Border Group Neighbourhood Plan Consideration of Representations – Key Housing issues April 2017
Housing Requirement Number of dwellings Target 2011-2031 36 Completions/under construction 2011-2014 Outstanding planning permissions 2014 (HC advice) 3 Rural windfall approved since 2014* 2 Land available within settlement boundaries Rural windfall allowance (outstanding) Total 44
Current Distribution Parish Dwellings 2011 Dwellings in NDP Adforton (2011 Census) Dwellings in NDP Adforton 68 9 Brampton Bryan 86 8/9 Lingen 82 11 Walford, Letton and Newton 79 8-10
Meeting the Housing Requirement Sites have to be Developable Sites have to be Deliverable Available Suitable Achievable
Adforton
Adforton – Housing issues Highway matters Design matters Dwelling type Delivering housing
Brampton Bryan
Brampton Bryan – Housing issues Settlement boundary Rural building conversion Alternative sites
Lingen
Lingen – Housing issues Lingen is not a sustainable location Insufficient regard to Conservation Area Status. Level of Development Highway safety Housing need Design requirements Formal allocations Specific sites including Nursery site
Walford
Walford – Housing issues Lack of services and facilities Flood risk Level of Development Highway safety Impact on character of the settlement Alternative sites Formal allocations Elan Valley Aqueduct
Housing issues Level of Development Housing need Sustainability of location Lack of services and facilities Highway matters/safety Impact on character of the settlement Flood risk Delivering housing/Formal allocations Broad
Housing issues Design matters/requirements Dwelling type Rural building conversion Alternative sites Insufficient regard to Conservation Area Status Specific sites Detailed
Border Group Parish Council ‘When representations have been received the NDP Steering Group be asked to give them due consideration and where appropriate and reasonable hold discussions with any parties suggesting improvements to the plan where these are relevant to those matters that an NDP can cover. The NDP Steering Group should include short reports on such discussions to the Parish Council together with a schedule of representations and list of any alterations arising from this particular consultation period.’
Housing Options No Change Seek more development on a limited number of larger sites to replace any lost. Change approach from spreading development equally across settlements. Undertake another 'call for sites‘. Seek clear evidence that level of development cannot be accommodated. Effectively restate HC Policy/extensions to SB
Restate HC Policy/Extensions to SB New housing development will only be permitted in accordance with the following criteria: (a) Should be directed away from areas at highest risk of flooding in accordance with national policy (b) Located within or adjacent to existing Settlement Boundary or as close as constraints allow (c) Density of development is appropriate and proportionate to its surroundings and immediate environmental conditions with 4-5 dwellings the optimum size of any development (f) Is not backland development which impacts on the character of the village (g) Safe and appropriate access can be achieved (h) Can be accommodated safely within the existing highway infrastructure (j) Ensures that any likely significant effect on the River Wye SAC is avoided or adequately mitigated; and (k) Development shall not unduly harm the amenity of neighbouring properties and existing development shall not unduly harm the amenity of any new residential property. Extract from Eardisland NDP