Photospheric emission from GRB jets

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pulsars Multi-Accelerator Radiation model Peking University.
Advertisements

Many different acceleration mechanisms: Fermi 1, Fermi 2, shear,... (Fermi acceleration at shock: most standard, nice powerlaw, few free parameters) main.
Collaborators: Wong A. Y. L. (HKU), Huang, Y. F. (NJU), Cheng, K. S. (HKU), Lu T. (PMO), Xu M. (NJU), Wang X. (NJU), Deng W. (NJU). Gamma-ray Sky from.
A two-zone model for the production of prompt neutrinos in gamma-ray bursts Matías M. Reynoso IFIMAR-CONICET, Mar del Plata, Argentina GRACO 2, Buenos.
Episodic magnetic jets as the central engine of GRBs Feng Yuan With: Bing Zhang.
Magnetic dissipation in Poynting dominated outflows Yuri Lyubarsky Ben-Gurion University.
Yizhong Fan (Niels Bohr International Academy, Denmark Purple Mountain Observatory, China) Fan (2009, MNRAS) and Fan & Piran (2008, Phys. Fron. China)
Low-luminosity GRBs and Relativistic shock breakouts Ehud Nakar Tel Aviv University Omer Bromberg Tsvi Piran Re’em Sari 2nd EUL Workshop on Gamma-Ray Bursts.
Low-luminosity GRBs and Relativistic shock breakouts Ehud Nakar Tel Aviv University Omer Bromberg Re’em Sari Tsvi Piran GRBs in the Era of Rapid Follow-up.
構造を持った相対論的ジェッ ト からの光球面放射 Hirotaka Ito RIKEN @コンパクト連星合体からの重力波・電磁波放射とその周辺領域 2015 /2/13 Collaborators Shigehiro Nagataki (RIKEN), Jin Matsumoto (RIKEN), Shiu-Hang.
Gamma-Ray Burst Jets: dynamics and interaction with the progenitor star Davide Lazzati, Brian Morsony, and Mitch Begelman JILA - University of Colorado.
Very High Energy Transient Extragalactic Sources: GRBs David A. Williams Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics University of California, Santa Cruz.
X-ray/Optical flares in Gamma-Ray Bursts Daming Wei ( Purple Mountain Observatory, China)
Temporal evolution of thermal emission in GRBs Based on works by Asaf Pe’er (STScI) in collaboration with Felix Ryde (Stockholm) & Ralph Wijers (Amsterdam),
Relativistic photon mediated shocks Amir Levinson Tel Aviv University With Omer Bromberg (PRL 2008)
GRB Prompt Emission: Turbulence, Magnetic Field & Jitter Radiation Jirong Mao.
Ehud Nakar California Institute of Technology Gamma-Ray Bursts and GLAST GLAST at UCLA May 22.
Outflow Residual Collisions and Optical Flashes Zhuo Li (黎卓) Weizmann Inst, Israel moving to Peking Univ, Beijing Li & Waxman 2008, ApJL.
GRB Puzzles The Baryon Purity Puzzle: Why is the energy spend on gamma rays and not on expanding matter? The photon entropy puzzle: Why Gamma Rays at 100.
1/39 New Relativistic Particle-In-Cell Simulation Studies of Prompt and Early Afterglows from GRBs Ken Nishikawa National Space Science & Technology Center/CSPAR.
Modeling GRB B Xuefeng Wu (X. F. Wu, 吴雪峰 ) Penn State University Purple Mountain Observatory 2008 Nanjing GRB Workshop, Nanjing, China, June
Testing a two-jet model of short Gamma-ray bursts A. Pozanenko 1 M. Barkov 2,1 P. Minaev 1 1 Space Research Institute (IKI) 2 Max-Planck Institut für Kernphysik.
Great Debate on GRB Composition: A Case for Poynting Flux Dominated GRB Jets Bing Zhang Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
Gamma-Ray Burst Polarimeter – GAP – aboard the Solar Powered Sail Mission Gamma-Ray Burst Polarimeter – GAP – aboard the Solar Powered Sail Mission Daisuke.
Gamma-Ray Bursts from Radiation-Dominated Jet? Kunihito Ioka (KEK) T. Inoue, Asano & KI, arXiv: KI, arXiv: Suwa & KI, arXiv:
Monte-Carlo Simulation of Thermal Radiation from GRB Jets Sanshiro Shibata (Konan Univ.) Collaborator: Nozomu Tominaga (Konan Univ., IPMU)
Radiative transfer and photospheric emission in GRB jets Indrek Vurm (Columbia University) in collaboration with Andrei M. Beloborodov (Columbia University)
Radiative processes during GRB prompt emission
Gamma-Ray Burst Polarization Kenji TOMA (Kyoto U/NAOJ) Collaborators are: Bing Zhang (Nevada U), Taka Sakamoto (NASA), POET team Ryo Yamazaki, Kunihito.
