PMS @ 2017-2018.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Company Name Here Partners’ names here.
Advertisements

Teacher Evaluation & Tenure What you need to know. Joe’s High School Happyville, USA April 17, 2014.
Numbers
3.7 Graphing Inequalities In Two Variables. Get y by itself Graph If ≤ or ≥: use solid line If : use dashed line If < or ≤: shade below the line If >
Update of EEA´s Core Set Indicator th EIONET Workshop on Air Quality Bern, 30 th September 2014 Alberto González Ortiz Project Manager – AQ data.
$100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400 $300 $200 $100 Names of numbers above 100 Names of numbers above 1,000 Names of numbers above 10,000 Roman /
Promotion of the Use of the Hydrogen Fuel Cell Hindering of the Use of the Hydrogen Fuel.
Retail Profit is UP TO 45 %
FCAT Update Grades FCAT Reading by Achievement Level Grades 3-10.
Dispersion Modeling Challenges for Air Permitting Justin Fickas Christine Haman Jake Stewart.
Promotion Recommendation
Math Graphing Linear Inequalities in Two Variables 1.
HR REVIEW. WE DID IT….  Reward and Recognition  Compensation and Benefits.
ASSESSMENT WITHOUT LEVELS. Assessing the Children The new way of assessing focuses on what the children can do, what they need to do next and how they.
10-1 人生与责任 淮安工业园区实验学校 连芳芳 “ 自我介绍 ” “ 自我介绍 ” 儿童时期的我.
Maths – Emerging Themes from Ofsted Reports Ian Goodwin Ofsted part-time Inspector 18 th March 2016.
Objective Question #1 1. As compared to their co-workers, individuals who have more opportunities for advancement are MORE LIKELY to have: A. greater.
PRG 420 Week 4 Individual Write a simple commission calculation program using IDE. To purchase this material click below link
Incremental Analysis Based on concept that any avoidable investment that does not yield at least the MARR should not be made Involves determining the ROR.
BA 2204 and BAS 324 Human Resource Management Managing compensation
Welcome to MF Click.
SAIMM Mining Charter III presentation presented by: Otsile Matlou
Section P8 Modeling with Equations
Adding Integers A.08.
Linking of appraisal of Regional Director/ Executive Officer/ Chapter In-charge with achievement of targets at Regional Office & Chapter Office.
Performance Management System
Planning at Product Level
IREDA Workshop on PMS/PRP at Visakhapatnam
Virginia Department of Taxation
The Rochford Review The expert review of statutory assessment arrangements for pupils working below the standard of national curriculum tests.
Example 4 Annuities Show that if regular payments of $1000 are made at the end of each year for 5 years into an account that pays interest at 10% per year.
Miraco EHS Strategy, Vision and Mission
Management AccountIng
5 HACKS THAT WILL HELP YOU ACHIEVE YOUR MAJOR BEAUTY GOALS.
Yahoo Mail Customer Support Number
Most Effective Techniques to Park your Manual Transmission Car
How do Power Car Windows Ensure Occupants Safety
Staff Compensation Update
Business plan presentation
Kingdom of Bahrain Civil Service Bureau
Delaware Department of Education
STORE INCENTIVE PLAN OCTOBER 2017
VARIABLE POLICY – M BAND AND ABOVE FY
Prepared for Quincy Schools – November 2013
Performance Management System (PMS) (Department of Public Enterprises)
Section 1.3 Models and Applications
2013 Annual Meeting • August 13, 2013
When finished complete your Math-Lib from Friday
Research Accounting Office
THANK YOU!.
Website Sponsorship Promote your company on the region’s leading source for relocation professionals. COST: $100 through 5/1 *price increases to $
COMPLAINT ANALYSIS FOR THE FY
Citation Rate Increases
Thank you.
Thank you.
Report of the / Proposal by the #### Title
Report of the / Proposal by the #### Title
In-Class Example (Incremental Traffic Carried )
Further Credit Modification Proposals
Data Analysis Questions
COMPLAINT ANALYSIS FOR THE FY
= indicates student is on target in this subject
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Miraco EHS Strategy, Vision and Mission
Transmit OOB emission Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
NOTICE OF 2019 TAX YEAR PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX RATE FOR CITY OF DENTON
12.3 Solving Equations with Variables on Both Sides
VARIABLE POLICY - GSP AND PRODUCT TEAMS – 18-19
Amount Borrowed or (Repaid) Prime Rate for the Month, %
Presentation transcript:

PMS @ 2017-2018

Rating against KRAs achievement for F17 KRA % Achievement Rating Rating Terminology Below 70% Need improvement ≥ 70% to 80% ≥ 1 Below expectations > 80% to 90% ≥ 2 Meet expectations > 90% to 99% ≥ 3 Exceed expectations 100% and more 4 Outstanding performer

Annual increment against KRAs achievement KRA % Achievement Rating Annual increment% ( FY 16-17) Annual increment% ( FY 17-18) Below 70% 0% ≥70% to 80% ≥ 1 3% > 80% to 90% ≥ 2 5% > 90% to 99% ≥ 3 8% 7% 100% and more 4 12% 10% For promotion FY 16-17: 10% additional increment For promotion FY 17-18: 8% additional increment

Variable pay-out against KRAs achievement KRA % Achievement ( FY 16-17) Variable pay-out% Below 60% 0% ≥ 60% to 70% ≥ 50% > 70% to 80% ≥ 60% > 80% to 90% ≥ 75% > 90% to 95% ≥ 80% > 95% to 99% ≥ 90% 100% and above 100% KRA % Achievement ( FY 17-18) Variable pay-out% Below 65% 0% ≥ 65% to 70% ≥ 30% > 70% to 80% ≥ 50% > 80% to 85% ≥ 75% > 85% to 90% ≥ 85% > 90% to 95% ≥ 90% 95% and above 100%

Variable pay-out KRAs proposal for 18-19 KRA % Achievement ( FY 18-19) Variable pay-out% Below 75% 0% ≥ 75% to 80% ≥ 50% > 80% to 85% ≥ 60% > 85% to 90% ≥ 80% > 90% to 95% ≥ 90% > 95% to 100% ≥ 95% 100% above 100% + ( subject to company goal)

Thank You