Student Growth and Performance Update: A Comparison of RttT & Non-RttT Ohio Public School Districts An Overview of Local LEA Data: Conneaut Area Schools, NE Region Winter 2013

Ohio RttT/Non-RttT Cohorts # OHIO Students RttT Non-RttT Public Districts 610 285 325 Enrollment 1,637,299 55% 45% Poverty 704, 209 62% 38% Minority 332,388 77% 23% Minority (excludes large urban districts) 200,122 Student with Disabilities (SWD) 218,497 59% 41% What do you notice about the differences in cohorts? Please keep such differences in mind as we continue to explore existing data.

District Demographics Type 4 (Small town with high student poverty and average student population) 1,799 Enrollment $24,145 Median Income 62.7% Poverty 8.5% Minority population 16.7% Students with Disabilities

Performance Index Gain of 2 Performance Index Gain of 2.4 RttT & Non-RttT Districts (3-year average before RttT and 2012-2013 LRC) The data we are looking at here reflects a 2.4 PI gain for both RttT and Non-RttT districts when comparing current Performance Index with the 3 year average for the years leading up to RttT participation.   There is no difference in the PI gains when comparing RttT with Non-RttT; but again, keep in mind the demographics of RttT and Non-RttT districts

District Performance Index Gain/Loss Three-year Average before RttT (08-10 LRC) 92.73 Performance Index 2012-2013 LRC 94.9 Gain/Loss + 2.17 gain

RttT, Non-RttT & District Performance Index Gain (3-year average before RttT and 2012-2013 LRC)

Percent of RttT vs Non-RttT Districts Adding More than 1 Year’s Growth These data reflect that 56% of Ohio RttT public school districts added MORE THAN one year’s growth as reported on the 2012-2013 LRC. That compares to 53% of Non-RttT

Gifted Value Added (based on distribution of scores for the entire state over several years) Percent of districts Adding More than 1 year's Growth 26% of RttT districts added more than one year’s growth for their gifted population compared to 19% of Non-RttT districts

SWD Value Added (based on distribution of scores for the entire state over several years) Percent of districts adding more than 1 year's growth (2012-2013 LRC) These data reflect that 32% of RttT public school districts added more than one year’s growth for their population of SWD as reported on the current LRC. Non-RttT districts did slightly better with their SWD population

Value Added - Lowest 20% (based on distribution of scores for the entire state over several years) Percent of districts adding more than 1 year's growth 2012-2013 LRC And when you look at the lowest quintile of achievement; the lowest 20%) 33% of RttT districts added more than one year’s growth compared to 28% of Non-RttT districts.

Value Added Growth – District A = 2 or more year’s growth B = 1 year of growth, but less than 2 C = Greater or equal to -1 but less than +1 D = Greater or equal to -2 but less than -1 F = Less than -2 F - Overall C - Gifted C - Students With Disabilities A - Lowest 20%

District Performance compared to All Ohio Districts Letter Grade All OH 610 Districts Overall Percent of Districts Gifted SWD Lowest 20% A 46 10 16 14 B 8 12 17 C 45 42 49 D F 23 13 6 NR 2 The highlighted areas shows how your district fell in relationship to the rest of the state.

RttT/Non-RttT 3rd Grade Reading % at or above Proficient (3-year average before RttT and 2012-2013 LRC)

District - 3rd Grade Reading 77.3% Three-year average before RttT Percent at or above Proficient 83.6% 2012-13 LRC 6.3 % Gain

3rd Grade Reading % at or above Proficient (3-year average before RttT and 2012-2013 LRC)

RttT/Non-RttT 4-Year Average Graduation Rate The 2012 RttT 4 year graduation rate improved by 3.7% over the 2010 rate This compares to a 2.4 % improvement by Non-RttT districts The data is 1 year behind thus accounting for no 2013 data

District Graduation Rate (4 Year) 2010 Rate 82.3% (“On-time”) 2012 Rate 83.1% (4-Year Longitudinal) Gain or Loss: + 0.8%

RttT, Non-RttT & District Graduation Rates