The Early Time Properties of GRBs : Canonical Afterglow and the Importance of Prolonged Central Engine Activity Andrea Melandri Collaborators : C.G.Mundell,
Amir Levinson Tel Aviv University Levinson+Bromberg PRL 08 Bromberg et al. ApJ 11 Levinson ApJ 12 Katz et al. ApJ 10 Budnik et al. ApJ 10 Nakar+Sari ApJ.
1 Physics of GRB Prompt emission Asaf Pe’er University of Amsterdam September 2005.
The acceleration and radiation in the internal shock of the gamma-ray bursts ~ Smoothing Effect on the High-Energy Cutoff by Multiple Shocks ~ Junichi.
Gamma-Ray Bursts Energy problem and beaming * Mergers versus collapsars GRB host galaxies and locations within galaxy Supernova connection Fireball model.
Photospheric emission from Structured Jet Hirotaka Ito Collaborators Shigehiro Nagataki YITP @ YITP Lunch Seminar /30 Shoichi Yamada Waseda University.
Gamma-Ray Bursts: Open Questions and Looking Forward Ehud Nakar Tel-Aviv University 2009 Fermi Symposium Nov. 3, 2009.
The peak energy and spectrum from dissipative GRB photospheres Dimitrios Giannios Physics Department, Purdue Liverpool, June 19, 2012.
High-Energy Gamma-Rays and Physical Implication for GRBs in Fermi Era
Hot Relics in GRB Photosphere and GeV Photon Delay Kunihito Ioka (KEK)
Gamma-ray Bursts and Particle Acceleration Katsuaki Asano (Tokyo Institute of Technology) S.Inoue ( NAOJ ), P.Meszaros ( PSU )
Alessandra Corsi (1,2) Dafne Guetta (3) & Luigi Piro (2) (1)Università di Roma Sapienza (2)INAF/IASF-Roma (3)INAF/OAR-Roma Fermi Symposium 2009, Washington.
Photospheric emission from Stratified Jets Hirotaka Ito RIKEN @ sngrb /12 Collaborators Shigehiro Nagataki RIKEN Shoichi Yamada Waseda Univ. Masaomi.
The prompt phase of GRBs Dimitrios Giannios Lyman Spitzer, Jr. Fellow Princeton, Department of Astrophysical Sciences Raleigh, 3/7/2011.
Gamma-ray Bursts from Synchrotron Self-Compton Emission Juri Poutanen University of Oulu, Finland Boris Stern AstroSpace Center, Lebedev Phys. Inst., Moscow,
Formation of BH-Disk system via PopIII core collapse in full GR National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Yuichiro Sekiguchi.
Stochastic wake field particle acceleration in Gamma-Ray Bursts Barbiellini G., Longo F. (1), Omodei N. (2), Giulietti D., Tommassini P. (3), Celotti A.
The prompt optical emission in the Naked Eye Burst R. Hascoet with F. Daigne & R. Mochkovitch (Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris) Kyoto − Deciphering then.
Slow heating, fast cooling in gamma-ray bursts Juri Poutanen University of Oulu, Finland +Boris Stern + Indrek Vurm.
Yizhong Fan (Niels Bohr International Academy, Denmark Purple Mountain Observatory, China)
Ariel Majcher Gamma-ray bursts and GRB080319B XXIVth IEEE-SPIE Joint Symposium on Photonics, Web Engineering, Electronics for Astronomy and High Energy.
京大天体核 D3 山崎 了 共同研究者 : 井岡 邦仁 ( 阪大 ) 、中村 卓史 ( 京大 ) Ref. Yamazaki et al., astro-ph/
Magnetized Shocks & Prompt GRB Emission
Thermal electrons in GRB afterglows, or
What GRBs can bring to Particle Astrophysics
Photon breeding mechanism in jets and its observational signatures
Observation of Pulsars and Plerions with MAGIC
Les sursauts gamma : la phase des chocs internes.
Dmitri Uzdensky (University of Colorado Boulder)
Fermi Collaboration Meeting
Gamma-ray bursts from magnetized collisionally heated jets
Acceleration of Electrons and Protons by Plasma Waves in Sgr A*
Observations: Cosmic rays
Prompt Emission of Gamma-ray Bursts
Opening angles of collapsar jets
Multi-color Blackbody Emission in GRB
Photosphere Emission in Gamma-Ray Bursts
Can we probe the Lorentz factor of gamma-ray bursts from GeV-TeV spectra integrated over internal shocks ? Junichi Aoi (YITP, Kyoto Univ.) co-authors:
Gamma-Ray Bursts Ehud Nakar Caltech APCTP 2007 Feb. 22.
Andrei M. Beloborodov Columbia University
Tight Liso-Ep-Γ0 Relation of Long Gamma-Ray Bursts
Presentation transcript:

