Status of Phase Feedforward Tests

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATF2: Status Update Glenn Christian (on behalf of FONT group) 10 th ATF Project Meeting.
Advertisements

P.N. Burrows ATF2 Project Meeting, KEK, 14/12/091 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales Philip Burrows Glenn Christian Hamid Dabiri Khah Javier Resta Lopez.
Lorentz force detuning measurements on the CEA cavity
Measurements on phase stability at CTF3 Giulio Morpurgo / CERN IWLC 2010.
PEP II Transverse Feedback System Ron Akre Anatoly Krasnykh Uli Wienands MAC April 15, 2004.
Testing and Development of Feed-Forward System for ATF2 A. Kalinin Accelerator Science and Technology Centre, Daresbury Laboratory, UK Fifth ATF2 Project.
S. Smith LCLS Facility Advisory April 16, BPMs and Toroids Facility Advisory Committee April 16, 2007 System overview.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
R. Corsini, CLIC Project Meeting - 24 th May 2013 CTF3 1 CTF3: Highlights of the 1 st run R. Corsini for the CTF3 Team 1.
Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales (FONT) - Review of Feedback Prototype Tests at ATF(KEK) Glenn Christian John Adams Institute, Oxford for FONT collaboration.
1 FONT Results 2010 Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Glenn Christian Michael Davis, Colin Perry, Javier Resta Lopez John Adams Institute Oxford.
FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF21 FONT digitisation studies of IP BPMs D. Bett, N. Blaskovic, P. Burrows, G. Christian, M. Davis, Y. I. Kim, C. Perry John.
NLC Intra-Pulse Fast Feedback Simon Jolly Oxford University NLC Beam Delivery Meeting July 2001.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
Status of Beam loss Monitoring on CTF3 Results of Tests on LINAC and PETS as R&D for TBL Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Thibaut Lefevre CERN CTF3.
Magnet Motion Produces Luminosity Loss. NLC Feedback Operation Kicker Gain Bunch Charge Measure deflected bunches with BPM and kick other beam to eliminate.
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
Future FONT BPM Processors C.Perry 25 June Types of Processor Two types of processor: a) present mixer type b) baseband type Both will be made because:
R. Corsini, CLIC Project Meeting October 24, 2012 CTF3 Experimental program for end 2012 R. Corsini for the CTF3 Team 1.
IP BPM Shift Report FONT Meeting: 22 December 2014 Talitha Bromwich.
1Ben Constance7 th January 2010 FONT5 December 2009 feedback results During the final shift we ran K1-to-P2 position feedback 151.2ns bunch spacing, quadrupoles.
1 FONT R&D status Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
CLIC CTF3: Phase Feed Forward Comparing the effect of the phase feed forward system on beam phase stability with various theoretical predictions. CLIC.
BPMs period General BPM Tasks/Projects New single bunch BPM electronics on ALICE AR1 + ST2 They had been tested already last year by Alex and Ian.
FONT Hardware Processing electronics and current beam tests Stephen Molloy Queen Mary, University of London.
Collimator BPM electronics – Results from the lab, SPS and LHC
Philip Burrows ATF2 project meeting 14/1/111 Plans for ATF2 IP Feedback Philip Burrows, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
1 Franz-Josef Decker 1 Multi-Bunch Operation for LCLS Franz-Josef Decker March 17, Definitions and goals multi-bunch within.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF October 2014 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.
Calibration summary Nov-Dec 09 R Apsimon. 10 Nov 09 Note, the power rail on the FONT5 board wasn’t working properly and so there is no good quality information.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF November 2013 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
Philip Burrows ATF2 project meeting 1/07/101 Plans for ATF2 IP Feedback Philip Burrows, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
NumberMikey Davis02 November 2012 Roundup of ATF Trip.
1 IP FB tests at ATF2 Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford.
Tools in CTF3 Simona Bettoni for the CTF3 operation team.
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
FONT4 Status Report Glenn Christian John Adams Institute, Oxford for FONT collaboration.
1/33Mikey Davis24 January 2013 Review of 23 rd of January Shift.
1 FONT IP FB Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
FONT Oxford FONT REPORT NOVEMBER Neven Blaskovic Kraljevic and Talitha Bromwich Friday, 27 November
N. Blaskovic, T. Bromwich, R. Ramjiawan
Roundup of Week at ATF Mikey Davis 19 April /26.
PreShower Characterisations
Phase Feed-Forward Piotr Skowroński (CERN)
Glen White, SLAC Jan th ATF2 Project Meeting, KEK
Further Tracking Studies and March Trip Plan
RF Synchronization Activity
Steering algorithm experience at CTF3
Feedforward runs N. Blaskovic N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting.
Monitoring glitches in the frequency divider
Firmware Update 29/03/2017 Rebecca Ramjiawan.
MKD Waveform Measurements
ATF Shift Plans Rebecca, Talitha 08/09/2017 Friday, 08 September 2017
March Trip Plan Mikey Davis 01 March /7.
Revised ATF Shift Plans
Chapter 6 Feedback Circuits
Work Update J. Rzepiela 8/17/10.
Phase Monitor Electronics: Output vs
Intra-Pulse Beam-Beam Scans at the NLC IP
Summary Shifts 8th Oct – 12th Oct
Phase Feedforward in 2015 & Plans for 2016
Beam-Based Alignment Results
Towards a ground motion orbit feed-forward at ATF2
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML
T2K Run8 MUMON Summary.
Machine Learning Study
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Stability of Calibration Data
INVERTERS. What is an Inverter? A static device that converts DC power into AC power at desired output voltage and frequency is called an Inverter. Applications.
Presentation transcript:

Status of Phase Feedforward Tests Jack Roberts 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

FONT Meeting PFF Update Introduction Most of this is the same as what I showed Phil & Glenn on the 12th Dec. New parts are: A more detailed look at the phase signals for one data set. Feedforward tests with wiggling of klystrons. We were unexpectedly able to take beam time Monday-Wednesday this week as the electrical tests caused no problems. Sorry I haven’t had time to do much more than dump plots on slides. 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Phase Feedforward Refresher Correct phase/time of drive beam by varying time of flight in the TL2 chicane using two kickers. 3 high resolution Frascati phase monitors (Mon1,Mon2,Mon3). Mon1 used as input to the feedforward system. “Controls” = FONT5 board and amplifier. Mon1 Mon2 φ φ PETS Mon3 K2 K1 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Quick Overview of Tests Late November 21st Nov: General phase measurements. 25th Nov: Constant kick measurements, response in BPMs. 26th Nov: Constant kick measurements, response in phase. 27th Nov: Feedforward tests, no (immediately) visible effect. 28th Nov: Constant kicks but only a short pulse, response in phase. 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Quick Overview of Tests December 4th Dec: Beam setup, orbit closure from kicks. Data taking from FONT5 board with all phase signals attached. 5th Dec: Feedforward applied to only one kicker, response in BPMs. R56 tests. 10th Dec: Kicker timing tests. Feedforward tests with gain scan. 11th -12th Dec: FF whilst changing mean klystron phase to induce known (hopefully correlated) phase shift. 15th-17th Dec: Additional devices added to acquisition. FF whilst changing klystron waveform. …Gigabytes of data to analyse! 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Comments on Phase Measurement Status Mon1 = old monitor, end of linac. Mon2 = new monitor, end of linac. Mon3 = new monitor, after correction. 2nd monitor is noisier than 1st monitor, but looks like this is coming from the electronics not the monitor itself. Resolution ~0.5 degrees. Correlation (mean phase) Between Mon1 and Mon2 is generally >90%. Between Mon2 and Mon3 is ~30-70% depending on the setup/day. Correlation between 3rd monitor and PETS is generally ~90%. Phase measurement in Mon3 visibly different to the linac: Phase sag Jitter in mean Features within the pulse By changing beam setup all these can be manipulated to some extent and have had similar looking signals to the linac at times. 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting 12/12/2014

Phase Monitor Performance / Phase Propagation More detailed look at the phase measurements for one data set. Only showing calibrated phases here – there are also interesting features in the calibrations and raw signals. Data set: 20141128_1252_FF_Gate340to460_GainK1_0_GainK2_0. Data from last day before we changed to connecting 1st monitor directly to the FONT5 board. Correlations happen to be quite poor in this data set (at the lower end of the typical range we saw). 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Mean Phase Along the Pulse 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Phase Jitter Along the Pulse 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

FONT Meeting PFF Update Resolution 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

