Door to Balloon Times: Achieving 90 Minutes and Less.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACTION Registry (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network) Initial Report 1st Quarter 2007 Results Report prepared by: www. ncdr.com.
Advertisements

Patient Oriented Therapy for STE-MI
Degli Studi e dei Registri: sul Territorio
ACC/AHA Classification of Care Metrics
Prepared by: ACTION Registry-GWTG Results: January – December, 2008.
June 20, 2008 Alliance for Health Reform Janet Wright MD FACC IC 3 Program: Challenges, Lessons, and Hope.
© 2010, American Heart Association. All rights Association of Hospital Primary Angioplasty Volume in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Quality.
STEMI Care Delivery Report Out
THE CODE STEMI PROJECT: Winning the Race
1 CCORT/CCS 2008 Quality Indicators for Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) Care - Introduction CIHR Team Grant in Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Jack.
The Pediatric Cardiology National Quality Improvement Collaborative
Local improvement following national clinical audit workshops Auditing heart attacks Saving lives Dr Andrew Wragg Barts Health.
BASE HOSPITAL GROUP ONTARIO Chapter 3 for 12 Lead Training -WHY 12 LEAD- Ontario Base Hospital Group Education Subcommittee 2008 TIME IS MUSCLE.
State-of-the-art Lifelong Learning Portfolio, designed to help CV professionals easily track MOC and CME and participate in learning activities based.
American College of Cardiology Transforming Science into Quality Care Alfred A. Bove, MD, PhD, FACC.
Part I: STEMI BootCamp The 5 “R’s” of Reperfusion”
Chapter 3 for 12 Lead Training -Precourse-
GAP-D2B An Alliance for Quality. GAP-D2B Goal n To achieve a door-to-balloon time of
D2B: Door-to-Balloon Initiative Guidelines for Kaleida Health.
NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO DECLARE J.M. McLENACHAN, LEEDS.
Cardiac Reperfusion Team Protocol Reduces Door-to-Balloon Time at Hamot Medical Center Antonios D. Katsetos, DO, Thomas Williams, MS, Theresa Kisiel, CRNP,
Regional Systems of Care to Optimize Timeliness of Reperfusion Therapy for STEMI: The Mayo Clinic Protocol Henry H. Ting, MD, MBA Associate Professor of.
New York City Direct Referral to Catheterization Lab STEMI Notification & Transportation Protocol.
Physician Progress Record JACC Appropriateness Figures 2, 3 and 4
OVERALL CATHETERIZATION LABORATORY NORMAL ANGIOGRAPHY RATE DOES NOT INCREASE WITH EMERGENCY ROOM ACTIVATION OF PRIMARY CORONARY INTERVENTION (PCI) FOR.
PPCI – National Update NCBC Workshop Jim McLenachan, National Clinical Lead for PPCI, NHS Improvement, England. London, 24 th November, NCBC Annual.
An Immediate Nursing Feedback Program for Primary PCI for ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Karen Mckenny RN, Theresa Fortner RN, Cheryl McNeil.
STEMI-OUR System of Care: A Big Town Perspective with a Small Town Compassion Door-to-Balloon (D2B) Intensive Analysis Wm. Todd Gray, D.O., F.A.C.C. June.
CARDIAC ALERT: A Change in Process
12 Tectonic Plates Shaping the Formation of Regional STEMI Networks Ivan C. Rokos, MD, FACEP, (FACC) Emergency Physician Asst. Clinical Professor, UCLA.
Bill Koenig, MD Medical Director Los Angeles County EMS Agency.
Very Rapid Treatment of STEMI: Utilizing Pre-Hospital ECGs to Bypass the Emergency Department Kenneth W. Baran, MD Medical Director for United Hospital’s.
Where is Cookeville Regional Medical Center? 0 Cookeville Regional Medical Center STEMI program (What we do well and our challenges) Commercial Interest.
