Status of SuperKEKB Design: Lattice and IR

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam-Beam Effects for FCC-ee at Different Energies: at Different Energies: Crab Waist vs. Head-on Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk FCC-ee/TLEP physics.
Advertisements

1 Crab Waist Studies for SuperB and KEKB Y. Ohnishi/KEK SuperB Workshop V Paris 10/May/2007.
KEKB Design 1.Parameters 2.Collider Ring 3.Interact Region 4. Magnet, RF, Instabilities 5.Recent progress with crab crossing.
Lattice Status SuperB Project Workshop SLAC, October 6-9, 2009 Yuri Nosochkov for the SuperB Lattice Team Major recent updates by P. Raimondi and S. Sinyatkin.
SuperKEKB Lattice and Dynamic Aperture H. Koiso Apr. 20, 2005 Super B Factory Workshop in Hawaii.
Nano-Beam Scheme for SuperKEKB Andrew Hutton Slides taken from talks by Haruyo Koiso, Yukiyoshi Ohnishi & Masafumi Tawada.
Super B-Factory Workshop, Hawaii, April 20-22, 2005 Lattice studies for low momentum compaction in LER M.E. Biagini LNF-INFN, Frascati.
Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB K. Ohmi & M Tawada (KEK) Super B factories workshop in Hawaii Apr
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
1 Optics and IR design for SuperKEKB Y.Ohnishi 1/19-22, 2004 Super B Factory Workshop in Hawaii.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Lattice simulation of lattice errors and optics corrections. November 1, 2007 Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
SuperB Lattice Studies M. Biagini LNF-INFN ILCDR07 Workshop, LNF-Frascati Mar. 5-7, 2007.
1 BINP Tau-Charm Project 3 February 2010, KEK, Tsukuba E.Levichev For the BINP C-Tau team.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
Simulation on beam loss from radiative Bhabha process Y. Funakoshi KEK.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Introduction of Accelerators for Circular Colliders 高亮度 TAU-CHARM 工厂 & 先进光源, 2014/09.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
J.W. ASEPS KEKB Upgrade Plan: SuperKEKB J.W. Flanagan ASEPS
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
Cui Xiaohao, Zhang Chuang,Bian Tianjian January 12,2016
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Non-linear Beam Dynamics Studies for JLEIC Electron Collider Ring
The SuperB Accelerator Lattice M. E
Proposal for a Transparent Off-Axis Injection Scheme for BESSY II
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Status of PEP-X Lattice Design Study
Optimization of CEPC Dynamic Aperture
Electron collider ring Chromaticity Compensation and dynamic aperture
Status of CEPC lattice design
Lattice design for CEPC PDR
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
The new 7BA design of BAPS
DA study for CEPC Main Ring
DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
Interaction region design for the partial double ring scheme
Comparison of the final focus design
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Lattice design for the CEPC collider ring
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
SuperB CDR Machine P. Raimondi for the SuperB Team Paris, May 9, 2007.
Lattice design for the CEPC collider ring
Upgrade plan of KEKB from 2012 to 20XX Y. Ohnishi / KEK
Update of DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
Overall Considerations, Main Challenges and Goals
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov. 13th 2007
CEPC optics and booster optics
Y. Ohnishi SuperB Workshop LAL, Orsay February, 2009
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
Lattice design and dynamic aperture optimization for CEPC main ring
Lattice Design of the Collider Ring toward TDR
Lattice design for CEPC PDR
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Alternative Ion Injector Design
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
Beam-beam simulations
Status of IR / Nonlinear Dynamics Studies
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
A TME-like Lattice for DA Studies
Presentation transcript:

Status of SuperKEKB Design: Lattice and IR Y. Ohnishi July 7, 2009 3rd Open Meeting of the Belle II collaboration KEK BELLE II L=8x1035 ! “Tanabata”: Festival of the Weaver ?

Nano-beam scheme: Design concept Machine parameters Lattice and IR Contents Nano-beam scheme: Design concept Machine parameters Lattice and IR

Design concept Luminosity is determined by 3 parameters in principle.

Total projected cross section Collision scheme High current scheme Nano beam scheme sz sx* L 2f Half crossing angle: f Head-on frame (rotation and Lorentz boost) Total projected cross section is equal for each other.

High Current Nano Beam Bunch length requirement : Hourglass requirement : Luminosity : Beam-beam parameter :

Small bx*, by* and small emittance is required. Strategy of Nano beam Smaller sy* provides higher luminosity. Smaller by* provides smaller sy*, however longer sz is OK. (less HOM, no CSR) Hourglass (H.G) condition requires smaller sx*, namely smaller bx* is necessary. Smaller beam-beam parameter is preferable, so ey should be smaller in proportional to by* Small bx*, by* and small emittance is required. Lattice design

Requirement: 8x1035 cm-2s-1 “Nano beam scheme” LER/HER ex = 2.8 nm / 2.0 nm bx*= 17.8 mm / 25 mm by* = 0.26 / 0.26 mm xy = 0.079 ~ KEKB

Machine parameters Tentative parameters: LER HER Emittance ex 2.8 2.0 nm Coupling ey/ex 0.74 1.80 % Horizontal beta at IP bx* 17.8 25.0 mm Vertical beta at IP by* 0.26 Horizontal beam size sx* 7.06 7.07 Vertical beam size sy* 0.073 0.097 Bunch length sz 5 Half crossing angle f 30 mrad Beam Energy E 3.5 8.0 Beam Current I 3.84 2.21 A Number of bunches nb 2252 Beam-beam parameter xy 0.079 Luminosity L 8x1035 (8.5x1035 with CW) cm-2s-1 * Luminosity is obtained from beam-beam simulations.

Lattice design

item 1 Low emittance HER Increase number of arc cells LER Longer bends

item 2 Low beta at IP Separated final quads Closer to IP

Local chromaticity correction item 3 Dynamic aperture for injection, Touschek lifetime Local chromaticity correction No/small emittance generation

Summary of items LER HER Low emittance Low beta at IP Longer bends 0.89 m to 4 m long Increase number of arc cells Smaller dispersion in bends 28 cells to 44 cells Low beta at IP Separated final quads. Closer to IP Superconducting or permanent magnets Local chromaticity correction (LCC) (to get large DA) KEKB-LER type Chicane-like (reverse bends) Geometrical flexibility Emittance is generated. ILC/SuperB type (modified to SuperKEKB) Bending angle is necessary (no reverse bends). Emittance can be ignored.

One of constraints is tunnel geometry.

TSUKUBA IR To Oho To Nikko LER/HER has an incident angle of -10/+50 mrad for GX-axis. outer wall inner wall LCC LCC HER Nano-LER LCC Nano-HER LCC LER Tsukuba

In case of HER, large incident angle(50 mrad) makes large bending angle at LCC. Consequently, large dispersion at LCC for HER. Then, chromaticity correction can be done with keeping dynamic aperture.

On the other hand, LER can use KEKB-LER type for LCC since wiggler sections can control emittance. Chicane type LCC is almost straight beam line from a global point of view although large dispersion can be made at LCC.

Beam axis and Solenoid axis *GY is parallel to OHO/NIKKO straight section. GX is perpendicular to GY. SuperKEKB HER KEKB LER New BELLE Solenoid? GY KEKB HER GY SuperKEKB LER 50 mrad = 30+20 mrad 4.55 mrad -17.45 mrad GX -10 mrad GX BELLE Solenoid=LER What is the Belle solenoid axis ? Solenoid axis is: LER axis -> +7.45 mrad ½ of finite-crossing angle -> +37.45 mrad or no solution to rotate BELLE

LER IR optics bx*/by*=17.8 mm/0.26 mm LCC LCC uc = 0.44 keV

HER IR optics bx*/by*=25 mm/0.26 mm LCC LCC Y. OHNISHI / KEK

HER arc to IR optics Arc Normal cell LCC(Vertical) LCC(Horizontal) Y. OHNISHI / KEK

LER whole ring C = 3016.243 m (same as KEKB-LER) Y. OHNISHI / KEK

HER whole ring C = 3016.262 m (same as KEKB-HER) #arc cells:40 Y. OHNISHI / KEK

IR magnets (Preliminary)

Dynamic aperture

HER dynamic Aperture (stored) bx*/by*=25 mm/0.26 mm NO ERROR 2Jy/2Jx= 1.8% ne = 6.17x1010 ttouschek = 17 min x/sx Dp/p0

HER dynamic aperture (injection) bx*/by*=25 mm/0.26 mm NO ERROR Injection Aperture: (synchrotron injection) 2Jx= 3.7x10-9 m (1.23x10-9 m in injector) 2Jz=0.5%+0.15% 2Jy/2Jx= 4% Injection Aperture: (betatron injection) 2Jx= 5x10-7 m 2Jy=2x10-8 m 2Jz=0.15%(sd=0.05% in injector) x/sx Dp/p0

LER dynamic aperture (injection & stored) Injection Aperture: (betatron injection) 2Jx= 5x10-7 m 2Jy=2x10-8 m 2Jz=0.25% Touschek lifetime ~400 sec np = 10.7x1010 k = 0.74 % Injection Aperture: (synchrotron injection) 2Jx= 1.2x10-8 m (4x10-9 m in injector) 2Jz=0.5%+0.25%

Synchrotron injection injected beam septum wall (w = 5 mm) stored beam injection kicker injection kicker *This scheme is applied in LEP. 1) Energy of injected beam is shifted by d0, then an injection orbit is adjusted to be a closed orbit of the ring. (X0,X0’)=(h,h’)d0 2) The coherent betatron oscillation due to the injection error should be zero since the betatron oscillation is transformed to the synchrotron oscillation. X0 = 2.5 sinj + 3 sring + w = 6~6.5 mm h = 1.28 m (LER) / 1.2 m (HER) for d0 = 0.5 %

To make this possible, the injection point will be moved from the FUJI straight section to the arc section. -> Remodel the BT lines

Good quality of injected beam is quite necessary Good quality of injected beam is quite necessary. e- low emittance RF gun and e+ DR

IR magnet configuration: Permanent magnet + S. C IR magnet configuration: Permanent magnet + S.C. corrector (alternative) Final focus quadrupoles(QC1) can be closer to IP than S.C. magnets only. This makes larger dynamic aperture.

QC1P/E(Permanent Magnet) Preliminary Correction S.C. magnet IP 2009/7/2 IR技術打合せ/ N. Ohuch

Summary The lattice of “Nano beam scheme” is still being developed. Dynamic aperture is not enough so far for injection/Touschek lifetime. It strongly depends on IR magnet configuration. We are considering both permanent and superconducting magnets.

Appendix

L= 0.89 m → 4 m LER Arc Cell ap ex (nm) ex = 8.8 nm ap = 3.3x10-4

HER arc cell 2.5p non-interleaved sextupole chromaticity correction Y. OHNISHI / KEK

HER arc cell #magnets increases by 60% Emittance (nm) Momentum Compaction

QCS1Pコイル長:305.93mm [磁石長370mm] QCS1Eコイル長:460.896mm [磁石長500mm] 磁石位置(IPから) QCS1P=1126.4mm  (910mm : 5/1 optics ) QCS1E=1571.4mm  (1460 mm) 2009/7/2 IR技術打合せ

LER IR optics bx*/by*=17.8 mm/0.26 mm LCC LCC