Quantification of BMP Impacts on CBP Management Strategies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Forestry BMP Review Process Mark Sievers, Tetra Tech Forestry Workgroup (FWG) Conference Call—February 1, 2012.
Advertisements

Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program, EPA 1 CBP Program Update on Bay Agreement Comments, Final Draft, and 2-Year Milestone Status Citizens.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
ProjectImpactResourcesDeadlineResourcesDeadline Forecast Plan Time Resources Risk 001xx 002xx 003xx 004xx 005xx 006xx 007xx TotalXX Example 1: Portfolio.
Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan Revised Terms of Reference
Jan 2016 Solar Lunar Data.
IT Strategy Roadmap Template
Timeline Roadmap Template

Q1 Jan Feb Mar ENTER TEXT HERE Notes
Funding from the Local Perspective
Concepts and Timeline for Developing a CBP Biennial Strategy Review System (DRAFT) October 31, 2016 (DRAFT)
Appendix C New Administration General Assembly Session
HL7/College/University Internship Program
Project timeline # 3 Step # 3 is about x, y and z # 2
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall

Commonwealth of Virginia

Concepts and Timeline for Developing a CBP Biennial Strategy Review System DRAFT August 29, 2016 DRAFT 12/4/2018 DRAFT.
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System:
2017 Jan Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat


This Presentation Pack is brought to you by
Gantt Chart Enter Year Here Activities Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE

Rev. 5 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY SERVICE PROVIDER JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN.

Rev. 5 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY SERVICE PROVIDER JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN.
Step 3 Step 2 Step 1 Put your text here Put your text here
Jan Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ITEM 1 ITEM 2 ITEM 3
Electricity Cost and Use – FY 2016 and FY 2017
Center for Vision (CVN) on Block 33 Move Planning & Logistics Timeline
Work plan and next steps – RDE-LDV working group
General Plan Amendment & Zone Change Timeline
Safety Group Program Timeline
SC SC SC WS SC S HIS Background document Seminar document


Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE

Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Project timeline # 3 Step # 3 is about x, y and z # 2

TIMELINE NAME OF PROJECT Today 2016 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Citizens Advisory Committee Discussion & Program Update Dana Aunkst Director USEPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 22,2019 Baltimore, MD.
Rev. 5 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY SERVICE PROVIDER JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN.
Rev. 2 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY 2002 SERVICE PROVIDER JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP.
Safety Group Program Timeline
2012 Safety Group 1 – 5 Year Program Timeline Guide

2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Pilot of revised survey
Rev. 2 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY 2002 SERVICE PROVIDER JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP.
Key Management Processes
Presentation transcript:

Quantification of BMP Impacts on CBP Management Strategies Fostering Chesapeake Stewardship Goal Implementation Team Meeting June 1, 2016

Contract Tetra Tech awarded contract from Chesapeake Bay Trust James Davis-Martin, Project Technical Lead Mark Sievers, Tetra Tech Lead and Urban Lead Steve Dressing, Agriculture Lead

Goal To quantify the effect the Bay Model’s best management practices (BMPs) have on each management strategy to better enable jurisdictions, localities, and others to assess the impact of their watershed implementation plans on all management strategies (co-benefits or unintended consequences)

Intended Result A matrix that assigns each BMP (or BMP group) an impact score for each management strategy or outcome Management Strategy BMP 1 BMP 2 BMP 3 Etc. A -X to +X B C

Process Early involvement of management strategy teams General input on project BMPs of concern Impacts (positive and negative) of BMPs on management strategies Ideas on assigning BMP impact scores Information sources

Process Develop narrative guidelines for assigning impact scores Review each management strategy, focusing on the Factors Influencing Success section, to help identify and assess the factors for which BMP impacts are of greatest concern Technical memorandum on the rationale for the guidelines GIT and management strategy team review

Matrix with all Management Strategies and BMPs Process Group BMPs Ensure consistency in assessing BMP impacts based on common features and application Simplify presentation of results in tabular format Matrix with all Management Strategies and BMPs

Process Gather information Management strategies Management strategy team and GIT members Inform and focus the search for information used in scoring impacts BMP Panel reports Scientific literature Toxic contaminants study Best professional judgment

Process Assign impact scores to BMP groupings Develop draft project report for review and comment Final report Final impact scores Rationale behind the BMP groupings Impact scoring guidelines Appendix with a literature listing

Tentative Timeline Task # Task Description May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 1 BMP List and Groupings    2 Impact Score Guidelines 3 Management Strategy Team Meetings 4 Literature Search 5 Literature Review and Scoring 6 Final Documentation

Management Strategies Stewardship GIT Citizen Stewardship Protected Lands Public Access Site Development Not Addressing Students Sustainable Schools Environmental Literacy Planning

BMPs All 453 Approved BMPs Group BMPs with similar function and potential impacts to help simplify analysis and result presentation Example: Cover crop Pending Phase 6 BMPs (26 currently under development or in review)

Questions for You Suggestions on impact score guidelines or how we might group BMPs in our scoring matrix? Which specific BMP (or BMP groups) do you feel would have the greatest impact (positive or negative) on management strategy goals? What do you think their impacts might be? Do you feel they would have a great impact (positive or negative)? What are the top impacts that concern you?

Questions for You Do you have any information sources that you can provide us or direct us to for this project? Are there specific individuals on the GIT or management strategy team we should contact for assistance?

Communications Send all information and inquiries to Mark Sievers, Tetra Tech mark.e.sievers@tetratech.com 703-385-2605

Discussion