Formative Assessment on the Fly~ Asking Questions, Getting Answers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Welcome Write your name on your journal. Label the first page Table of Contents. Number each page. On the last page, create an Alpha Box graphic organizer.
Mentoring New Educators
Milwaukee Public Schools: Protocol for Examining Student Work February Academic Coach-Math Training February 8, 2013 Presented by ACMs: Darryl Moore Ingrid.
Talk Moves: Using math talk to help students learn
MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS Exploring a Think Aloud Academic Coach-Math Training February 8, 2013 Presented by ACMs: Shirley Kimmons Elnore McKinley.
Coaching Conversations: Paraphrasing Laura Maly Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez November Academic Coach-Math Training November 2, 2012.
Milwaukee Public Schools: Math Intervention Ideas March Academic Coach-Math Training March 8, 2013 Presented by ACM: Sean Goldner.
1 Lodi Unified School District Monitoring and Accountability A District Program Improvement Update Board of Education Study Session August 19, 2008.
Milwaukee Public Schools: How Coaching Conversations Around Student Work have Improved Mathematics National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics April.
Creating Student Crisis/Safety Plans. Elements of Crisis/Safety Planning  Identify and engage the people who know the crisis best  Define and specify.
Region 11 Math and Science Teacher Center Equality.
Milwaukee Public Schools: Another Way to Differentiate: Parallel Tasks March Academic Coach-Math Training March 15, 2013 Presented by: Bernard Rahming.
Does Inner-City Teaching Interest You? Brett Fuller Curriculum Specialist Health, Physical Education, Safe & Supportive Schools Trina Schuh Physical Education.
La Escuela Fratney Response to Intervention (RTI): A System Overview.
Formative Assessment: What Is It, Where Is It and How Do I Know I Have Found It? Academic Coaches Meeting MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS Lee Ann Pruske Mary.
Milwaukee Public Schools: Standards for Mathematical Practice March Academic Coach-Math Training March 8, 2013 Presented by ACM: Sean Goldner.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Questions in a Learning Focused Conversation February 1, 2013 Academic Coach-Math Training Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez.
Student Engagement Presenter(s) August 22 nd, 2013.
Measured Progress ©2011 ASDN Webinar Series Spring 2013 Session Four March 27, 2013 New Alaska State Standards for Math: Connecting Content with Classroom.
MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS Monthly Planning Template Mary Mooney Tara Raymond February 8, 2012.
FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING (FFT) SUMMER INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS TO ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DR. MICHAEL BROOKS JUNE 18, 2012.
Milwaukee Public Schools Aquaponics Program Rochelle Sandrin Food Safety in the Classroom.
New Teachers’ Induction January 20, 2011 Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
Jon Jagemann & Colleen Wey September 18 th, 2014 CICO- Teacher’s Role.
The Power of Formative Assessment to Advance Learning.
Progress Monitoring and Exceed Jon Jagemann and Kristin Annen August 28 th, 2013.
L EADERSHIP P ILLAR Sit at the table marked with your Instructional Guide Grade Level assignment.
Formative Assessment: Making Learning Visible What Works Best? Academic Coaches Meeting MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS Lee Ann Pruske Mary Mooney December 9,
What is it we expect students to learn? Curriculum learning tasks need to be clearly stated 1.What policies and practices, regarding curriculum development,
Tier 2 New Team Member Training PBIS RtI District Team Part 1: Overview and CICO.
Checking for Understanding NUCC Elementary Summer Institute August 5-6, 2014 Presented by Suzanne Cottrell.
©2015 Milwaukee Public Schools 1 1 Title of Presentation Presenter name Date.
Introduction to Curriculum Topic Study – Bridging the Gap Between Standards and Practice.
Milwaukee Public Schools: A Template for Planning March Academic Coach-Math Training March 8, 2013 Presented by ACM: Jennele Majszak.
Oregon Department of Education Office of Assessment and Accountability Jim Leigh and Rachel Aazzerah Mathematics and Science Assessment Specialists Office.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
Mathematical Practice 1.Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2.Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3.Construct viable arguments and.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
What’s Math Got to Do With It? Academic Coach Meeting MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS Lee Ann Pruske Mary Mooney November 2, 2012.
Formative Assessment: Planning for Learning Academic Coaches Meeting MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS Lee Ann Pruske Mary Mooney March 15, 2013.
Teaching and Learning In Action Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez November Academic Coach-Math Training December 7, 2012.
©2015 Milwaukee Public Schools 1 1 Reflection Process for Data- Based Decision-Making Research and Evaluation November 2015.
Connections and Actions Utilizing coaching skills to enhance mathematics instruction Astrid FossumLee Ann Pruske Laura MalyCynthia Rodriguez MTL Sessions,
Milwaukee Public Schools: Examining ACM/Teacher Cohort Teams February Academic Coach-Math Training March 8, 2013 Presented by ACM: James McHale.
CCRS Quarterly Meeting CCRS Quarterly Meeting English Language Arts
Department of Education Professional Learning Institute GOOD TEACHING Differentiated Classroom Practice Learning for All Module 1.
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
©2015 Milwaukee Public Schools 1 Opportunity Schools and Partnership Program Update Gina Spang, P.E., Chief of Staff Kristen DeCato, Director, Procurement.
District Literacy Leaders Network Meeting March 24, :00am-12:00pm Dr. LaWonda Smith Manager, English Language Arts Dr. Argentina Back Manager, Multilingual.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Using MAP Data to Impact Instruction Melanie R. Stewart, Ph.D
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Welcome!! Please sit in teams of 4
MPS PBIS Tier 3 Lessons Learned
Community of Practice and Calibration for School Administrators
The Learner Centered Classroom
Questions and Questioning Strategies
Equality Project Part A Observations
What it is, How to Implement it, and How to sustain it
Critical Reading Charting the Text.
Special Education Supervisor
Secondary District Professional Development
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
“UNPACKING” Standards
Examining Student Work
Overview Mini-problem Analyzing teacher questions
Presentation transcript:

Formative Assessment on the Fly~ Asking Questions, Getting Answers MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS Lee Ann Pruske Mary Mooney April 12, 2013

Professional practice Work with one teacher on the formative assessment process. Elicit, interpret, make decisions about the next steps in instruction, and implement those decisions with students. Prepare a short vignette around the work with teachers and students to share at the April ACM meeting.

