrickson  Structure 
Error-Prone DNA Polymerases
Naomi Courtemanche, Doug Barrick  Structure 
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Graham D. Bailey, Jae K. Hyun, Alok K. Mitra, Richard L. Kingston 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Alternative Folding Nuclei Definitions Facilitate the Evolution of a Symmetric Protein Fold from a Smaller Peptide Motif  Liam M. Longo, Jihun Lee, Connie A.
Probing the “Dark Matter” of Protein Fold Space
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages e5 (October 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Omar Davulcu, Peter F. Flynn, Michael S. Chapman, Jack J. Skalicky 
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
A Different Look for AB5 Toxins
Jason O. Moore, Wayne A. Hendrickson  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Crystal Structures of the BAR-PH and PTB Domains of Human APPL1
Volume 112, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
The Active Conformation of the PAK1 Kinase Domain
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 84, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Eva M. Huber, Michael Groll  Structure 
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Jianchao Li, Haiyang Liu, Manmeet H. Raval, Jun Wan, Christopher M
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
Qing Yao, Sara J. Weaver, Jee-Young Mock, Grant J. Jensen  Structure 
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Evolution and Design of Protein Structure by Folding Nucleus Symmetric Expansion  Liam M. Longo, Ozan S. Kumru, C. Russell Middaugh, Michael Blaber  Structure  Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages 1377-1384 (October 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2014.08.008 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2014 22, 1377-1384DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.08.008) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Scheme for Folding Nucleus Symmetric Expansion Applied to the β-Trefoil Symmetric Protein Fold (A) Secondary structure schematic of FGF-1 with the repeating “trefoil-fold” structural subdomains indicated by different colors and associated secondary structure elements (arrows indicate β strands, cylinders helices, and gray bars loops/surface turns). The amino acid numbering scheme of the 140 amino acid form of FGF-1 is used throughout. (B) Intron-exon structure of the FGF-1 gene. (C) Location of critical folding nucleus of FGF-1 as determined from experimental ɸ-value analysis. (D) Phifoil design based on the folding nucleus of FGF-1 expanded by the three-fold symmetry of the β-trefoil target architecture (and associated secondary structure elements derived from FGF-1). Structure 2014 22, 1377-1384DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.08.008) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Heat Map of ɸ-Values in FGF-1 A previously reported study of ɸ-values of FGF-1 at all turn positions demonstrated that FGF-1 has a highly polarized folding nucleus, comprised principally of residue positions 23–64 (Longo et al., 2012). Structure 2014 22, 1377-1384DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.08.008) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Primary Structures of Phifoil and FGF-1 The primary structures of Phifoil and FGF-1 (single-letter code) are arranged according to the three repeating trefoil-fold structural subdomains (Figure 1A). The numbering scheme is based upon FGF-1 (relative gaps or insertions are indicated). The red shading of contiguous amino acid positions 23–64 identify the folding nucleus of FGF-1 that was expanded by the three-fold symmetry of the β-trefoil architecture to construct the Phifoil protein (Figure 1C). Additional pink shaded positions identify identical amino acids between FGF-1 and Phifoil in the remaining regions of the protein—showing that the primary structure of the folding nucleus exhibits minimal identity with the other symmetry-related positions in FGF-1. Structure 2014 22, 1377-1384DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.08.008) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Unfolding of FGF-1 and Phifoil (A) Isothermal equilibrium denaturation by GuHCl of FGF-1 (solid line) and Phifoil (dashed line). The lines are the two-state model fit to the indicated experimental data points. (B) Differential scanning calorimetry endotherms of FGF-1 (solid line) and Phifoil (dashed line). Fitted parameters for isothermal equilibrium denaturation and differential scanning calorimetry are provided in Tables S1 and S2, respectively. Structure 2014 22, 1377-1384DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.08.008) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 pH versus Temperature Empirical Phase Diagrams of FGF-1 and Phifoil EPDs (Kim et al., 2012) were constructed using three structural probes: circular dichroism (CD), in which the red color indicates native-like secondary structure; ANS binding, in which green color indicates partially folded or molten-globule-like states; and static light scattering (SLS), in which blue color indicates protein aggregation. Individual contributions from each probe are shown on the right; with the large images showing the additive overlay of all probe data (A, FGF-1; B, Phifoil). Source data used to generate the Phifoil EPD are shown in Figure S1. Structure 2014 22, 1377-1384DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.08.008) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Main Chain Ribbon Diagram of FGF-1 and Phifoil Crystal Structures (A) Ribbon diagram of FGF-1 (side view, left; top view [i.e., parallel to the three-fold axis of rotational symmetry], right) and with the blue region identifying the three-fold repeating trefoil-fold structural subdomain (PDB accession 2AFG). (B) A ribbon representation for Phifoil (same orientations as the FGF-1 ribbon diagrams) and with the red region identifying residue positions 23–64; the folding nucleus extracted from FGF-1 and expanded by the intrinsic three-fold symmetry to generate the purely symmetric Phifoil primary structure. The N- and C-termini positions are indicated. Structure 2014 22, 1377-1384DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.08.008) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions