2015 UNS Rate Case – DG Trends in Action

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Advertisements

DG Values and Costs: An Open Spreadsheet Approach Residential Utility Consumer Office (RUCO) Lon Huber.
The Regulatory Assistance Project 50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, VT Phone: “Designing Distributed Generation.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
October 8, 2013 Eric Fox and Mike Russo. AGENDA »Recent Sales and Customer Trends »Preliminary State Sales and Demand Forecast »Building a No DSM Forecast.
Cost of Services Pricing Enables a Net Zero Energy World © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. 1.
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
1 Managing Revenues in Regulated Industries Rate Design May 2008 Richard Soderman Director-Legislative Policy and Strategy.
TIME OF USE RATES AT THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY Presented at: Connecticut’s Energy Future December 2, 2004 James D. Lundrigan Pricing Manager The.
Compare and Contrast ELCC Methodologies Across CPUC Proceedings
ANALYZING YOUR ELECTRIC BILL Bob Walker Met-Ed November 7, 2007.
NARUC Energy Regulatory Partnership Program The Georgian National Energy Regulatory Commission and The Vermont Public Service Board by Ann Bishop Vermont.
Welcome and Introductions CoServ Presentation & Member Input.
1 Filename, Version Fair Rate Setting for a Renewable Future Renewable Cities Forum, Vancouver BC, May 2015.
LAKELAND ELECTRIC Pricing to Meet Net Meter Rules APPA 2009 Business & Finance Conference Sept 14, 2009 Jeff Sprague Manager Pricing & Rates.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
Rate Design June 23, 2015 Laurie Reid. 2 Overview 1.A little bit of physics 2.The Ratemaking Process 3.Generally Accepted Ratemaking Principles 4.What’s.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
© 2006 San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. SDG&E’s Sustainable Communities Program and Support for our Solar.
Rate Design: Options for addressing NEM impacts Utah NEM Workgroup 4 1 July 8, 2015 Melissa Whited Synapse Energy Economics.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Cost of Service Based Water and Wastewater Rates City of Lawrence, Kansas February 11, 2004 J. Rowe McKinley Keith D. Barber.
NASUCA Annual Meeting Austin, Texas November 10, 2015 Scott J. Rubin, Attorney + Consultant 333 Oak Lane + Bloomsburg, PA Office: (570)
1 Modeling Distributed Generation Adoption using Electric Rate Feedback Loops USAEE Austin, TX – November 2012 Mark Chew, Matt Heling, Colin Kerrigan,
Rate Policy Discussion Presentation to Review Panel November 1, 2013.
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
More Than Smart – A Distribution System Vision © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. Dave Geier – VP Electric.
California Energy Commission 2015 IEPR Self-Generation Forecast Sacramento, CA 12/17/2015 Asish Gautam Demand Analysis Office Energy Assessments Division.
Demand Response 2010 and Beyond April 28, 2011 Pete Pengilly.
Program Overview Solar resource will be built by j uwi, (pronounced “you-vee”), a developer based out of Boulder, Colorado. Solar farm will be located.
0 LMP+D RATE FOR DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES IN NEW YORK AEEI – ACENY – NECEC* Proposal to NY Public Service Commission *Developed with support from Clean.
Distributed Generation Chau Nguyen, Pricing & Sales Support
Hawai’i Over 77,000 PV systems interconnected or approved statewide. 17% of customers 500+ MW of PV installed Oahu: 32% of single family homes have.
The Rooftop Solar Revolution Implications for Consumer Advocates Lon Huber Tim Schneider.
SOLAR*CONNECT COMMUNITY SM David Donovan, General Manager, Customer and Community Service March 1, 2016.
Residential demand charges
Background / Introduction
EE5900 Cyber-Physical Systems Smart Home CPS
Alternative Ratemaking Methodologies Docket No. M
Kaysville City, UT Electric Rate Study Results
Bypass Distributed Generation (DG) Forecast Methodology
The Net Metering Controversy
Self-Generation Forecast CED 2017 Preliminary
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Distributed Generation Chau Nguyen, Pricing & Sales Support
Presented to the NARUC 2013 Winter Meeting
Narragansett Electric Rate Classes
Strategies for Promoting Equity in Clean Energy Deployment June 27th 2016 Tracy Babbidge, Bureau Chief Energy Policy.
The Rise of Residential Advanced DER Rates
Rick Umoff, SEIA Sean Garren, Vote Solar
Electric Rates 101: Understand Your Rates, Control Your Bill
The Potential of Solar Power in New Zealand
Homework Ch 12 Electricity Regulation
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
2500 R Midtown Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Presented by Douglas Danley at
Lebanon Community Power & Liberty Utilities TOU Rate & Battery Pilot December 11, 2018 by City Councilor Clifton Below, Chair, Lebanon.
Arizona Public Service Company 2012 Renewable Energy Standard Implementation Plan Arizona Corporation Commission Open Meeting August 17, 2011.
Solar Panels on Your Home & in Your Community
Photovoltaic Systems Engineering Application to PV Systems
How Small Developers and EPC Contractors Can Add PPA Financing to their Arsenals John Langhus, VP Business Development Midwest Solar Expo 2019 New Energy.
Commissioner Anne C. George
Production Month Sun Hours K Monthly Kwh Tou Peak Value After Kwh
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Medium & Heavy Duty Electric Transportation Rate Designs at SCE
Beartooth Electric Cooperative Rate Design Analysis
Presentation transcript:

2015 UNS Rate Case – DG Trends in Action Lon Huber, Director June 7, 2016

UNS Proposed: For non-DG customers For solar customers 5.8 cents/kWh offset with a demand charge ($6/kW & $9.95/kW after 7 kW) 24/7 demand charge Hourly exports at 5.9 cents/kWh linked to utility scale PV Energy offset is somewhat arbitrary Typical opening position

Solar Proposed: Status Quo NEM Maybe explore minimum bill Look into a optional TOU rate Equal treatment

RUCO Principles Do not inhibit conservation related price signals Reduce reliance on fixed charges Don’t rock the boat for 98% of UNS ratepayers No drastic changes Send more accurate price signals to DG DG neutral demand based TOU Create options for future solar customers RPS compliance driven fixed solar credit

DG Customers are Different After a certain point of self generation, DG customers are partial requirements customers: Masks load only during certain times and weather conditions Exports electrons to the distribution system Comes in and out of needing service unlike energy efficiency Can completely erase a monthly bill Impacts are mimics throughout the service territory at high penetrations Intra class equity and exclusivity issues

RUCO’s Proposal For DG Solar Customers Three options: Advanced DG rate RPS Credit Option Self consumption option

Avoided Costs from DG Followed Commission guidance on value of solar to determine starting rate. Gauge the value of solar by comparing it to the next marginal unit of generation needed to meet system peak. Straightforward to estimate once methodology chosen: Energy Capacity (assumed direct offset) Transmission related to capacity Environmental (mostly baked in avoided costs) Unknown or highly variable: Distribution System Transmission

2014 IRP Need new CT 2018-2019

LCOE of Units on the Margin

Aligning to system need

kWh usage per hour by the average customer Summer Peak kWh usage per hour by the average customer January July December

Peak Hours: 2:00 PM to 7:59 PM

Proposal For DG customers – Advanced DG Demand Rate Three core components $12 minimum bill 8.5 cent/kWh offset UNS IRP based value of solar Summer based demand charge TOU ~ $16.5 kW Monthly NEM with export

Option B for Solar Customers UNS has a residential renewable energy target. The utility needs ~10 MW of additional DG Create a procurement mechanism that drives costs down. Buy-all sell-all credit structure. Declining trigger based on capacity installed. Similar structure to incentive programs. Fixed 20 year rate that appears as bill credit.

REST Procurement Mechanism The price averages 8.5 cents/kWh (the value of solar) and the declines are set at the historic yearly system decline rate

Bombshell

Staff Proposed: Temporary 15% load factor floor to protect customers against adverse effects Company to build a communication and outreach plan For all customers $5.15/kw monthly demand charge $15/mo fixed charge Company Jumped Onboard! Basic Service Charge All kW All kWh Winter off peak Winter on peak Summer off peak Summer on peak $15.00 $5.15 $0.016760 $0.038610 $0.082800 $0.042830 $0.102251

Public Outcry

Next Up

Questions?

Linking to Bonbright Simplicity, understandability, public acceptability and feasibility of application and interpretation Stability of rates themselves, minimal unexpected changes that are seriously adverse to existing customers Fairness in apportioning cost of service among different consumers Avoidance of “undue discrimination” Efficiency, promoting efficient use of energy and competing products and services

KW Charge Similar to Commercial Large Power Service Time-of-Use (LPS-TOU)