Reinventing Program and Services Review at Chaffey College Marie Boyd Giovanni Sosa Tom Vitzelio.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WEST HEMPSTEAD UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT Three Year Strategic Plan
Advertisements

How did we get Here and Where are We? Outcomes Assessment at Carteret Community College.
Pathway to Proficiency Chaffey Colleges Plan to Achieve Proficiency in Student Learning Outcomes March, 2010.
SLO Assessment Departmental Tools and Examples from the Field Sacramento City College Fall Flex Workshop 8/21/08 8/21/08Presenters: Alan Keys Faculty Research.
Troy University eTROY Colloquium April 17-18, 2012.
Course Selected Institutions decide to examine an online or hybrid course as part of a peer review. Since institutions make a significant investment in.
David J. Sammons, Dean UF International Center. Southern Association of Colleges and Schools: SACS is our regional accrediting authority. The last SACS.
Student Learning Outcomes at PCC Adapted from a presentation to the PCC Board of Trustees in 2007.
Arlene Paxton Advanced Training 2014
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
Maximizing Effectiveness Using Positive Behavior Support Methods in the Classroom: Monitor and Evaluation.
Helping L2 writers respond to writing assignments across the curriculum Part 2 Zuzana Tomaš Eastern Michigan University
1 Distance Learning College Action Project UPDATE – September 22, 2011 Presented by: Eric Kunnen, M.A. Director, Distance Learning and Instructional Technologies.
MARCH 26, 2014 TASKSTREAM TASKFORCE UPDATE. WORKGROUP OUTCOMES Workgroup training summary What the workgroup learned regarding template and workspace.
The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Assessment of Learning at the Peralta Community Colleges Engaging the College Community in Assessment Opportunities and Transforming the Institutional.
February  Founded  Located in Crystal Lake, IL.  offers six associate's degrees and 17 Associate of Applied Science degrees.  About 400.
Apples to Oranges to Elephants: Comparing the Incomparable.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Outcomes, Assessment and Improvement Student Learning Outcomes Implementation at Crafton Hills College.
Online and Classroom Observation Training. Learning Objectives: 1.Identify the behaviors that characterize the elements of effective teaching 2.Review.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Augustana’s Five Year Goals To Create a Campus Climate that Fosters Student Learning through Effective Assessment To Articulate Learning Objectives for.
1 EEC Board Meeting June 11, 2013 Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Review of Standards Removal Board Vote Feb 12, 2013.
2012 Self-Evaluation Report Update 7/27/11 1. LAHC 2012 Self-Evaluation Report Update 7/27/11 All Accreditation Commission recommendations successfully.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
A Tour of CCSSE and SENSE Tools 2012 CCCSE Workshop.
August 3,  Review “Guiding Principles for SLO Assessment” (ASCCC, 2010)  Review Assessment Pulse Roundtable results  Discuss and formulate our.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Assessment Review Committee Report College of Business Leah Katell February 3, 2014.
Revised PEF Conceptual Framework We have not created a new framework; rather, we have rearticulated our vision, mission, and learning outcomes to emphasize.
Maricopa Priorities Status Update Fall Maricopa Priorities Basics What it isWhat it’s not A regular, cyclical, bottom-up process to: ▫Evaluate everything.
Achieving the Dream Status Report Mentor Visit February 5-6, 2009.
Proficiency and Beyond! The ACCJC Rubric for Institutional Effectiveness in SLOs Julie Bruno, Facilitator Kristina Allende, Mt. San Antonio College Eric.
Note: Because of slide animation, this ppt is intended to be viewed as a slide show.  While viewing the ppt, it may be helpful to obtain a sample Core.
Undergraduate Academic Assessment Plans: What’s New for Timothy S. Brophy, Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of.
2015 Governance Survey Results Planning and Resource Council (PaRC) June 17, 2015 E. Kuo & J. Marino-Iacieri FH IR&P.
All College Day August 23, 2013 The Homestretch to Reaffirmation! REAFFIRMED.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
2007 Strengthening Student Success Conference, San Jose Dr. Jack Friedlander Executive Vice President, Educational Programs Santa Barbara City College.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
Linked Courses: General Education with Developmental Education Redesign Alliance Conference Orlando, FL March 28-30, 2010 Dr. Leslie Kimberling Jones University.
PBIS Meeting for BCPS Team Leaders and Coaches March 14, 2008 Oregon Ridge.
11/19/2004 SLOs at MJC Bill Scroggins Mike Sundquist Modesto Junior College
Presentation by: Carol Mattson, Dean of Academic Services, Fullerton College Nancy Deutsch, Reading Faculty/Staff Development Coordinator, Cypress College.
Fall 2015 Professional Development Days C. Cruz-Johnson & R. Gamez August 28, Walking with Integrity Towards Student Success.
THE SLO PROCESS #1 create/update SLO’s, rubrics, & assessment methods #2 assess all students in all sections of all courses #3 maintain SLO assessment.
CCC Planning & Assessment “Wrap Up” Findings & Recommendations By: Diane Drebin, Kate Gray and Judy Redder (a.k.a.“The Wrappers”) 06/02/08.
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
S LOs What is New and Due in the Assessment Process: A focus on continued improvement in academic year NOTE: For reference, hyperlinks to resources.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
SLO + Assessment: Guiding Principles, Roles & Processes David Morse, Long Beach City College Julie Bruno, Sierra College Joseph Bielanski, Peralta / Berkeley.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Educator Effectiveness Updates April Updates Closing up Looking forward to
Evaluating Our Assessment Program Spring 2004 What is assessment? Assessment is the ongoing process of understanding and improving student learning.
1 Curriculum Renewal Part I Developing a Dynamic Curriculum Renewal Process Modify File name here using "Insert" "Header and Footer": Format is Full_File_Name_Updated_2013.XX.XX.
Accreditation Update Self-Study Progress and Review MPC Flex Days Spring 2015.
Achieving More with An Assessment Inventory Neil GuptaWorthington City Schools Cathy HeidelbergEducational Service Center of Central Ohio Devin AndersonBuckeye.
SLO P ROCESSES G UIDE This guide is a compilation of a series of SLO presentations over the last several years. This guide will serve as a review or for.
HARNESSING VOICES OF SUPPORT FOR PROGRAM REVIEW
Still Lovin’ those Outcomes
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Curriculum Coordinator: Marela Fiacco Date : February 29, 2015
Accreditation follow-up report
Presentation transcript:

Reinventing Program and Services Review at Chaffey College Marie Boyd Giovanni Sosa Tom Vitzelio

Presentation Overview SETTING THE STAGE SETTING THE STAGE THE PROCESS THE PROCESS PROBLEMS PROBLEMS THE RESULTS THE RESULTS REWARDS REWARDS FUTURE GOALS FUTURE GOALS

SETTING THE STAGE Chaffey completed a program review (PSR) every year. The Problems: The Problems: Labor intensive process Labor intensive process Undefined process = No real substantive comments Undefined process = No real substantive comments Evolved into a budgeting focused process Evolved into a budgeting focused process Discontent with the decision making process Discontent with the decision making process Slow SLO process Slow SLO process Confusion regarding the definition of a program Confusion regarding the definition of a program

SETTING THE STAGE Dr. Sherrie Guerrero decided that a new PSR was to be launched. Dr. Sherrie Guerrero decided that a new PSR was to be launched. Summer of 2008: revising the PSR templates in Curricunet Summer of 2008: revising the PSR templates in Curricunet Fall 2008: fine tuning new model and dialoging with the PSR committee. Fall 2008: fine tuning new model and dialoging with the PSR committee. Spring 2009: reading and critiquing the SLO portion of PSR was now established under the SLO Committee Spring 2009: reading and critiquing the SLO portion of PSR was now established under the SLO Committee February to March 2009: development of resources and training for both the PSR writer and the SLO Committee Readers February to March 2009: development of resources and training for both the PSR writer and the SLO Committee Readers

THE PROCESS The SLO Committee was divided into reading teams The SLO Committee was divided into reading teams AUOs (administrative unit outcomes) AUOs (administrative unit outcomes) Administrators and non-instructional staff members Administrators and non-instructional staff members SLOs SLOs Faculty and staff from instructional programs Faculty and staff from instructional programs Hybrid programs Hybrid programs either an AUO team or SLO team. either an AUO team or SLO team. The SLO Committee: The SLO Committee: Decide the desired progress of the program SLOs/AUOs Decide the desired progress of the program SLOs/AUOs

