Group 3 Day 2.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

THE APRM MONITORING PROCESS MOZAMBIQUE EXPERIENCE Workshop on Harmonizing the Zambian APRM NPoA with the NDP and MTEF Oct. 2014, Lusaka 1.

Advertisements

USE OF COUNTRY SYSTEMS TO MANAGE CLIMATE CHANGE PAUL STEELE, UNDP.

Internal Audit reporting to CHU Evelin Pungas Head of Internal Control Coordination Unit Financial Control Department

Enhancing Integrity in Public Procurement OECD Recommendation and Toolbox Elodie Beth Administrator Integrity Public Governance and Territorial Development.

Счетная палата Республики Молдова 1 The activity of Court of Accounts of the Republic of Moldova in the context of the reforms and priorities of the country's.

Meeting on Environmental Assessments Geneva, 16-17April 2013 Items of the provisional agenda.

Establishment and Development of the Internal Audit System for the Public Sector in Kyrgyz Republic INTERNAL AUDIT COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE ISTANBUL

Mrs. Mariya Shulezhko Director of Audit Department Accounting Chamber of Ukraine VII EUROSAI WGEA Meeting, 6-8 October 2009, Sofia, Bulgaria.

PEM -PAL 13th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERNAL AUDIT , Hotel Granit, Ohrid.

World Bank and Statistical Capacity Building PARIS21 Task Team Meeting Washington, DC September 10, 2001.

The Role of Parliament in the budget process. Overview Actors in the budget process Stages in the budget process Budgeting for the medium term.

Use of Policy Analysis in Local Government in the Greater Las Vegas Metropolitan Area PUA 726 Policy Analysis Spring 2009 Dawn Barlow Shane Dillon Lynn.

1 External audit RF Court of Accounts Laws 41-ФЗ, 6-ФЗ, Standards of external audit Government Control Entities Control and Revision Directorates Financial.

Experience of the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation in Performance Auditing of Public Debt Management Vilnius, Lithuania June 2011 Accounts Chamber.

THE EXPERIENCE OF ESTABLISHING THE VETERINARY STATUTORY BODY IN KYRGYZSTAN Zh. Dadybaev, K. Mamatkulov, R. Tashbaeva.

Budget Literacy and Transparency Working Group Key Outcomes and Prospects Anna Belenchuk, Head of the Working Group February 25, 2016.

The PEFA Framework – a tool for monitoring government performance ICGFM – New Developments in Governmental Financial Management Miami, May 19-22, 2008.

ASSESSING LONG-TERM STRATEGIC DOCUMENTS WITH THE EU PERSPECTIVE Supreme Audit Office Poland Slawomir Grzelak Director, Department of Economy,

Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.

Future Planning for new BCOP Working Group Nicolay Begchin, MoF Russian Federation Leader of the PEMPAL BCOP Program and Performance Budgeting Working.

Expansion of OECD Performance Budgeting Survey to PEMPAL countries PEMPAL Budget Community of Practice (BCOP) Nicolay Begchin, MoF Russian Federation Leader.

Overview of Program and Performance Budgeting Working Group

Treasury of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Introducing Accrual Accounting in the Republic of Kazakhstan

Budget Monitoring and Evaluation

BUDGET transparency in the Kyrgyz Republic

Financial Management for Africa Centers of Excellence Project Presented by Patrick Umah Tete, World Bank on May 20, 2014 during the launch of the project.

Update on Progress PEMPAL Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)

Newly diagnosed HIV infections per million population

Program budgeting in the Kyrgyz Republic

Budgeting systems : Monitoring and Evaluation

Division of powers between IA, SAI and FI

PEMPAL, Moscow, October 2016 Natalia Pilets Deputy Head,

PEMPAL Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)

Budget Formulation: good practices

Public Financial Management Performance Measurement Framework

The road to budget transparency in Mexico

Financial Management and Accountability

Moving Forward in PFM for Sustainable Economic Growth and Development

GIFT and IBP Pilot PROJECT on PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Group 2 Day 2 Citizen Engagement

Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)

Evolution of the Role and Functions of the Treasury

Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)

PEMPAL Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)

Measuring and Monitoring Treasury Performance

PEMPAL Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)

Cumulative reported HIV infections per million population

Group 2 Day 1 Program Budgeting

Annual newly diagnosed HIV infections per million population

Pubic Financial Management Financial Management in Sub national government Rajendra Prasad Nepal.

Finding A Common Scale: An Overview of PFM Performance Indicators

Budget Management and Financial Accountability: Overview

Proposed criteria for putting aid on budget

Ministry of National Economy of The Republic of Kazakhstan

PEMPAL Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)

The policy framework for cooperation Casablanca, 4-5 September 2013 Workshop on the Models to Promote Cooperation between Civil Society and Government.

Spending Reviews in PEMPAL Countries

PEMPAL Budget Community of Practice (BCOP)

GROUP 2 Belarus, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Russia, Uzbekistan,

Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation

Developing Labour Statistics in the CIS Region: Goals and Objectives

Elena Nikulina, the World Bank

Elena Nikulina, the World Bank

Public Expenditure Management Peer Assisted Learning (PEMPAL) Network

Elena Nikulina, the World Bank

Budget Transparency in PEMPAL Countries

Group X (1, 2 or 3).

Strategic development goals and priorities of the Republic of Tajikistan . National monitoring and evaluation system for their achievements. Eshboev.

Presentation transcript:

Group 3 Day 2

Group 3 - Countries Russian Federation Bulgaria Belarus Moldova Ukraine Kyrgyz Republic Kazakhstan Uzbekistan

Summary of Discussions Who should develop performance indicators? Indicators should be developed by a government body responsible for policymaking in a given sector by engaging local authorities (if the government program is developed at the national and subnational levels) External evaluation (clearance) – MOF, MOE, and academic community. The adoption authority depends on the level at which government programs are adopted (e.g. parliament, government, line ministries, etc.).

Should indicators distinguish between levels and type of spending/spending units? Indicators should primarily capture the effectiveness of government programs Types of indicators: - qualitative (performance) indicators; - quantitative indicators; -effectiveness indicators (budget resources spent on a specific intervention, service). Cross-sector indicators within government programs are adopted by government decision (a government agency in charge is appointed)

How should monitoring and evaluation of performance indicators be conducted to assess program effectiveness and how should information be used? By putting in place a centralized framework comprising: A coordinating government body (e.g. Ministry of Economy in Russia an Belarus); Line ministries (government program clients); Budget beneficiaries; Chamber of Accounts Throughout the fiscal year line ministries – government program clients and implementing units – conduct monitoring exercises. Evaluation (high-level monitoring) is performed by the government and coordinating government agency. A more thorough analysis is conducted less frequently by the Chamber of Accounts and other audit bodies.

The following must be ensured: Results of implementation of government programs must be made public (in an accessible and easy to understand format): posted on government websites, in explanatory notes to the budget, etc.; Transparency; Consideration and analysis of budget requests in the course of (forward-looking) budget preparation and audit of budget execution.

Thank you