Photospheric emission from GRB jets Hirotaka Ito RIKEN Collaborators Shigehiro Nagataki (RIKEN), Jin Matsumoto (RIKEN), Shiu-Hang Lee (JAXA), Masaomi Ono (Kyushu Univ.), Jirong Mao (Kyushu Univ), Asaf Pe’er (UCC), Akira Mizuta (RIKEN), Alexei Tolstov (IPMU), Maria Dainotti (RIKEN), Maxim Barkov (RIKEN) Shoichi Yamada (Waseda Univ.), Seiji Harikae (Mitubishi UFJ) @ GRB workshop 2015 /3/3

Plan of this talk Introduction ・Brief overview of prompt emission of GRBs ・Photospheric emission model Photospheric emission from structured jet ・Spetrum and polarization ・Photospheric emission based on 3D jet simulation Ito+2015 in prep. Summary Ito + 2013, 2014

Model for Emission Mechanism Internal Shock Model ・Low efficiency for gamma-ray production flaw ・Difficult to model hard spectrum in low energy band (α) Photospheric Emission Model Natural consequence of fireball model (e.g., Rees & Meszaros 2005, Pe’er et al.2005, Thompson 2007) ・High radiation efficiency ・Clustering of peak energy ~ 1MeV γ γ photosphere Internal shock External shock

Slide from P.Meszaros @ SNGRB in Kyoto 2013

Slide from P.Meszaros @ SNGRB in Kyoto 2013 GRB 090902B Slide from P.Meszaros @ SNGRB in Kyoto 2013 Strong evidence for the existence of photospheric emission Ryde + 2011

Difficulty in photospheric emission model non-thermal spectrum fν~ν-1.2 fν~ν0 E (MeV) Broadening from the thermal spectra is required

Dissipative process Magnetic recconection 1D steady spherical outflow high energy tail is reproduced by the relativistic pairs produced by dissipative processes Magnetic recconection assumption Giannios & Spruit 2007, Giannios 2008, 2012 1D steady spherical outflow Repeated Shock Ioka + 2007, Lazzati & Begelman 2010 Proton-neutron collision relativistic pairs upscatter thermal photons Derishev 1999, Beloborodov 2010, Vurm+2011 Beloborodov 2010

Geometrical brodening Structure of the jet can give rise to the non-thermal spectra Mizuta+2011 spectrum broadens even in the absence of relativistic pairs Ioka+2011 Multi-dimensional structure of jet may be a key to resolve the difficulty

Our focus: Effect of the jet structure on the emission Find the jet structure that can explain the observation Stratified Jet structure 2 effects on the spectra (I) multi-color effect see also Lundman + 2013 G0 G1 G1 t~1 νfν photosphere Spine Sheath n G0 > G1

Photons gain energy by crossing the boundary layer Our focus: Effect of the jet structure on the emission Find the jet structure that can explain the observation Stratified Jet structure 2 effects on the spectra (I) multi-color effect see also Lundman + 2013 (II) Fermi acceleration of photons Accleration region Photons gain energy by crossing the boundary layer t~1 νfν photosphere Spine Sheath n G0 > G1