FONT Meeting PFF Update Mean Phase vs. Time 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Mean Phase vs. Time: Mon2-Mon1 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Mean Phase vs. Time: Mon3-Mon1 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Mean Phase vs. Time: Mon3-Mon2 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Mean Phase vs. Time: PETS-Mon1 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Mean Phase vs. Time: PETS-Mon2 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Mean Phase vs. Time: PETS-Mon3 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Correlation Mean Phase: Mon1-Mon2 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Correlation Mean Phase: Mon1-Mon3 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Correlation Mean Phase: Mon2-Mon3 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Correlation Mean Phase: Mon1-PETS 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Correlation Mean Phase: Mon2-PETS 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Correlation Mean Phase: Mon3-PETS 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Correlation vs. Sample No. 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Correlation: Difference to Mean Pulse Phase 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Relative Kicker Timing (K1/K2 Trig Out Delay Scan) Performed different configurations of constant kicks to identify the region in which we were kicking and to check whether K1 and K2 need different trig out times relative to each other. Kick short pulse: Gated output from sample 375 to sample 435 on FONT5 board. +/- 800 counts to use full range of amplifier. Looking at one of the first BPMs after the chicane. 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

No Delay, both kicks same direction NO CORR Both Kicks + Both Kicks - 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Opposite Kicks, K1delay=0, K2delay=28ns 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Opposite Kicks, K1delay=0, K2delay=14ns 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Opposite Kicks, K1delay=0, K2delay=5.6ns 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Opposite Kicks, K1delay=0, K2delay=0 Probably the best, so the difference in cable lengths is now the same as the difference in the beam time of flight between the two kickers (at least within 2 samples = 5.6ns). N.B. Earlier tests suggested we needed a stronger kick from the 2nd kicker to close the orbit. Here equal magnitudes is ok. 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Opposite Kicks, K1delay=5.6ns, K2delay=0 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Opposite Kicks, K1delay=14ns, K2delay=0 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Constant kick as seen in the 3rd Phase Monitor Using the same setup as before for the relative timing tests (gate sample 375 to 435 on FONT5 board). Sample range (on SiS) of flat top is: ~300 to 323. Sample range (on SiS) from/to switch on/off time is: ~279 to 333 . Range of kick is +/- 3 degrees (6 degree diff between max and min). Expect roughly +/-2.5 degrees from model and current amplifier power. 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Response to FF Kick in BPMs: 1st Kicker 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Response to FF Kick in BPMs: 2nd Kicker 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Response to FF Kick in BPMs: Both Kickers 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Feedforward Gain Scan (10th Dec) Using the same portion of the pulse as just shown for the constant kick/timing tests. Feedforward tests with different gains (-63, -40, -20, 0, +20, +40 and +63). Phase units are just counts on SiS digitiser (mixer channel only) in these plots. Correlations are between monitor 2 (end linac, noisier measurement) and monitor 3 (in CLEX, after chicane). Monitor 1 connected directly to FONT5 board as FF input. 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Phase Jitter within the Pulse Approx. correction region. Variation of jitter in the correction region looks promising. But note differences outside the correction region. 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Mean Phase Correlation Plots -20 -40 -63 +20 +40 +63 GAIN Correlation becomes anti-correlation as we change the gain. 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

FONT Meeting PFF Update 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

FONT Meeting PFF Update 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Gain Scan Results Table STD CORR -63 725 0.50 -40 649 0.26 -20 577 0.42 506 0.20 +20 438 0.01 +40 404 -0.01 +63 522 -0.28 ~45% reduction in jitter with a gain of +40 and removal of correlation. My only slight concern would be whether it’s too good to be true considering how weak the correlation is with 0 gain. 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Wiggling Phase of Klystrons Various tests wiggling the phase of one or both of the first two klystrons in an attempt to create a correlated phase jitter. One example shown in the following slides: 2nd Klystron (MKS-3) waveform (within the pulse) wiggled with time. Similar to animation but we used a saw tooth rather than a sine offset. 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Wiggle Along 3: Phase Jitter 1st Peak 2nd Peak 3rd Peak Correction region 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Mean Phase: 1st Corrected Peak 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Correlation: 1st Corrected Peak 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Mean Phase: 2nd Corrected Peak 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Correlation: 2nd Corrected Peak 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Mean Phase: 3rd Corrected Peak 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

Correlation: 3rd Corrected Peak 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update

FONT Meeting PFF Update Summary We’ve managed to demonstrate the effect of the feedforward system on the phase – both in terms of reducing/amplifying correlation and jitter. The propagation in phase between the upstream and downstream monitors is 70% at best and often half that. We can influence (but not necessarily greatly improve) it by varying the R56 in TL1, see 12th Dec presentation for initial results. We did manage to boost the correlation by wiggling klystrons. First look at sample by sample correlations didn’t reveal a hidden part of the pulse that is well correlated. No beam until March/April now. Lots of data to analyse. Acquisition tools to get ready. Merry Christmas! 03/12/2018 FONT Meeting PFF Update