System Monitoring/Regulatory Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IEC C ASE S TUDY PRESENTED BY: Mark D. Fisher, CHMM, LSRP Principal – The ELM Group, Inc.
Advertisements

Vapor Intrusion. What is Vapor Intrusion? The migration of volatile chemical vapors from the subsurface to overlying buildings.
© 2011 COLUMBIA Technologies. Use of MiHpt Systems to Improve Project Outcomes Rapid, Real-Time High Resolution Site Characterization © 2013 COLUMBIA Technologies.
PA One Cleanup and Land Use Controls The “Business of Brownfields” Conference April 17, 2008 Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
Biodegradation and Natural Attenuation
Dale T Littlejohn Senior Geologist. What is fate and transport in the vadose zone? Vadose Zone Hydrocarbon release from buried pipeline Aquifer Surface.
Air Force Plant 4 Superfund Site Evaluation of SVE Combined with ERH for the Remediation of TCE Source Material Jeffrey Ragucci SWS 6262 – Soil Contamination.
Chemical Oxidation Treatment Technologies Susan J. Masten, Ph.D., P.E. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing,
Craig E. Marlow 8248 Hidden Forest Drive, Holland, Ohio Phone Fax Cell
REGULATORY ACCEPTANCE OF POST-CLOSURE CARE INNOVATION Mr. Charles G. Johnson Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Hazardous Material and.
Defending the Rights of Metals: How to Distinguish Naturally High Groundwater Concentrations from Site-Related Contamination Karen Thorbjornsen and Jonathan.
Phytotechnologies for Environmental Restoration and Management Micah Beard, M.S. Shaw Environmental, Inc.
The NEA Sorption Project a multinational cooperative program to advance the use of Thermodynamic Sorption Models Mark Fuhrmann U.S. NRC Office of Nuclear.
SCR-15 Coal Slurry Underground Injection. SCR-15 “That the Department of Environmental Protection and the Bureau for Public Health shall jointly design.
1 Kent S. Sorenson, Jr. Ryan A. Wymore Enhanced Bioremediation for Treatment of Chlorinated Solvent Residual Source Areas – Case Study and Implications.
Evaluating Natural Attenuation
Vapor Intrusion Guidance Proposed Updates
Solution Provider bij bodemsanering Leading in soil and groundwater remediation Solution Provider for soil & groundwater remediation Leading in soil and.
Remediation of Mixed Chromium and TCE Releases
Module 4: Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS. 2 Module Objectives  Explain the purpose of the scoping phase of the RI/FS  Identify existing data which.
1 In-Situ Treatment of Groundwater with Non-aqueous Phase Liquids December 10-12, 2002, Chicago, IL Scott G. Huling, Ph.D., P.E. USEPA Robert S. Kerr Environmental.
What’s New with In Situ Chemical Oxidation
Roger Miller, Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Barry Jackson, USGS Arkansas Water Science Center ARKANSAS EXCHANGE NETWORK FOR GROUNDWATER-QUALITY.
LOGO Feasibility Test of Applying Complex Remediation Technology for Diesel Contamination in Soil and Groundwater 2012 International Conference on Environmental.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
Overview of Remedial Approaches at Superfund Fractured Bedrock Sites Edward Gilbert, CPG Technology Assessment Branch Technology Innovation and Field Services.
ITRC Overview: Decision-making Tools and Resources for the Environmental Community Copyright 2006 Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council Regulatory.
1 Section 5: Limitations. 2 ISCO Limitations  Saturated Zone vs Unsaturated Zone  Chemistry  CoSolvents  Geology /Geochemistry/Hydrogeology  NAPL.
Using GIS to Assess Potential Abiotic Degradation of Chlorinated Ethenes Tim Glover and Theodore Parks MACTEC Engineering and Consulting Kennesaw, GA USA.
1 Section II: ISCO Technology  Importance of ISCO chemistry  Terminology  Reaction sequences/products/byproducts  Oxidant selection/contaminants 
7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund Site August 20, 2013.
The world’s leading sustainability consultancy In Situ Chemical Oxidation of Pesticides Using Shallow Soil Mixing The world’s leading sustainability consultancy.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
1 Section 6- ISCO DESIGN  Initial Site Evaluation  ISCO Compatibility  ISCO Modeling and Dosage Considerations  Bench Testing  Pilot Testing/Delivery.
Two Union Square Union Street, Suite 601 Seattle, WA (206) Field testing and modeling of in situ groundwater.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
1, 12/2/ Key factors for a successful ISCO application with Permanganate Prepared by: Richard W Lewis CPG Program Manager ERM.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
DeNovo Constructors, Inc.
“ Safer, More Effective ISCO Remedial Actions Using Non-Extreme Persulfate Activation to Yield Sustained Secondary Treatment ” Michael Scalzi, President.
7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund Site February 19, 2013.
1 Section 4- Characterization  Characterization is 95% of the Success of ISCO  Develop a complete and comprehensive Conceptual Site Model  ISCO is a.
“ Safer, More Effective ISCO Remedial Actions Using Non-Extreme Persulfate Activation to Yield Sustained Secondary Treatment ” Michael Scalzi, President.
Feb. 2006IHA/pm1 Site remediation 1 Planning site remediation Excavation: Pros/cons & How.
By Alex Walton Josh Bush Alex Walton, Josh Bush1.
“ Safer, More Effective ISCO Remedial Actions Using Non-Extreme Persulfate Activation to Yield Sustained Secondary Treatment ” Wade Meese, Vice President.
1 Groundwater Pollution GW 10 Monitored Natural Attenuation.
1 Source Removal- Policy and Practice in the FDEP Robert C. Cowdery, P.E. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Section Division of Waste Management Florida Department.
Expediting Site Remediation By Integrating The Membrane Interface Probe With In-Situ Remediation Injection Design Eliot Cooper,
Remediating Contaminated Groundwater with Slow-Release Oxidants Remediating Contaminated Groundwater with Slow-Release Oxidants Steve Comfort – University.
Benefits of Laboratory Treatability Studies in Support of Full-Scale Design for In Situ Remedies Michaye McMaster Geosyntec Consultants Sandra Dworatzek.
2017 ITRC Annual Meeting Technical team update
Introduction to Chemical Reactions
Cover Slide TCEQ logo.
Word … and chemical equations
Background Professional Geologist - 36 years
Explore the future HORIBA GROUP
Jesse Taylor: Remington Technologies
ASSESSMENT OF CORRECTIVE MEASURES PUBLIC MEETING
Improving Site Characterization in New Jersey Allan Motter, NJDEP
Environmental Issues Mapping Field Lab
Rapid Closure of Lingering Off-Site Plume Remediation Program in Residential Neighborhood using Horizontal Air Sparge and Soil Vapor Extraction Wells Narayanan.
Formation of a new substance vocabulary
AN emerging issue (PFAS POLY- AND PERFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES)
Advancing Environmental Solutions
Dan Bryant and Jim Wilson Geo-Cleanse International, Inc.
Monitoring Guidance Johannes Grath Rob Ward 12th October 2005.
FAQs for Evaluating the Soil-to-Groundwater Pathway
Presented by: Kerry Martin, P.G., DCRP Technical Specialist
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model
Presentation transcript:

System Monitoring/Regulatory Evaluation Performance monitoring Performance expectations Total mass evaluation Regulatory perspective No associated notes. Electroconductivity Diagram

Performance Monitoring Establish baseline conditions and sampling locations before treatment Determine contaminant mass / concentration reduction Monitor contaminant release and/or mobilization Includes post-treatment and possibly closure monitoring No associated notes. Application Wells Monitor Wells

Performance Monitoring Common Field Parameters (Section 6.1/p. 58) contaminants,oxidants metals, ions nitrate, sulfate and chloride alkalinity, ORP, pH temperature, specific conductance No associated notes.

Performance Monitoring Oxidant Specific Parameters: Confirming ROI Permanganate: purple color via field spectrophotometer Sodium Persulfate: iron, pH or persulfate Hydrogen Peroxide: See Tables 6-1 and 6-2 for injection well/monitoring well process parameters Ozone: ozone gas and VOCs No associated notes.

Performance Expectations Risk, Mass, and Toxicity Reductions ISCO reduces contaminant mass through the oxidation process Mass reduction = reduction in risk Rapid reduction of source area concentrations to acceptable levels for biological polishing and plume control No associated notes.

Total Mass Evaluation Nature of Contamination Contamination mass exists in four phases in the contaminated zone Soil gas Sorbed Dissolved Non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) or phase-separated Geochemistry, partitioning coefficient (Kow) determines the relationship between phases in the saturated zone Majority of mass (normally >80%) is sorbed and phase-separated Graphic source: Suthersan, 1996 The partitioning coefficient (Kow) is a measure of the equilibrium concentration of a compound (contaminant) that describes the potential for the compound to partition into soil organic matter. The contaminant with the highest partitioning coefficient will partition into soil organic matter first. Suthersan, S.S., Remediation Engineering: Design Concepts. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla.

Total Mass Evaluation Importance of Mass Calculations Evaluate pre- and post- total contaminant mass Sorbed and non-aqueous phase mass converts to dissolved during treatment and until site reaches post treatment final equilibrium Possible “rebound” causes Dissolution of sorbed or non-aqueous phase Inadequate site characterization Change in groundwater flow direction Decrease in total mass may not be reflected in short-term dissolved concentrations Evaluation of pre- and post- total contaminant mass is recommended Mass is converted from sorbed and non-aqueous phase to dissolved during treatment and until site reaches post treatment final equilibrium “Rebound” in dissolved concentrations can be caused by dissolution of sorbed or non-aqueous phase, inadequate site characterization, change in groundwater flow direction, etc A decrease in total mass may not be reflected in short-term dissolved concentrations Electroconductivity Diagram

Regulatory Perspective Summary Life of a regulator Too many cases/many deadlines Needs to make sound technical decisions in a timely manner The ISCO-2 document Allows a regulator to feel much more confident in reviewing an ISCO proposal Provides a list of contacts Contacts in the form of ISCO team members as well as case study participants represent an invaluable resource. For contact information, see ITRC's In Situ Chemical Oxidation of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater, 2nd Edition (ISCO-2, 2005): Appendix D. Case Studies – includes contact information for case study participants Appendix E. ITRC ISCO Team Contacts ISCO guidance document is available on www.itrcweb.org under “Guidance Documents” and “In Situ Chemical Oxidation.”

Topics Included in ISCO-2 Document Regulatory permits Health and safety issues Oxidant application Conceptual site model System strategies Dosage considerations Performance monitoring Cost considerations Emerging ISCO technologies Acronyms, glossary, case studies ITRC ISCO team contacts The ISCO-2 document provides a detailed ready reference for anyone that is involved with an ISCO proposal/project. ISCO guidance document is available on www.itrcweb.org under “Guidance Documents” and “In Situ Chemical Oxidation.”