A RTP crystal electro-optic modulator for next generation gravitational wave detector Wan Wu, Volker Quetschke, Ira Thorpe, Guido Mueller, David Reitze,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Advertisements

19. October 2004 A. Freise Automatic Alignment using the Anderson Technique A. Freise European Gravitational Observatory Roma
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Transportation of Ultra-Stable Light via Optical Fiber Emily Conant Bard College, California Institute of Technology Mentors: Evan Hall, Rana Adhikari,
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
Optical simulation – March 04 1 Optical Simulation François BONDU VIRGO Tools Goals Example: tuning of modulation frequency A few questions.
Measurement of the laser beam profile at PSL to Mode Cleaner interface for the 40 Meter Prototype Interferometer A table of contents 1. Introduction 1.1.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory1 Characterization of LIGO Input Optics University of Florida Thomas Delker Guido Mueller Malik Rakhmanov.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems Design & Interferometer Sensing & Optics Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 13 Meeting, 5 June 2003.
G R DC Readout for Advanced LIGO P Fritschel LSC meeting Hannover, 21 August 2003.
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.
aLIGO EOM at LLO and LHO Assembly/testing/installation
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
Amaldi conference, June Lock acquisition scheme for the Advanced LIGO optical configuration Amaldi conference June24, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
Modulation techniques for length sensing and control of advanced optical topologies B.W. Barr, S.H. Huttner, J.R. Taylor, B. Sorazu, M.V. Plissi and K.A.
LIGO- G R Telecon on June, Mach-Zender interferometer to eliminate sidebands of sidebands for Advanced LIGO Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech.
1 Wan Wu, Volker Quetschke, Ira Thorpe, Rodrigo Delgadillo, Guido Mueller, David Reitze, and David Tanner Noise associated with the EOM in Advanced LIGO.
LIGO- G R Amaldi7 July 14 th, 2007 R. Ward, Caltech 1 DC Readout Experiment at the Caltech 40m Laboratory Robert Ward Caltech Amaldi 7 July 14.
G Z LIGO R&D1 Input Optics Definition, Function The input optics (IO) conditions light from the pre- stabilized laser (PSL) for injection into.
LIGO- G R Sensing and control, SPIE conference, June Sensing and control of the Advanced LIGO optical configuration SPIE conference at.
DFG-NSF Astrophysics Workshop Jun 2007 G Z 1 Optics for Interferometers for Ground-based Detectors David Reitze Physics Department University.
Arm Length Stabilisation for Advanced Gravitational Wave Detectors Adam Mullavey, Bram Slagmolen, Daniel Shaddock, David McClelland Peter Fritschel, Matt.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
LIGO-G Z Guido Mueller University of Florida For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration ESF Exploratory Workshop Perugia, Italy September 21 st –23.
Paolo La Penna Injection optics for Advanced VirgoLSC/VIRGO joint meeting, Cascina, 25/05/ Advanced VIRGO Input optics LIGO-G Z.
Split Electrode Wedged RTP crystal To avoid the unwanted generation of amplitude modulation by polarization modulation because of imperfect alignment of.
LIGO-G R High power optical components for Enhanced and Advanced LIGO Optics/Lasers WG, March 21, 2007 Volker Quetschke, Muzammil Arain, Rodica.
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Scientific Collaboration1 eLIGO Input Optics Characterization and Performance Kate Dooley University of Florida.
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
Advanced LIGO Simulation, 6/1/06 Elba G E 1 ✦ LIGO I experience ✦ FP cavity : LIGO I vs AdvLIGO ✦ Simulation tools ✦ Time domain model Advanced.
Sapphire for the LCGT project Eiichi Hirose ICRR, University of Tokyo Kyohei Watanabe, Norikatsu Mio PSC, University of Tokyo GT Advanced Technology, Sep.
ACIGA High Optical Power Test Facility
LIGO-G Z High Power Components for Advanced LIGO University of Florida Rupal Amin, Joe Gleason, Rachel Parks Christina Leidel, Mike Marquez, Luke.
Cascina, Nov. 4 th, 2008 AdV review 1 AdV Injection system E. Genin European Gravitational Observatory.
THE INPUT OPTICS OF ENHANCED AND ADVANCED LIGO D.B. Tanner, M.A. Arain, A. Lucianetti, R.M. Martin, V. Quetschke, L.F. Williams, Wan Wu, G. Mueller, and.
1 DC readout for Virgo+? E. Tournefier WG1 meeting, Hannover January 23 rd,2007 DC vs AC readout: technical noises Output mode cleaner for DC readout.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
LIGO- G R 40m/AdLIGO, LSC, August Issues in sensing and control of the 40m and Advanced LIGO optical configuration LSC meeting, August.
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment Rainer Weiss, MIT On behalf of the proposing group Fermi Lab Proposal Review November 3, 2009.
Where is the change in refractive index of the glass, and is the change in temperature due to heating. The relative phase change due to asymetric heating.
Laser Adaptive Optics for Advanced LIGO
ET-ILIAS_GWA joint meeting, Nov Henning Rehbein Detuned signal-recycling interferometer unstableresonance worsesensitivity enhancedsensitivity.
Testing Advanced LIGO length sensing and control scheme at the Caltech 40m interferometer. at the Caltech 40m interferometer. Yoichi Aso*, Rana Adhikari,
Calibration and the status of the photon calibrators Evan Goetz University of Michigan with Peter Kalmus (Columbia U.) & Rick Savage (LHO) 17 October 2006.
Complex Optical Modulation Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller, David Reitze, David Tanner an extension of work done at UF for LIGO in 1997 by Qi-Ze Shu Department.
Advanced Virgo INJ: Faraday isolator, Electro-optical modulator, high power beam dump and Input mode-cleaner E. Genin for AdV INJ team European Gravitational.
H1 Squeezing Experiment: the path to an Advanced Squeezer
Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors
Daniel Sigg, Commissioning Meeting, 11/11/16
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment
GEO600 Control aspects where do the error signal come from?
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
The LIGO input optics D.B. Tanner, M.A. Arain, A. Lucianetti, R. Martin, V. Quetschke, L.F. Williams, Wan Wu, G. Mueller, and D.H. Reitze University.
Output Mode Cleaners: Introduction for non-experts
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities
Commissioning the LIGO detectors
Heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO
Quantum effects in Gravitational-wave Interferometers
Homodyne or heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO?
Current Status of the 40m Detuned RSE Prototype
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO
Effect of sideband of sideband on 40m and Advanced LIGO
Coupling of frequency dependent length changes to the light phase in a double grating setup Volker Quetschke, Stacy Wise, Guido Mueller, David Reitze,
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
Enhanced LIGO Modulator Supported by NSF grant PHY
Flat-Top Beam Profile Cavity Prototype
Advanced Optical Sensing
Presentation transcript:

A RTP crystal electro-optic modulator for next generation gravitational wave detector Wan Wu, Volker Quetschke, Ira Thorpe, Guido Mueller, David Reitze, and David Tanner LIGO-G070243-00-Z Physics Department University of Florida Gainesville, FL Supported by NSF grant PHY-0555453, PHY-0354999 & NASA//OSS grant BEFS04-0019-0019

EOMs in Advanced LIGO Part of the technical concerns for Advanced LIGO Potential ‘thermal lensing’ headaches due to the application of 180W laser Stringent requirement on the laser amplitude and frequency noise Demanding requirements on EOMs: Ultra-low optical absorption on the 1064nm laser Negligible residual amplitude and phase noise associated with the phase modulation SRM BS ETM ITM Mode Cleaner PRM EOMs

RTP crystal EOM A novel RTP ( RbTiOPO4 ) crystal EOM is developed for Advanced LIGO Optical absorption coefficient < 1000 ppm/cm (upper limit according to our measurement) Maximum power loss of 00-mode ~ 1.4%

RFAM DIW / IDC ~ 10e-5 RFAM creates unwanted offsets in the length sensing and control signals Measured RFAM produced by RTP EOMs under high power laser heating DIW / IDC ~ 10e-5

Noise associated with EOM EOM imposes the additional noise on the transmitted light - Creates intensity noise of both the carrier and the sidebands - Introduces sidebands phase noise ( The phase fluctuation between the carrier and the sidebands causes laser frequency noise via the feed back loop ) Noise generation mechanism - Variation of the modulation index - Variation of the phase retardation - Fabry-Perot cavity effect Carrier Sidebands

Measurement of the intrinsic EOM noise Nd:YAG EOM Phase meter Nd:YAG PLL f 2 Phase lock two lasers with a frequency offset Measure the beat signals – Carrier-Carrier (C-C), Carrier-Sidebands (C-S)

Amplitude noise & phase noise

Noise in the beat notes Noise in two beat signals (C-C, C-S) in common mode - Beam jitter between two laser beams - Laser intensity noise Noise in two beat signals in differential mode (amplitude & phase noise) - produced by the EOM Amplitude Common-mode noise rejection analysis Phase

Data analysis

Future improvement Temperature stabilization is needed Modulation index Phase retardation Temperature stabilization is needed Use wedge crystal to eliminate the cavity effect

Our ultimate goal Solving the noise problems associated with EOMs is a challenging task ! Current estimation of the requirement on the amplitude and the phase noise: - Laser intensity noise ~ - Sideband phase noise ~ at 100 Hz Based on the calculation in ( K. Somiya, Y. Chen, S. Kawamura, and N. Mio, PRD, 2006 )