Give One, Get One With your typed vignette in hand, find a partner . Share your stories, trade vignettes Find a new partner and share, trade vignettes

Learning Intention Success Criteria We are learning to use the formative assessment process within the classroom DURING instruction. We will know we are successful when we recognize formative assessment opportunities in classrooms.

“…it is essential that teachers explore students’ thinking before assuming that students have understood something.” D. Wiliam, 2011

Why ask questions? 1. Cause thinking 2. Provide teacher with information to assist instructional decision making* *Ask questions that students can’t get the correct answer with incorrect thinking. Summarize the activity Some tasks are better for discussion, others for student work samples, teachers have to be aware of both types of tasks to gauge understanding. Over generalize p. 75 2.3x10=2.30 from 8x10=80 Apply information in the wrong place, students making sense of their world

What is the purpose of the question? Discussion Questions Whole class discussion Surface student thinking, and justifications Teachers can probe for details Takes class time Diagnostic Questions Individual responses Discussion not needed Be careful students don’t get right answer, for incorrect thinking Summarize the activity Some tasks are better for discussion, others for student work samples, teachers have to be aware of both types of tasks to gauge understanding. Over generalize p. 75 2.3x10=2.30 from 8x10=80 Apply information in the wrong place, students making sense of their world

Misconception Managed Take a card out Individually solve the problem Discuss how you might surface student understanding through this problem Would you use the problem as a classroom discussion, or individual diagnostic tool Pass the envelope and repeat Activity cards

Simplify (if possible) Problem A Simplify (if possible) 2a + 5b Problem – insights into student’s understanding Diagnostic

Problem B Make this true: 3a = 24 a + b = 16 Uncovers understanding, and beliefs, that a and b can’t stand for the same value in an equation. Discussion

Problem C Which is larger: 3/7 or 3/11 Discussion of how students are thinking about the relationships in the problem

Problem D In this sequence 3, 7, 11, 15, 19 Which is the best rule to describe the sequence. n + 4 3 + n 4n – 1 4n + 3 Discussion of how students think about the problem and the relationships within the expressions. C one few or D 3 times greater than the 4 times tables

Formative Assessment…on the fly

Diagnostic Questions “Range-finding” questions find out what students already know before beginning a topic. “Hinge point” diagnostic questions are used in the middle of instruction to check for understanding. Next step hinges on student understanding. When you are listening for teachers questions, it helps to understand the different types of questions for possible learning focused conversations for which to shift up to increase the level of cognition. Pages 100-101

Types of Listening Evaluative listening Interpretive listening Listening for knowledge, content, correctness. (Do they get it?) (Do I need to re-teach this content or can I move on?) Interpretive listening What are students’ thinking? (How can I build on their understanding?) Shifting Up teacher moves Evaluative listening responses: Teacher Responses : almost, close, nearly, try again. Wellman and Lipton Shifting up moves

Instructional Practice Skill Use your ABCDEF cards to answer Hold up the correct cards indicating your answer. No discussing please.

Watch for answers on cards

What is the relationship among the sides of a right triangle? Find student with the right answer to articulate relationship with the given triangle, that is without labeling the sides.. Ask 1-2 students who previously had wrong answer to paraphrase the relationship

What is the relationship among the sides of a right triangle? c b a Find student with the right answer to articulate relationship with the given triangle, that is without labeling the sides.. Ask 1-2 students who previously had wrong answer to paraphrase the relationship given by first student

Instructional Strategy Revisited Diagnostic question All student response through A-F cards Interpretive listening

Professional Practice Observe a teacher or two in your building listening for opportunities to work with student misconceptions. Type up what you observe and put it in the TLC under Listening Practice. Consider the following in your summary: Why did the student answer incorrectly? What is the misconception? Was the teacher engaged in evaluative or interpretive listening? How does/did the teacher plan for misconceptions? Did misconceptions derail instruction? What did the teacher do next? Post by May 10, 2013, Reply to at least 2 colleague’s posts by May 24, 2013 P 102

Feedback question What is your hunch about the types of questions (diagnostic, discussion, range finding, hinge point) teachers in your building will be asking when you listen in for misconceptions in math?

Spring CR items are up! www.mmp.uwm.edu Instructional Guides Use them with your teachers.

Milwaukee Public Schools TITLE OF PRESENTATION MPS Board of School Directors Dr. Michael Bonds, President Larry Miller, Vice President Mark Sain, District 1 Jeff Spence, District 2 Annie Woodward, District 4 Dr. Peter Blewett, District 6 David Voeltner, District 7 Meagan Holman, District 8 Terrence Falk, At-Large Senior Team Dr. Gregory Thornton, Superintendent Naomi Gubernick, Chief of Staff Darienne Driver, Chief Innovation Officer Tina Flood, Executive Director, Curriculum and Instruction Dr. Karen Jackson, Chief Human Resources Officer Michelle Nate, Chief Operations Officer Gerald Pace, Esq., Chief Financial Officer Anita Pietrykowski, Director, School Administration Denise Callaway, Communications & Partnerships Patricia Gill, Executive Director, Family Services Sue Saller, Coordinator to the Superintendent