THE PROCESS A consistent set of comments A consistent set of comments 5 phases of the assessment cycle 5 phases of the assessment cycle Goal: consistency among teams of readers Goal: consistency among teams of readers Institutional Research online evaluation form Institutional Research online evaluation form Electronically submitted to IR Electronically submitted to IR Copy for programs being evaluated Copy for programs being evaluated

Chaffey PSR Screen Shots: Program Mission and Overview

Chaffey PSR Screen Shots: Program Goals and Outcomes Assessment

Chaffey PSR Screen Shots: Program Curriculum Mapping Matrix

Chaffey PSR Screen Shots: SLO Committee Comments

Chaffey PSR Screen Shots: Institutional Research Summary E-Form

PROBLEMS New Curricunet design did not norm to the 5 phase of the assessment cycle exactly New Curricunet design did not norm to the 5 phase of the assessment cycle exactly Catching up after the SLO process had gone cold Catching up after the SLO process had gone cold 5 phases of the SLO process, and a common language 5 phases of the SLO process, and a common language Tight time frame for the SLO readers Tight time frame for the SLO readers training on the new tools, training on the new tools, establishing a common understanding of the task, and the evaluation establishing a common understanding of the task, and the evaluation The SLO Committee readers had two weeks to read 127 program reviews (Over 600 AUOs and SLOs) and provide feedback to the PSR Committee The SLO Committee readers had two weeks to read 127 program reviews (Over 600 AUOs and SLOs) and provide feedback to the PSR Committee Alignment with IR online evaluation form and Curricunet SLO/AUO section of PSR Alignment with IR online evaluation form and Curricunet SLO/AUO section of PSR Technical glitches with the online evaluation form Technical glitches with the online evaluation form

THE RESULTS Different GOALS Different GOALS Evaluation of student-centered Evaluation of student-centered Differences in writing outcome statements and benchmarks. Differences in writing outcome statements and benchmarks. Consistent comments = all program SLO/AUOs were graded with the same rubric. Consistent comments = all program SLO/AUOs were graded with the same rubric.

THE RESULTS Programs with difficult selected forms of assessments. Programs with difficult selected forms of assessments. Many did not know about the unique and exciting possibilities of assessment format Many did not know about the unique and exciting possibilities of assessment format Heavy reliance on pre/post test. Heavy reliance on pre/post test. Widespread confusion regarding reflective dialogue Widespread confusion regarding reflective dialogue

REWARDS Program goals are student-centered Program goals are student-centered Chaffey has an actual count – a complete picture – of the status of program AUOs and SLOs for the first time ever. Chaffey has an actual count – a complete picture – of the status of program AUOs and SLOs for the first time ever. All programs have a consistent set of recommendations to follow to jump start the SLO process which had gone cold All programs have a consistent set of recommendations to follow to jump start the SLO process which had gone cold

REWARDS The SLO Co-coordinators know exactly the sorts of interventions and advice to offer to specific program SLOs The SLO Co-coordinators know exactly the sorts of interventions and advice to offer to specific program SLOs Suggestions for more interesting, engaging, and AUTHENTIC forms of assessment Suggestions for more interesting, engaging, and AUTHENTIC forms of assessment Noticeably more involvement and positive dialogue regarding the outcomes assessment process at Chaffey among faculty, staff and administrators Noticeably more involvement and positive dialogue regarding the outcomes assessment process at Chaffey among faculty, staff and administrators

NEW FOCUS: FUTURE GOALS Modify the Curricunet SLO screens Modify the Curricunet SLO screens Streamline the IR electronic survey Streamline the IR electronic survey Improve the ability to search the database Improve the ability to search the database Reword comments/recommendations for clarification Reword comments/recommendations for clarification Continue to create an authentic link between SLO PSR process and the planning/budgeting process Continue to create an authentic link between SLO PSR process and the planning/budgeting process Include students in the overall SLO process Include students in the overall SLO process Improve the communication and dialogue between the SLO Committee and the PSR Committee Improve the communication and dialogue between the SLO Committee and the PSR Committee