Photons gain energy by crossing the boundary layer Our focus: Effect of the jet structure on the emission Find the jet structure that can explain the observation Stratified Jet structure 2 effects on the spectra (I) multi-color effect see also Lundman + 2013 (II) Fermi acceleration of photons Accleration region Photons gain energy by crossing the boundary layer t~1 νfν photosphere Spine Sheath n G0 > G1 Propagation of photons are solved by Monte=Carlo method

Klein-Nishina cut-off Two-component jet G0=400 qj =1° q0=0.5° qobs=0.4° Thermal + non-thermal tail Spine Sheath Emax = G0mec2 Klein-Nishina cut-off Non-thermal tail becomes prominent as the relative velocity becomes larger

Klein-Nishina cut-off Two-component jet G0=400 qj =1° q0=0.5° qobs=0.4° Thermal + non-thermal tail Spine Sheath Emax = G0mec2 Klein-Nishina cut-off Non-thermal tail becomes prominent as the relative velocity becomes larger But limited only for narrow range of observer angle |θobs- θ0 | < G-1 ~0.14°G400-1  

Multi-component jet G0=400 G1=100 dθ Interval of velocity shear dθ < 2G-1

Multi-component jet G0=400 G1=100 β= -2.5 dθ Emax = G0mec2 ~ 100MeV Interval of velocity shear dθ < 2G-1 high energy spectra (β) is reproduced by accelerated photons Cut off at ~ 100 MeV

Multi-component jet G0=400 G1=100 β= -2.5 α=-1.5 α=-1 dθ Emax = G0mec2 ~ 100MeV Interval of velocity shear dθ < 2G-1 high energy spectra (β) is reproduced by accelerated photons Cut off at ~ 100 MeV Low energy spectra (α) is reproduced by multi-color effect see also Lundman + 2013

Multi-component jet G0=400 G1=100 dθ Face on view of jet Simulation by Dr. Matsumoto transverse structure

polarization multi-component jet that reproduces Band spectra G0=400 G1=100 DOP(%)=(I+ - I-) / (I+ + I-) 0% dθ qobs (degree) High polarization degree (>10%) is predicted See also Lundman + 2014 Future missions such as Tsubame and POLAR may probe such an emission

3D relativisitic hydrodymaical simulation Calculation of relativistic jet breaking out of massive progenitor star Progenitor star t=4s 16TI (Woosley & Heger 2006) M* ~14Msun R* ~ 4×1010 cm @presupernova phase Jet parameter Lj = 1050 erg/s t=300s qj = 5° Gj = 5 Gh = 500 Rinj = 1010 cm 流体計算の設定(親星、ジェットパラメター) Model 1: steady injection Model 2: precession

3D relativisitic hydrodymaical simulation Calculation of relativistic jet breaking out of massive progenitor star Progenitor star t=4s 16TI (Woosley & Heger 2006) g M* ~14Msun R* ~ 4×1010 cm @presupernova phase g Jet parameter Lj = 1050 erg/s t= 1 t=300s qj = 5° tinj >> 1 Gj = 5 g Gh = 500 g Rinj = 1010 cm 流体計算の設定(親星、ジェットパラメター) Model 1: steady injection Model 2: precession Radiative transfer calculation Propagation of photons are calculated until they reach optically thin region

Model 1 steady injection log G

Model 1 steady injection log G

Model 1 steady injection log G 4° Photons are accelerated at the shock β=-2.5 α=-1 However Numerical diffusion smears out the sharp shock structure Efficiency of acceleration is artificially decreased

Model 2 Precession (tpre=2s θpre = 3°) log G

Model 2 Precession (tpre=2s θpre = 3°) log G Precession activity can be directly observed in the lightcurve

Model 2 Precession (tpre=2s θpre = 3°) log G β=-2.5 Precession activity can be directly observed in the lightcurve α=-1

- - - - Summary Futrure works Structured jet can produce a broad non-thermal spectrum non-thermal particle is not required such structure can naturally develop during propagation - Multi-component jet can reproduce Band function irrespective to the observer angle β is reproduced by the accelerated photons α is reproduced by the multi-color effect - Polarization signature is not negligible in the structured jet High DOP (>10%) is predicted for the jet structure that reproduces Band function - Central engine activity can be directly observed in the light curve engine activity is not smeared out during the propagation Futrure works Photon accelerations in various structures with high spacial resolution calculation shocks, turbulence