Proposed PAR and 5 Criteria for High Throughput Task Group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /327r0 Submission May 2003 Adrian Stephens, Intel et alSlide 1 A Proposed Usage Model Methodology for High Throughput Task Group Adrian.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /108r0 Submission January 2003 Adrian Stephens, IntelSlide 1 Some proposed motions for HT SG Adrian P Stephens
Doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 Submission May 2004 Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 1 IEEE Wireless Interworking with External Networks (WIEN)
IEEE r q Submission Sept 2014 B. Rolfe (BCA)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /0684r0 Submission November 2005 Erik Schylander, PhilipsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE Submission November 2004 Robert F. HeileSlide rd Session of meetings of the IEEE Working Group for Wireless.
TGn Chair’s Status Update
Task Group G Report January 17, 2003
IEEE TGa Project Timeline
Interworking Study Group Justification
Intel Validation of TGn Simulation Scenarios
Mesh Networking Task Group Process
Co-existence Beacon Element
TGn PSMP Ad-hoc July 2007 Date: Authors: July 2007
High Throughput Coexistence issues – a personal comment
HT SG PAR Proposal Colin Lanzl Aware, Inc.
Management Frame Protection Study Group Request
Month 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 March 2008 Motion
TGn Closing Report September 2003
TGn Closing Report Waikoloa, HI, US 802 Plenary – 8-12 September ‘08
Outputs of the Usage Model Special Committee
Guidelines for Internal TGad Comment Submission and Resolution
Guidelines for Internal TGad Comment Submission and Resolution
TGn FRCC Jan 2004 Report Adrian P Stephens
Month 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 September 2004 Motion
Motions for 2007/09 Date: Authors: September 2007
TGn Closing Report Waikoloa, HI, US 802 Plenary – 8-12 September ‘08
Adrian Stephens nominee statement for Working Group Vice Chair
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor
– Proposed change to Operations Manual – access to members area
Avoiding unnecessary delays in the WG Letter Ballot process
Adrian P Stephens Chair, FRCC
Adrian P Stephens Chair, FRCC
November 2011 WG11 Motions for the EC
TGn FRCC Jan 2004 Report Adrian P Stephens
TGn FRCC Report March 2004 Adrian P Stephens Chair TGn FRCC
TGn Closing Report November 2003
TGn FRCC Jan 2004 Report Adrian P Stephens
Updates to TGn FRCC Documents
IEEE ah Timeline Projection
Proposed PAR and 5 Criteria for High Throughput Task Group
Management Frame Protection Study Group Request
Radio Resource Measurement Closing Report to the Working Group
Proposed text for HTSG draft PAR and 5 Criteria
TGn Chair’s Status Update
TGn Closing Report September 2003
Motions for 2007/05 Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
<month year> November 2005
Motion to a Start High Throughput Study Group
WME+ / Fasttrack Differences
January 2010 doc.: IEEE < > January 2010
IEEE SGa Project Timeline
Straw polls and Motions on Spec text for and
802.11ax Spec Development Process Proposal
IEEE Revision Timeline
Fast Roaming Study Group Closing Report March 2004
Adrian Stephens nominee statement for Working Group Chair
Task Group G Report January 17, 2003
Avoiding unnecessary delays in the WG Letter Ballot process
Straw polls and Motions on Spec text for and
DLS SG Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2007 Month Year
802.11s motion Date: Authors: November 2007 Month Year
Intel Validation of TGn Simulation Scenarios
Mesh Networking Task Group Process
TGs Closing Plenary Report
802.11ax Spec Development Process Proposal
Month 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 November 2003
TGn FRCC Jan 2004 Report Adrian P Stephens
Adrian P Stephens Chair, FRCC
Discussion on The EHT Timeline and PAR Definition
Presentation transcript:

Proposed PAR and 5 Criteria for High Throughput Task Group Month 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 November 2002 Proposed PAR and 5 Criteria for High Throughput Task Group Adrian P Stephens, Intel Corporation Adrian.p.stephens@intel.com Tel: +44 771 276 3448 (mobile) Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation John Doe, His Company

Draft PAR and 5C submission (11-02-654r0) November 2002 Draft PAR and 5C submission (11-02-654r0) Intended to become a working document owned by the group Needs additional marketing input Needs additional technical input Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

Month 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 November 2002 Proposed Process Move to accept submission 11-02-654r0 as a draft PAR and 5C Move to solicit market information (usage models) and add to the PAR & 5C. Move to solicit technical information on what rates are feasible and add to the PAR and 5C. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation John Doe, His Company

Why solicit marketing information ? November 2002 Why solicit marketing information ? Coexistence/Compatibility with legacy equipment will add complexity to the protocol and cost to implementations. This information (in the form of breakdown by usage model/market segment) should resolve what is actually required to go into the PAR. If we don’t do this, the assumption will be made that we will support the operation of a mixed BSS of legacy and 802.11 HT devices. This is complex and will add to the duration of the task group. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

Why solicit technical feasibility information? November 2002 Why solicit technical feasibility information? We don’t want to set the bar too low (not enough Pizzaz) or too high (too much cost). Indefinite language in the PAR & 5C risks delay in its sponsor ballot process. i.e. it is better to have the delay discussing something useful rather than mired down in the balloting process. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

Review of the document Document: November 2002 Review of the document Document: 11-02-654r0-HT-Proposed_PAR_and_5_Criteria_for_802.11_High_Throughput_Task_Group.doc Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

November 2002 Motion 1 Move that this group adopt 11-02-654r0 as its draft PAR and 5C. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

November 2002 Motion 2 Move that: this group solicit Marketing Information submissions containing usage scenarios / market segments size for 802.11 high throughput the group determine the requirements for compatibility/coexistence based on this information and add these requirements into its draft PAR & 5C the PAR and 5C will not be submitted to ballot until these requirements are added Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

November 2002 Motion 3 Move that: this group solicit technical submissions indicating what data throughput rates should be feasible along with an architectural (high level) description of the technology to achieve it the group determine a suitable performance requirement for its PAR and 5C that is shown to be technically feasible. the PAR and 5C will not be submitted to ballot until this requirement is added Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation