Establishing an International Specialized Institution for Environment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE ROLE OF UNESCO NATCOMS Dr. Yvonne Donders Faculty of Law.
Advertisements

Overview of United Nations Reform II: System-wide coherence in UN development activities New York, 4 November 2011 UNITAR Workshop Navid Hanif, Acting.
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Guidance Note on Joint Programming
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO Climate & Water Department Side Event I: The Role.
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO GFCS Governance proposal Process of development.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
URUGUAY’s efforts to address synergies among the Conventions Workshop on synergies and cooperation with other conventions 2-4 July 2003 Espoo, Finland.
SUB-REGIONAL WORKSHOP FOR GEF FOCAL POINTS IN WESTERN AND CENTRAL AFRICA, DAKAR, May 2007 GEF NATIONAL COORDINATION: BURKINA FASO’S EXPERIENCE.
Harmonization of Information Management and Reporting for Biodiversity- Related Treaties Vijay Samnotra, UNEP Espoo, Finland, July 2-4, 2003.
Jasminka Dzumhur, Ombudsperson of BiH “Role of national human rights institutions” Ljubljana, 1. December 2014.
Summary Report of CSO Meeting GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop (ECW), Southern Africa 15 th July 2013 Livingstone, Zambia (
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
Non-governmental Actors in the Compliance with and Monitoring of Multilateral Environmental Decisions.
1 Roles of UNEP, GEF & CBD in the Environment 2 nd Training Workshop for BCH Regional Advisors May 2006 Bangkok, Thailand.
International Environmental Governance – where from here? Joy Hyvarinen FIELD.
The WIPO Development Agenda: An Overview Geneva May, 2009 Esteban Burrone World Intellectual Property Organization.
A Green Economy in the Context of Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication; Institutional Framework for Sustainable Development; and Establishing.
Global Action Plan and its implementation in other regions Meeting for Discussion of the draft Plan for the Implementation of the Global Strategy to Improve.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
ENHANCING SYNERGIES AMONG THE BASEL, ROTTERDAM AND STOCKHOLM CONVENTIONS Tirana, Albania, June 2010 Basel ConventionRotterdam ConventionStockholm.
New GEF Agency Training Washington, May, 2015 The GEF Overview.
1 Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) SAICM Secretariat.
Legal and institutional foundation of economic statistics Overview of international experience Regional Workshop for African Countries on Compilation of.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Global Geospatial Information Management (GGIM) A UN-DESA Initiative in collaboration with Cartographic Section, DFS Stefan Schweinfest UNSD.
International Organizations Continue…. UN Environment Program (UNEP) Established in 1972 by General Assembly Resolution 2997 following the Stockholm Conference.
Main outcomes of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development: Institutional Framework An ECA Presentation at the Eighth Session of the Committee.
Office of Special Projects Issues arising from the Second Review Conference on Safety and Security at Chemical Plants and Relationships with CWC stakeholders.
Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention Getting ready for COP-4.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Presentation title Enhancing synergies towards climate action and sustainable development on the ground GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Da Nang, Vietnam,
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Communications on the:
International Affairs Division
United Nations Environment Programme
Agency Performance: A New Agenda
Briefing to Permanent Missions in Geneva
Institutional Strengthening Support
Objectives of WHO's collaboration with NGOs
MAINSTREAMING OF WOMEN, CHILDREN AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES’ CONSIDERATIONS IN RELATION TO THE ENERGY SECTOR Presentation to the Joint Meeting of the.
GEF governance reforms to enhance effectiveness and civil society engagement Faizal Parish GEC, Central Focal Point , GEF NGO Network GEF-NGO Consultation.
Country Support Programme GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop
Business sector engagement and Consumer Awareness October 3rd, 2017
Second SDG Partnerships Webinar:
The value of UNCAC Session 5.
Establishing the Infrastructure for Radiation Safety Preparatory Actions and Initial Regulatory Activities.
Draft Career Development Services Policy: Building an effective and integrated Career Development Services System for South Africa Mr FY Patel Deputy.
NGO CSocD Civil Society Forum 56th Commission FOR Social Development Regional Breakout Groups Through the lens of Social Protection and Poverty Eradication,
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
11/18/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE – 02 MAY 2018.
OUTLINE OF THE PRESENTATION
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
12/5/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Select COMMITTEE – 19 June 2018.
UN-GGIM:Africa Meeting Objectives UN-GGIM:Africa 2018
Institutional changes The role of Bilateral Oversight Boards
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
1. Introduction to the Convention 2
International Organizations
PRESENTATION BY NCOP ON STRUCTURE, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF NCOP, DISTRICT AND SUB COUNTY COUNCILS FOR OLDER PERSONS COUNCILS.
Governance Structure for 2008 SNA and Related EcoStat Implementation
National implementation and monitoring frameworks
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
Building Statistical Capacity UNSD perspective
FINANCING NATURA 2000 Agenda item 2.1 CGBN Co-ordination Group
PRESENTATION ON THE REPORT ON AFRICAN UNION INSTITUTIONAL REFORM 28 MARCH
The GEF Public Involvement Policy
Roles and Responsibilities
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
Presentation transcript:

Establishing an International Specialized Institution for Environment Presentation will go through legal status of the two options Institutional structure of the options Relationship to other parts of the system, stakeholders, financing Comparison of the two options

Basis for Presentation Current institutional structures do not address Africa’s needs in matters of the environment and sustainable development. Malabo Decision - Heads of State and Government decided to “take into consideration the need to strengthen, consolidate and transform UNEP into an international specialized institution for the environment based in Nairobi, Kenya.” Outcome of 4th SS of AMCEN - African Environment Ministers “affirm[ed] that any such specialized institution, whatever its form, should comply with the [9] characteristics specified in the outcome document.” Assumption that the 9 characteristics will have been listed by Chair before introducing UNEP

Basis for Presentation - cont’d Request to UNEP and UNECA seen in the context of the Malabo and Bamako decisions and outcomes technically translates into elaboration of two options: Strengthened, consolidated and transformed UNEP UN specialised Agency Subsidiary organ of the General Assembly The other options in the Nairobi-Helsinki Outcome (listed below) pertain to IFSD as a whole and go beyond UNEP. The mandate to look at IFSD as a whole has been given to UN-DESA, who have contracted a consultant to prepare a study on the legal, financial and structural implications of all the Nairobi-Helisinki Outcome With regards to the option of “Enhancing institutional reforms and streamlining existing structures”, for UNEP, this is addressed by the six system-wide responses described in the Nairobi-Helsinki Outcome. Options in Nairobi-Helsinki Outcome related to IFSD: Establishing a new umbrella organization for sustainable development Reforming the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) and the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) Enhancing institutional reforms and streamlining existing structures

Routes to a “strengthened, consolidated and transformed UNEP” Requires Majority Vote of All Members of UN Subsidiary Organ Established by GA Resolution Additional Step Relationship Agreement linking specialized institution to UN Requires Some States (Not All) Agree Specialized Institution Established by treaty It is important to note that, based on Articles 57 and 63 of the UN Charter, specialized agencies cannot be established without (1) negotiation of a treaty, and (2) relationship agreement linking it to the UN. The treaty (intergovernmental agreement) aims to regulate the mandate, functions, membership and structure of the specialized institution. This relationship agreement defines the relationship between a specialized agency and the United Nations, and is subject to approval by the GA. a specialized institution for environment would agree, for example, to: submit all recommendations addressed to it by the GA and Security Council to its decision-making organ; the coordination of its activities to prevent duplication of administrative and technical services; prompt exchange of information and documents; to consult with the UN on the preparation of its budgets; and, to conform, as far as practicable, to standard practices recommended by the UN.

Status of specialised institution vs. subsidiary organ Specialised agency Subsidiary organ Article 57 of UN Charter Range from autonomous – semi-autonomous Independent membership, governance, financial regulations Own directors, management and budget Mandate/powers derived from ‘constitution’ Makes reports to ECOSOC Article 22 of UN Charter General Assembly has supervisory rights Membership of GA ≡ membership of subsidiary organ Funding from regular UN budget approved by all UN member-states Mandate/powers derived from GA Reports to GA Article 22: The General Assembly may establish such subsidiary organs as it deems necessary for the performance of its functions. Article 57: (1). The various specialized agencies, established by intergovernmental agreement and having wide international responsibilities, as defined in their basic instruments, in economic, social, cultural, educational, health, and related fields, shall be brought into relationship with the UN in accordance with the provisions of Art. 63. (2). Such agencies thus brought into relationship with the United Nations are hereinafter referred to as specialized agencies.

Powers that UNEP as a “specialized institution” could have that it does not currently possess: Adopt decisions within the scope of mandate, which would not be subject to review Appoint its own head Locus standi - to request advisory opinions from the ICJ Enter into agreements with govts and IGOs; Create subsidiary bodies and committees Adopt and administrate treaties.

Powers that UNEP as “subsidiary organ of the GA” could have that it does not currently possess: Create subsidiary bodies and committees Enter into agreements with govts and IGOs Adopt decisions Make recommendations to the UN system in the areas of its mandate

Other key differences between specialized institution vs Other key differences between specialized institution vs. subsidiary organ Clarity of relationship to other UN entities: Specialized Institution: independent from UN, but there is close cooperation. Subsidiary Organization: relationship would lack the clear division of labour and standing. relationship with other entities could be clarified by an GA resolution but would not have the formal agreement provided for by Article 57. Powers to adopt treaties and standards: Specialized Institution: would have the power to adopt treaties and conventions and implement them. Future environmental treaties could therefore be closely linked to the agency and its activities and would allow for greater cost effectiveness and efficiently. Subsidiary Organization: An GA resolution would not afford UNEP with the authority to adopt treaties or set standards. Article 22 of the UN Charter, which allows the GA to establish subsidiary bodies, is vague in describing the details of the governance and links of all subsidiary organs.

Other key differences between specialized institution vs Other key differences between specialized institution vs. subsidiary organ (cntd) Budget Specialized Institution: would not receive funds from the UN regular budget but would rely on contributions from its member states (does not necessarily mean assessed contributions) Trust funds and voluntary funding are commonly used to supplement core funding Subsidiary Organization: would continue to apply the VISC system. However, provisions could be made to increase the regular budget to reflect an enhanced UNEP. Timing Specialized Institution: would require negotiation of its constitution by member states. Subsidiary Organization: A GA resolution enhancing UNEP could be a comparatively rapid process

Organs of a Specialized Institution for environment Subsidiary bodies/functional commissions including an implementation arm Facilitation of work of ministerial conference (does not adopt decisions) /day-to-day administration plenary body with universal membership, one-state-one-vote Ministerial Conference Executive Body Committee I Committee II…n Secretariat The organizational reforms delivered through a GA resolution or through an intergovernmental treaty are largely assumed the same. A ‘Ministerial Conference’—with universal membership—composed of environment ministers would be established to adopt, promote and evaluate the policies and operational programmes for environmental activities. One-state-on-vote decision making principle, Overall purpose - to provide environment ministers with a high-level institutional mechanism through which they can set a coherent agenda for global environmental sustainability. Would also clarify the inter-linkages between existing instruments, such as MEAs and their contributions to the wider sustainable development agenda. Would meet every two years Would, inter alia, elect the head and members of the executive organ. Approve the budget and work programme of the Institution Other ministries participate in sessions, MEAs participate, along with other stakeholders A smaller body, the ‘Executive Board’, would consist of government representatives as well as technically, in the field of environment qualified, persons. purpose - meet inter-sessionally to prepare the budget and work programme for approval by the Ministerial Conference geographically representative and elected for a specific term on a rotating basis founding states would have the discretion in deciding the mandate and composition of the Executive Board the Executive Board would not adopt decisions Secretariat would act as the focal point for all the agency’s activities and the degree of influence that the Secretariat has over the institution’s activities would be decided by the Ministerial Conference Purpose - to conduct the day-to-day administration of the Institution and facilitate implementation of the decisions that are taken by the Ministerial Conference would play a strong role in convening science, policy coordination and implementation committees and ensuring that their work is carried out To address the issues of insufficient coordination/coherence of policies, deficiencies in the existing international science-policy infrastructure for environment, and insufficient capacity-building and implementation support and monitoring, functional committees could be set up by and under the Ministerial Conference to tackle specific issues on a continuing basis. In all cases, their work would be approved by the Ministerial Conference, overseen by the Executive Board and facilitated by the Secretariat. Discuss committees on science, policy and implementation

Specialized Institution operational links & funding Relationship to MEAs Relationship to International Institutions Engagement with Civil Society & NGOs MEAs Independent, can take whatever decisions they like However, doesn’t continue to make sense for them to work in isolation – must function in greater context of environmental sustainability and SD to achieve collective UN goals. envisioned Specialized Institution—which would ostensibly have universal membership and, therefore, more closely reflect the membership of MEAs—would be the principle international body for the environment and would set the environmental agenda system-wide. Would also provide advice on the priorities, activities and actions required to have holistic approaches to environmental protection and sustainability Would make recommendations in this domain to the entire UN system, to MEAs and to all countries in general Opportunity for substantive gains in effectiveness and efficiency by fostering synergies, through: coordinating secretariat functions of MEAs; supporting policy planning and implementation at the national level; and providing overarching policy guidance on the inter-linkages of the MEAs through the Ministerial Conference. Given that a specialized agency has the power to establish its own treaties and conventions, future MEAs could be negotiated under the agency which would be a comparative advantage to the current system and reduce the treaty fragmentation that has developed the last few decades Autonomy of COPs is maintained but guidance and recommendations from the Ministerial Conference IGOs UN recognises the autonomy of specialized agencies through their individual basic instruments but also requires that specialized agencies be brought into a relationship with the General Assembly through agreements made between the agency and ECOSOC Environmental issues are cross-cutting, thus a Specialized Institution for the environment would be required to work closely with the UN system in order to promote cooperation and work through other UN bodies and agencies to achieve environmental goals. For the Specialized Institution to work closely with the rest of the UN system and with other UN bodies, these functions would be reflected in its founding document For example, Article 2 of the WHO Constitution requests that the WHO promote cooperation in the field of health with other specialized agencies. Similarly, Article 2 of the UNIDO Constitution calls on UNIDO, in accordance with the UN Charter, to coordinate all activities in the UN system in the field of industrial development. Article IV B.3 of the Constitution of UNESCO provides that “the General Conference shall advise the United Nations Organization on the educational, scientific and cultural” Other institutions whose activities have implications for environmental sustainability should be given observer status in the Ministerial Conference and the Specialized Institution should seek reciprocal status Additionally, memoranda of understandings and other agreements could be entered into to clarify priorities, areas of activity Engagement with CSOs and NGOs enhanced role for civil society and non-governmental organizations is envisioned delineation of Major Groups and Stakeholders within UNEP would be replaced with accreditation of Local Governmental Organisations (LGOs), Civil Society Organisations and Business They would participate Ministerial Conference meetings/ possibly be granted the right to make interventions and participate in the decision-making process. They could also participate in review and monitoring of the MEA implementation process and would be integral to facilitating national level capacity-building and implementation of MEAs. Participation of a wide range of observers would allow for input across the UN system, underlining the role of the Ministerial Conference as the central environmental policy forum within the UN. Funding (3 aspects: contributions & linking environmental policy making with environmental funding, financing MEAs) Contributions - Specialized Institution’s budget is subject to negotiations, and international law does not mandate assessed contributions, nor does it restrict countries from tailoring the budget to their own needs. Voluntary Indicative Scale of Contributions (VISC) system that UNEP now uses could become the core method for funding and could be scaled up so that funding needs of the new specialised agency could be met. There could be a combination of assessed contributions and voluntary contributions whereby only a percentage of the overall budget would be assessed could also be a combination of funds set up for technical assistance, capacity building and implementation of MEAs that was combined with other funding modalities A strong specialized institution for environment would enable member states to set environmental priorities jointly and to define a budget based on these priorities & be better able to attract funding Linking policy and financing could arguably help rationalise the financing of international environmental policies through strategic guidelines, as well as encourage pooling of cross-sectoral funding. Enhanced coordination potential of a Specialized is one of the key benefits in responding to the deficit in funding for environmental activities. no legal requirements to alter the status of the GEF when upgrading UNEP, however, the Specialized Institution could be brought into closer relationship with the GEF For better policy guidance, could begin by linking the GEF Assembly debates with the Ministerial Conference debates. Financing MEAs each MEA has its own secretariat and conference of parties, which create their own working groups with the result that delegates spend considerable financial resources and time on attending various meetings; preparing separate reports for each MEA; and sacrifice resources on administrative issues, which would better be used for implementing the MEA Ministerial Conference, convening with Universal Membership and in agreement with the COPs of the relevant MEAs, could amend current arrangements to establish joint secretariat functions, such as legal, conference and finance services—with a view to freeing up resources for implementation Funding

Important note: Strengthening IEG alone does not fully address sustainable development. The social, economic and environment pillars must be balanced to achieve the goals of sustainable development.

Thank You Questions? Please See FAQs as well