Masoudi FA et al J Am Coll Cardiol (Published online 27 November 2008) CVN Weekly Interventional Update December 8, 2008 Jeffrey J. Popma and Christopher.
GUSTO I GUSTO I Median Time (hrs) Between Symptom Onset and Treatment GUSTO III GUSTO III InTIME II InTIME II ASSENT.
Overview Public Reporting Cardiovascular Data Recommendations.
American College of Cardiology Transforming Science into Quality Care.
Ambulance Victoria and MonashHEART Acute Myocardial Infarction (Mon-AMI) 12 lead ECG project. An update On behalf of the MonAMI Team A Hutchison, Y Malaiapan,
Regional Showcase West Tennessee. Speakers: John Baker M.D./Emily Garner RN Presentation: Regional Showcase – West Tennessee Presenter Disclosure Information.
Door to Balloon Times: How we got to where we are Brittany Cunningham, RN, MSN VHVI Quality Consultant July 27 th, 2011.
1 Redesigning Hospitals to Improve Quality The Door-to-Balloon A lliance Elizabeth H. Bradley, PhD Professor of Public Health Yale School of Public Health.
Forsyth ML Receiving Center Report New Slide for Transfer in patients #2.
The Impact of Regional ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Systems of Care on the Use of Protocols and Quality Improvement Initiatives in Community Hospitals.
1 Primary Angioplasty for Acute STEMI Dr Adam Jacques Dr Sola Odemuyiwa February 2010.
Virginia Heart Attack Coalition/Mission Lifeline.
Mission: Lifeline The AHA STEMI Initiative Status Report Alice K. Jacobs, M.D. Boston University Medical Center Boston, MA There are no conflicts or relationships.
National AMI Information Call February 5, 2008 Patient Safety Initiative.
Effect of Switching Antithrombin Agents for Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction The HORIZONS-SWITCH Analysis HORIZONS AMI Dangas G, et al.
Our STEMI Program Leesa Wright, RN, CCCC, CCRN
Confidential. This presentation is provided for the recipient only and cannot be reproduced or shared without Tennova Healthcare, Inc.’s express consent.
The Health Roundtable Saving heart muscle by reducing delays to getting patients to the overnight regional catheter lab Presenter: Debby Hailstone Middlemore.
Presenter Disclosure Information Kevin Daniel, RN, CEN Clinical Data Supervisor Northside Hospital System Metro Atlanta Mission Lifeline Quality & Data.
PCI for STEMI Ari de la Hera, M.D..
Inter-Hospital Transfer of High Risk STEMI Patients for PCI is Safe and Feasible David M. Larson, Katie M. Menssen, Scott W. Sharkey, Marc C. Newell, Anil.
RACE: Reperfusion of acute myocardial infarction in North Carolina emergency departments Christopher Granger, MD Director, Cardiac Care Unit Duke University.
Overview of the Winnipeg CODE STEMI Project Implemented May 2008 Dr.J.Tam MD, FRCP(C), FACC Section Chief Cardiology WRHA and University of Manitoba Lillian.
Telemedicine To Expedite Patient’s Transfer: The Introduction of the Videophone Lowell Satler, MD Washington Hospital Center.
Prof Kim Myeong Kon / R1 Park Ji Yoon
Challenging Case Presentations From South Texas Methodist Hospital
What Have We Learned From the Mission: Lifeline Registry?
Eva Kline-Rogers RN, NP, AACC University of Michigan
STEMI Systems of Care – Update on Mission: Lifeline:
The Model Patient and Model EMS
Brief History on Mission: Lifeline
Public Reporting of Cardiovascular Data
EDOSG National STEMI Initiatives In Partnership with the HSR-DCC
ACC/SCAI – i2 Summit Late Breaking Clinical Trials March 29, 2008
Circulation 2001;104: Circulation 2001;104:
OHSU Chest Pain Program
A model of variation and accelerating factors in the process of acute care chain of patients with STEMI going for primary PCI. PCI, percutaneous coronary.
Presentation transcript:

Door to Balloon Times: Achieving 90 Minutes and Less

Quality Update from ACC West Virginia Chapter 3 rd Annual Meeting November 22, 2008 ¤ D2B Alliance D2B-Sustain the Gain ¤ Appropriateness Criteria App Use Criteria ¤ IC3 = Improving Continuous Cardiac Care ¤ D2B Alliance D2B-Sustain the Gain ¤ Appropriateness Criteria App Use Criteria ¤ IC3 = Improving Continuous Cardiac Care Janet Wright MD FACC Sr VP of Science and Quality

Median Door-to-Balloon Time McNamara et al., JACC, 2006

D2B Alliance Goal ¤ Goal: –To achieve a door-to-balloon time of 90 minutes for at least 75% of non-transfer primary PCI patients with STEMI. ¤ Goal: –To achieve a door-to-balloon time of 90 minutes for at least 75% of non-transfer primary PCI patients with STEMI.

Evidence-based Strategies that Reduce Treatment Delays 1.ED physician activates the cath lab 2.One call activates the cath lab 3.Cath lab team ready in minutes 4.Prompt data feedback 5.Senior management commitment 6.Team-based approach *Optional: Pre-hospital ECG to activate the cath lab if feasible 1.ED physician activates the cath lab 2.One call activates the cath lab 3.Cath lab team ready in minutes 4.Prompt data feedback 5.Senior management commitment 6.Team-based approach *Optional: Pre-hospital ECG to activate the cath lab if feasible

D2B Alliance: Timeline Krumholz HM et al. JACC-Cardiovascular Intervention 2008;1:97-104

More than 1,000 hospitals joined the effort

ACC NCDR Cath-PCI Registry % D2B <90 min 62% 82%

Goal Attained!!! ACTION Quarter Results - Non-Transfer Patients with DTB 90 mins Non-transfer patients represent 67% of primary PCI population

Use of strategies in D2B Alliance hospitals changed Recommended Strategy Baseline Follow-up ED physician activates lab52%60% Single call activates lab31%37% Cath team in minutes81%89% Prompt data feedback61%79% Team-based approach 64%85% PH ECG activates lab33%41% Recommended Strategy Baseline Follow-up ED physician activates lab52%60% Single call activates lab31%37% Cath team in minutes81%89% Prompt data feedback61%79% Team-based approach 64%85% PH ECG activates lab33%41%

What is Next? The D2B-Sustain the Gain Program ¤Many hospitals – still actively implementing six strategies ¤ACC – will continue support – web pages, listserve support on bi-monthly webinars ¤MOC IV Certification Points available for QI activity ¤Alignment with AHAs Mission LIfeline The D2B-Sustain the Gain Program ¤Many hospitals – still actively implementing six strategies ¤ACC – will continue support – web pages, listserve support on bi-monthly webinars ¤MOC IV Certification Points available for QI activity ¤Alignment with AHAs Mission LIfeline

Why ACCF Appropriate Use Criteria? ¤ Improve utilization of resource-intensive tests and procedures –Developed by physicians/providers –Literature-based (when possible) approach –Initial focus on advanced diagnostic cardiac imaging –Expansion to revascularization, potential for other procedures ¤ Focused reduction of procedures based on clinical value and practice patterns, not indiscriminant volume reduction ¤ Facilitates continuous quality improvement though education and feedback ¤ Preserves patient/provider relationship ¤ Provides for continued patient access ¤ Improve utilization of resource-intensive tests and procedures –Developed by physicians/providers –Literature-based (when possible) approach –Initial focus on advanced diagnostic cardiac imaging –Expansion to revascularization, potential for other procedures ¤ Focused reduction of procedures based on clinical value and practice patterns, not indiscriminant volume reduction ¤ Facilitates continuous quality improvement though education and feedback ¤ Preserves patient/provider relationship ¤ Provides for continued patient access

The Appropriate Use Criteria Queue Nuclear cardiology (SPECT MPI) Nuclear cardiology (SPECT MPI) October 2005 Cardiac CT/MR Cardiac CT/MR September 2006 Echocardiography (Transthoracic/Transesophageal) Echocardiography (Transthoracic/Transesophageal) June 2007 Echocardiography (Stress) Echocardiography (Stress) December 2007 ¤ Revascularization (PCI and CABG) December 2008 (In Press) ¤ Revised SPECT Criteria (in preparation) ¤ CV imaging cross modality (efficiency) evaluation Nuclear cardiology (SPECT MPI) Nuclear cardiology (SPECT MPI) October 2005 Cardiac CT/MR Cardiac CT/MR September 2006 Echocardiography (Transthoracic/Transesophageal) Echocardiography (Transthoracic/Transesophageal) June 2007 Echocardiography (Stress) Echocardiography (Stress) December 2007 ¤ Revascularization (PCI and CABG) December 2008 (In Press) ¤ Revised SPECT Criteria (in preparation) ¤ CV imaging cross modality (efficiency) evaluation

