State Profile West Virginia

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Howard County, MD Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan October 6, 2011 Howard Saltzman Howard County Department of Public Works.
Advertisements

James River Chlorophyll Study Status Update: January 2015 House Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources Committee David K. Paylor, DEQ Director.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
Phase Difference = Phase Difference = 0.05.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
Progress Update: Evaluation of Federal Facilities in WIPs and Milestones CBPO Management Board March 6, Jim Edward, EPA Greg Allen, EPA.
Milestone Evaluations and Long Term Water Quality Monitoring Trends: What are They Telling Us About Where We are and Where We are Heading Chesapeake Bay.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
Status and Effect of Impervious Area Estimates in the TMDL Presented to the Potomac Watershed Roundtable by Michael S. Rolband P.E., P.W.S., P.W.D., LEED.
Water JAM 2010 City of Raleigh briefing for Jordan Lake Partnership October 24, 2014.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Moving towards a restored Chesapeake Bay watershed
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
Milestones, Progress and the Mid-point Assessment APPROACHING 2017 James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager Department of Environmental Quality.
E MKT 230 Week 5 CheckPoint New Product Development Read the following: You are working in the product development department of a company that creates.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017
Citizens Advisory Council
Development of a HAB Model for the James River Estuary
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Chesapeake bay program
Jim Edward, Deputy Director – EPA/CBPO
CBP Update: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL
West Virginia’s Agriculture Stakeholders Engagement Strategy
DEP Citizen Advisory Committee October 17, 2017
State Profile Maryland
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
2025 Chesapeake Bay Climate Change Load Projections
Watershed Implementation Plan
Methodology to Distribute Target Loads
State Profile Delaware
Chesapeake Bay Program Principals’ Staff Committee December 20, 2017
ФОНД ЗА РАЗВОЈ РЕПУБЛИКЕ СРБИЈЕ
Federal Facilities and the District’s Phase III WIP
Local Government Engagement Initiative January 16, 2018
Local Partners Engagement and Communication Strategy
State Profile Pennsylvania
State Profile New York.
أنماط الإدارة المدرسية وتفويض السلطة الدكتور أشرف الصايغ
Conowingo Dam Update Presented to the Citizens Advisory Committee
Status Nearly 30 scenarios completed for NAB and CBP over a year’s effort. Report on application of CBEMP in preparation. October time frame for draft.
2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision October 5, 2017 Local Government Advisory Committee Meeting.
Local Government Advisory Committee
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Outcomes and Phase III WIPs
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
'III \-\- I ', I ,, - -
Maryland’s Phase III WIP Planning for 2025 and beyond
“Phase 6 Septic vs Local/State Data”
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager
Chesapeake Bay Program Climate Change Modeling 2.0
LECTURE 9.4 – EQUILIBRIUM.
Agronomy Research Station Established 1892
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
Citizen Advisory Committee November 30, 2018
,, 'III \-\-
Citizens Advisory Committee Discussion & Program Update Dana Aunkst Director USEPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 22,2019 Baltimore, MD.
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
Watershed Restoration, Chesapeake Bay
SMR Nutrient Initiative Group Background Information Review
VIRGINIA’S Phase iii watershed implementation plan
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
VIRGINIA MUNICIPAL LEAGUE OCTOBER 7, 2019
Presentation transcript:

State Profile West Virginia

WV Draft Phase III WIP Planning Targets + Reference Loads Nitrogen Load No-Action (M lbs) E3 2013 Progress Phase II WIP (reference) Draft Phase III WIP Planning Target WV James 0.05 0.04 WV Potomac 9.90 4.95 8.01 7.78 6.30 WV Total 9.95 4.98 8.06 7.82 6.35 Phosphorus Load 0.005 0.004 0.909 0.280 0.555 0.453 0.451 0.915 0.285 0.560 0.458 0.456

WV Nitrogen Loads-Goals, Phase 5.3.2

WV Nitrogen Loads-Goals, Phase 6

WV Nitrogen Change in Level of Effort

WV Phosphorus Loads-Goals, Phase 5.3.2

WV Phosphorus Loads-Goals, Phase 6

WV Phosphorus Change in Level of Effort

WV Nitrogen – Phase 6 Level Of Effort (NoAction:E3 Reference)

WV Phosphorus – Phase 6 Level Of Effort (NoAction:E3 Reference)

WV Nitrogen – Phase 6 Loads and Target Where did the reductions come from? 1985 2013 Draft Phase III WIP Planning Target

WV Phosphorus – Phase 6 Loads and Target Where did the reductions come from? 1985 2013 Draft Phase III WIP Planning Target

WV Nitrogen – Phase 6 Scenario Loads and Draft Target

WV Phosphorus – Phase 6 Scenario Loads and Draft Target

Nitrogen – Phase 6 Relative Effectiveness Effect of Nitrogen Load Reduction on WQ Standard Attainment A = Above Fall Line B = Below Fall Line

Phosphorus – Phase 6 Relative Effectiveness Effect of Phosphorus Load Reduction on WQ Standard Attainment A = Above Fall Line B = Below Fall Line

Nitrogen Relative Effectiveness Phase 5.3.2

Nitrogen Relative Effectiveness Phase 6, WWTP, Mid-90s

Nitrogen Relative Effectiveness Phase 6, WWTP, Conowingo Dynamic Equilibrium

Nitrogen Relative Effectiveness Phase 6, All Else, Mid-90s

Nitrogen Relative Effectiveness Phase 6, All Else, Conowingo Dynamic Equilibrium

Phosphorus Relative Effectiveness Phase 5.3.2

Phosphorus Relative Effectiveness Phase 6, WWTP, Mid-90s

Phosphorus Relative Effectiveness Phase 6, WWTP, Conowingo Dynamic Equilibrium

Phosphorus Relative Effectiveness Phase 6, All Else, Mid-90s

Phosphorus Relative Effectiveness Phase 6, All Else, Conowingo Dynamic Equilibrium