NPS Management Update September 27, 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Virginia Conservation Agency. Section 319 Non Point Source Program WVCA is the primary entity responsible for the implementation of the: Agriculture.
Advertisements

July 15, 2008 – GB Work Session Discussion of Mayor Thomas E. Swisstack’s Priority List Recommendations.
District of Columbia Stormwater Fees October 27, 2008 Apartment and Office Building Association of Metropolitan Washington Brendan Shane DDOE Office of.
Implementing A Section 319 Project During a Time of Regulatory Change The Catoma Creek Story Alabama Water Resources Association Conference September 2005.
1 Watershed Condition Framework Overview SEAKFHP Strategic Planning Meeting Sheila Jacobson, Fisheries Biologist October 2012.
Lucia Machado, NPS Coordinator.  Under Section 319 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act) ◦ Part (h) provides the grant program.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Rick Koelsch University of Nebraska – Lincoln Bob Broz University of Missouri - Columbia.
Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Illinois Coastal Management Program Illinois was officially approved as a Coastal Management Program on Jan.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
ANRC AACD Arkansas Conservation Districts Training Program Power Point 12 Arkansas Natural Resources Commission.
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
Section 319 Grant Program Nonpoint Source Pollution Control
2006 Network Users’ Meeting Chesapeake Bay Program Regional Exchange for Non Point Source Best Management Practices April 18, 2006 Nancie L. Imler PA DEP.
Community Development & Planning Grant Pre-Application Meeting April 17,
THE COST AND LEVEL OF SERVIC E PRESENTED BY: COURTNEY REICH, AICP ECOLOGICAL PLANNING GROUP Stormwater Management Programs for Local Governments.
1 Small Community Environmental Compliance Assistance Project May 8, 2007 Arizona’s.
Project Funding Workshop Lynn Boerman, IDNR June 22, 2011.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan North Bay Watershed Association Meeting November 3, 2006 Working together to enhance sustainable water.
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
Water Quality Program Financial Assistance Progress and Plans for Meeting RCW Requirements (Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee)
Gerry Pratt State AOC Coordinator, Division of Water New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, Albany, NY P: 518.
NPS Program Funded Success Stories September 17, 2014 Arkansas Natural Resources Commission Tony Ramick, Supervisor NPS Management Program.
Lake County Watershed Management Board Funding Program Mike Prusila, CFM, Watershed Planner.
S TREBAND C LOUD : A TOOL FOR CONSERVATION PLANNERS Picture of White River near Flippin, AR, by James Powers Project No ANRC NPS Annual 319 Program.
CLEAN WATER ACT Section 319 Grant Funds Robin F. “Rob” Rung Contracts / Grants Officer Water Quality Planning Bureau Department of Environmental Quality.
Species, Stories and Stakeholders September 17, 2014 Arkansas Natural Resources Commission Tony Ramick, Supervisor NPS Management Program.
1 Cross-Cutting Issues 5310-JARC-New Freedom U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration SAFETEAU-LU Curriculum August 7, 2007.
Guidance on Section 106 Grants to Indian Tribes Lena Ferris, US EPA Office of Wastewater Management November 2007.
NPS Management Update September 23, 2015 Arkansas Natural Resources Commission Kevin McGaughey, Program Manager NPS Management Program.
Post-Flood Training - Municipal Officials/Contractors Rick Weidenbach, Executive Director Delaware County Soil & Water Conservation District Scotty Gladstone,
Paso del Norte Watershed Council Activities August 2004 Postponement of planned demonstration of Coordinated Database/GIS for Congressionals on September.
1 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Budget Presentation FY
Water Conservation Field Services Program. Water Conservation Field Services Program Program Emphasis –Planning Development of Water Management Plans.
Innovative Solutions for Water and the Environment San Diego IRWMP Regional Advisory Committee Meeting October 9, 2007.
Virginia’s Brownfield Program - An Attitude of Success Presented by: Delegate Terrie Suit Member - Virginia House of Delegates 81st District & Chris Evans.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
New Mexico’s Nonpoint Source Management Program and Plan Revision.
Mary Apostolico Potomac Watershed Manager. Current Authorities for TMDL Process Federal Clean Water Act, § 303(d) - TMDL List & TMDL Development §303(e)
Ashley Wendt Texas State Soil & Water Conservation Board NPS Project Manager.
HOUSING POLICIES UPDATE & CALENDAR A BRIEFING TO THE HOUSING COMMITTEE JUNE 6, 2016.
Leveraging Resources with National Estuary Programs
Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Dave Jones, Water Quality Program Manager Division of Conservation
Partners in Conservation
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Watershed Section Funding
Chesapeake Bay Program Budget & Finance Workgroup Meeting
Tim Cawthon TCEQ Nonpoint Source Program
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Department Activities
North Dakota’s Alternative Plans
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Water Quality Improvement Projects and Engineering Planning Grant
State Agency Perspective of Estuary Program Subcommittees
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
CROSS County L’Anguille River Watershed water quality project
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should:
US Environmental Protection Agency
Conservation Districts
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
NPS Management Update September 21, 2016
Nonpoint Source Program
Stormwater Grant Updates
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Sustainable Agricultural Lands Conservation Program
Stormwater Local Assistance Fund
Presentation transcript:

NPS Management Update September 27, 2017 Arkansas Natural Resources Commission Allen Brown, Program Coordinator NPS Management Program

Updates and Information Funding $3,062,000 was approved by EPA to fund 11 NPS related projects in Arkansas starting on October 1, 2017 Costshare Streambank Restoration Monitoring Green Infrastructure Education Workplans No request for workplans will be announced by ANRC in December 2017 The FY18 grant will be used for administrative cost over a 3 to 4 year period

Updates and Information Funding – unknown in the future We expect allocation amount(s) to be systematically reduced. It also appears allocation amounts will not be determined quickly. Also we do not know what the focus will be if EPA downsizes Annual Report Annual report to EPA was submitted on January 20th, 2017 and received a favorable review of the accomplishments made, the success accomplished, coordination with other partners and projects being implemented. Success Since January 1st of 2017 ANRC has had a total of 3 Watershed Management Plans that have been accepted by EPA and currently 1 is in development

Historic Funding for the NPS Program in Arkansas FY 15 $2,957M (-) 31K FY 16 $3,057M + 100K FY 17 $3,062M + 5K FY 18 $???? (?) * * Currently we are anticipating and planning for less $$ for FY18. Depending on the FY18 $$ we would fund admin to keep the program going.

NPS Program focus for the Future? Changes More focus on BMP implementation Smaller 12 Digit HUCs Delistings Costshare projects are declining based on match More Costshare partners Slight upswing in LID projects Milestones Hurdles MS4 permits City ordinances Knowledge based Planners, Developers and Contractors Education opportunity

Essential changes needed of the NPS Management Program Money The NPS program could use more $’s but only if there are partners (entities) willing to do the work (projects) or do the work necessary (eligibility) with the restrictions of where $’s can be used based on EPA guidance (criteria) Currently only federal $’s are put into the NPS program. There is no “line item” or Arkansas legislative funding allocated Project area or stream segment monitoring, results and WQx cost versus “on the ground” implementation Field Capacity – there are not entities to carry out projects Not financially secure or ever develop a long term revenue stream No full time coordinator or dedicated personnel No activities to keep partners involved Little or no recognition or expressed appreciation Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) – ADEQ develops the Integrated Water Quality Report (305b) and the subsequent 303(d) list of impaired waters Roving monitoring network – waters actively assessed on a rotating basics Typically an 8 digit HUC has 2-3 monitoring stations Not enough monitoring to assess effectiveness of “small” projects

Limitations of the NPS Management Program Documented Success Difficult and takes time (long term monitoring and assessment) Indicative of waters removed Reactive versus Proactive management Historically EPA has mandated a reactive management approach to WQ (i.e. address only waters that are impaired) Federal fiscal year 2014 EPA agreed with states that some $’s be dedicated to maintaining waterbodies Time Practices (BMPs) placed along the streambank have the most immediate effect BMPs placed within the riparian zone have the next quickest effect BMPs placed out of the riparian zone but within ¼ of a mile typically will not show an effect for years (dependent on the practice, condition, slope, etc.) No real way to assess the effects of controlling, reducing or abating NPS expediently Watersheds are not static Improvements may be negligible or negated in the geographic scope of the watershed

Strength of the NPS Management Program Partners Federal and State agencies, academic institutions, conservation districts, organizations and watershed groups How is Partnership strength demonstrated Informing stakeholders and citizens who your are and what you do Giving credit where credit is due Reporting activities through “snap shot reporting” Distributing the “annual report” to partners The NPS Program has initiated a “Snap shot” reporting form to help capture activities occurring in the State that agencies, academic institutions, conservation districts, organizations and watershed groups are doing. 2015 ANRC received 21 Snap Shot forms 2016 ANRC received 13 Snap Shot forms

NPS Management Plan Update 2017-2020 ANRC is currently in the process of updating the plan to submit to EPA New plan will not include regulatory or permitted practices Mining Septic tanks CAFO’s Land application Roads/Construction

Tony Ramick, Supervisor UP Next Brian Fontenot, Ph.D. EPA Region VI Tony Ramick, Supervisor ANRC NPS Section Allen Brown, Program Coordinator NPS Management Program Arkansas Natural Resources Commission 101 East Capitol, Suite 350 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-3902 Allen.Brown@arkansas.gov