Implementation and Evaluation ¤ Development of methodology and publication of Criteria is not enough to ensure change in clinical practice ¤ Formation of AUCIE (Appropriate Use Criteria Implementation and Evaluation) Working Group –Education/Communication (Kim Williams) –Implementation Tools (electronic) (Michael Mirro) –Databases and Registries (James Min) –CMS Demonstration Pilot Proposal (Eric Peterson) –Performance Measurement Development (Robert Hendel) ¤ ACCF/United Healthcare SPECT Appropriateness Pilot ¤ MIPPA mandate for Appropriateness Criteria Demo ¤ Development of methodology and publication of Criteria is not enough to ensure change in clinical practice ¤ Formation of AUCIE (Appropriate Use Criteria Implementation and Evaluation) Working Group –Education/Communication (Kim Williams) –Implementation Tools (electronic) (Michael Mirro) –Databases and Registries (James Min) –CMS Demonstration Pilot Proposal (Eric Peterson) –Performance Measurement Development (Robert Hendel) ¤ ACCF/United Healthcare SPECT Appropriateness Pilot ¤ MIPPA mandate for Appropriateness Criteria Demo

Evaluation of Appropriateness AppropriateUncertainInappropriate Hendel, %6%11% Williams, %5%8% Ayyad, %5%10% Druz, %33%10% Gaztanega, %28%17% Al-Mallah, %12%13% Gibbons, %11%14%

ACCF/ASNC & United Healthcare Partnership Pilot Project Goals ¤ Quality Improvement –Effective patient care –Efficient care ¤ Assess Validity of Appropriateness Criteria –Provide data for revisions/updates –Determine threshold levels of performance ¤ Assess Practice Patterns –Feedback to practice & individual physician –Identify areas for improvement ¤ Analysis of Decision Making –Correlation of level of appropriateness and image findings/patient outcome ¤ Alternative to Prior Notification/Prior Authorization ¤ Quality Improvement –Effective patient care –Efficient care ¤ Assess Validity of Appropriateness Criteria –Provide data for revisions/updates –Determine threshold levels of performance ¤ Assess Practice Patterns –Feedback to practice & individual physician –Identify areas for improvement ¤ Analysis of Decision Making –Correlation of level of appropriateness and image findings/patient outcome ¤ Alternative to Prior Notification/Prior Authorization

Pilot Project Methodology ¤ Sites –7 participating sites –Cross-country geographic representation from Oregon to Florida ¤ Data Collection –Collected at imaging facility and feedback on practice patterns sent by sites to referring physicians –ALL SPECT MPI patients at participating practices –Collected on paper form and entered online at practice site –Collect data to evaluate appropriate use and test result ¤ Education and Feedback –Practice pattern reports –Change behavior at point of order with educ & tools ¤ Sites –7 participating sites –Cross-country geographic representation from Oregon to Florida ¤ Data Collection –Collected at imaging facility and feedback on practice patterns sent by sites to referring physicians –ALL SPECT MPI patients at participating practices –Collected on paper form and entered online at practice site –Collect data to evaluate appropriate use and test result ¤ Education and Feedback –Practice pattern reports –Change behavior at point of order with educ & tools

Data Collection Form ¤ Front page –Patient demographics –History & risk factors –Prior procedures & tests ¤ Back page –Current study –Reference section ¤ Designed to be completed in one minute or less ¤ Front page –Patient demographics –History & risk factors –Prior procedures & tests ¤ Back page –Current study –Reference section ¤ Designed to be completed in one minute or less

¤ Most patients classified as to level of appropriateness ¤ Findings consistent with other studies –Wide practice variation –Few indications account for majority of inappropriates –Greater frequency of inappropriate tests from outside of lab ¤ Collection of test results –Validate criteria –Potential to be used to track downstream utilization – value of test (separate project - planning cohort study for CCTA) ¤ Most patients classified as to level of appropriateness ¤ Findings consistent with other studies –Wide practice variation –Few indications account for majority of inappropriates –Greater frequency of inappropriate tests from outside of lab ¤ Collection of test results –Validate criteria –Potential to be used to track downstream utilization – value of test (separate project - planning cohort study for CCTA) Preliminary Findings

Preliminary Data ¤ Data collection from March 3 -July 31, 2008 ¤ 6/7 sites entering data ¤ 3,035 studies ¤ 256 excluded –173 for insufficient data (64% from single practice) –82 for conflicting scores ¤ Data collection from March 3 -July 31, 2008 ¤ 6/7 sites entering data ¤ 3,035 studies ¤ 256 excluded –173 for insufficient data (64% from single practice) –82 for conflicting scores n = 2,779

Pilot Site Specific Results SiteNAppropriateUncertainInappropriate Not classified #115755%15%22%5% #281154%8%22%14% #372860%17%17%2% #486160%21%13%3% #529179%6%11%2% #618759%19%18%2%

Most Common Inappropriate Indications INDICATIONFREQUENCYPERCENT Detection of CAD Asymptomatic, low CHD risk 2629% Asymptomatic, post-revascularization < 2 years after PCI, symptoms before PCI 913% Evaluation of chest pain, low probability pt Interpretable ECG and able to exercise 823% Pre-operative assessment Low risk surgery 211% Asymptomatic or stable symptoms < 1 year after cath or abn prior SPECT 16<1%

¤ De-identified feedback to individual practitioners regarding their practice patterns in reference to benchmarks ¤ Development and dissemination of list of top inappropriate indications ¤ Internal education within cardiology practice regarding key inappropriate indications and ordering patterns ¤ Support of joint attribution by a non-threatening letter to referring practitioners about inappropriate use and key targets ¤ Decision support tools, via PDA, Internet, order-entry ¤ De-identified feedback to individual practitioners regarding their practice patterns in reference to benchmarks ¤ Development and dissemination of list of top inappropriate indications ¤ Internal education within cardiology practice regarding key inappropriate indications and ordering patterns ¤ Support of joint attribution by a non-threatening letter to referring practitioners about inappropriate use and key targets ¤ Decision support tools, via PDA, Internet, order-entry Quality Improvement and Educational Initiatives

ConclusionsConclusions ¤ Appropriate use evaluation tool –Rapid, easy to use, and provides feedback ¤ Transparent methods accepted by physicians and payer ¤ Potentially superior method to RBMs indiscriminant volume reduction ¤ Potential to understand the value of imaging test results and their impact on downstream utilization ¤ Important collaboration between physicians/ medical societies and health plans for ongoing quality improvement for cardiovascular imaging ¤ Appropriate use evaluation tool –Rapid, easy to use, and provides feedback ¤ Transparent methods accepted by physicians and payer ¤ Potentially superior method to RBMs indiscriminant volume reduction ¤ Potential to understand the value of imaging test results and their impact on downstream utilization ¤ Important collaboration between physicians/ medical societies and health plans for ongoing quality improvement for cardiovascular imaging

The IC 3 Program Quality Improvement in Practice In Every Office, Right Now

IC 3 Program at ACC Advocacy Chapters Science & Quality: NCDR & CQC Education IC3Program Informatics

The goal of the IC 3 Program is to help clinicians improve the quality of cardiovascular care and patient outcomes

IC 3 Program Context: The ACC We Believes ¤ Performance-based reimbursement is your future –Measurement, the given –Improvement, the opportunity ¤ You must invest in and use health IT ¤ Your practice pattern is or will soon be public ¤ It takes a team to deliver quality care –Preventive, acute, chronic, and palliative care ¤ Your patients trust you; you can build on that trust

Study last week in the Lancet Best practice interventions would reduce overall coronary heart disease deaths by 57%, and the difference in deaths by socioeconomic groups by 69%. Such interventions include, reduction of systolic blood pressure by 10 mmHg, of cholesterol by 2 mmol/L, and of blood glucose by 1 mmol/L in pre-diabetic people, and quitting smoking. Kivimaki et al. Lancet 2008;372:

The goal of the IC 3 Program is to help clinicians... Documentation P4P Certification EHR …. Guideline-based Patient care survive

…improve the quality of cardiovascular care and patient outcomes Variation in Care Gaps in Care Poor Care Coordination

Outpatient Performance Measures CAD, Afib, HTN, Heart failure, Diabetes, Rehab ACC/AHA PCPI PQRI NQF

Community Building The IC 3 national network of practices dedicated to high quality CV care. Interactive communication. Best practices.

Education Educational programming. Clinical guideline updates. Selection of EHR vendors. Billing and coding.

Data Collection Office-based registry. Collect and use patient care data more effectively. Coordinate care. Benchmarking. Demonstrate quality of care.

Performance Improvement Practice assessment. QI tools. Decision support (CardioPATH).

Coronary Artery Disease BP Measurement Symptom & Activity Assessment Smoking Assessment Anti-platelet Therapy Lipid Profile Use of Lipid Therapy -blocker post-MI ACE/ARB in EF & DM Screening for Diabetes Heart Failure LVEF Assessment Weight Measurements BP Measurements Clinical Symptom Assessment Activity Assessment Signs of Volume Overload Patient Education -blocker in EF ACE/ARB in EF Warfarin for Afib Initial Lab Tests Current ACC/AHA Performance Measures

Atrial Fibrillation ¤ ¤ Thromboembolic Risk – –Prior CVA/TIA – –Age 75 – –Hypertension – –Diabetes – –Heart failure or EF ¤ ¤ Warfarin use in High-risk pts ¤ ¤ Monthly INR in pts on warfarin Cardiac Rehabilitation Referral to a Rehab Program –Within 12 months of ACS PCI CABG Valve Surgery Transplant –Stable Angina Diabetes –Poor HbA 1c (>9%) –LDL Control (<100) –BP Control (<140/80)

Recognition and Rewards Incentives. Recognition. ABIM MOC. Payers. Liability reduction. tipping points

Research New insights on care delivery. Impact of program. Practice-Based Research Network.

Rewards and Recognition PQRI as an example - CMS approval - 3 practices - Preparing for change from reporting to performance evaluation

IC 3 Program Aims ¤ Prepare clinicians to thrive in a performance- based healthcare system Decision support to ensure consistent practice of evidence- based medicine: CAD, HF, Afib, Htn, DMDecision support to ensure consistent practice of evidence- based medicine: CAD, HF, Afib, Htn, DM ¤ Provide the road map and vehicle for QI Guidance about selection and use of HITGuidance about selection and use of HIT Multiple mechanisms for data collection when readyMultiple mechanisms for data collection when ready Options for data reporting and benchmarkingOptions for data reporting and benchmarking Reporting for P4P and maintenance of certificationReporting for P4P and maintenance of certification ¤ Coordinate care across sites and settings ¤ Connect practices in a learning community committed to patient-centered care

IC 3 Program Package ¤ Practice Readiness Assessment ¤ Series of Webinars ¤ Guideline Derivatives ¤ Periodic newsletter ¤ MAHI Help Desk ¤ Practice Certificate ¤ Data submission to payers; collect once, report to all ¤ How-tos: EMR selection, PQRI participation, ABIM Maintenance of Cert, Team- based Care ¤ Workflow design tips ¤ Medication adherence aids ¤ Community access for best practice sharing and problem-solving ¤ Liability reduction

How to Join ¤ Review the levels of participation at improvingcardiaccare.org and choose yours based on practice readiness and resources ¤ Not ready to collect or submit data? –Sign the IC 3 Program Participant Agreement to gain access to all activities and support ¤ Data collection and submission-worthy? –Sign the contract so that protected health information can be transmitted ¤ Review the levels of participation at improvingcardiaccare.org and choose yours based on practice readiness and resources ¤ Not ready to collect or submit data? –Sign the IC 3 Program Participant Agreement to gain access to all activities and support ¤ Data collection and submission-worthy? –Sign the contract so that protected health information can be transmitted